Jump to content

Featured Replies

On 8/22/2020 at 11:12 PM, Nascent said:

I wonder if we have a solution for this on our list in Mitch Hannan. He has the attributes to be a good winger with speed, height and ability overhead and he is often clean with the footy with a neat kick on his left. The question mark would probably be his endurance base to cover the ground back and forth like Langdon does. 

Currently the main issue I have with his game is that he often goes missing at length and I think that isn't helped by playing in our forward 50 where we have similar mid sized forwards in Melksham and Fritsch that are often used as hit up targets. Perhaps Hannan to a wing could improve our dynamic in the forward half while solving our outside run and spread? Worth a shot at least in my view.

Agree - I think Hannan (and Fritsch) are both worth trying in this role.  

I also wonder why Hunt hasn't been given a decent go at it.  I know his kicking isn't great (but neither is Langdon's).  I assume it is more about fitness.  But if it's not a fitness issue, I feel like there's no reason why he couldn't do what Langdon's doing.  When he started his career he showed not only his pace, but his ability to tackle, to win the ball in the air and to read the play. Even playing as a defensive winger to shut down their most dangerous one, he has the speed to hurt the opposition when we have the ball.

 

I think one of the things that I've really noticed about Langdon watching the game on the TV is that he's a natural outside player. He holds his shape exceptionally well. It's been such a glaring problem that having him do his role properly has only further emphasised what i think is a clear list imbalance. He's the only one that does is consistently, which is why he's become such a link player for us.

Speed is important, but we have too many guys who get caught in no mans land 10 metres from the pack when playing outside. If you maintain your shape in relation to the contest you're much more useful both defensively and moving forward. We seem to struggle to teach players how to do that, so I'd be keen to bring in someone else with experience at the end of the year to whom it comes naturally. 

The Doggies gave us a lesson in what a dynamic balanced midfield looks like on Saturday.

Yes, we need another winger, but I was just as impressed by the way their 3 mids quickly got the ball out of congestion with one or two quick handballs. They have Libba dishing it out to the likes of Bontempelli and Macrae who killed us.

Hopefully Saturday was just a blip, as we saw improvement from our mids in the previous few weeks, but it needs to become the norm quick.

 

 

Just about agree with total of Page 15 and add that Jackson with a year under his belt and maybe a Laird to the list would be a tremendous help.

  • Author

I worry greatly that the team named this weekend will be far too slow. Have added no outside rom, wouldve loved to see guys like baker and bedford given a crack


46 minutes ago, Elegt said:

I worry greatly that the team named this weekend will be far too slow. Have added no outside rom, wouldve loved to see guys like baker and bedford given a crack

Absolutely right. We’ve gone slow v Saints. 
 

Surely Bedford and Baker and Corey waggenholfenbrau as ins. Before Oscar and josh waggenholfenbrau. 

Edited by spirit of norm smith
V

 
  • Author
17 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Absolutely right. We’ve gone slow v Saints. 
 

Surely Bedford and Baker and Corey waggenholfenbrau as ins. Before Oscar and josh waggenholfenbrau. 

Goodwin seems to love slow players 

4 minutes ago, Elegt said:

Goodwin seems to love slow players 

More to the point Goodwin dislikes certain players and they happen to be the ones with pace. 


1 hour ago, Redleg said:

More to the point Goodwin dislikes certain players and they happen to be the ones with pace. 

Yeah, he clearly hates Langdon. Just hates him.

  • Author
33 minutes ago, A F said:

Yeah, he clearly hates Langdon. Just hates him.

Langdon seems to be the only player in the whole 22 who can run

15 hours ago, A F said:

Yeah, he clearly hates Langdon. Just hates him.

Don’t pick one player as an example, who was brought into the club, is playing well and was in from the first game. I am talking about players like Hunt, Bedford, Bennell and Baker who have pace but are not being considered. 
I also said he dislikes, not hates, certain players and they have pace. I never said he hated EVERY player with pace. Don’t misquote when you respond to try and make a poster look stupid.
I think most DL’s would agree we have gone slow this week, when playing a quick side. If the Saints rebound without pressure, like the Dogs did last week, we will have problems.
Anyway it is the Coach’s choice and if we win, he gets the credit.

