Jump to content

Featured Replies

7 minutes ago, chook fowler said:

Haven’t heard a Bull Smiths or Buggs name. Were they playing?

Also how did Hunt go?

 
2 minutes ago, MSFebey said:

Is 3 years possible? I thought the rule was 2 years maximum as a rookie? 

I think if you elect to rookie a player for a 3rd year, you then have to draft them onto the senior list the following year.

4 minutes ago, MSFebey said:

Is 3 years possible? I thought the rule was 2 years maximum as a rookie? 

Nah its 3 now. Whitey was rookied for 3 years

 
5 minutes ago, Demon Disciple said:

I think if you elect to rookie a player for a 3rd year, you then have to draft them onto the senior list the following year.

Yeah I thought they’d changed this rule, thanks mate.

Agreed he deserves another year on the list, has shown a lot of improvement this year in particular.

Another great win to Casey........!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


24 minutes ago, Demon Disciple said:

I think if you elect to rookie a player for a 3rd year, you then have to draft them onto the senior list the following year.

Trust me about this, you can have a maximum of 3 years on the Rookie list. To stay on after that you need to be promoted to the Primary List or Delisted. IE Mitch White last year played his 3rd ans final year on the list, if Melbourne were gonna keep him they wouldve had to promote him to the senior list via the drafted 

9 minutes ago, Drunkn167 said:

Trust me about this, you can have a maximum of 3 years on the Rookie list. To stay on after that you need to be promoted to the Primary List or Delisted. IE Mitch White last year played his 3rd ans final year on the list, if Melbourne were gonna keep him they wouldve had to promote him to the senior list via the drafted 

Your thoughts on Hunt and did Scott play?

 
Just now, WERRIDEE said:

Your thoughts on Hunt and did Scott play?

Hunty did some good things but was otherwise quiet

nah scott didnt play

Also im a little inebriated so i didnt really focus on every player my bad

Geelong smashing Richmond we could be on top of the ladder?


16 minutes ago, Drunkn167 said:

Trust me about this, you can have a maximum of 3 years on the Rookie list. To stay on after that you need to be promoted to the Primary List or Delisted. IE Mitch White last year played his 3rd ans final year on the list, if Melbourne were gonna keep him they wouldve had to promote him to the senior list via the drafted 

Used to be that you could only have 1 third year rookie. Is that still the case? 

Will be a hard call with Bull Smith and Corey Maynard if its still the same.

3 minutes ago, BAMF said:

Used to be that you could only have 1 third year rookie. Is that still the case? 

Will be a hard call with Bull Smith and Corey Maynard if its still the same.

That's interesting because if that is the case Bull and Keilty are in trouble because Maynard is signed for another year.

We can't afford Keilty to ever leave. Who's will give us VFL match reports without Drunkn?

@Drunkn167 Hand on heart, do you think if given the opportunity that Dec has what it takes to be an AFL footballer? I've seen enough to know he is a fantastic VFL defender. Any thoughts or you just want to see him get a chance?

1 hour ago, D4Life said:

Also how did Hunt go?

I thought Hunt worked his way into the game as it went along. It looks like he's got his pace back and got some good deltoid gains since we have last seen him.

 


2 hours ago, Drunkn167 said:

Keilty was great. In the last minute he was out of position on casboult but still managed to not only get the spoil in but effevt the mark then run in front to get away from him

I truly think he desrves a third year on the rookie list

Totally agree with you.  Dec has had a really consistent year and has shown he can be a most versatile player, playing predominantly back, but able to go forward and take a grab, kick a goal, but also play in the ruck at a pinch.  If we don't keep him on the list there should be a few other sides that take a serious look at him.

Once Mitch King went off injured Tim Smith was moved into the ruck and I thought her performed really well, winning several tap outs to advantage and as usual competing strongly around the packs, laying some great tackles.  I was surprised that Filopovic was not moved onto the ball at this time, but was kept in the forward line.  I worry that this may be Filopovic's last year, as I do  not think the King and Lachie have really come on as much as would have been hoped.

 

Corey Machaya is certainly a player to keep an eye on.  He seems to get better with every game I see him in.  He is elusive, clean hands in packs and delivers well be foot.

32 minutes ago, Tough Kent said:

@Drunkn167 Hand on heart, do you think if given the opportunity that Dec has what it takes to be an AFL footballer? I've seen enough to know he is a fantastic VFL defender. Any thoughts or you just want to see him get a chance?

Look it’s hard for me not to be biased but I really think he can. I’ve seen him play on experienced AFL listed guys (to be fair not superstars or anything) and dominate them. 

He was all over Casboult today, he f’d up Buzza last week, he’s beat McKernan, T.Boyd and other good KPFs in the past. 

