Jump to content

Dees Post Operating Loss for 2019

Demonland
Demonland
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

42 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Because of the amount of regulations and red tapes involved in gaming, the closest they've been able to get is vague links through security companies. I think you might be overselling their power somewhat.

point being is there is no shortage of takers for pokie licenses, you just end up further down the ethical list

and you'd be surprised how the underworld get into "legitimate" businesses

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     
    1 hour ago, daisycutter said:

    point being is there is no shortage of takers for pokie licenses, you just end up further down the ethical list

    and you'd be surprised how the underworld get into "legitimate" businesses

    Westpac has been doing a lot of Laundry 

    One of the Big 4, who would have guessed...

  • Quote
    2 hours ago, daisycutter said:

    point being is there is no shortage of takers for pokie licenses, you just end up further down the ethical list

    and you'd be surprised how the underworld get into "legitimate" businesses

    Not this type of business they won't.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     

    morally getting rid of the pokies was the best thing, financially it was the worst thing, i said it at the beginning it would be the downfall of the club, and no  the AFL will not give us more money just because you got rid of the pokies that's a pipe dream, and no getting rid of pokies won't get as more sponsors. The Hawks will never get backlash from having more pokies, winning premierships and being successful forgives clubs for all their sins.

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    2 hours ago, drysdale demon said:

    Not this type of business they won't.

    i admire your confidence

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    7 hours ago, Lord Nev said:

    Didn't the Hawks nearly merge with some other loser club back in 96...

    Yep hawks moved on & build a successful profitable club & have won 4 flags... what has the mfc done no home base , financial losses, blown loads of early draft picks & played in 1 Gf in 24 years!

    Edited by Demonsone

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Don't forget - we will be getting a few million bucks pa for the naming rights to our new training and admin facilities. Collingwood gets $3+ mill pa. Now all we need to do is design and build the thing

  • Quote

    I was always concerned about the fact that we were beginning the QB sharing in 2019 to coincide with us not hvaing the ANZAC eve gate, adding to the pokies reduction (I believe we are still operating some but not as much unless I'm mistaken), and of course all this happened just as we had an demorolising season of woe to ensure the fans wouldn't want anythign to do with the club. A lot of the hard work built over years got lost very quickly.

    BUT this can turn around quickly next year. We get those two big games back, if our players are able to hit back to the form they (in my opinion) are capable of and we have success, then we will be back in the black next year.

    It sucks, we as members should be dissapointed this has happened, but we aren't a juggernaut club and we won't be until we have SUSTAINED success.

  • Quote
    •  
    9 hours ago, daisycutter said:

    i admire your confidence

    I know very well the process required to get gaming licences and I also know pretty well the way organised crime gangs work and I state again it just won't happen.

  • Quote

    I don’t think the medium to long term business case of an AFL club is (or should be) in pokie revenue.

    That said, it’s concern if the club didn’t have some realistic and sensible plan to sustainably replace this revenue when it comes to an end.

    Also - I don’t think selling home games to Darwin should be (or have been) part of the business plan of a large Melbourne-based AFL club called “Melbourne”. It’s not sustainable, it appears desperate in my view, and it compromises the ability to win a game each year which in turn possibly compromises gate revenue, our ladder position, and therefore memberships. Not unhappy about this aspect at all.

    As a debt demolition member, I’m not excited about the prospect of re-entering that zone again. Whilst this financial result is a concern, however, I don’t believe it’s flashing red just yet. Not nearly.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    2 hours ago, drysdale demon said:

    As swyl states. winning games is the main key to get the finances in order.

    that certainly is the case but not having our own training/admin facility has/is a massive missed opportunity. each year that has gone by has cost us a few mill p.a. in missed naming rights revenue e.g. ricoh centre, ikon park, holden centre, gmhba stadium, city mazda stadium/ Swinburne centre, linen house/rsea oval. That revenue would provide stability and make us less reliant on onfield performances

    Edited by Demons1858

  • Quote
    7 minutes ago, Demons1858 said:

    that certainly is the case but not having our own training/admin facility has/is a massive missed opportunity. each year that has gone by has cost us a few mill p.a. in missed naming rights revenue e.g. ricoh centre, ikon park, holden centre, gmhba stadium, city mazda stadium/ Swinburne centre, linen house/rsea oval. That revenue would provide stability and make us less reliant on onfield performances

    Agree with your point, but isn't our training base "AAMI Park"?

  • Quote
    13 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

    Agree with your point, but isn't our training base "AAMI 

    l don't believe we get naming rights revenue and if we did it would have to be shared with the storm, rebels and victory l suspect

    Edited by Demons1858

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    Just now, Demons1858 said:

    l don't believe we get naming rights revenue and if we did it would have to be shared with the rebels and victory l suspect

    Yeah, was just about to edit my post to add "do we get anything from that?" but you were too quick for me!

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    13 minutes ago, Demons1858 said:

    that certainly is the case but not having our own training/admin facility has/is a massive missed opportunity. each year that has gone by has cost us a few mill p.a. in missed naming rights revenue e.g. ricoh centre, ikon park, holden centre, gmhba stadium, city mazda stadium/ Swinburne centre, linen house/rsea oval. That revenue would provide stability and make us less reliant on onfield performances

    But why should we be less reliant on onfield performances?