Edited by Redleg

1 hour ago, Redleg said:

Don’t pick one player as an example, who was brought into the club, is playing well and was in from the first game. I am talking about players like Hunt, Bedford, Bennell and Baker who have pace but are not being considered. 
I also said he dislikes, not hates, certain players and they have pace. I never said he hated EVERY player with pace. Don’t misquote when you respond to try and make a poster look stupid.
I think most DL’s would agree we have gone slow this week, when playing a quick side. If the Saints rebound without pressure, like the Dogs did last week, we will have problems.
Anyway it is the Coach’s choice and if we win, he gets the credit.

Fair enough. I'd debate that Bedford is fast though. I'm not against playing Hunt on a wing, but clearly he has been an inconsistent performer over the journey.

As for Bennell, he's not involved enough and Baker is a young guy trying to develop his game in the 2s. There's nothing wrong with that. It's a standard development path.

I think it'd be stupid to just play fast players simply because they're fast, if they're not going to get involved or be accountable to the way the team wants to play.

I reckon Bedford will definitely see another game this year. It's just about consistent performance and the spot will open up. Particularly, given the condensed fixturing ahead.

Edited by A F

30 minutes ago, A F said:

Fair enough. I'd debate that Bedford is fast though. I'm not against playing Hunt on a wing, but clearly he has been an inconsistent performer over the journey.

As for Bennell, he's not involved enough and Baker is a young guy trying to develop his game in the 2s. There's nothing wrong with that. It's a standard development path.

I think it'd be stupid to just play fast players simply because they're fast, if they're not going to get involved or be accountable to the way the team wants to play.

I reckon Bedford will definitely see another game this year. It's just about consistent performance and the spot will open up. Particularly, given the condensed fixturing ahead.

I agree you don’t just play guys because they have pace, but IMO we needed to add pace to a very pedestrian side, not made any quicker by adding Jones, Brown, Oscar and Wagner , though at least Rivers is not slow. 
While Bedford might not win the Stawell Gift, he is quicker than all of our ins this week. The real surprise to me is Hunt. He is quicker than Spargo, Hannan, Melk and VDB, is a good mark and a long, reasonably accurate kick, but can’t get a game ahead of a guy who is 15 cms smaller than him and much slower. He is really on the outer.

Edited by Redleg


11 minutes ago, Redleg said:

I agree you don’t just play guys because they have pace, but IMO we needed to add pace to a very pedestrian side, not made any quicker by adding Jones, Brown, Oscar and Brown, though at least Rivers is not slow.

Fair enough. I disagree that we needed to inject those you mentioned just to add pace to the side.

Either the forwards and mids bring enough pressure or it won't matter. We clearly wanted attack off half back so brought in Wagner and Rivers, and Jones will add pressure forward of centre. Tomlinson will move to the wing. pushing AVB forward to add pressure with Jones.

Our game IMO is based on 18 players running hard both ways and our mids and half backs using the ball well from stoppage or contested situations.

Edited by A F

Whilst we beat the Saints, Brad Hill and Zac Jones were in their best as running mids. We still need another midfielder or two with outside speed on the wing. 

current group - Baker or Hunt might get an opportunity (perhaps this week v Swans or Freo) 

Trade options - Matthew Ling (Swans) for Preuss, or Cedric Cox from Lions 

under 18s - our first pick 20-25 range : options are Jack Carroll (East Freo) or Eddie Ford(Western Jets) are guns.  Brandon Walker (East Freo) is another skilled fast mid but he’s under Freo NGA. 

Edited by spirit of norm smith
X

I reckon Jared Polec would be well worth a go. We could get him pretty cheap (trade wise) and we know what his best can produce.

Polec or Williams or Saad. Heard On the Slouch that Saints and Blues are going hard for Williams....

