Jump to content

POLL 259 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the Demons split their Pick 3 by trading it for 2 First Round Picks

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Featured Replies

Well I hope we're bloody confident Young won't be there at 8 to have not done it on draft night.

 
3 hours ago, Fifty-5 said:

The only 100% fact so far is that it's not a 100% fact.

Isn’t it?

Well played by the club. We get back a second round pick and move back to pick 10.

We weren't going to use pick 50. So essentially our trade with North becomes 2020 first round pick for pick 10.

We Lose: Pick 26, 2020 first round.

We Gain: Pick 10, Pick 28, 2020 fourth round

Edited by BAMF

 

Just now, Lord Nev said:

And we may not be finished just yet...

 

Go on...

1 minute ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Go on...

Pick 10 might be on the move again. Early-ish days, so don't take it as gospel yet though.

Geelong a possible deal partner now.

 

1 minute ago, Lord Nev said:

And we may not be finished just yet...

 

Good get on this. Your source got anything else for us?

 

14 and 17 for 10 and 28?

could happen.  Geelong must have a specific target in mind and we are keen on two players to go in the teens

4 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Pick 10 might be on the move again. Early-ish days, so don't take it as gospel yet though.

Geelong a possible deal partner now.

 

10 and 28 for 14 and 17 perhaps?

Gives is three first round picks.


1 minute ago, ben russell said:

10 and 28 for 14 and 17 perhaps?

Gives is three first round picks.

Yeah you'd think that's what the deal would be should it happen.

Just now, Lord Nev said:

Yeah you'd think that's what the deal would be should it happen.

If that is the scenario then I’d say Weightman would be a definite for one of those picks.

With us seemingly cooling on Young at pick 3 in favour of Jackson or Green, I wonder whether we would be targetting  Gould with pick 17. He would likely be gone by pick 28.

Your all over it Lord New. Do you think Weightman is a chance to get to 14?

6 minutes ago, ben russell said:

If that is the scenario then I’d say Weightman would be a definite for one of those picks.

With us seemingly cooling on Young at pick 3 in favour of Jackson or Green, I wonder whether we would be targetting  Gould with pick 17. He would likely be gone by pick 28.

 

3 minutes ago, Colm said:

Your all over it Lord New. Do you think Weightman is a chance to get to 14?

Weightman is a VERY high chance to get to us. May depend if another club pulls the trigger earlier than us, but from what I've heard the club is dead keen on him.

Interestingly, they may be shifting towards Green over Jackson, then the ball will be in GWS' court. Doesn't seem like Young will be a Dee at this stage, but that's just opinion.

Bidding for Green helps the value of pick 10, kind of hoping we do bid. Even just for the entertainment value


5 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

 

Weightman is a VERY high chance to get to us. May depend if another club pulls the trigger earlier than us, but from what I've heard the club is dead keen on him.

Interestingly, they may be shifting towards Green over Jackson, then the ball will be in GWS' court. Doesn't seem like Young will be a Dee at this stage, but that's just opinion.

Lord Nev is the number 1 on trade / draft time poster power rankings at the moment

22 minutes ago, DubDee said:

14 and 17 for 10 and 28?

could happen.  Geelong must have a specific target in mind and we are keen on two players to go in the teens

Geelong apparently want McAsey a key defender and need to move up a bit to ensure getting  him.


7 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Pick 3. Split? Do the Giants have anything to offer? 4 and 40. Crazy times!!!

That would have to mean our target is not Jackson or Green unless we got an understanding from GWS that they would not take Jackson at 3. I think we would want another pick in teens plus 4 given what it means to GWS.

From my very uninformed viewpoint  

I would like to get kemp. If available at 10 we should keep

Someone said Stephens is coming to us at 10.

 
8 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

Someone said Stephens is coming to us at 10.

Who was that?

3 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Who was that?

Can't remember it was on one of the threads. He\she had a source.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Like
    • 276 replies
  • REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Essendon

    Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

      • Clap
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Gold Coast

    The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Thanks
    • 138 replies
  • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 33 replies
  • POSTGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons simply did not take their opportunities when they presented themselves and ultimately when down by 25 points effectively ending their finals chances. Goal kicking practice during the Bye?

      • Haha
      • Thanks
    • 252 replies