Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

Hard to distinguish between the dark and light blues. And the videos show that several kicks went to opposition players. Maybe the two are connected.  Or maybe we are still unable to find a teammate.

 

Looks like they ‘took a knee’ in one of those pics  in sympathy for Black lives matter. Good to show some solidarity for your mates.


1 hour ago, Lever08 said:

I was there. Watched behind the perimeter fence on far wing. So good to see live action!

observations:

- 4x 25 min quarters no time on played

-Lots of swapping of players between the two teams

-Lever Pruess Petty KK and Nietscke only 5 who didn’t play

- May starred, BOG easily 

-Bennell played all 4 quarters, 1st half on ball 2nd half on HFF

-Spargo did some great things, I’m not always a fan but he looked at the level today

-Fritsch was the best forward

-J Smith will be close to selection, either if Lever doesn’t come up or instead of O Mac.

- I rate Sparrow. HIGHLY!! Head to head with Viney all game and not a backward step taken.

- No injuries during the game to anyone. Relief!

- Rivers and Hibberd were in a showdown for the final HBF spot. Both played well today

- Dont expect to see any of the two Wagners, or Baker early in season. They look like the last in line depth players to me

- Actually think Bradtke showed he can play. 20% better than his Casey 2019 form

- Goalkicking am issue, but expect it will be for all 18 clubs next weekend till the season gets into its rhythm 

- Hunt looks out of favour

- My biggest take - get on Brayshaw for a return to form. Played with no helmet, and moved and hunted the ball like it was 2018 again.

Happy to answer questions 

 

Fritsch still being our best forward seems like a concern, for the forward dynamics. He plays on a 2nd tall from any club, or Lever/Petty and he'll be kept quiet. May blunts TMac, understandable. But then Brown, Weid, Jackson, any reports on forward work? Contesting? Marking? Goalkicking? A lot is riding on these boys. As well as Petty if we also plan to slot him forward 

 

Edited by John Demonic

12 minutes ago, John Demonic said:

Fritsch still being our best forward seems like a concern, for the forward dynamics. He plays on a 2nd tall from any club, or Lever/Petty and he'll be kept quiet. May blunts TMac, understandable. But then Brown, Weid, Jackson, no reports on forward work? Contesting? Marking? Goalkicking? A lot is riding on these boys. As well as Petty if we also plan to slot him forward 

 

Agree

unless Weideman can contribute, our forward structure is questionable. Why he was played in the ruck again is a puzzle. Sure it gives him a chance to get the ball but rucking is not what he is paid for.

6 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Agree

unless Weideman can contribute, our forward structure is questionable. Why he was played in the ruck again is a puzzle. Sure it gives him a chance to get the ball but rucking is not what he is paid for.

Planning your attack around Fritsch becoming the next Gary Ablett is a bold strategy DJ. Let's see if it pays off for Goody.

 

@Lever08

Were the forwards, especially Weideman taking any marks inside the 50?

What was the score in goals and points?

1 hour ago, dworship said:

Yes great and very timely first post. How did Mitch Hannan go?

 

Hannan was quiet, played in the “reserves” team 


1 hour ago, WERRIDEE said:

Great write up!

How did Chandler, Hannan and Bedford go?

Who gets the spot? Hibberd or Rivers?

 Chandler the best of this lot, interesting to see him play back pocket the whole game and it suited him. Hibberd over Rivers but this will change in 2021

1 hour ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

Weid or Jackson for second tall forward / ruck relief @Lever08?

 

Weid was strong, kicked a couple of snags and moved well. Jackson still a way off being selected by him for now I think, although the athletic attributes of Jacko is mouth watering. 

1 hour ago, titan_uranus said:

@Lever08 thanks for the write up. How was the ball movement and structures?

