Jump to content

The Jesse Hogan Panic Room - all contract talk here

Featured Replies

16 hours ago, Abe said:

His post doesn't make sense GNF, it says that Jesse has been given time and space to work things out and deal with a personal issue, how can they claim they're doing that but also have a time frame on an answer from Jesse, surely it's one or the other. 

if he's genuinely torn than any time frame puts pressure on that decision which makes giving him time and space in a difficult time for his family totally pointless doesn't it?

if that's the way the club deals with a young man in a difficult time of his life i'd be really dissapointed, and absolutely shocked if Jesse is a demon by the end of trade week.

His post makes sense to me.

In fact, it makes sense generally.

 

 

Fwiw some chick on those facebook pages has claimed that Hogan has signed a 4 year deal and will be announced next week.

6 minutes ago, Ron Burgundy said:

His post makes sense to me.

In fact, it makes sense generally.

 

Please explain Ron?

 
Just now, dazzledavey36 said:

Fwiw some chick on those facebook pages has claimed that Hogan has signed a 4 year deal and will be announced next week.

Some chick???

4 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Fwiw some chick on those facebook pages has claimed that Hogan has signed a 4 year deal and will be announced next week.

I once claimed that I was from outer space, no one ever doubted it, must be true. As for Jessie, that's great news hooray!

 

 

Edit_typo

Edited by ManDee


2 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Fwiw some chick on those facebook pages has claimed that Hogan has signed a 4 year deal and will be announced next week.

If true that would put him in FA at the end. Would make sense from his point of view. Hopefully again if true, it is a 4 year extension, giving us 5 more years at least. 

7 minutes ago, Ted Fidge said:

Yeah, some chick wearing a blue and yellow beanie.

Don't be like that Teddy.

 

As i do not have facebook can someone provide a link?

 

17 minutes ago, Ted Fidge said:

Yeah, some chick wearing a blue and yellow beanie.

Daniel Chick?


44 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Fwiw some chick on those facebook pages has claimed that Hogan has signed a 4 year deal and will be announced next week.

You do know who that girl is?? Let's just say her dad is very well connected with Melbourne, as well as being a foundation hero.

I have a feeling that this "some chick" is once again Dr Turfs daughter... which MAY slightly raise her credibility....

However i seem to recall she was the same person claiming Jack Watts was gone at the end of last season.... 

 

51 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Fwiw some chick on those facebook pages has claimed that Hogan has signed a 4 year deal and will be announced next week.

Would be nice if it was Hogans girlfriend

7 minutes ago, Micah said:

I have a feeling that this "some chick" is once again Dr Turfs daughter... which MAY slightly raise her credibility....

However i seem to recall she was the same person claiming Jack Watts was gone at the end of last season.... 

 

Yes i do recall that. Straight after the gws game she mentioned that.


Just now, Petraccattack said:

Would be nice if it was Hogans girlfriend

Just would be nice if it were true!

18 minutes ago, Micah said:

I have a feeling that this "some chick" is once again Dr Turfs daughter... which MAY slightly raise her credibility....

However i seem to recall she was the same person claiming Jack Watts was gone at the end of last season....

I don't think she was that wrong at the time.  Remember he had lots of chances last year and was dropped for the last game and we were looking for a decent offer to trade him.  We didn't get any decent offers (thank God) but I don't think the girl was wrong.

Lets hope she is right with Jesse!

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

here we go

I have edited the posters name out 

Screen Shot 2016-09-27 at 9.38.37 am.png

Thanks mark.

Be great if true, then we start on Fyfe!

 


7 minutes ago, markc said:

here we go

I have edited the posters name out 

Screen Shot 2016-09-27 at 9.38.37 am.png

Did anyone ask her where she got the info from?

1 hour ago, Abe said:

Please explain Ron?

He seems to be saying that:

1 the club has put an offer to Hogan that they had hoped/expected he would have signed by now, but that he hasn't (seems credible); and

2. given the significant nature of Hogan's next contract, the importance of Hogan to the club and to our future list management, and Hogan's current trade value which seems likely to be greater this year than next, the club wishes/needs to know whether Hogan is going to extend his contract beyond next year before this year's trade period concludes because it may compromise Hogan's trade value if he actually wishes to leave the club  in 2017 and it also impacts upon the way we structure the list going forward (seems credible).

So, in short, I don't know if this is true, or if Flamingdees is pulling stuff out of his arse, but his post makes perfect sense to me.

 

 

 

Just now, Ron Burgundy said:

He seems to be saying that:

1 the club has put an offer to Hogan that they had hoped/expected he would have signed by now, but that he hasn't (seems credible); and

2. given the significant nature of Hogan's next contract, the importance of Hogan to the club and to our future list management, and Hogan's current trade value which seems likely to be greater this year than next, the club wishes/needs to know whether Hogan is going to extend his contract beyond next year before this year's trade period concludes because it may compromise Hogan's trade value if he actually wishes to leave the club  in 2017 and it also impacts upon the way we structure the list going forward (seems credible).

So, in short, I don't know if this is true, or if Flamingdees is pulling stuff out of his arse, but his post makes perfect sense to me.

 

 

 

All of that makes sense, but he also said in a seperate post that the club is not putting pressure on Hogan and giving him space, i don't believe you can give him space and pressure him for a decision sooner than he'd like to make it, they can't trade him if he doesn't want to go.

 

 

 

4 minutes ago, Demons11 said:

Did anyone ask her where she got the info from?

 

yes , she said "can't say " 

and then is was stated this is a yoke by someone else 

and her reply was     Would never joke about Jesse haha

this was on a closed melbourne Facebook page

 Melbourne Football Club, The Mighty Demons

 

believe what you want , its on Facebook it must be true !

Edited by markc

1 minute ago, markc said:

 

 

 

yes , she said "can't say " 

and then is was stated this is a yoke by someone else 

and her reply was     Would never joke about Jesse haha

this was on a closed melbourne Facebook page

 Melbourne Football Club, The Mighty Demons

 

believe what you want , its on Facebook it must be true !

Ha no doubt. Take it to the bank then 


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Gold Coast

    The Gold Coast Suns find themselves outside of the top eight for the first time since Round 1 with pressure is mounting on the entire organisation. Their coach Damien Hardwick expressed his frustration at his team’s condition last week by making a middle-finger gesture on television that earned him a fine for his troubles. He showed his desperation by claiming that Fox should pick up the tab.  There’s little doubt the Suns have shown improvement in 2025, and their position on the ladder is influenced to some extent by having played fewer games than their rivals for a playoff role at the end of the season, courtesy of the disruption caused by Cyclone Alfred in March.  However, they are following the same trajectory that hindered the club in past years whenever they appeared to be nearing their potential. As a consequence, that Hardwick gesture should be considered as more than a mere behavioral lapse. It’s a distress signal that does not bode well for the Queenslanders. While the Suns are eager to remain in contention with the top eight, Melbourne faces its own crisis, which is similarly deep-seated but in a much different way. After recovering from a disappointing start to the season and nearing a return to respectability among its peer clubs, the Demons have experienced a decline in status, driven by the fact that while their form has been reasonable (see their performance against the ladder leader in the Kings Birthday match), their conversion in front of goal is poor enough to rank last in the competition. Furthermore, their opponents find them exceptionally easy to score against. As a result, they have effectively eliminated themselves from the finals race and are again positioned to finish in the bottom half of the ladder.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Like
    • 287 replies
  • REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Essendon

    Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

      • Clap
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Gold Coast

    The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Thanks
    • 371 replies
  • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 33 replies