Jump to content

Featured Replies

I will add 3 to that number tomorrow. Just got back from Qld and I always like to renew face to face at the club office.

I realise that that is an old fashioned notion but I an old fashioned. 

Demonland Podcast LIVE @ 8:00PM with Jeff White
 
  • Author
26 minutes ago, red&blue for ever said:

42186 now getting close to all time high

Yep, 48 to go!  Definitely countdown time!

At this time last year we had 40,549 members then added 1,684 in the following months to reach the 42,233 record by the end of July. 

Can we add a similar amount in the next months to get to around 44,000? 

Given how slow membership renewals were late last year, I reckon the club would be quite pleased with that.

Edit:  45 to go with @pineapple dee3 membership renewals tomorrow?

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

Given the side play  as they have in the last two or three weeks   The magic 45 might be close,

watch all the old supporters come out if we are 8 and 3   half way

 
  • Author

42,218

15 to go! 

Tomorrow will be the day to break the record.  More than two months ahead of last year...


On 5/18/2018 at 12:18 PM, Is Dom Is Good said:

Agreed. But if a team is inflating their numbers the sponsors will know about it. Plus they would also want to know average game attendance, average TV audience, number of full season members v a few games etc. 

There would be a lot more to it than just the number a club promotes on its website.

Indeed. I fully expect that part of any major sponsorship package is access to the membership database. Whether it's email addresses or residential addresses, sponsors would see great value in direct marketing to members. 

 

Do you reckon after knocking off Those Pies, we will get to 45,000?

32 minutes ago, Barney Rubble said:

Do you reckon after knocking off Those Pies, we will get to 45,000?

will be tough but if we go into the bye at 9 and 3 i think it's doable

club needs to start a media campaign to get those extra memberships

Edited by daisycutter


another day, another lazy 134 suckers members ?

and p.s. george, can we have this in the may column not the june one

p.p.s. now tracking about 2k over last year with the gap increasing

42,721

Edited by daisycutter

A lot of these will be the three game memberships that give reseeved seat on QB. 

Be interesting to see the conversion numbers over to full membership next year.

5 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

 chugging along nicely - another day, another lazy 474 - WOW

43,195

Apologies If it’s been asked already dc but where can one find these figures?


6 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

 chugging along nicely - another day, another lazy 474 - WOW

43,195

Wow thats a big day indeed.

1 minute ago, Dee Zephyr said:

Apologies If it’s been asked already dc but where can one find these figures?

On the club website under the Membership tag at the top of the screen. It has the updated number there. 

1 minute ago, Petraccattack said:

Wow thats a big day indeed.

I rang a couple of days ago organising a couple of things and it was quite a long wait, they said they're sorry for the wait but they are flat out signing up new members. Yeh......

Just now, Dee Zephyr said:

Apologies If it’s been asked already dc but where can one find these figures?

club site home page > membership banner > membership home page > there it is

ignore the counter on club site home page. it is not updated as regularly as the membership home page. why it isn't just linked programmatically i have no idea

18 hours ago, Gorgoroth said:

A lot of these will be the three game memberships that give reseeved seat on QB. 

Be interesting to see the conversion numbers over to full membership next year.

Thats the glaring problem when you just focus on pure numbers. The only meaningful number from memberships should be - Net Profit. 

What I've always wondered is ... How profitable are Armchair Memberships, 3 game MFC members and MCC Demons allocated members. 

 


  • Author
46 minutes ago, DaveyDee said:

Thats the glaring problem when you just focus on pure numbers. The only meaningful number from memberships should be - Net Profit. 

What I've always wondered is ... How profitable are Armchair Memberships, 3 game MFC members and MCC Demons allocated members.

1) Not in the eyes of the AFL and Ch7:  membership/supporter numbers are the basis of their fixtures (despite their protestations to the contrary) for FTA premium time slots - Count the Thur, Fri and Sat night FTA slots for Ess, Coll, Rich, Carlt, Hawks even in their non-performing years.  Simply, Ch 7 want numbers to sell adv time to their sponsors. 

Also, check out the venues those clubs play at - you rarely see them at low capacity grounds like Kardinia Park or Docklands when they play each other.  They play at our home ground while we have to sell games interstate or play at Docklands. 

2) Not in the eyes of sponsors:  club sponsors want numbers to market their products to.   The more the merrier.  The profitability of the members is of little interest to them.  We make a lot more more money from sponsors than members so they are critical to our financial well being.  Again, look at the sponsorship revenue for the aforementioned clubs.  It is big because they have a lot of members!

3) Not in the eyes of clubs: once they have you as a member, even as an Armchair, or 3 gamer they can work to make you a full member and get your family on board.  (Without those membership options we may not have any country or interstate members).  Also, members buy merchandise, adding revenue to the club and revenue and advertising to our sponsors- anyone buy New Balance gear recently?

4) The more members we have the more people at games and so gate revenue goes up.

Looking at 'Net Profit' is a very limited view, especially as club costs are 'fixed' - effectively, any additional member is almost 100% profit (after allowing for making up and mailing membership packs).

The club would be ecstatic to break last years record so early and grow our membership by over 30% in 4 years.  We fans should share that excitement.  So, I don't see the point of introducing 'Net Profit' to this thread.  imv it simply isn't relevant to the thread nor to the value of increased membership numbers.  Enjoy the ride on and off the field!

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

1 minute ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

1) Not in the eyes of the AFL and Ch7:  membership/supporter numbers is the basis of their fixtures (despite their protestations to the contrary) for FTA premium time slots - Count the Thur, Fri and Sat night FTA slots for Ess, Coll, Rich, Carlt, Hawks even in their non-performing years.  Simply, Ch 7 want numbers to sell adv time to their sponsors. 

Also, check out the venues those clubs play at - you rarely see them at low capacity grounds like Kardinia Park or Docklands when they play each other.  They play at our home ground while we have to sell games interstate or play at Docklands. 

2) Not in the eyes of sponsors:  club sponsors want numbers to market their products to.   The more the merrier.  The profitability of the members is of little interest to them.  We make a lot more more money from sponsors than members so they are critical to our financial well being.  Again, look at the sponsorship revenue for the aforementioned clubs.  It is big because they have a lot of members!

3) Not in the eyes of clubs: once they have you as a member, even as an Armchair, or 3 gamer they can work to make you a full member and get your family on board.  (Without those membership options we may not have any country or interstate members).  Also, members buy merchandise, adding revenue to the club and revenue and advertising to our sponsors- anyway buy New Balance gear recently?

4) The more members we have the more people at games and so gate revenue goes up.

Looking at 'Net Profit' is a very limited view, especially as club costs are 'fixed' - effectively, any additional member is almost 100% profit (after allowing for making up and mailing membership packs).

The club would be ecstatic to break last years record so early and grow our membership by over 30% in 4 years.  We fans should share that excitement.  So, I don't see the point of introducing 'Net Profit' to this thread.  imv it simply isn't relevant to the thread nor to the value of increased membership numbers.  Enjoy the ride on and off the field!

all very good points lucy

total membership numbers and total membership revenue are both important to the financial success of the club

3 hours ago, daisycutter said:

 chugging along nicely - another day, another lazy 474 - WOW

43,195

That's fantastic, should crack 45k or go very near now. That sets a great foundation to build off over the coming years should we get the onfield success we all hope for. If we can get up to 50k in the next year or two that puts us around the mark with Carlton, Geelong etc which is about right.

Demonland Podcast LIVE @ 8:00PM with Jeff White
 
6 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

That's fantastic, should crack 45k or go very near now. That sets a great foundation to build off over the coming years should we get the onfield success we all hope for. If we can get up to 50k in the next year or two that puts us around the mark with Carlton, Geelong etc which is about right.

win the next 2 and well smash 45k.....maybe 46k?

I don’t know how Richmond have so many members, I’d imagine a membership with your name on it would be hard to steal. 

Win the next two and we’ll break 45k. #Youhearditherefirst. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 2 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 115 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 35 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 296 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies
  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    It's Game Day and the Demons have traveled to Alice Springs to take on the Saints and they have a massive opportunity to build on the momentum of two big wins in a row and keep their finals hopes well and truly alive.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 907 replies