On 8/29/2020 at 3:36 PM, Redleg said:

I agree you don’t just play guys because they have pace, but IMO we needed to add pace to a very pedestrian side, not made any quicker by adding Jones, Brown, Oscar and Wagner , though at least Rivers is not slow. 
While Bedford might not win the Stawell Gift, he is quicker than all of our ins this week. The real surprise to me is Hunt. He is quicker than Spargo, Hannan, Melk and VDB, is a good mark and a long, reasonably accurate kick, but can’t get a game ahead of a guy who is 15 cms smaller than him and much slower. He is really on the outer.

Backs - I'd like a burner off half back but if we have Rivers and Salem and good structure we can be fine. 

Forwards - Hannan is almost as quick as Hunt and knows how to use it with forward craft, although his skills have gone out the window which opens the door for the likes of Hunt. Kossie obviously. Spargo - doesn't have Hunt's pace but he has a very quick change of direction due to being smaller and football smarts, quick mind and quick feet beats pure pace. Long term Spargo is better suited coming up the ground more and getting more of the ball, in the role Jones is currently playing, but for now I think he's ahead of the other pacey options.

Outside mids - Langdon, Vanders, Tomlinson. Clearly would like to replace one of those last two with someone quicker. Vanders still has the pace in a straight line and at least some understanding of the wing role. Can Harmes or Hunt do the same? Fritsch has done it before, do we go back to him playing at least a share of wing minutes? I'm more worried that we don't have a smart/skilled winger who knows the position more than pure speed.

Inside mids - I actually think this is our biggest weakness and it shows up at centre bounces and when the structure breaks down. Harmes was the answer in years previous. Sparrow has provided some cover with decent results at times this year. But we need to cut it to the time our 4 main guys play on ball and find a 5th option with speed.


J Stephenson from Collingwood seems to have his issues at Collingwood, he was dropped against us ( to my delight ) is he gettable, can he be moved up to a wing, does he have a tank

Others I would like us to enquire about

A Cerra, freo

Ainsworth  gc

S Bolton rich

 

26 minutes ago, Paulo said:

J Stephenson from Collingwood seems to have his issues at Collingwood, he was dropped against us ( to my delight ) is he gettable, can he be moved up to a wing, does he have a tank

Others I would like us to enquire about

A Cerra, freo

Ainsworth  gc

S Bolton rich

 

Cerra for Brayshaw anyone?

On 9/1/2020 at 9:35 PM, It's Time said:

Cerra for Brayshaw anyone?

This would be a win for both clubs. But I think Gus is such a popular bloke with his teammates and coming into his prime at 24, it would be a harsh move.

Brayshaw would have to initiate the move and not MFC. In fact I think Gus can still get better.

Cerra certainly has huge potential and would be a good fit to balance our midfield between inside and outside mids. 
 

So it’s a no but agree with you raising as a “thought bubble”

Edited by spirit of norm smith
C

 
  • Author
5 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

This would be a win for both clubs. But I think Gus is such a popular bloke with his teammates and coming into his prime at 24, it would be a harsh move.

Brayshaw would have to initiate the move and not MFC. In fact I think Gus can still get better.

Cerra certainly has huge potential and would be a good fit to balance our midfield between inside and outside mids. 
 

So it’s a no but agree with you raising as a “thought bubble”

thats crazy. Brayshaw has gone backwards, cerra will be a star


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PODCAST: Essendon

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

    • 14 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Fremantle

    The Demons return home to the MCG in search of their first win for the 2025 Premiership season when they take on the Fremantle Dockers on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Vomit
      • Angry
      • Sad
    • 40 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Essendon

    Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Clayton Oliver, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Jake Bowey. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Like
    • 20 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Essendon

    Despite a spirited third quarter surge, the Demons have slumped to their worst start to a season since 2012, remaining winless and second last on the ladder after a 39-point defeat to Essendon at Adelaide Oval in Gather Round.

      • Vomit
      • Like
    • 232 replies
    Demonland
  • GAMEDAY: Essendon

    It’s Game Day, and the Demons are staring down the barrel of an 0-5 start for the first time since 2012 as they take on Essendon at Adelaide Oval for Gather Round. In that forgettable season, Melbourne finally broke their drought by toppling the Bombers. Can lightning strike twice? Will the Dees turn their nightmare start around and breathe life back into 2025?

      • Like
    • 723 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Essendon

    As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland