Jump to content

Featured Replies

5 minutes ago, george_on_the_outer said:

No he was playing forward in a couple of the clips. 

 

5 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Bradtke was playing too. Surely Weid would have played some time up forward?

Jackson playing too (at least a tiny bit), so yeah not sure now!

Didn't notice Weid forward a lot, he did have that nice hitout to Bennell for his 2nd though I tihnk.

Edited by Lord Nev

 
17 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

I saw Jackson warming up as an emergency.  I highly doubt he played.

 

24 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Was probably playing in the ruck given Brown was forward and Jackson was a designated emergency.

 

Jackson was playing in the scratch match, not sure of his minutes though. 

 
Just now, Ham said:

 

Jackson was playing in the scratch match, not sure of his minutes though. 

Yeah added another comment after that one after I noticed him. Looked like maybe he only played the first quarter potentially?

i'm not sure what you can take out of that game. I think it was only 14 a side and there didn't look to be too much pressure about and plenty of open space instead. Bennell looks a class above most our players as a finisher around goals though.


Just now, Demon Dude said:

there didn't look to be too much pressure about and plenty of open space instead.

Sounds exactly like the seniors, so can probably judge both games the same...

Just now, Lord Nev said:

Yeah added another comment after that one after I noticed him. Looked like maybe he only played the first quarter potentially?

I think you're right there. 

Weid did have a good tap down to Bennell for a goal, but I want to see him clunking them, not rucking. 

1 minute ago, Ham said:

I think you're right there. 

Weid did have a good tap down to Bennell for a goal, but I want to see him clunking them, not rucking. 

Same mate, but hard to judge that without seeing the actual game and what his role was.

 
52 minutes ago, old dee said:

Re Brown how can he be worse than the lot running around in the seniors the last two games?
simple fact he kicked three goals and in a team that cannot score that says he should be in the seniors.

watch round 1 for your answer

13 minutes ago, Ham said:

I think you're right there. 

Weid did have a good tap down to Bennell for a goal, but I want to see him clunking them, not rucking. 

In Weid's defense, he could have been clunking them all day long but that won't make the goals only highlights reel.

Hopefully a detailed write-up will be posted soon.

 


2 minutes ago, DubDee said:

watch round 1 for your answer

So he is the only one not allowed to have a bad game? If we recruited him knowing he was that bad why did we bother. Says lots about the FD. 

1 minute ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

In Weid's defense, he could have been clunking them all day long but that won't make the goals only highlights reel.

Hopefully a detailed write-up will be posted soon.

 

Don't hold your breath. One of the serious problems for the league is how do the players not selected in the seniors get form when they are playing in Mickey mouse games of 14 players. Another month goes by and teams get a few injuries what happens then? 12 or 10 a side?

3 minutes ago, old dee said:

Don't hold your breath. One of the serious problems for the league is how do the players not selected in the seniors get form when they are playing in Mickey mouse games of 14 players. Another month goes by and teams get a few injuries what happens then? 12 or 10 a side?

Strange times...

does anyone know if the Swans "reserves" play GWS each week or do they fly around as well?

25 minutes ago, DubDee said:

watch round 1 for your answer

So that's it then? Has 1 poor game (in a game where very few players weren't poor) and we write him off for selection in perpetuity despite any other available form since? Fess up, you're on the selection committee aren't you?

1 hour ago, george_on_the_outer said:

Sadly nothing from Weidemann

He hasn't really featured in anything much this "season" . He's a bit of a mystery man.

However, if Brown or Jackson get selected as an extra tall before him this week, his future at Melbourne is looking grim


6 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

So that's it then? Has 1 poor game (in a game where very few players weren't poor) and we write him off for selection in perpetuity despite any other available form since? Fess up, you're on the selection committee aren't you?

 

6 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

So that's it then? Has 1 poor game (in a game where very few players weren't poor) and we write him off for selection in perpetuity despite any other available form since? Fess up, you're on the selection committee aren't you?

Love it LN. So much I put it in twice. IT is painfully obvious we have no forward coach how else can you explain the selections. I think they are picking them with a pin.

Just now, Bitter but optimistic said:

He hasn't really featured in anything much this "season" . He's a bit of a mystery man.

However, if Brown or Jackson get selected as an extra tall before him this week, his future at Melbourne is looking grim

And what does that say about the MFC FD we extend his contract last year? 

17 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

So that's it then? Has 1 poor game (in a game where very few players weren't poor) and we write him off for selection in perpetuity despite any other available form since? Fess up, you're on the selection committee aren't you?

I admit it. ha

I'm biased, I just don't rate him. At least others have some credits in the bank based on previous good performances

44 minutes ago, old dee said:

So he is the only one not allowed to have a bad game? If we recruited him knowing he was that bad why did we bother. Says lots about the FD. 

strange recruit for sure. Bombers are crying out for a tall fwd and they cut him

I would play Jackson ahead of him.  then he can give Max a hand in the ruck too

5 minutes ago, DubDee said:

I admit it. ha

I'm biased, I just don't rate him. At least others have some credits in the bank based on previous good performances

So why the hell did we not trade him out last year? No he is so good we extended his contract.

Edited by old dee


1 minute ago, old dee said:

So why the hell did me not trade him out last year? No he is so good we extended his contract.

I was talkin Brown.  I still have hope that Weed can become a decent player. he has talent but maybe its the mental side of the game

3 minutes ago, DubDee said:

strange recruit for sure. Bombers are crying out for a tall fwd and they cut him

I would play Jackson ahead of him.  then he can give Max a hand in the ruck too

Unless Weideman's training and scratch match performances make him impossible to overlook, I'd prefer to play Jackson, too, but just as a tall forward. I thought Tomlinson was more than handy in the Gawn support role.  And if Weideman plays, I would also leave him in the forward line all game.

 
8 minutes ago, DubDee said:

I admit it. ha

I'm biased, I just don't rate him. At least others have some credits in the bank based on previous good performances

I don't either mate, but I'm just super keen for us to pick on more than reputation and favouritism.

 

1 hour ago, old dee said:

Re Brown how can he be worse than the lot running around in the seniors the last two games?
simple fact he kicked three goals and in a team that cannot score that says he should be in the seniors.

Oh Bennell was dropped because he could only play half a game in the seniors well I think it is obvious his half a game is better than a number who played a full game. He kicks one goal we win. 

Wasn't having a go at Brown OD, just saying that if all he did all day was kick 2 goals and nothing else well then it's not much to get excited about. Thanks also for filling me in about Bennell, I hadn't seen the numerous threads or news conferences in which this was discussed. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 128 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 37 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 306 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies
  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    It's Game Day and the Demons have traveled to Alice Springs to take on the Saints and they have a massive opportunity to build on the momentum of two big wins in a row and keep their finals hopes well and truly alive.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 907 replies