Jump to content

Nominations for the new Richmond Board

Featured Replies

Media coverage seems to suggest the proposed new Board is underwhelming. Would have thought that would align perfectly with the playing list and coaching staff thereby finally giving Richmond members the unity and synergy they pray for.

 

Wow, only just caught up on this Richmond fiasco.. is this the biggest smunt in footy?

We've all seen how this ends.

28 minutes ago, 3Dee said:

Wow, only just caught up on this Richmond fiasco.. is this the biggest smunt in footy?

We've all seen how this ends.

the simpsons excellent creepy

 
2 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Media coverage seems to suggest the proposed new Board is underwhelming. Would have thought that would align perfectly with the playing list and coaching staff thereby finally giving Richmond members the unity and synergy they pray for.

how words can hurt. very cruel la dee.  

5 hours ago, hemingway said:

It also highlights how quickly things change. From finals contender one year, when everyone was talking them up and the start of the season when Tigers supporters were again looking to the season with optimism and another finals appearance. They may have been overrated and the seeds of their demise may have been seen from their list, their coaches, whatever, but not many predicted such an implosion. 

Its a lesson that tells us that success can sometimes be fleeting and footy supporters should not get ahead of themselves. The optimism at MFC will quickly be wiped if we have a poor year under Goodwin. Injuries, players not living up to expectations, can quickly destroy a season. And when that happens things turn pear shaped.

For all those getting a vicarious pleasure out of watching the Tigers problems, be careful what you wish for. And don't forget where Melbourne has come from. We are still a long way from getting out of the woods ourselves. 

 

44% of teams play finals - almost half.

Supporters need to stop thinking of finals as some sort of successful benchmark.  Richmond proves it isn't. 

That said, I have no doubt that when we eventually get there, whether it be 2017 or 18, we'll be on the type of incline that will at least lead to a prelim.


I have no Sympathy for the Tigers at all. 

After their loss to Carlscum in the 2013 finals that was when the Dumb Bastards should have realized it wasn't going to get better. Carlscum didn't even make the 8

But Runt Road did nothing and recruited the bare minimum

They were arrogant and stupid and now it has exploded

Entertainment....

16 minutes ago, ProDee said:

44% of teams play finals - almost half.

Supporters need to stop thinking of finals as some sort of successful benchmark.  Richmond proves it isn't. 

That said, I have no doubt that when we eventually get there, whether it be 2017 or 18, we'll be on the type of incline that will at least lead to a prelim.

After the last decade for the MFC I think it would an achievement of grand proportions ProDee

44 minutes ago, old dee said:

After the last decade for the MFC I think it would an achievement of grand proportions ProDee

Losers mentality.

Try not to EVER dumb yourself down, no matter the circumstances. 

 
Just now, ProDee said:

Losers mentality.

Try not to EVER dumb yourself down, no matter the circumstances. 

Yes oh wise one

7 minutes ago, ProDee said:

Losers mentality.

Try not to EVER dumb yourself down, no matter the circumstances. 

Losers mentality Pro or just realistic given a long period of hopes and dreams and disappointments?

OD is not on the current playing list so you can hardly call him a loser. He is a long time supporter like the rest of us who desperately want success before we die. We are prepared to concede that it is possible we will not win a flag.  Of course we want a flag but if we don't we want success.

Talking about winners and losers as if there is no in between is the dumb bit. 

You call an athlete that makes an Olympic final or wins a silver or bronze medal a loser?

I don't think your dumb but seriously if this is your proposition I will have to reconsider.  


11 minutes ago, hemingway said:

Losers mentality Pro or just realistic given a long period of hopes and dreams and disappointments?

OD is not on the current playing list so you can hardly call him a loser. He is a long time supporter like the rest of us who desperately want success before we die. We are prepared to concede that it is possible we will not win a flag.  Of course we want a flag but if we don't we want success.

Talking about winners and losers as if there is no in between is the dumb bit. 

You call an athlete that makes an Olympic final or wins a silver or bronze medal a loser?

I don't think your dumb but seriously if this is your proposition I will have to reconsider.  

Covered it well Ernest. 

1 hour ago, hemingway said:

I don't think "your" dumb but seriously if this is your proposition I will have to reconsider.  

Irony.

Your analogy of silver or bronze in the Olympics is silly.  Being the second or third best in the world in no way equates to making the eight in AFL.  

I agree that success "can" be relative, but merely graduating to finals is fool's gold.  We played finals in 6 of Daniher's 10 years and if you think that in any way equated to success then we read from a different handbook. 

In our relatively small national competition the only real success is a premiership.

21 hours ago, beelzebub said:

yellow and......   well...just  YELLOW 

"Hello Tiger Boys "........that's the colour of the wig of ageing "Trout from Woodend" who sits with the kids in the Cheer Squad .

1 hour ago, whers_jacka_now said:

Why is Adolf Hitler on the ticket?

That's "Sliding Doors" Adolf. He sold a few paintings in his youth and never went to jail, never wrote his manifesto, and never got into politics.

But he still had an urge to wreak havoc. Hence "Focus on Footy".


1 hour ago, Ted Fidge said:

That's "Sliding Doors" Adolf. He sold a few paintings in his youth and never went to jail, never wrote his manifesto, and never got into politics.

But he still had an urge to wreak havoc. Hence "Focus on Footy".

That's one of the "Dodgy Brothers" :)

3 hours ago, ProDee said:

Irony.

Your analogy of silver or bronze in the Olympics is silly.  Being the second or third best in the world in no way equates to making the eight in AFL.  

I agree that success "can" be relative, but merely graduating to finals is fool's gold.  We played finals in 6 of Daniher's 10 years and if you think that in any way equated to success then we read from a different handbook. 

In our relatively small national competition the only real success is a premiership.

Well Pro if your only measure of success is a flag, does that mean that we have a team of losers and that we support a bunch of losers and indeed we supporters are losers. Sorry we do have a different handbook. 

4 hours ago, hemingway said:

Well Pro if your only measure of success is a flag, does that mean that we have a team of losers and that we support a bunch of losers and indeed we supporters are losers. Sorry we do have a different handbook. 

There are degrees of everything, but the only real success in the AFL is a premiership.  Pretty self-explanatory I would have thought. 

If you want to label those who fall short of that mark "a bunch of losers" that's up to you. 

Richmond must be prepared to offer Prestia $800k a year for 5 years to get him to that rabble. 

12 hours ago, whers_jacka_now said:

Why is Adolf Hitler on the ticket?

Untitled.jpg

That is the most Richmond photo ever.

30 minutes ago, praha said:

Richmond must be prepared to offer Prestia $800k a year for 5 years to get him to that rabble. 

That is the most Richmond photo ever.

Except that he has teeth.


7 hours ago, ProDee said:

There are degrees of everything, but the only real success in the AFL is a premiership.  Pretty self-explanatory I would have thought. 

If you want to label those who fall short of that mark "a bunch of losers" that's up to you. 

Really, is that the best you can do Pro?  I hope your a more agreeable person in real life.

2 minutes ago, hemingway said:

Really, is that the best you can do Pro?  I hope your a more agreeable person in real life.

I am sick to death of seeing other clubs win the Flag....

18 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

I am sick to death of seeing other clubs win the Flag....

Totally agree Sir. 

 
6 minutes ago, hemingway said:

Totally agree Sir. 

This year will be yet another Yawnfest

we have to demand at least a serious crack at Success

  • Author
3 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Except that he has teeth.

Dont be fooled by the teeth, they're mahogany.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 141 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 39 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Like
    • 318 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 31 replies