Jump to content

Field Layout & Player Placement

ignition.
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

Posted

It was very frustrating sitting at last weekend's game.

The thing that both baffled and frustrated me most was the placement of players.

For the majority of the first three quarters, we had no one, or at least Lockhart at full forward. The likes of Smith and T.McDonald were starting and leading from CHF (or close to).

The current game plan is horrendously congested. The mentality behind it is to win the ball. The problem is getting it out. Far too often our players look to the right or left for a teammate immediately next to them. This wastes time and causes our forwards to run back into our open 50 (sh*t we saw in the Bailey years). If our forwards fail to get free the inefficient ball movement wastes crucial time resulting in a flooded forward 50.

Now, as I said above the most frustrating thing was the starting positions at a stoppage. In contrast, GWS had Cameron leading from the square all day. They also had their half-forwards spread out wider. So when they won the ball they had more room to run and more room to lead and hit a target. YES, basic football.

It wasn't until the start of the final quarter Tom McDonald started, and somewhat stayed, deeper at stoppage. This IMO was a major catalyst for our final quarter run on (exc. GWS knowing they had it in the bag). Why Goodwin waited all game to make this move is beyond me. Maybe it's the inner gambler thinking things will miraculously come good when down (that's a bit harsh).

I've been harping on about our inefficient ball movement for years. But my word, is it too much to ask the team properly utilises the MCG's enormous space properly? On top of that, put faith in our ball winners such as Viney, Oliver, Brayshaw, Jones, and Harmes, and let them clear it out to a man in space (preferably further than 15m).

  • Quote
    • Like 6
     

    GWS also had three running players injured on the bench in the last.... so I’m pretty sure that was a significant factor. 

  • Quote
    •  

    I am quite worried about Goodwinds coaching. When things are going well... all good... but Goodwin seems unadaptable to doing things differently. We seem to get coaches who really cannot keep up with the development of the game.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    I've posted similar before.

    Our set up in the forward half for centre bounces is way too congested & doesn't let us take full advantage of 666.

    We get around 15 to 20 seconds without numbers flooding back into our forward half yet we don't use the space to advantage.

    The one time we did open it out was in the last minute of the GC game because we needed to score quickly & we did.

    Now i know my thinking may be a bit simplistic but why don't we use this as our default set up rather than our current inefficient model that sees high inside 50 numbers with poor score conversion????

    Edited by rjay
    Meant Gold Coast game not GWS

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    36 minutes ago, rjay said:

    I've posted similar before.

    Our set up in the forward half for centre bounces is way too congested & doesn't let us take full advantage of 666.

    We get around 15 to 20 seconds without numbers flooding back into our forward half yet we don't use the space to advantage.

    The one time we did open it out was in the last minute of the GWS game because we needed to score quickly & we did.

    Now i know my thinking may be a bit simplistic but why don't we use this as our default set up rather than our current inefficient model that sees high inside 50 numbers with poor score conversion????

    Because we have a coach who is in denial and stubbornly sticks to an unworkable game plan.

    Blind Freddy can see the problems but week after week we use the same setups

    This is compounded by having far too many players attempting to get the pill. It looks completely disorganised and it probably is.

  • Quote

    I've attended every game at the G this year. 

    And in everyone (even when we won) our forward line has (for varying amounts of time) has looked a shambles.

    We either have no one to kick to or, we kick to a crowd.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    8 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

    I've attended every game at the G this year. 

    And in everyone (even when we won) our forward line has (for varying amounts of time) has looked a shambles.

    We either have no one to kick to or, we kick to a crowd.

    Or we kick directly to an opposition backman on his own

  • Quote
    • Like 2
     

    We had our own version of the mosquito fleet going on in the 3rd quarter last week for at least 3 centre bounces.

    HF: Baker, Spargo, Stretch

    FF: Hunt, Garlett, Lockhart.

  • Quote
    • Angry 1
    1 hour ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

     

    We either have no one to kick to or, we kick to a crowd.

    One of our specialties.

  • Quote
    • Haha 1

    1 hour ago, Moonshadow said:

    Or we kick directly to an opposition backman on his own

    Our other specialty.

  • Quote
    • Haha 1
    1 hour ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

    I've attended every game at the G this year. 

    And in everyone (even when we won) our forward line has (for varying amounts of time) has looked a shambles.

    We either have no one to kick to or, we kick to a crowd.

