Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

Massively important player for his pressure and tackling, but I've still never seen an AFL footballer struggle to hit handball targets like him. His kicking is very hit and miss too, so he has to get it done with his pressure game and his toughness can never be questioned.

 

I reckon it was Vanders' best game for a while!

I expected Vanderberg to still be coming along so cautiously that he wouldn't even play this weekend, so for him to be out there doing a few of the exact things that make us appreciate him as a player was a great moment.

Best scenario in my mind is the team in general finding form and Vandenberg needing to really press for AFL selection.  As it always should be.  But in his case it is particularly nice knowing that even were he to be in and out a bit as depth he would a) appreciate the opportunities fully, b) see it as part of making progress and c) be that rare thing, a depth player who opponents actually have to think about in their planning and playing.


18 minutes ago, Little Goffy said:

I expected Vanderberg to still be coming along so cautiously that he wouldn't even play this weekend, so for him to be out there doing a few of the exact things that make us appreciate him as a player was a great moment.

Best scenario in my mind is the team in general finding form and Vandenberg needing to really press for AFL selection.  As it always should be.  But in his case it is particularly nice knowing that even were he to be in and out a bit as depth he would a) appreciate the opportunities fully, b) see it as part of making progress and c) be that rare thing, a depth player who opponents actually have to think about in their planning and playing.

Vandenberg depth ?

52 minutes ago, loges said:

Vandenberg depth ?

I see your point and I don't intend my comment as a slight on Vandenberg.  It is just a fact that if the team is in form then it is likely we will be absolutely stacked for midfielders and half forwards and he'll have some work to do to establish himself.

In the midfield we look like now having Viney, Petracca, Brayshaw and Oliver as full time strong bodies, with presumably Salem, Harmes and a couple of others rolling through.

For the mid-sized forwards we've got Melksham and Fritsch basically locked in and a whole collection of other 'possibles' who Vandenberg will be competing with.

The addition of Langdon and Tomlinson has tightened the 22 quite a bit as well.

Vandenberg's physicality sets him apart and I think he is AFL quality, but if the team is up and about in general then, no, he is not a walk-up start for our best-22. 

Give him a season to find his best, though he may well play more and more as the season progresses and I'm sure there's a part of the coaching panel planning to time his peak for september as the positive side-effect of managing his loads early in the season.

https://www.afl.com.au/news/377069/no-golf-no-dog-forgotten-dee-hopes-sacrifices-pay-off-in-r1

Interesting article on the AFL website - really highlights how much his body has struggled with AFL. Had to give up his dog because he couldn't walk it apparently. Also states that he was on a modified preseason program, training twice a week (as opposed to the main group doing 4), with the aim of completing one full training session per week during the season and playing "most" games. 

The fact that he can make such an impact of such a low fitness base truly is a testament to the sheer willpower of the bloke.

29 minutes ago, Little Goffy said:

Vandenberg's physicality sets him apart and I think he is AFL quality, but if the team is up and about in general then, no, he is not a walk-up start for our best-22. 

I get what you're saying - he has his limitations, but I just can't leave him out of our best 22, simply for the fact that we're a better team when he's playing. 

Absolutely love the way Vanders goes about it. The sort of bloke that could be the difference in a grand final.

 
54 minutes ago, Little Goffy said:

I see your point and I don't intend my comment as a slight on Vandenberg.  It is just a fact that if the team is in form then it is likely we will be absolutely stacked for midfielders and half forwards and he'll have some work to do to establish himself.

In the midfield we look like now having Viney, Petracca, Brayshaw and Oliver as full time strong bodies, with presumably Salem, Harmes and a couple of others rolling through.

For the mid-sized forwards we've got Melksham and Fritsch basically locked in and a whole collection of other 'possibles' who Vandenberg will be competing with.

The addition of Langdon and Tomlinson has tightened the 22 quite a bit as well.

Vandenberg's physicality sets him apart and I think he is AFL quality, but if the team is up and about in general then, no, he is not a walk-up start for our best-22. 

Give him a season to find his best, though he may well play more and more as the season progresses and I'm sure there's a part of the coaching panel planning to time his peak for september as the positive side-effect of managing his loads early in the season.

I think he'd at least be on the bench, and if he's just depth this side is going a very long way.

Vandenberg is key to the manic forward pressure game that had us unravel top teams in 2018. Him crashing and hunting opens the congestion for others to wreak havoc. He can also mark and kick goals, and hurt the opposition fairly... a very useful trait in modern sanitised footy.

Edited by PaulRB


4 hours ago, A F said:

Massively important player for his pressure and tackling, but I've still never seen an AFL footballer struggle to hit handball targets like him. His kicking is very hit and miss too, so he has to get it done with his pressure game and his toughness can never be questioned.

In a two-way discussion of some length, it was determined, unanimously that:

  • it is terrific to have AVB back on the field - and let's hope that he can be there every week without risk;
  • AVB's role in footy for the Demons is to put people on the ground; and 
  • AVB must chase at all times to scare the living daylights out of some recipient or several across a game, once he has put two or three down on the ground so that they have to live with the fact that they are not Demons!

 

Edited by Deemania since 56

4 hours ago, PaulRB said:

Vandenberg is key to the manic forward pressure game that had us unravel top teams in 2018. Him crashing and hunting opens the congestion for others to wreak havoc. He can also mark and kick goals, and hurt the opposition fairly... a very useful trait in modern sanitised footy.

He wasn't there for much of 2018. He came back at the end of 2018 if I recall correctly.

Depth ... what an insult.

I have him in my top six most important players at our club because he brings a hard (almost nasty) edge to our midfield unit - go back and watch video of our Anzac Eve win against Richmond five years ago and you will see what i mean - the Tigers were jumping out of his way and we are talking the same ferocious team that won a flag two years later.

Olly and Trac are both big units that hunt the ball, but they don't hurt guys - that's why VDB makes us an intimidating unit especially against sides like Geelong and Collingwood that like to bully us.     

51 minutes ago, Deespicable said:

Olly and Trac are both big units that hunt the ball, but they don't hurt guys -

Oliver is one of the best tacklers in our team...he lays them and sticks them.


56 minutes ago, Deespicable said:

Olly and Trac are both big units that hunt the ball, but they don't hurt guys - that's why VDB makes us an intimidating unit especially against sides like Geelong and Collingwood that like to bully us.  

Agreed Ds.

I would have put AVB somewhere between our 6th to 10th best performers for game impact and contribution in the practice match just gone.

I'm guessing with the reduced training, he probably won't have the same capacity to pump out the kms in games, but he doesn't seem to have lost much/if any pace which is pretty impressive.  I don't think it matters so much if he can't cover as much ground in a game as he seems to have such good footy brain for where to position both himself and where he kicks the ball to.

Some have a bit of a chip on him for his disposal, but I think he generally makes pretty good decisions using the ball, and facilitates such good ball movement by busting tackles and breaking lines that he doesn't need the silky skills that some have.  He's a fairly decent shot for goal from what I recall too.

In just hope beyond hope that he can stay fit for the most important parts of the season.

7 hours ago, PaulRB said:

Vandenberg is key to the manic forward pressure game that had us unravel top teams in 2018. Him crashing and hunting opens the congestion for others to wreak havoc. He can also mark and kick goals, and hurt the opposition fairly... a very useful trait in modern sanitised footy.

We didnt unravel any top teams in 2018, or at least not when it mattered. And we're so far away from that month of great footy, that who is a key or not to our current sides gameplan (Manic pressure) is in need of a dramatic revision over the next few months. VDB may very well be depth as the above poster said

Heck, brayshaw or Harmes could even find themselves depth if we're stacked with other mids and half backs in better form at some stage.

Edited by John Demonic

7 hours ago, John Demonic said:

We didnt unravel any top teams in 2018, or at least not when it mattered. And we're so far away from that month of great footy, that who is a key or not to our current sides gameplan (Manic pressure) is in need of a dramatic revision over the next few months. VDB may very well be depth as the above poster said

Heck, brayshaw or Harmes could even find themselves depth if we're stacked with other mids and half backs in better form at some stage.

HMMMM West Coast  GWS Geelong Hawthorn in that order come to mind. Think Vanders played in all those games.


14 hours ago, Deespicable said:

Olly and Trac are both big units that hunt the ball, but they don't hurt guys - that's why VDB makes us an intimidating unit especially against sides like Geelong and Collingwood that like to bully us.     

Jeremy McGovern says hi .( internal bleeding after a Trac hit in prelim ) 

Running hard at the footy with serious intent will always claim a few scalps - thats the only way to do it these days- Trac does that and can hurt .

Edited by CityDee

15 minutes ago, CityDee said:

Jeremy McGovern says hi .( internal bleeding after a Trac hit in prelim ) 

Running hard at the footy with serious intent will always claim a few scalps - thats the only way to do it these days- Trac does that and can hurt .

Well that would be a welcome first.

The knocks on his game are his disposal and likely a fitness/game minutes restriction and they are valid concerns. 

But a fitter inside mid quatet of Oliver, Viney, Petracca and we assume Gus plus Langdon and Tomlinson on the wings means we can have some lower minutes through the mid/forward group.

Vanders versatility means he can cover the wing rotations, have short bursts on ball - could switch with Petracca - and provide some pressure as a forward. Versatility + tone setting physicality + ability to break the lines adds makes a useful player even with skill errors.

Edited by DeeSpencer

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 200 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Love
      • Like
    • 517 replies