Jump to content

Featured Replies

Just now, dazzledavey36 said:
Something May be brewing..
 
WC8bQjli_x96.jpeg
 
So now Melbourne have picks 3 and 8 in this year's draft after pick swap with North. Do the Demons have an ace up their sleeve for a player trade we haven't heard about?

Throw them both at the Giants for Lachie Whitfield sounds alright to me.

 
7 minutes ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

I Bloody hope so! we're robbing them if it is, i don't think there will be 8 good players in next years draft

Question is will they go to the draft with 3 & 8 or is there big deal going down that no one has anticipated??? Mouth watering.

 

 

Wouldnt rule out splitting pick 8 now..

 
7 minutes ago, Demon3 said:

Wouldnt rule out splitting pick 8 now..

Our track record of early draft picks isn’t great either 

13 minutes ago, wizardinoz said:

Norf have lost the plot.

Our track record of early picks isn’t great.. hawks haven’t given up much they have 3 former number 1picks Omera, Scully & Patton 

Edited by Demonsone


If we're as keen on Anderson as i reckon we are maybe we could send 3 and 8 to the Suns for 2 and 15

So as at 2:11 pm

Out: Frost, Pick 22, Pick 42, Pick 61, Pick 79, Pick 26, Pick 50, R1 2020, R2 2020, R4 2020

In: Tomlinson, Langdon, Pick 26, Pick 50,  R2 2020, R4 2020, Pick 8

Out:

  • Frost
  • Pick 22
  • Pick 42
  • Pick 61
  • Pick 79
  • R1 2020

In:

  • Tomlinson
  • Langdon
  • Pick 8 

Edited by TRIGON
Poor bistro-maths

6 minutes ago, TRIGON said:

So as at 2:11 pm

Out: Frost, Pick 22, Pick 42, Pick 61, Pick 79, Pick 26, Pick 50, R1 2020, R2 2020, R4 2020

In: Tomlinson, Langdon, Pick 26, Pick 50,  R2 2020, R4 2020, Pick 8

Out:

  • Frost
  • Pick 22
  • Pick 42
  • Pick 61
  • Pick 79
  • R1 2020

In:

  • Tomlinson
  • Langdon
  • Pick 8 

Nice.

6 minutes ago, TRIGON said:

So as at 2:11 pm

Out: Frost, Pick 22, Pick 42, Pick 61, Pick 79, Pick 26, Pick 50, R1 2020, R2 2020, R4 2020

In: Tomlinson, Langdon, Pick 26, Pick 50,  R2 2020, R4 2020, Pick 8

Out:

  • Frost
  • Pick 22
  • Pick 42
  • Pick 61
  • Pick 79
  • R1 2020

In:

  • Tomlinson
  • Langdon
  • Pick 8 

Also have received Hawks 2nd round next season

26 minutes ago, Collar-Jazz-Knee said:

Also have received Hawks 2nd round next season

We traded a R2 2020 pick to Freo. I haven't taken into account who these are tied to.


So how do we get a pick around 50 ish?

3 minutes ago, TRIGON said:

We traded a R2 2020 pick to Freo. I haven't taken into account who these are tied to.

Yeah I believe that was our 2nd round pick next season.

So we finish higher than the Hawks and we are laughing.

5 minutes ago, Demon3 said:

So how do we get a pick around 50 ish?

Billy Stretch

5 minutes ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

Billy Stretch

of course.. you reckon thats going to happen?

So assuming we take Hayden Young and cody Weightman in the draft, our best 22 for Round 1 could look something like this:

B:       Jetta               May                  Lever

HB:    Young             Petty                Hibberd

C :      Langdon         Viney               Salem

HF:     Petracca        McDonald       Melksham

F:       Fritsch             Weideman      Weightman

R:      Gawn               Oliver               Brayshaw

Int:    Tomlinson       Harmes          Hannan        VandenBerg

Emg:  Preuss            O McDonald       Neal-Bullen       Hunt


In most cases, new draftees tend to not play many games in their first season.

Gryan Miers, who others have mentioned as the type we could use, spent his entire first year developing in the VFL

5 hours ago, TRIGON said:

So as at 2:11 pm

Out: Frost, Pick 22, Pick 42, Pick 61, Pick 79, Pick 26, Pick 50, R1 2020, R2 2020, R4 2020

In: Tomlinson, Langdon, Pick 26, Pick 50,  R2 2020, R4 2020, Pick 8

Out:

  • Frost
  • Pick 22
  • Pick 42
  • Pick 61
  • Pick 79
  • R1 2020

In:

  • Tomlinson
  • Langdon
  • Pick 8 

Need to amend. Looks like good dealing with Tomlinson but he was free agent. 
 
1- free agency. Tomlinson

2- trading ... looks slightly impacted 

I would leave the future outs and ins but call it as the picks flow. 
ie ins - future 2nd round Hawks , future 4th round Freo 

outs - future MFC 2nd round, future MFC 4th round 

5 hours ago, Demon3 said:

So how do we get a pick around 50 ish?

 

5 hours ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

Billy Stretch

Pick around the 50’s for Billy? Bit of a stretch. 

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

 
3 hours ago, demonstone said:

In most cases, new draftees tend to not play many games in their first season.

Gryan Miers, who others have mentioned as the type we could use, spent his entire first year developing in the VFL

miers was a pick in the 50s

pick 8 should be more like a connor rozee in 2018, jaidyn stephenson in 2017

B: Jetta    McDonald   May 

hb: Hibbo   Lever    Salem 

C:  Langdon   Oliver   Tommlinson

hf: Track    Weid       Melksham

f:  Fritsch   TMAC    Serong 

Fol: Gawn   Brayshaw  Viney 

I/c   Jones, Harmes, Kolojasniji, Ash 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 157 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies