Jump to content

Featured Replies

Let’s see:

- absolutely petrified

- runs around contests

- drops chest marks

- slow

- can’t lay tackles

- pretty good actor in TV commercials

ill need time to think about this..

 
7 minutes ago, Beetle said:

Let’s see:

- absolutely petrified

- runs around contests

- drops chest marks

- slow

- can’t lay tackles

- pretty good actor in TV commercials

ill need time to think about this..

Currently leading our tackles...

Screenshot_20180714-180459_AFL.jpg

2 minutes ago, deanox said:

Currently leading our tackles...

Screenshot_20180714-180459_AFL.jpg

Well I stand corrected. This is why I’ll need to think about it.

 
23 minutes ago, Beetle said:

Well I stand corrected. This is why I’ll need to think about it.

Take your time.


18 minutes ago, P-man said:

Take your time.

Nah...drop and delist thanks.

He’s looked good this quarter 

Just now, Roost It said:

He’s looked good this quarter 

I agree with you Roost, but stand by my thoughts.

 
4 minutes ago, Beetle said:

Nah...drop and delist thanks.

agreed not sure what positives he offers. Rather keep Trengove.

1 minute ago, Beetle said:

I agree with you Roost, but stand by my thoughts.

Yeah. Stand by your thought that the leading tackler on the ground can’t lay a tackle. Good lad.


4 minutes ago, P-man said:

Yeah. Stand by your thought that the leading tackler on the ground can’t lay a tackle. Good lad.

I said I stood corrected on his tackling stats at that point P-Man. His second half tackling has also been very good.

I stand by my thoughts he isn’t up to it and adds very little.

Instead of attempting to belittle me, enlighten me on his upside?

Edited by Beetle

Just now, Beetle said:

I said I stood corrected on his tackling stats at that point P-Man.

I stand by my thoughts he isn’t up to it and adds very little.

Instead of attempting to belittle me, enlighten on his upside?

Oh many pardons. Am I belittling you? I‘m terribly sorry. 

Please return to your zealousness to sink the boot in. I’ll stop hurting your feelings.

 

Done enough to stay in

barely saw Hannan today but often miss him

Fritsch can do it all

2 minutes ago, P-man said:

Oh many pardons. Am I belittling you? I‘m terribly sorry. 

Please return to your zealousness to sink the boot in. I’ll stop hurting your feelings.

 

Not sure where the so called hurt feelings come into it, but thanks for the pompous reply.

Now as per my previous post, please let me know your thoughts on JKH’s positive future at the Melbourne Football Club.


Why did you ignore half his post? What is JKH's upside?

I don't see it either. But I think he gives it a real go. I'm just not sure he's fast enough to lock down a position.

 

I thought he did alright today. Finished with plenty of tackles and looks hungry for the ball

 

Has definitely improved since his last game

Edited by low flying Robbo

Did enough in last qtr to keep his spot. Tackle count good. We need guys who hunt down tackles

He tackled strongly and he was quite neat with the ball at times and quick to release.  Had some poor moments but worth another chance.  Probably playing in a position not suited to him as well (wing).

yes i think its a bit premature to start calling for his delisting. his first game in a while and he did a lot better than some others. Showed a little give him a little more time, he could be pretty handy.


First half was soft as always.

Got in some late game tackles.

Is and always will be depth.

1 minute ago, Satyriconhome said:

JKH hadn't played at AFL level for a while

Worked his way into the game

Agree,  and with 9 tackles he's earnt another crack despite the slow start .

 

In for another week of the key to getting a game is being a competitor.

His job shouldn't be to get 40 touches. That's what we have Clarry and Gus for. If he gets blokes thinking twice when taking their time to size to their options, then keep him in.

Did a great kick to Hogan for a goal. 8 tackles Give him some credit


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Sad
      • Love
      • Like
    • 528 replies