Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Demonland

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Field Layout & Player Placement

Featured Replies

It was very frustrating sitting at last weekend's game.

The thing that both baffled and frustrated me most was the placement of players.

For the majority of the first three quarters, we had no one, or at least Lockhart at full forward. The likes of Smith and T.McDonald were starting and leading from CHF (or close to).

The current game plan is horrendously congested. The mentality behind it is to win the ball. The problem is getting it out. Far too often our players look to the right or left for a teammate immediately next to them. This wastes time and causes our forwards to run back into our open 50 (sh*t we saw in the Bailey years). If our forwards fail to get free the inefficient ball movement wastes crucial time resulting in a flooded forward 50.

Now, as I said above the most frustrating thing was the starting positions at a stoppage. In contrast, GWS had Cameron leading from the square all day. They also had their half-forwards spread out wider. So when they won the ball they had more room to run and more room to lead and hit a target. YES, basic football.

It wasn't until the start of the final quarter Tom McDonald started, and somewhat stayed, deeper at stoppage. This IMO was a major catalyst for our final quarter run on (exc. GWS knowing they had it in the bag). Why Goodwin waited all game to make this move is beyond me. Maybe it's the inner gambler thinking things will miraculously come good when down (that's a bit harsh).

I've been harping on about our inefficient ball movement for years. But my word, is it too much to ask the team properly utilises the MCG's enormous space properly? On top of that, put faith in our ball winners such as Viney, Oliver, Brayshaw, Jones, and Harmes, and let them clear it out to a man in space (preferably further than 15m).

 

GWS also had three running players injured on the bench in the last.... so I’m pretty sure that was a significant factor. 

 

I am quite worried about Goodwinds coaching. When things are going well... all good... but Goodwin seems unadaptable to doing things differently. We seem to get coaches who really cannot keep up with the development of the game.

I've posted similar before.

Our set up in the forward half for centre bounces is way too congested & doesn't let us take full advantage of 666.

We get around 15 to 20 seconds without numbers flooding back into our forward half yet we don't use the space to advantage.

The one time we did open it out was in the last minute of the GC game because we needed to score quickly & we did.

Now i know my thinking may be a bit simplistic but why don't we use this as our default set up rather than our current inefficient model that sees high inside 50 numbers with poor score conversion????

Edited by rjay
Meant Gold Coast game not GWS


36 minutes ago, rjay said:

I've posted similar before.

Our set up in the forward half for centre bounces is way too congested & doesn't let us take full advantage of 666.

We get around 15 to 20 seconds without numbers flooding back into our forward half yet we don't use the space to advantage.

The one time we did open it out was in the last minute of the GWS game because we needed to score quickly & we did.

Now i know my thinking may be a bit simplistic but why don't we use this as our default set up rather than our current inefficient model that sees high inside 50 numbers with poor score conversion????

Because we have a coach who is in denial and stubbornly sticks to an unworkable game plan.

Blind Freddy can see the problems but week after week we use the same setups

This is compounded by having far too many players attempting to get the pill. It looks completely disorganised and it probably is.

I've attended every game at the G this year. 

And in everyone (even when we won) our forward line has (for varying amounts of time) has looked a shambles.

We either have no one to kick to or, we kick to a crowd.

8 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

I've attended every game at the G this year. 

And in everyone (even when we won) our forward line has (for varying amounts of time) has looked a shambles.

We either have no one to kick to or, we kick to a crowd.

Or we kick directly to an opposition backman on his own

 

We had our own version of the mosquito fleet going on in the 3rd quarter last week for at least 3 centre bounces.

HF: Baker, Spargo, Stretch

FF: Hunt, Garlett, Lockhart.

1 hour ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

 

We either have no one to kick to or, we kick to a crowd.

One of our specialties.


1 hour ago, Moonshadow said:

Or we kick directly to an opposition backman on his own

Our other specialty.

1 hour ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

I've attended every game at the G this year. 

And in everyone (even when we won) our forward line has (for varying amounts of time) has looked a shambles.

We either have no one to kick to or, we kick to a crowd.

Or we kick it in high to midgets like Spargo, Garlett, Lockhart, Hunt who are outnumbered 3 to 1.

The delivery from the mids has been shocking but our forward setup is also dysfunctional.

Edited by Dr. Gonzo

9 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Or we kick it in high to midgets like Spargo, Garlett, Lockhart, Hunt who are outnumbered 3 to 1.

The delivery from the mids has been shocking but our forward setup is also dysfunctional.

Another specialty.

13 hours ago, ignition. said:

They also had their half-forwards spread out wider. So when they won the ball they had more room to run and more room to lead and hit a target. YES, basic football.

When is this simple and effective plan going to emerge? Our smalls and bigs, so to speak, recover well - it is not as if they are all ageing, handicapped veterans, nor is it the case that they are asked to run in such a manner to and fro for 100 minutes.

No-one is looking into their zone for spaces at all. The players are locked into the mentality of combat football, and lose it and themselves repeatedly. The mantra of see footy, get footy, keep footy has now totally disappeared because footy space is not being exploited. 


2 hours ago, Moonshadow said:

Or we kick directly to an opposition backman on his own

Our ability to find a player from the other team in our congested forward line is outstanding. 

I ranted about this years ago.

Players want the ball 30-40 metres out from goal and yet they start about 25 metres out from goal and give themselves no space to lead into.

30 minutes ago, Clint Bizkit said:

I ranted about this years ago.

Players want the ball 30-40 metres out from goal and yet they start about 25 metres out from goal and give themselves no space to lead into.

Yeah correct Clint - when we actually provide a lead that is!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Carlton

    The text messages started flooding in shortly after quarter time. One read: “Is Melbourne even at the ground?” Moments later, as Carlton’s Elijah Hollands kicked the first goal of the second term, the Blues held a commanding 43-point lead. By then, the Demons’ only score was a behind kicked by Brody Mihocek nearly five minutes into the game. Ironically, Mihocek would also register the last minor score of the day after the game took a dramatic turnaround. 

    • 4 replies
  • POSTGAME: Carlton

    The Demons snatched Victory form the Jaws of Defeat as they clawed their way back from 43 points down to win by 23 points in Max Gawn and Tom McDonald's 250th matches at the MCG. Never in Doubt!!!

      • Haha
      • Love
      • Like
    • 447 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on TUESDAY, 31st March @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees miraculous 66 point turnaround win against the Blues at the G.

      • Love
    • 35 replies
  • VOTES: Carlton

    The Milestone Man Max Gawn is currently leading the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Jack Steele, Jacob van Rooyen & Christian Salem. Your votes please for the Demons come from way behind win against the Blues. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, & 1.

      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 79 replies
  • GAMEDAY: Carlton

    It’s Game Day and the Demons are back at the MCG for a big occasion, celebrating the 250-game milestones of Premiership pair Max Gawn and Tom McDonald, while rookie Paddy Cross gets his first taste of AFL football against the Blues. What are you hoping to see from the Dees today?

      • Thumb Down
      • Love
      • Like
    • 585 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 03

    Round 3 of the 2026 AFL Premiership Season kicks off on tonight. Follow along and discuss all the big games not involving the Dees. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons?

    • 339 replies

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.