Jump to content

THE MOST AWESOME POST MATCH THREAD EVER!!!

red and blue forever
red and blue forever
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, Rod Grinter Riot Squad said:

#freepasshawthorn

This is a joke.

 

firstly, I assumed Rioli got a fine for the tackle, but no nothing there, instead a fine for a perfect bump to the body.

 

secondly, Sicily was deemed as medium impact. Are they joking.

 

third, Mitchell was said to have made a pushing action, not a striking action. Now I know they are taking the p155. All 3 decisions farcical IMO

  • Quote
    •  

    I have Cyril is lined up when next we play them, and mitchell, and Gibson, and Sicily, and .........

  • Quote
    9 minutes ago, Rod Grinter Riot Squad said:

    This is a joke.

     

    firstly, I assumed Rioli got a fine for the tackle, but no nothing there, instead a fine for a perfect bump to the body.

     

    secondly, Sicily was deemed as medium impact. Are they joking.

     

    third, Mitchell was said to have made a pushing action, not a striking action. Now I know they are taking the p155. All 3 decisions farcical IMO

    Why would anyone be surprised by the MRP...

  • Quote
    •  
    1 minute ago, jnrmac said:

    Why would anyone be surprised by the MRP...

    Oh, I am not surprised at all.

     

    TBH I would have been fine if Mitchell got off, or only copped a fine, as it really was quite minor, but to say it was a pushing action and not a striking motion is just ludicrous

  • Quote

    I kinda think that Riolis bump was a good one. 

    It was damn close to being dangerous but just got him low enough. 

    Mitchell getting off is an absolute joke though.... open hand?!?!?!

  • Quote

    1 minute ago, 93dee said:

    I kinda think that Riolis bump was a good one. 

    It was damn close to being dangerous but just got him low enough. 

    Mitchell getting off is an absolute joke though.... open hand?!?!?!

    I think Cyrils is about right, it was reckless but he pulled it off, just. To say Mitchells was a pushing motion in hilarious. I bet Tom Hawkins is really happy with that interpretation!

    Not surprised there was no mention of the spear tackle either.

  • Quote
    23 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

    Cyril can accept $1,000 for rough contact

    Sicily, 1 week

     

    Random thought 4

    Yet no free paid in either situation. Go figure.

  • Quote
    •  
    33 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

    Cyril can accept $1,000 for rough contact

    Sicily, 1 week

    Mitchell, cleared.

    Mitchell lucky considering Hawkins went 2 down to 1, for equal or less!

    I look at those names and have to feel for Sicily, If only he had a differnt name he would have gotten off. Maybe he should consider changing his name to James Hodge, James Rioli or James Mitchell just to ensure this doesnt happen again

  • Quote
    28 minutes ago, Gorgoroth said:

    Sicily deserves the week.  Rioli I thought is stiff, that was a great bump. 

    Mitchell should have been cleared.  He slaps his at most afterwatts grabs hiya face. Nothing in it.

    Sicily and Mitchell correct - I give up with Rioli decision. Its either high and he gets rubbed out or, as they deemed it to be the body he gets off - so now players get a fine for hitting a player with a legitimate bump ?????

    The bump is well and truly dead - as much as i hate to say it - if i was the Hawks i would appeal the Rioli decision - once they deemed it "not the head"  - he should have been cleared. 

  • Quote

    17 minutes ago, 93dee said:

    I kinda think that Riolis bump was a good one. 

    It was damn close to being dangerous but just got him low enough. 

    Mitchell getting off is an absolute joke though.... open hand?!?!?!

    it was an open hand.. they showed it slowed down on the Sunday footy show - it was open hand.

  • Quote
    32 minutes ago, Rod Grinter Riot Squad said:

    This is a joke.

     

    firstly, I assumed Rioli got a fine for the tackle, but no nothing there, instead a fine for a perfect bump to the body.

     

    secondly, Sicily was deemed as medium impact. Are they joking.

     

    third, Mitchell was said to have made a pushing action, not a striking action. Now I know they are taking the p155. All 3 decisions farcical IMO

    It is not  decisions that are wrong in the last two  - it is how they are worded.

    The Rioli decision is plain wrong - or they have just changed the rules on bumping without telling anyone... no head no fine...

  • Quote

    I'm really looking forward to Cyril playing in a struggling Hawthorn team when Hodge, Mitchell, Burgoyne and Gibson all retire at once.  It's just not possible to replace that much class.  Cyril and Lewis trying to carry the can.  I think we'll see some frustration.

  • Quote

    They graded the Rioli hit as to the head but low impact? 

    If that's the case then Rioli is lucky Oliver is as tough as anything otherwise he'd be facing weeks. 

  • Quote
    3 minutes ago, Seraph said:

    They graded the Rioli hit as to the head but low impact? 

    If that's the case then Rioli is lucky Oliver is as tough as anything otherwise he'd be facing weeks. 

    no - they graded it to low impact to the body which makes it more ridiculous.

    It was high impact but it was to the body-  still trying to figure out how he could get fined for it.

    If it was the head he would of ( make that should of ) got weeks. 

  • Quote

    Just now, nutbean said:

    no - they graded it to low impact to the body which makes it more ridiculous.

    It was high impact but it was to the body-  still trying to figure out how he could get fined for it.

    If it was the head he would of ( make that should of ) got weeks. 

    Directly from the MRP statement:

    Based on the available video evidence and a medical report from the Melbourne Football Club, the incident was assessed as careless conduct with low impact to the head. The incident was classified as a $1500 sanction. The player has no applicable record which impacts the penalty. An early plea enables the player to accept a $1000 sanction. 

  • Quote
    On 6 August 2016 at 4:15 PM, Clint Bizkit said:

    All bias aside, does Rioli deserve weeks? I thought there was some head contact, he left the ground and went past the ball to bump.

     

    On 6 August 2016 at 4:18 PM, FireInTheBelly said:

    What about Mitchell? Punched Watts in the face. Obviously hits like a little schoolgirl.

    Is anyone really surprised?

  • Quote

    They are the little darlings of the AFL. Mark Jackson was on the money about that.

    Go to VFL park.Yes

    Go to Tas.Yes

    Invest in Pokies.Yes

    Do what we say and we'll look after you.Ok

    I'm tired of their slurping ways and their false family club image.

    Hope they get slapped around heavily.

    We made them look old and slow-hope the other teams can wipe them out for 2016.

  • Quote

    All I see in the replay is Oliver's head fling backwards. Not sure how that happens without contact to the head.

  • Quote
    7 minutes ago, Seraph said:

    Directly from the MRP statement:

    Based on the available video evidence and a medical report from the Melbourne Football Club, the incident was assessed as careless conduct with low impact to the head. The incident was classified as a $1500 sanction. The player has no applicable record which impacts the penalty. An early plea enables the player to accept a $1000 sanction. 

    They cant even get the reporting right !!!

    Charges Laid:

    Cyril Rioli, Hawthorn, has been charged with engaging in rough conduct against Clayton Oliver, Melbourne, during the first quarter of the Round 20 match between Hawthorn and Melbourne, played at the MCG on Saturday August 6, 2016.

    In summary, he can accept a $1000 sanction with an early plea.

    Based on the available video evidence and a medical report from the Melbourne

    Football Club, the incident was assessed as careless conduct with low impact to the body. The incident was classified as a $1500 sanction. The player has no applicable record which impacts the penalty. An early plea enables the player to accept a $1000 sanction. 

    Very odd indeed !

  • Quote

    1 minute ago, nutbean said:

    They cant even get the reporting right !!!

    Charges Laid:

    Cyril Rioli, Hawthorn, has been charged with engaging in rough conduct against Clayton Oliver, Melbourne, during the first quarter of the Round 20 match between Hawthorn and Melbourne, played at the MCG on Saturday August 6, 2016.

    In summary, he can accept a $1000 sanction with an early plea.

    Based on the available video evidence and a medical report from the Melbourne

    Football Club, the incident was assessed as careless conduct with low impact to the body. The incident was classified as a $1500 sanction. The player has no applicable record which impacts the penalty. An early plea enables the player to accept a $1000 sanction. 

    Maybe refresh? I think they typed it wrong originally then changed it.

  • Quote
    8 minutes ago, Seraph said:

    Directly from the MRP statement:

    Based on the available video evidence and a medical report from the Melbourne Football Club, the incident was assessed as careless conduct with low impact to the head. The incident was classified as a $1500 sanction. The player has no applicable record which impacts the penalty. An early plea enables the player to accept a $1000 sanction. 

     

    1 minute ago, nutbean said:

    They cant even get the reporting right !!!