If he had played v the Saints over Petty we would’ve won I reckon 

I just hope he gets his chance and we can see for sure if he has what it takes at that level.

33 minutes ago, Paxi said:

Corey Machaya is certainly a player to keep an eye on.  He seems to get better with every game I see him in.  He is elusive, clean hands in packs and delivers well be foot.

Having seen both a number of times over the last two year imo they are not VFL standard let alone  AFL. Every week the Casey team play to a losing ruck. If it were up to me both would be gone by the time the 2019 season rolls around.


5 hours ago, forever demons said:

that would be a ginger snap

I was just thinking exactly that fd.

Lets nickname him 'SNAP'.

He is already a GingerNut

?

5 hours ago, Deeoldfart said:

Is that a slightly odd selection (unless he is expected to play tomorrow)?  I would have thought the priority would have been to give him another game at Casey, to try to run him into form.

Maybe Spargo?

35 minutes ago, Drunkn167 said:

Look it’s hard for me not to be biased but I really think he can. I’ve seen him play on experienced AFL listed guys (to be fair not superstars or anything) and dominate them. 

He was all over Casboult today, he f’d up Buzza last week, he’s beat McKernan, T.Boyd and other good KPFs in the past. 

If he had played v the Saints over Petty we would’ve won I reckon 

I just hope he gets his chance and we can see for sure if he has what it takes at that level.

Do you know if there can only be 1 3rd year rookie used or can it be as many as you want?

 
1 hour ago, Tough Kent said:

@Drunkn167 Hand on heart, do you think if given the opportunity that Dec has what it takes to be an AFL footballer? I've seen enough to know he is a fantastic VFL defender. Any thoughts or you just want to see him get a chance?

I'm amazed he hasn't had a call-up already.  I thought he was the perfect choice to replace Lever.  Similar size and game.  He takes a great contested mark, he's strong and tough.  The only knock I see is he doesn't look that quick. 

Went along today to see a very impressive Casey performance. I had a few, but here's my take on how the Melbourne players went;

Mitch Hannan: Was very active in the 1st term and involved in several of our forward frays. Spent his time betweeen half forward & the midfield. Attempted to take mark of the year a few times to no avail. Did enough to keep his name in contention.

Cameron Pedersen: BOG for me today. Marked everything that came his way and defended strongly. Has had a great year at VFL level.

Sam Weideman: Kicked a couple of goals and played a really good first half and took some strong marks. Spent a little bit more time in the ruck in the 2nd half after King went off and kept himself involved in the game. Still tracking encouragingly. 

Jayden Hunt: First game back since Queens Birthday weekend and he did a few nice things without dominating. Good launching pad for a potential return to the senior team before finals.

Tom Bugg: Pretty quiet game from buggy I thought. He may have got more of it in & under then I realized, but was otherwise a pretty unnoticeable game.

Oskar Baker: Was playing another solid game, showing good pace, pressure and kicking a goal. Looked to do his hamstring late in the 3rd term, however spotted him on the bench running lines and trying to get back on, but looked to get ordered out of the game by the coaches. Think/hope it was only a strain or bad cramp and we'll see him back next week or the week after.

Mitch King: Competed ok, but I'm still yet to see anything from him that makes me think he'll make it. To make matters worse, he then either done a MCL or Meniscus Injury to end his day, potentially season and potentially Melbourne career.

Harrison Petty: Hasn't quite hit the heights of his early season form since his AFL debut, but he defended dourly and played his role in a strong defensive unit.

Dion Johnston: I've liked his move to defence and he played another solid game. Think Nev's mentorship is paying off and a new 1 year deal should be put on the table for Dion.

Tim Smith: Not a huge game for the Bull. He competed as he always does and played as the main ruck after King went off. Like many on our list today, played his role without having a huge day himself.

Pat McKenna: Barely noticed him in the first half, but he worked his way into the game in the 2nd kicking a goal. Given the injuries he's had to overcome, it's great that he's just out there playing again. 1 year deal for me, so Guy Walker has someone to bowl to in the nets.

Josh Wagner: Controlled things across half back and was assured with his ball use and always seemed to have time & space.

Declan Keilty: After Pedersen I thought he was the best of the Melbourne players. Kicked a few, took some strong marks and provided a real target. Has had a great year at VFL level and unlucky not to have received a senior opportunity. He's developing well!

Lachlan Filipovic: Gone for mine. Even when King went off, it was Smith & Weideman who were asked to compete in the ruck. Limited impact and doesn't get involved enough.

Thought I should add, that after Pedersen I thought the next three best were all Casey listed players in Jay Lockhart, Corey Wagner & Cory Machaya. Lockhart in particular is someone we should look to draft. Nice kick, good pace and run, exactly the type we could do with. Watch this space!


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 38 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies