Jump to content

POLL 259 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the Demons split their Pick 3 by trading it for 2 First Round Picks

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Featured Replies

Well I hope we're bloody confident Young won't be there at 8 to have not done it on draft night.

 
3 hours ago, Fifty-5 said:

The only 100% fact so far is that it's not a 100% fact.

Isn’t it?

Well played by the club. We get back a second round pick and move back to pick 10.

We weren't going to use pick 50. So essentially our trade with North becomes 2020 first round pick for pick 10.

We Lose: Pick 26, 2020 first round.

We Gain: Pick 10, Pick 28, 2020 fourth round

Edited by BAMF

 

Just now, Lord Nev said:

And we may not be finished just yet...

 

Go on...

1 minute ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Go on...

Pick 10 might be on the move again. Early-ish days, so don't take it as gospel yet though.

Geelong a possible deal partner now.

 

1 minute ago, Lord Nev said:

And we may not be finished just yet...

 

Good get on this. Your source got anything else for us?

 

14 and 17 for 10 and 28?

could happen.  Geelong must have a specific target in mind and we are keen on two players to go in the teens

4 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Pick 10 might be on the move again. Early-ish days, so don't take it as gospel yet though.

Geelong a possible deal partner now.

 

10 and 28 for 14 and 17 perhaps?

Gives is three first round picks.


1 minute ago, ben russell said:

10 and 28 for 14 and 17 perhaps?

Gives is three first round picks.

Yeah you'd think that's what the deal would be should it happen.

Just now, Lord Nev said:

Yeah you'd think that's what the deal would be should it happen.

If that is the scenario then I’d say Weightman would be a definite for one of those picks.

With us seemingly cooling on Young at pick 3 in favour of Jackson or Green, I wonder whether we would be targetting  Gould with pick 17. He would likely be gone by pick 28.

Your all over it Lord New. Do you think Weightman is a chance to get to 14?

6 minutes ago, ben russell said:

If that is the scenario then I’d say Weightman would be a definite for one of those picks.

With us seemingly cooling on Young at pick 3 in favour of Jackson or Green, I wonder whether we would be targetting  Gould with pick 17. He would likely be gone by pick 28.

 

3 minutes ago, Colm said:

Your all over it Lord New. Do you think Weightman is a chance to get to 14?

Weightman is a VERY high chance to get to us. May depend if another club pulls the trigger earlier than us, but from what I've heard the club is dead keen on him.

Interestingly, they may be shifting towards Green over Jackson, then the ball will be in GWS' court. Doesn't seem like Young will be a Dee at this stage, but that's just opinion.

Bidding for Green helps the value of pick 10, kind of hoping we do bid. Even just for the entertainment value


5 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

 

Weightman is a VERY high chance to get to us. May depend if another club pulls the trigger earlier than us, but from what I've heard the club is dead keen on him.

Interestingly, they may be shifting towards Green over Jackson, then the ball will be in GWS' court. Doesn't seem like Young will be a Dee at this stage, but that's just opinion.

Lord Nev is the number 1 on trade / draft time poster power rankings at the moment

22 minutes ago, DubDee said:

14 and 17 for 10 and 28?

could happen.  Geelong must have a specific target in mind and we are keen on two players to go in the teens

Geelong apparently want McAsey a key defender and need to move up a bit to ensure getting  him.


7 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Pick 3. Split? Do the Giants have anything to offer? 4 and 40. Crazy times!!!

That would have to mean our target is not Jackson or Green unless we got an understanding from GWS that they would not take Jackson at 3. I think we would want another pick in teens plus 4 given what it means to GWS.

From my very uninformed viewpoint  

I would like to get kemp. If available at 10 we should keep

Someone said Stephens is coming to us at 10.

 
8 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

Someone said Stephens is coming to us at 10.

Who was that?

3 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Who was that?

Can't remember it was on one of the threads. He\she had a source.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

    With both sides precariously positioned ahead of the run home to the finals, only one team involved in Sunday’s clash at the Adelaide Oval between the Power and the Demons will remain a contender when it’s over.  On current form, that one team has to be Melbourne which narrowly missed out on defeating the competition’s power house Collingwood on King's Birthday and also recently overpowered both 2024 Grand Finalists. Conversely, Port Adelaide snapped out of a four-game losing streak with a win against the Giants in Canberra. Although they will be rejuvenated following that victory, their performances during that run of losses were sub par and resulted in some embarrassing blow out defeats.

      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • NON-MFC: Round 14

    Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Thanks
    • 189 replies
  • REPORT: Collingwood

    The media focus on the fiery interaction between Max Gawn and Steven May at the end of the game was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 181 replies
  • PODCAST: Collingwood

    I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 37 replies
  • POSTGAME: Collingwood

    Despite effectively playing against four extra opponents, the Dees controlled much of the match. However, their inaccuracy in front of goal and inability to convert dominance in clearances and inside 50s ultimately cost them dearly, falling to a heartbreaking one-point loss on King’s Birthday.

      • Sad
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 533 replies