    Charges Laid:

    Cyril Rioli, Hawthorn, has been charged with engaging in rough conduct against Clayton Oliver, Melbourne, during the first quarter of the Round 20 match between Hawthorn and Melbourne, played at the MCG on Saturday August 6, 2016.

    In summary, he can accept a $1000 sanction with an early plea.

    Based on the available video evidence and a medical report from the Melbourne

    Football Club, the incident was assessed as careless conduct with low impact to the body. The incident was classified as a $1500 sanction. The player has no applicable record which impacts the penalty. An early plea enables the player to accept a $1000 sanction. 

     

     Wonder which one is the 'edited' version

  • Quote
    1 minute ago, mrtwister said:

     

     Wonder which one is the 'edited' version

    How bizarre is that !!

    I am tipping it has to be the one that says head - or he would have ( should have) got weeks.

    But if it is a bump to the body i am trying to figure out why he got fined at all !

    To me it was 3 weeks or nothing - bizarre ! ( either way it is wrong)

  • Quote
    •  
    1 minute ago, nutbean said:

    How bizarre is that !!

    I am tipping it has to be the one that says head - or he would have ( should have) got weeks.

    But if it is a bump to the body i am trying to figure out why he got fined at all !

    To me it was 3 weeks or nothing - bizarre ! ( either way it is wrong)

    okay - now it says head - YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME !!!!!! How can you get a reprimand for that !!!!!!!!!! If he choose to bump and hit the head it has to be weeks. I don't give a rats the Clarrie got straight up ( i do actually). How about you smash someone in the face with a fist and if they dont stay down you claim "insufficient impact". The MRP is a joke of the highest order. 

  • Quote
    18 hours ago, Rod Grinter Riot Squad said:

    or is that too hard for you?

    Just to be clear that you were responding to Akum, not me.  I didn't make that post... not sure why it comes up under my name?

  • Quote

    • Archived

    This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • REPORT: Hawthorn

      There was a time during the current Melbourne cycle that goes back to before the premiership when the club was the toughest to beat in the fourth quarter. The Demons were not only hard to beat at any time but it was virtually impossible to get the better them when scores were close at three quarter time. It was only three or four years ago but they were fit, strong and resilient in body and mind. Sadly, those days are over. This has been the case since the club fell off its pedestal about 12 months ago after it beat Geelong and then lost to Carlton. In both instances, Melbourne put together strong, stirring final quarters, one that resulted in victory, the other, in defeat. Since then, the drop off has been dramatic to the point where it can neither pull off victory in close matches, nor can it even go down in defeat  gallantly.

        • Clap
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Footscray

      At twenty-four minutes into the third term of the game between the Casey Demons and Footscray VFL at Whitten Oval, the visitors were coasting. They were winning all over the ground, had the ascendancy in the ruck battles and held a 26 point lead on a day perfect for football. What could go wrong? Everything. The Bulldogs moved into overdrive in the last five minutes of the term and booted three straight goals to reduce the margin to a highly retrievable eight points at the last break. Bouyed by that effort, their confidence was on a high level during the interval and they ran all over the despondent Demons and kicked another five goals to lead by a comfortable margin of four goals deep into the final term before Paddy Cross kicked a couple of too late goals for a despondent Casey. A testament to their lack of pressure in the latter stages of the game was the fact that Footscray’s last ten scoring shots were nine goals and one rushed behind. Things might have been different for the Demons who went into the game after last week’s bye with 12 AFL listed players. Blake Howes was held over for the AFL game but two others, Jack Billings and Taj Woewodin (not officially listed as injured) were also missing and they could have been handy at the end. Another mystery of the current VFL system.

        • Thanks
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Brisbane

      The Demons head back out on the road in Round 10 when they travel to Queensland to take on the reigning Premiers and the top of the table Lions who look very formidable. Can the Dees cause a massive upset? Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 124 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Hawthorn

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Demons loss to the Hawks. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

        • Clap
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 52 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: Hawthorn

      Wayward kicking for goal, dump kicks inside 50 and some baffling umpiring all contributed to the Dees not getting out to an an early lead that may have impacted the result. At the end of the day the Demons were just not good enough and let the Hawks run away with their first win against the Demons in 7 years.

        • Clap
        • Love
        • Like
      • 354 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • VOTES: Hawthorn

      After 3 fantastic week Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award from Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Ed Langdon who round out the Top Five. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

        • Thanks
      • 34 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All