    Or we kick it in high to midgets like Spargo, Garlett, Lockhart, Hunt who are outnumbered 3 to 1.

    The delivery from the mids has been shocking but our forward setup is also dysfunctional.

    Edited by Dr. Gonzo

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    9 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

    Or we kick it in high to midgets like Spargo, Garlett, Lockhart, Hunt who are outnumbered 3 to 1.

    The delivery from the mids has been shocking but our forward setup is also dysfunctional.

    Another specialty.

  • Quote
    13 hours ago, ignition. said:

    They also had their half-forwards spread out wider. So when they won the ball they had more room to run and more room to lead and hit a target. YES, basic football.

    When is this simple and effective plan going to emerge? Our smalls and bigs, so to speak, recover well - it is not as if they are all ageing, handicapped veterans, nor is it the case that they are asked to run in such a manner to and fro for 100 minutes.

    No-one is looking into their zone for spaces at all. The players are locked into the mentality of combat football, and lose it and themselves repeatedly. The mantra of see footy, get footy, keep footy has now totally disappeared because footy space is not being exploited. 

  • Quote

    2 hours ago, Moonshadow said:

    Or we kick directly to an opposition backman on his own

    Our ability to find a player from the other team in our congested forward line is outstanding. 

  • Quote
    • Haha 1
    30 minutes ago, Clint Bizkit said:

    I ranted about this years ago.

    Players want the ball 30-40 metres out from goal and yet they start about 25 metres out from goal and give themselves no space to lead into.

    Yeah correct Clint - when we actually provide a lead that is!

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Haha 1

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • GAMEDAY: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

      It's Game Day and the Demons are back on the road for their 3rd interstate game in 4 weeks as they face a fit and firing Crows at Adelaide Oval. With finals now out of our grasps what are you hoping from the Dees today?

        • Thanks
      • 257 replies
      Demonland

    • WHAT’S NEXT? by The Oracle

      What’s next for a beleagured Melbourne Football Club down in form and confidence, facing  intense criticism and disapproval over some underwhelming recent performances and in the midst of a four game losing streak? Why, it’s Adelaide which boasts the best percentage in the AFL and has won six of its last seven games. The Crows are hot and not only that, the game is at the Adelaide Oval; yet another away fixture and the third in a row at a venue outside of Victoria. One of the problems the Demons have these days is that they rarely have the luxury of true home ground advantage, something they have enjoyed just once since mid April. 

        • Thanks
      • 2 replies
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Gold Coast

      From the start, Melbourne’s performance against the Gold Coast Suns at Peoples First Stadium was nothing short of a massive botch up and it came down in the first instance to poor preparation. Rather than adequately preparing the team for battle against an opponent potentially on the skids after suffering three consecutive losses, the Demons looking anything but sharp and ready to play in the opening minutes of the game. By way of contrast, the Suns demonstrated a clear sense of purpose and will to win. From the very first bounce of the ball they were back to where they left off earlier in the season in Round Three when the teams met at the MCG. They ran rings around the Demons and finished the game off with a dominant six goal final term. This time, they produced another dominant quarter to start the game, restricting Melbourne to a solitary point to lead by six goals at the first break, by which time, the game was all but over.

        • Clap
        • Thanks
      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Gold Coast

      Coming off four consecutive victories and with a team filled with 17 AFL listed players, the Casey Demons took to their early morning encounter with the lowly Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium with the swagger of a team that thought a win was inevitable. They were smashing it for the first twenty minutes of the game after Tom Fullarton booted the first two goals but they then descended into an abyss of frustrating poor form and lackadaisical effort that saw the swagger and the early arrogance disappear by quarter time when their lead was overtaken by a more intense and committed opponent. The Suns continued to apply the pressure in the second quarter and got out to a three goal lead in mid term before the Demons fought back. A late goal to the home side before the half time bell saw them ten points up at the break and another surge in the third quarter saw them comfortably up with a 23 point lead at the final break.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

      With their season all over bar the shouting the Demons head back on the road for the third week in a row as they return to Adelaide to take on the Crows. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Thanks
      • 213 replies
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

      The Demons did not come to play from the opening bounce and let the Gold Coast kick the first 5 goals of the match. They then outscored the Suns for the next 3 quarters but it was too little too late and their season is now effectively over.

        • Sad
        • Like
      • 231 replies
      Demonland
    View All