Jump to content

Featured Replies

48 minutes ago, Dr.D said:

doesn't mean we ignored it. We aren't going to get leg speed over night. 

Tactics must be changed to suit what we have available 

hone in on ball skills, don’t just play last years model. It never works...

 
6 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Tactics must be changed to suit what we have available 

hone in on ball skills, don’t just play last years model. It never works...

That would require a different coaching approach SWYL so good luck.

If so many of you are so sure the FD reviewed that game heavily despite the message over the offseason from the club that it wasn't (see post #4 which mentioned some of the times), please explain why that message came out?  What did they hope to achieve by publicly downplaying how much that loss to WCE was analysed? I don't get it.

 
20 minutes ago, S_T said:

If so many of you are so sure the FD reviewed that game heavily despite the message over the offseason from the club that it wasn't (see post #4 which mentioned some of the times), please explain why that message came out?  What did they hope to achieve by publicly downplaying how much that loss to WCE was analysed? I don't get it.

Goodwin backed in his Gameplan, calling it a bad day. 

I always have thought it was far worse, along with others on here. 

The Coach now, either still backs in his plan or he has hit the wall. 

I think Simon is a good bloke, but i have always been worried that a rookie coach would not be able to sort this club out, our issues are too deep. 

He still has the chance to prove me wrong, and i hope he does, but a huge loss tonight will be a serious punch on and off the field. 

Our list is not balanced, regardless of injury. The 2019 rules have completely sideswiped the MFC Football Dept. 

how this happened has me very concerned. 

Edited by Sir Why You Little

1 hour ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Goodwin backed in his Gameplan, calling it a bad day. 

I always have thought it was far worse, along with others on here. 

The Coach now, either still backs in his plan or he has hit the wall. 

I think Simon is a good bloke, but i have always been worried that a rookie coach would not be able to sort this club out, our issues are too deep. 

He still has the chance to prove me wrong, and i hope he does, but a huge loss tonight will be a serious punch on and off the field. 

Our list is not balanced, regardless of injury. The 2019 rules have completely sideswiped the MFC Football Dept. 

how this happened has me very concerned. 

I'm not sure Goodwin still qualifies as a "rookie coach". Not only is he onto his third season as senior coach, but he's also had many years as an assistant including a couple at Melbourne as part of a proper succession plan.


  • Author
12 hours ago, Dr.D said:

doesn't mean we ignored it. We aren't going to get leg speed over night. 

But we should have got it over the off season. Thats the point.

20 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

I'm not sure Goodwin still qualifies as a "rookie coach". Not only is he onto his third season as senior coach, but he's also had many years as an assistant including a couple at Melbourne as part of a proper succession plan.

His first Senior Coaching job was with us, We have a bad history with Rookies...

 
18 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

His first Senior Coaching job was with us, We have a bad history with Rookies...

How many years do you think a coach has to serve before he's no longer a "rookie"? It can't just be that a coach is a "rookie coach" when he's at his first senior job. By that definition Alistair Clarkson and John Longmire would still be "rookies". 

I can accept Goodwin was a "rookie coach" in his first year as our Senior Coach and maybe even his second. But not now that he's into his third.

Edited by La Dee-vina Comedia
typo

  • Author
33 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

Where from?  

Reckon the draft and trade period would have been a good place to start..


18 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

How many years do you think a coach has to serve before he's no longer a "rookie"? It can't just be that a coach is a "rookie coach" when he's at his first senior job. By that definition Alistair Clarkson and John Longmire would still be "rookies". 

I can accept Goodwin was a "rookie coach" in his first year as our Senior Coach and maybe even his second. But not now that he's into his third.

I used 'rookie' yesterday referring to Goodwin and Mahoney not yet having the experience to steer us thru difficult times such as now, without Roos (for Goodwin) and PJ (for Mahoney) to guide or cover them.

I was making a case for a Neil Balme type to steady the ship and support them thru challenging times thereby reducing the risk of 'rookie' errors.   'So 'rookie' was intended as breadth of experience not time.   

Maybe that is where SWYL picked up the 'rookie' reference.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

7 minutes ago, Demon3 said:

Reckon the draft and trade period would have been a good place to start..

And which players?  

Just saying 'trade and draft period' is an easy out for you.  Who are these quick and skillful players we missed out on?

28 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

How many years do you think a coach has to serve before he's no longer a "rookie"? It can't just be that a coach is a "rookie coach" when he's at his first senior job. By that definition Alistair Clarkson and John Longmire would still be "rookies". 

I can accept Goodwin was a "rookie coach" in his first year as our Senior Coach and maybe even his second. But not now that he's into his third.

Well then we think differently 

Clarkson and Longmire climbed the mountain ⛰ 

Goodwin thus far has come crashing down to the ground, with no plan B

13 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

I used 'rookie' yesterday referring to Goodwin and Mahoney not yet having the experience to steer us thru difficult times such as now, without Roos (for Goodwin) and PJ (for Mahoney) to guide or cover them.

