Jump to content

Featured Replies

5 hours ago, DeePressed said:

What is our best 22? 

Injuries and new recruits aside what would your best 22 look like Rnd 1 2021? Fire away.

B: Lockhart May Hore

HB: Rivers Lever Salem

C  Langdon Brayshaw Bennell

HF: Harmes Jackson Melksham

F: Pickett Weideman Fritsch

F: Gawn, Oliver, Petracca

I: Hannan Viney AVB Tomlinson

E: Hibberd Jordan Sparrow Petty

Interesting team.

This is how I see it. (@Werridee will love this thread)

I'd have Tomlinson in the back 6 or a traded in KPD, but I wouldn't have Hore in the team at all. Petty definitely ahead of him. 

I'd love Bennell to be able to play on a wing, but is his body up to it?

As it stands, I don't think Melksham and Fritsch can play in the same team.

I reckon three or four places on the bench are up for grabs.

 

B: SALEM, MAY, LEVER

HB: RIVERS, PETTY, HIBBERD

C : LANGDON, PETRACCA, TOMLINSON

HF: MELKSHAM, JACKSON, FRITSCH

F: PICKETT, WEIDEMAN, BENNELL

FOLL: GAWN, OLIVER, VINEY

IC: BRAYSHAW, SPARROW, LOCKHART, HANNAN

Petracca, May, Gawn, Oliver, Salem, Langdon.... 

Cannot think of any one else... 

 
  • Author
5 minutes ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

Wont matter how good the 'best 22' looks come Round 1 2021 if we still have the same coaches.

Very true that


This is pretty depressing to read, we dont really have any midfield depth at all and banking on a first year player to hold down chf and a bloke that has played a handful of games and can't get his body right as either key forward or back

41 minutes ago, drdrake said:

This is pretty depressing to read, we dont really have any midfield depth at all and banking on a first year player to hold down chf and a bloke that has played a handful of games and can't get his body right as either key forward or back

We absolutely do have midfield depth.

Petracca, Oliver, Harmes, Viney, Brayshaw are 5 very solid mids.

B: Lockhart May Hore

HB: Rivers Lever Lin Jong

C  Langdon Brayshaw Bennell

HF: Salem Daniher Josh P. Kennedy

F: Pickett Cameron Brad Ebert

F: Gawn, Oliver, Petracca

Int: Jackson, Weideman, Jack Newnes, Jeremy Finlayson

 
54 minutes ago, A F said:

We absolutely do have midfield depth.

Petracca, Oliver, Harmes, Viney, Brayshaw are 5 very solid mids.

Then who 

8 minutes ago, drdrake said:

Then who 

I'd run defensive forwards through there as we did in 2018. I'd like to think Bennell might be able to get involved too, but his tackling left a lot to be desired this year.


2 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

B: SALEM, MAY, LEVER

HB: RIVERS, PETTY, HIBBERD

C : LANGDON, PETRACCA, TOMLINSON

HF: MELKSHAM, JACKSON, FRITSCH

F: PICKETT, WEIDEMAN, BENNELL

FOLL: GAWN, OLIVER, VINEY

IC: BRAYSHAW, SPARROW, LOCKHART, HANNAN

Hannan will surely be delisted.  God help us if hes in our best 22 next year.  

Edited by Pickett2Jackson

Best 22 for Round 1 2021

FB:  M. Hore  S. May  T. Rivers

HB:  J. Lever  T. McDonald  C. Salem

C:  E. Langdon  A. Brayshaw  T. Phillips

HF:  B. Fritsch  J. Hogan  K. Pickett

FF:  T. Bedford  S. Weideman  J. Viney(resting mid rotation)

Fol:  M. Gawn  C. Petracca  C. Oliver

Int:  M. Hibberd  J. Harmes  L. Jackson  J. Lockhart

Think Hogan and Phillips are very fringe at current club, and if we are lucky enough to get an CHF well McDonald was once a super solid defender, very reliable.  also is a few wing types going to be available so no reason we cant get one as long as we can afford it.

Best 22 from current list

FB:  M. Hore  S. May  T. Rivers

HB:  J. Lever  A. Thomlinson  M. Hibberd

C:  E. Langdon  A. Brayshaw  C. Salem

HF:  B. Fritsch  L. Jackson  K. Pickett

FF:  T. Bedford  S. Weideman  J. Viney(resting mid rotation)

Fol:  M. Gawn  C. Petracca  C. Oliver

Int:  H. Bennell  J. Harmes  T. Sparrow  J. Lockhart

EMG: H. Petty  T. Mcdonald  C. Spargo  J. Jordan

 

59 minutes ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

B: Lockhart May Hore

HB: Rivers Lever Lin Jong

C  Langdon Brayshaw Bennell

HF: Salem Daniher Josh P. Kennedy

F: Pickett Cameron Brad Ebert

F: Gawn, Oliver, Petracca

Int: Jackson, Weideman, Jack Newnes, Jeremy Finlayson

Big trade period!

 

1 hour ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

Hannan will surely be delisted.  God help us if hes in our best 22 next year.  

I tend to agree. He will be lucky to survive. I'm finding it very hard to make a best 22 when players that should have improved have been poor like Brayshaw, Harmes and Vandenberg.

BEST 22

B: SALEM, MAY, LEVER

HB: RIVERS, ?, HIBBERD

C : LANGDON, PETRACCA, ?

HF: MELKSHAM, JACKSON, FRITSCH

F: PICKETT, WEIDEMAN, ?

FOLL: GAWN, OLIVER, VINEY

IC: ?,?,?,?

 

KEEP: BEDFORD, BENNELL, TOMLINSON, JORDON, NEITSCHKE, SPARROW, BAKER, HORE, PETTY, JETTA, LOCKHART, BRADTKE  

DELIST: JONES, SPARGO, KOLODJASHNIJ, HANNAN, O.MCDONALD, HUNT, CHANDLER, BROWN, C.WAGNER, J.WAGNER, SMITH, DUNKLEY

TRADE: HARMES, BRAYSHAW, PREUSS, VANDENBERG, T.MCDONALD, NEAL-BULLEN

 

12 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

TRADE: HARMES, BRAYSHAW, PREUSS, VANDENBERG, T.MCDONALD, NEAL-BULLEN

 

HARMES FOR PHILLIPS

BRAYSHAW FOR FREO FIRST ROUNDER

PREUSS FOR ALIIR 

VANDENBERG FOR CUMMING

T.MCDONLAD FOR ESSENDON 3RD ROUNDER

NEAL-BULLEN FOR ADELAIDE 4TH ROUNDER

WILLIAMS AS A FREE AGENT

 

B: SALEM, MAY, LEVER

HB: WILLIAMS, ALIIR, HIBBERD

C: LANGDON, PETRACCA, PHILIPS

HF: MELKSHAM, JACKSON, FRITSCH

F: PICKETT, WEIDEMAN, CUMMING

FOLL: GAWN, OLIVER, VINEY

IC: RIVERS, TOMLINSON, BENNELL, FREO FIRST ROUNDER


34 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

HARMES FOR PHILLIPS

BRAYSHAW FOR FREO FIRST ROUNDER

PREUSS FOR ALIIR 

VANDENBERG FOR CUMMING

Shouldn't happen - Phillips can't kick, we can fix Harmes. Won't happen x 3 - Gus isn't worth a first, Preuss isn't worth Aliir, Vanders isn't worth Cumming.

34 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

T.MCDONLAD FOR ESSENDON 3RD ROUNDER

 

Could happen, but I see it as unlikely.

34 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

NEAL-BULLEN FOR ADELAIDE 4TH ROUNDER

WILLIAMS AS A FREE AGENT

Won't happen x 2. The Crows don't need ANB. Williams we can't afford.

Adam Tommlinson    Steven May    Michael Hibberd 

Jake Lever   Tom McDonald  Christian Salem 

Trent Rivers   Christian Petracca   Ed Langdon 

Jake Melksham Sam Weideman  Harley Bennell 

Kozzie Pickett  Harrison Petty  Aaron Vandenberg 

Max Gawn  james Harmes  Clayton Oliver 

Jack Viney, Angus Brayshaw, Luke Jackson, Bailey Fritsch 

 

Some positional changes i'd make. 

Tmac to CHB. a full pre season of working on his running i think he can settle back into that position with much more support around him. 

Lever to the back flank. he's consistently caught one on one. he'll be dangerous for us as a quarter back player who can use his kicking and leave his opponent and intercept. 

Really rate Rivers, would be backing him to develop into the wingman we're crying out for. 

I think Harry Petty has shown great signs as a forward and i'd be willing to back him in if he can get fit, Vanders and Spargo down there provides some tackle pressure and also dangerous players. Bennell and Melksham help address the inside 50 conversion. 

 

1 hour ago, DeeSpencer said:

Shouldn't happen - Phillips can't kick, we can fix Harmes. Won't happen x 3 - Gus isn't worth a first, Preuss isn't worth Aliir, Vanders isn't worth Cumming.

Could happen, but I see it as unlikely.

Won't happen x 2. The Crows don't need ANB. Williams we can't afford.

Phillips is a wingman and that's what we need Harmes is not what we need. I think Brayshaw is still worth a pick between 10 and 20. Aliir was dropped not getting a game Preuss is the ruckman they need and Cumming isn't even getting a game is he? Give ANB away for nothing some team will take him for nothing. The big one Why can't we afford Williams we are an ordinary team not even a top 8 team. We should be able to afford anyone especially if we can offload McDonald.

Why are you wanting blokes who can’t get a game at clubs lower on the ladder than us?

20 hours ago, layzie said:

I've seriously got no idea what our best 22 is anymore. 

Only 20 I can think of.
 

CROMPTON MASSEY TAS JOHNSON

DAVIS ROET ANDERSON

DIXON WILLIAMS ADAMS

VAGG JACOBS KENEALLY

LORD BOURKE MANN

WISE BARASSI TOWNSEND

EMSELLE  MCLEAN


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 86 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 316 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies