Jump to content

FA & Trade Whispers

Featured Replies

3 minutes ago, DV8 said:

absolutely... yes yes yes. get him we need small forwards.

I raised it on here a week ago but apparently he has nominated the Blues and will likely get there today. We don't have anything left to give up for him. Our earliest pick is now 57 so unless we can upgrade we're done for this trade period.

 

Hibberd is better than Tuohy, who can be a shocking turnover merchant.

  • Author
3 minutes ago, ProDee said:

Hibberd is better than Tuohy, who can be a shocking turnover merchant.

Just looked at the stats. Much, much better. 

 
1 minute ago, Dee-licious said:

Just looked at the stats. Much, much better. 

Tuohy is ordinary. The cats seem to be getting desperate. 

2 hours ago, billy2803 said:

Obviously I wasn't being serious about moving in with him.  I just want ANB to learn as much as he possibly can about the way he goes about his footy.

Maybe he can be their families match-day nanny, and can catchup with Lewis about the game after he returns


This one is from left-field. Pat McKenna goes from GWS to Melbourne with picks 51 (R3) and 69 (R4) for picks 57 (R3) and 59 (R4).
 
  • Author

That is now 3 in and 3 out. We now need to see another 3 out..... Dunn is one, who will be the other 2? 

 
19 minutes ago, Dee-licious said:

That is now 3 in and 3 out. We now need to see another 3 out..... Dunn is one, who will be the other 2? 

Dunn, Newton and Dawes. Michie may well go too.

  • Author

Cleary reporting that Dawes is no longer a Melbourne player. 


Mitch Cleary reporting that Dawes is gone. Was informed today apparently

Patrick - thank god.

I thought we might have blown pick 58 on Peter McKenna.

He must be nearly 70 years old!!!

4 minutes ago, A F said:

Dunn, Newton and Dawes. Michie may well go too.

Michie's a rookie, so wouldn't make a difference to our trade plans if he goes.

 

Vardy to WCE for pick 72? Surely we could have put up something better than that?


4 minutes ago, Beats said:

Michie's a rookie, so wouldn't make a difference to our trade plans if he goes.

 

Vardy to WCE for pick 72? Surely we could have put up something better than that?

If he gets an injury-free run, this will be the best deal of the trade period.

Mitch Clark gets out on the park more than Vardy - whilst Vardy has potential upside, it's a no from me

20 minutes ago, Beats said:

Michie's a rookie, so wouldn't make a difference to our trade plans if he goes.

No, I know, but he's another that'll probably go, meaning we'll free up a rookie spot.

Hawks will offer Pick 10 + Isaac Smith for JOM...

Watch this space... Hawks have lost the plot!


Just now, Krazy Jaeger O'Smeara said:

Hawks will offer Pick 10 + Isaac Smith for JOM...

Watch this space... Hawks have lost the plot!

His arrogance and smugness cost them a chance to play in the Grand Final.  While I'm not sure if you are taking the pi$$ or not with the above, I'll presume you aren't, and will wonder if that;s part of the reason why he's being offered up.

Misses a shot to get his team into the GF one month...

Racking lines off a mirror in the sun the next :cool:

11 minutes ago, Krazy Jaeger O'Smeara said:

Hawks will offer Pick 10 + Isaac Smith for JOM...

Watch this space... Hawks have lost the plot!

I thought they'd be going the Sydney route.

If trade talk points are correct, 14+17=2100 and #10 = 1300. Then they only need to offer a #20-25 type pick to even the trade. Would more likely be Hartung, Puopolo or Siciliy to Sydney I think and send 14 + 17 to GCS ?

 
10 minutes ago, Krazy Jaeger O'Smeara said:

Hawks will offer Pick 10 + Isaac Smith for JOM...

Watch this space... Hawks have lost the plot!

HUGE MISTAKE!

they should just hold on, there is no way the Suns are really going to let him walk for nothing.

Talk around that GWS may be stripped of draft picks over the Whitfield episode!!  Now wouldn't that make a lot of people happy!  A bit of poetic justice one would think.

Back to the draft: they might do a last minute deal to get 2017 early picks.  I don't usually hypothesise about picks but this would be nice:  GWS: a 2016 1st and 2nd round for MFC: 2017 1st round and 2016 #69 which has draft points value and 2017 3rd round.  We could always trade into 2017 later rounds next year.

Why do it: might get us the ruck/forward with their 2016 2nd round and give us a 1st round pick.  Of course we would only do it if we had a target in the 1st round.

Doable?


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 528 replies