    That is our core business and should always be priority one

  • Quote

    Makes sense why we needed a please explain at the end of the season. This is significant, and if there is no real game plan apart from “winning games” we will be rattling tins again in 2 years. Unbelievable.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    13 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

    But why should we be less reliant on onfield performances?

    That is our core business and should always be priority one

    think l understand what your saying, but all clubs are funded by sponsorship to exist and compete at an elite level. we can do more than one thing at once

  • Quote
    35 minutes ago, Demons1858 said:

    think l understand what your saying, but all clubs are funded by sponsorship to exist and compete at an elite level. we can do more than one thing at once

    Yes i agree. But it is time to shift priorities. For too long we have just survived. 
    Winning games  of Football is why we exist, by doing that we aquire the rest

  • Quote
    On 12/16/2019 at 6:30 PM, Sir Why You Little said:

    Gotta start winning games. The only answer

    That's so simplistic and only half the answer, that is not sustainable, the reality is there are  18 teams and only 8 teams every year make finals, if winning is the only answer then the club is  doomed in  the long run. The club has to get a business model that sees the the club break even in bad years not make huge losses. Winning is a byproduct of making profits, not profits are a  byproduct of winning.  Hawthorns profit is built on two major factors, one being selling more home games then any other team in history, and  having more pokies then  other team in history, they built that business model before they became successful in the modern era.

  • Quote

    1 hour ago, don't make me angry said:

    That's so simplistic and only half the answer, that is not sustainable, the reality is there are  18 teams and only 8 teams every year make finals, if winning is the only answer then the club is  doomed in  the long run. The club has to get a business model that sees the the club break even in bad years not make huge losses. Winning is a byproduct of making profits, not profits are a  byproduct of winning.  Hawthorns profit is built on two major factors, one being selling more home games then any other team in history, and  having more pokies then  other team in history, they built that business model before they became successful in the modern era.

    Whorethorn have been a Success ever since Norm Smith taught John Kennedy what it takes to Coach. Yes they have had some troughs, but they know how to climb out again. By winning games. 
     

    Winning is the core to sustained success

  • Quote
    4 hours ago, Ron Burgundy said:

    I don’t think the medium to long term business case of an AFL club is (or should be) in pokie revenue.

    That said, it’s concern if the club didn’t have some realistic and sensible plan to sustainably replace this revenue when it comes to an end.

    Also - I don’t think selling home games to Darwin should be (or have been) part of the business plan of a large Melbourne-based AFL club called “Melbourne”. It’s not sustainable, it appears desperate in my view, and it compromises the ability to win a game each year which in turn possibly compromises gate revenue, our ladder position, and therefore memberships. Not unhappy about this aspect at all.

    As a debt demolition member, I’m not excited about the prospect of re-entering that zone again. Whilst this financial result is a concern, however, I don’t believe it’s flashing red just yet. Not nearly.

     

    Ron I suspect we gave up the Darwin game to GCS at the request of the AFL as I believe they want GCS up there because it is their zone. I have no idea what the pay off is but suspect it might have something to do our new home next decade. I wrote to the club asking how we were going to replace the revenue lost from the Darwin game and after a few weeks I got a reply that sounded like wishing and hoping rather than solid reasons. I doubt we will know the plan anytime soon but there maybe things going on that the club does not want to discuss. This business of the members wanting the game returned to the G is IMO a smoke screen there is more at play here. 

     

  • Quote
    4 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

    Whorethorn have been a Success ever since Norm Smith taught John Kennedy what it takes to Coach. Yes they have had some troughs, but they know how to climb out again. By winning games. 
     

    Winning is the core to sustained success

    You may never say words truer than those SWYL.

  • Quote
    •  
    42 minutes ago, old dee said:

    You may never say words truer than those SWYL.

    You and i know the Core is simply winning OD, everything else, is important yes. But a side issue. 
    without the Winning it is unsustainable 

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    So the club took the morale high ground and sold the gaming venues but didn't replace that revenue? We have withdrawn from Darwin so that income drops off next year.

    Doesn't sound like a very good business plan if we are walking away from revenue with no replacement other than the "win" more games!

    Based on history we can't be trusted to win games....got a feeling we are headed for a big issue once again!

     

     

     

     

  • Quote

    • Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • GAMEDAY: Essendon

      It’s Game Day, and the Demons are staring down the barrel of an 0-5 start for the first time since 2012 as they take on Essendon at Adelaide Oval for Gather Round. In that forgettable season, Melbourne finally broke their drought by toppling the Bombers. Can lightning strike twice? Will the Dees turn their nightmare start around and breathe life back into 2025?

        • Like
      • 41 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Essendon

      As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Essendon

      Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

        • Thanks
      • 489 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 05

      Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sunday’s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

        • Thanks
      • 190 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Geelong

      There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullarton’s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Casey’s three matches and, with Melbourne’s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next week’s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forward’s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasn’t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Geelong

      I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the team’s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourne’s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season. There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight. Since that game, the Demons’ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All