Josh Kelly

[Redleg 41,427]

Good to see footy talk in the media, instead of talking about 35 year old tennis players.

[Soprano66 9]

if he is out of contract we won't have to offer anything will we? Also Dusty is a restricted free agent so tigers will have the chance to match his deal. 

[boydie 655]

13 minutes ago, Soprano66 said:

if he is out of contract we won't have to offer anything will we? Also Dusty is a restricted free agent so tigers will have the chance to match his deal. 

He's not a free agent so you have to trade.

Either that or he walks out on GWS and you hope he makes through to you in the preseason draft which is no chance.

[Demon trucker 1,800]

2 minutes ago, boydie said:

He's not a free agent so you have to trade.

Either that or he walks out on GWS and you hope he makes through to you in the preseason draft which is no chance.

He is a free agent 

[Soprano66 9]

he's out of contract does he not qualify for free agency or something?

[Dr. Gonzo 24,289]

Josh Kelly is not a free agent.

[boydie 655]

12 minutes ago, don't make me angry said:

He is a free agent 

He's going into his 4th season, restricted free agency is 6 or 7 years.

Edited January 30, 2017 by boydie

[Demon trucker 1,800]

He 25 he started as a 18 yearold this is his seventh season not 5 this year he was drafted in 2009  first playing season was 2010 so this o's his 7 season check your facts he was drafted the same year as tom$ 

[Demon trucker 1,800]

8 minutes ago, boydie said:

He's going into his 5th season, restricted free agency is 6 or 7 years.

He started in 2010 season can u count 

[McQueen 17,867]

You blokes do realise we're talking about Nat Fyfe.

[Demon trucker 1,800]

Martin and Nat are freeagents 

[Demon trucker 1,800]

29 minutes ago, boydie said:

He's going into his 4th season, restricted free agency is 6 or 7 years.

Sorry I said Martin is a free agent not Kelly 

[Willmoy1947 4,140]

3 hours ago, beelzebub said:

Thankyou..i resemble that

Well, so am i, because i reckon all is not cocha (wouldn't have to be an R Scholar to figure) at GWS. Further more i reckon we can beat them, and they are overfed and got big heads.

He would do well to be looking at us, just as Lewis did quite successfully....

[Engorged Onion 10,223]

10 hours ago, McQueen said:

You blokes do realise we're talking about Nat Fyfe.

Potential derail -but who would you rather - Fyfe or Kelly?

[rjay 25,086]

26 minutes ago, Danelska said:

Potential derail -but who would you rather - Fyfe or Kelly?

Kelly would be a better fit...

[Soprano66 9]

2 minutes ago, rjay said:

Kelly would be a better fit...

I would rather Kelly, not too sure what Fyfe's ego is like. 

[red and blue forever 1,041]

7 minutes ago, Soprano66 said:

I would rather Kelly, not too sure what Fyfe's ego is like. 

or his leg...

[DEE fence 5,039]

15 hours ago, beelzebub said:

I'll call it..Melbourne has as much chance of a Flag before the Giants.

Yep I'm mad.....or am I ?

We;ll be up and running this year. We can beat the Giants..we actually know how... bizarre at that is..cant beat other teams we ought to but somehow we have'm worked out.

Point being.. No  team is a monty for the Granny.

They havent the miles on the board yet...one day...they will ...not yet. 

Players will start coming to us...just you watch.......oh wait  ...

Who hijacked your login? Most optimistic I have ever seen you.

[McQueen 17,867]

50 minutes ago, Danelska said:

Potential derail -but who would you rather - Fyfe or Kelly?

Kelly.

[beelzebub 23,383]

29 minutes ago, DaisyDeeciple said:

Who hijacked your login? Most optimistic I have ever seen you.

shhhh !!

I'm often optimistic....and then......

[beelzebub 23,383]

45 minutes ago, Soprano66 said:

I would rather Kelly, not too sure what Fyfe's ego is like. 

I reckon if you asked him.....he'd tell you !! lol

[beelzebub 23,383]

Two things about this..well probably more really

It is Sam ...so meh....caveat emptor with anything he writes,; the expression  "hit or miss" I think was coined for him.

Kelly may well choose to stay( Giants )  a while and enjoy some good footy but I do note the mention of only signing (potentially ) for another 2 years ?? That's hardly a concrete commitment. That's someone biding their time and keeping all bets open.

Happily welcome  Kelly... Fyfe....might be more a can of worms imho.

[Moonshadow 17,677]

1 hour ago, Danelska said:

Potential derail -but who would you rather - Fyfe or Kelly?

Kelly please

[Dr. Gonzo 24,289]

31 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

Two things about this..well probably more really

It is Sam ...so meh....caveat emptor with anything he writes,; the expression  "hit or miss" I think was coined for him.

Kelly may well choose to stay( Giants )  a while and enjoy some good footy but I do note the mention of only signing (potentially ) for another 2 years ?? That's hardly a concrete commitment. That's someone biding their time and keeping all bets open.

Happily welcome  Kelly... Fyfe....might be more a can of worms imho.

You mean like Hogan? Not many potential superstars will sign longer than 2 years unless they get an offer they can't refuse. Would be stupid to - imagine settling for $600k/year and knowing you could have got double that in years 3 & 4 if you signed for 2 instead of 4 years.

[Dr. Gonzo 24,289]

12 hours ago, don't make me angry said:

He 25 he started as a 18 yearold this is his seventh season not 5 this year he was drafted in 2009  first playing season was 2010 so this o's his 7 season check your facts he was drafted the same year as tom$ 

We were talking about Josh Kelly in the thread, ironically enough, titled "Josh Kelly"