Ball movement had lots of “plan on from a mark” and honour the leading player. Pickett and Bennell made it noticeably quicker

34 minutes ago, John Demonic said:

Fritsch still being our best forward seems like a concern, for the forward dynamics. He plays on a 2nd tall from any club, or Lever/Petty and he'll be kept quiet. May blunts TMac, understandable. But then Brown, Weid, Jackson, any reports on forward work? Contesting? Marking? Goalkicking? A lot is riding on these boys. As well as Petty if we also plan to slot him forward 

 

May rarely played on T Mac. He and Weid pushing up the ground lots with Fritsch, Melky and Pickett at times isolated inside 50. Fritsch being best forward doesn’t mean TMac wasn’t performing

The forward line looked much more dynamic than last year. Although keen to see goal kicking improve 

12 minutes ago, kev martin said:

@Lever08

Were the forwards, especially Weideman taking any marks inside the 50?

What was the score in goals and points?

Marks from Weid more so than TMac. Will also say that Brown presented and marked well for the “reserves”


22 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Agree

unless Weideman can contribute, our forward structure is questionable. Why he was played in the ruck again is a puzzle. Sure it gives him a chance to get the ball but rucking is not what he is paid for.

Weid played ruck less than 20 percent of the game. Was because no Pruess in the match today, so hardly a puzzle??

14 minutes ago, kev martin said:

@Lever08

Were the forwards, especially Weideman taking any marks inside the 50?

What was the score in goals and points?

Can’t remember the exact scores, but Navy beat Royal blue 11 goals to 9. However, about 20 players played for both teams during the match so.... 

2 hours ago, Lever08 said:

I was there. Watched behind the perimeter fence on far wing. So good to see live action!

observations:

 

Happy to answer questions 

 

Best couple of write ups from any Track watcher for weeks........thanks

Thanks Lever08.

I understand that Bennell played first half in the reserves and second in the seniors...

From what you saw today, do you think he'll play round two, or still a little off?

Did Petracca play? 


29 minutes ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

Thanks Lever08.

I understand that Bennell played first half in the reserves and second in the seniors...

From what you saw today, do you think he'll play round two, or still a little off?

With Hannan playing so poorly you would think Bennell would be in the box seat to take the last spot as the 7th forward. I am really interested in what Lever says.

15 minutes ago, Earl Hood said:

Did Petracca play? 

Yes he did only 5 didn't play according to Lever.

3 hours ago, Lever08 said:

I was there. Watched behind the perimeter fence on far wing. So good to see live action!

observations:

-...

- I rate Sparrow. HIGHLY!! Head to head with Viney all game and not a backward step taken.

.....

My mate (an avid Crows supporter) taught Tom a few years ago. Rates him very highly. One to watch.

 
4 hours ago, Supermercado said:

Obviously Joel Smith is a defender again but I thought he looked good as a forward. No doubt will be thrown there ASAP if we're kicking 6.12.48 every week.

We have a plethora of defenders.

We have very few forwards.

Smith is a better forward than defender.

We are playing Smith as a defender.

We never learn.

So based on Lever’s write up, Goodwin is backing the midget forward line to get the job done. He mentioned Weid and TMac playing high HF roles and relying on Melky Fritta and Kozzie. This may work on transition once in a while, but given that we often win the midfield battle and bomb forward, the disconnect will continue. Any coach, who had 3 months to review any of the tapes from rd 1, would be able to pick that up. 
 

Then you have McDonald’s interview, which was less than convincing. He suggests that supporters may still feel frustrated by the forward structure. That sounded more like he was frustrated. Probably because he is again being played out of position. 
 

hate to sound pessimistic, but the script seems written. Dominate the midfield, win clearances, have good defence but cannot convert inside 50s to goals. A losing formula. And when we get outnumbered on the rebound, sides cut ya up and score easily. 
 

happy to be proven wrong, but I don’t think this side is going anywhere under Goodwin. He seems stubborn and talks a lot, but we never see the action. A real salesman

Edited by Leoncelli_36


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 12 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 47 replies