I was making a case for a Neil Balme type to steady the ship and support them thru challenging times thereby reducing the risk of 'rookie' errors.   'So 'rookie' was intended as breadth of experience not time.   

Maybe that is where SWYL picked up the 'rookie' reference.

No I spoke for myself

  • Author
3 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

And which players?  

Just saying 'trade and draft period' is an easy out for you.  Who are these quick and skillful players we missed out on?

Its not an easy out  because Ill tell you exactley ..  and it goes back to the original post, if a proper review was done of the West Coast prelim loss then they would have identified they need to get some serious leg speed into the team.. rather than be seduced by what they think they need.. another big defender.. ridiculous. Take pick 6 and get Zac Buttress , dont use pick 27 on another inside mid like Tom Sparrow, go for Ian hill, quick outside player with great skills, Nick Hind was the quickest player in the VFL.. but we take a bloke called Aaron NIetshcke no one has ever heard of.. i could go on..  Matthew Parker is electric.. the Saints nabbed him at 47.

 

SO there are heaps of examples.. but im a bit over the to and fro Wiseblood, i respect your decision to disagree. Hope the Dees can turn it around.


11 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Well then we think differently 

Clarkson and Longmire climbed the mountain ⛰ 

Goodwin thus far has come crashing down to the ground, with no plan B

It took Clarkson 5 years to as you say " climb the mountain" as senior coach and Longmire inherited a very professional and experienced side to win a flag in his 2nd year.

4 minutes ago, drysdale demon said:

It took Clarkson 5 years to as you say " climb the mountain" as senior coach and Longmire inherited a very professional and experienced side to win a flag in his 2nd year.

Thanks for passing on information that we all know

Goodwin is a Rookie Coach at a Club that doesn’t know how to win (still)

Clarkson and Longmire weren’t put in that situation 

3 hours ago, S_T said:

If so many of you are so sure the FD reviewed that game heavily despite the message over the offseason from the club that it wasn't (see post #4 which mentioned some of the times), please explain why that message came out?  What did they hope to achieve by publicly downplaying how much that loss to WCE was analysed? I don't get it.

I'll tell you why. 

As i have said on any number of occasions across multiple threads - and at the real risk of repeating myself and boring posters to death - our communication at the club is appalling. There are any number of examples from big to small. 

PJ made it clear that our focus in terms of our resourcing had to be the football department as you are going nowhere if not winning. And hard to argue against that. Implicit though in that focus was that once winning began other aspects of the club would get attention.

I can only assume that has not occurred because our communication and membership engagement is not up to scratch and is a black eye on the club. And on Gary Pert i reckon. Maybe the last point is bit tough on Pert, but he has had enough time at the club to sort things and communication and membership engagement must be among his KPIs.

Our messaging (or more accurately mixed messaging), our website, our social media, how we respond to membership queries (not blaming the staff by the way on this - it is clearly a system issue and reflects a lack of investment) and our members engagement strategies are all poor.

 

 

14 hours ago, Dr.D said:

doesn't mean we ignored it. We aren't going to get leg speed over night. 

totally Dr.

33 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Thanks for passing on information that we all know

Goodwin is a Rookie Coach at a Club that doesn’t know how to win (still)

Clarkson and Longmire weren’t put in that situation 

Why don't you go into hibernation for the next 5 years or more until Goodwin is no longer coaching the Demons following a successful career.


1 hour ago, Demon3 said:

Reckon the draft and trade period would have been a good place to start..

I reckon we were D3... Gaff.  But IMO during the 2nd Half of the season changed our views on the priority of Gaff,  and at the End, showed we needed much more than foot speed/running power ...

Maybe our tall defenders hadn't come on as wanted or expected during 2019, and with Levers 2nd knee injury... the footy dept May have decided to get the best Tall back we could find. 

.... And then we went to the draft, selecting quick running players.   But they are still 1st Yr players.

...................................................................

 

I reckon Our 2019 gloss made us look far more  'complete',  than we really were/are. We Are still building, still developing...  maybe more like  75%  finished ???

.

Edited by DV8

  • Author
1 minute ago, DV8 said:

I reckon we were D3... Gaff.  But IMO during the 2nd Half of the season changed our views on the priority of Gaff,  and at the End, showed we needed much more than foot speed/running power ...

Maybe our tall defenders hadn't come on as wanted or expected during 2019, and with Levers 2nd knee injury... the footy dept May have decided to get the best Tall back we could find. 

.... And then we went to the draft, selecting quick running players.   But they are still 1st Yr players.

All fair points DV8. As i said, its an oponion game, i respect those who disagree, iI' in the camp that we ignored our most pressing needs and didn't react to a major loss. I hope the  players we drafted really do make it, time will tell.

 

Go Dees.

13 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Tactics must be changed to suit what we have available 

hone in on ball skills, don’t just play last years model. It never works...

Hawthorn's foot skills, for example

Geelong with their ball movement from the back half (hand and foot skills)

Both those teams "tweaked" their style over the years.

Not sure our game plan is amenable to tweaking; as we've seen over the last few weeks, it's all or nothing. When we lose, we lose really badly - we have no "give" in our structures - they are brittle.

 
28 minutes ago, drysdale demon said:

Why don't you go into hibernation for the next 5 years or more until Goodwin is no longer coaching the Demons following a successful career.

Leave the humour out of this. You are not a funny man

you and Satyr have the same Blind Faith

So what is your margin for tonight?

22 minutes ago, frankie_d said:

Hawthorn's foot skills, for example

Geelong with their ball movement from the back half (hand and foot skills)

Both those teams "tweaked" their style over the years.

Not sure our game plan is amenable to tweaking; as we've seen over the last few weeks, it's all or nothing. When we lose, we lose really badly - we have no "give" in our structures - they are brittle.

Great isn’t it....


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 11

    Round 11, the second week of The Sir Doug Nicholls Round, kicks off on Thursday night with the Cats hosting the Bulldogs at Kardinia Park. Geelong will be looking to to continue their decade long dominance over the Bulldogs, while the Dogs aim to take another big scalp as they surge up the ladder. On Friday night it's he Dreamtime at the 'G clash between Essendon and Richmond. The Bombers will want to avoid another embarrassing performance against a lowly side whilst the Tigers will be keen to avenge a disappointing loss to the Kangaroos. Saturday footy kicks off as the Blues face the Giants in a pivotal clash for both clubs. Carlton need to turn around their up and down season while GWS will be eager to bounce back and reassert themselves as a September threat. At twilight sees the Hawks taking on the Lions at the G. Hawthorn need to cement themselves in the Top 4 but they’ll need to be at their best to challenge a Brisbane side eager to respond after last week’s crushing loss to the Dees on their home turf. The first of the Saturday night double headers opens with North Melbourne up against the high-flying Magpies. The Roos will need a near-perfect performance to trouble a Collingwood side sitting atop the ladder.

      • Thanks
    • 143 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Sydney

    The two teams competing at the MCG on Sunday afternoon have each traversed a long and arduous path since their previous encounter on a sweltering March evening in Sydney a season and a half ago. Both experienced periods of success at various times last year. The Demons ran out of steam in midseason while the Swans went on to narrowly miss the ultimate prize in the sport. Now, they find themselves outside of finals contention as the season approaches the halfway mark. The winner this week will remain in contact with the leading pack, while the loser may well find itself on a precipice, staring into the abyss. The current season has presented numerous challenges for most clubs, particularly those positioned in the middle tier. The Essendon experience in suffering a significant 91-point loss to the Bulldogs, just one week after defeating the Swans, may not be typical, but it illustrates the unpredictability of outcomes under the league’s present set up. 

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 3 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Brisbane

    “Max Gawn has been the heart and soul of the Dees for years now, but this recent recovery from a terrible start has been driven by him. He was everywhere again, and with the game in the balance, he took several key marks to keep the ball in the Dees forward half.” - The Monday Knee Jerk Reaction: Round Ten Of course, it wasn’t the efforts of one man that caused this monumental upset, but rather the work of the coach and his assistants and the other 22 players who took the ground, notably the likes of Jake Melksham, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kozzie Pickett but Max has been magnificent in taking ownership of his team and its welfare under the fire of a calamitous 0-5 start to the season. On Sunday, he provided the leadership that was needed to face up to the reigning premier and top of the ladder Brisbane Lions on their home turf and to prevail after a slow start, during which the hosts led by as much as 24 points in the second quarter. Titus O’Reily is normally comedic in his descriptions of the football but this time, he was being deadly serious. The Demons have come from a long way back and, although they still sit in the bottom third of the AFL pack, there’s a light at the end of the tunnel as they look to drive home the momentum inspired in the past four or five weeks by Max the Magnificent who was under such great pressure in those dark, early days of the season.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Southport

    The Southport Sharks came to Casey. They saw and they conquered a team with 16 AFL-listed players who, for the most part, wasted their time on the ground and failed to earn their keep. For the first half, the Sharks were kept in the game by the Demons’ poor use of the football, it’s disposal getting worse the closer the team got to its own goal and moreover, it got worse as the game progressed. Make no mistake, Casey was far and away the better team in the first half, it was winning the ruck duels through Tom Campbell’s solid performance but it was the scoreboard that told the story.

      • Thanks
    • 3 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Sydney

    Just a game and percentage outside the Top 8, the Demons return to Melbourne to face the Sydney Swans at the MCG, with a golden opportunity to build on the momentum from toppling the reigning premiers on their own turf. Who comes in, and who makes way?

      • Thanks
    • 308 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Brisbane

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse a famous victory by the Demons over the Lions at the Gabba.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 35 replies
    Demonland