Jump to content

The if you can't get Dustin Martin get Reece Conca Thread

Featured Replies

Posted

Richmond offering him 550k per year, he wants more

MFC should step in and off him 800k over 5 years

With the nugget of playing under Eade or Choco, as he needs that experienced father figure type to guide him and keep him on the straight and narrow

 

Signed a two year deal. Pretty sure.

Reported on SEN yesterday that he had agreed to term with RFC.

 
  • Author

God damn it

MFC missed out on a huge opportunity here

Should have paid him massive overs

I wonder if we even made an approach

I'm much happier with Dustin Martin at Richmond.

He doesn't make the tigers side, and would be a liability in more ways than one, in our club environment.

Taylor Adams is the must-get target, in my opinion.


Martin would have been a massive win.

We should start getting used to it. No one is going to want to come to us this year.

And for all those people saying it cant get any worse ... it will. Wooden spoon for us next year. GWS will suprass us in leaps and bounds from here on in.

Going to be a long year again next year.

Conca is ripe for the picking IMO, by paying overs for Martin, they can't afford Conca, we could comfortably offer him $200,000 more than Richmond can afford. A quality player who would walk into our top 7

 

Conca is ripe for the picking IMO, by paying overs for Martin, they can't afford Conca, we could comfortably offer him $200,000 more than Richmond can afford. A quality player who would walk into our top 7

Hes the one alright, Conca manager has already stated that he wants to play for the Tigers but hes not going to do it for nothing.


Martin would have been a massive win.

We should start getting used to it. No one is going to want to come to us this year.

And for all those people saying it cant get any worse ... it will. Wooden spoon for us next year. GWS will suprass us in leaps and bounds from here on in.

Glad we missed him.

FFS, name and quality players have been avoiding us for the past seven year. You are hardly being Nostradamus with this.

And it cant get any worse. We been fined and exposed for tanking, dumped the President, CEO and Coach with huge contract payments, we have been tish all year, we are in AFL administration and we have a co captain wondering whether he has been given a banned substance.....and you think it can get worse...Good grief.

Glad we missed him.

FFS, name and quality players have been avoiding us for the past seven year. You are hardly being Nostradamus with this.

And it cant get any worse. We been fined and exposed for tanking, dumped the President, CEO and Coach with huge contract payments, we have been tish all year, we are in AFL administration and we have a co captain wondering whether he has been given a banned substance.....and you think it can get worse...Good grief.

We will finish 17th this year. 18th next year.

I'm not trying to be Nostradamus. Just trying to discuss football. Dawes and Clarke both came to us over the last two years. So I say you are wrong there. None will come to us this year.

We will finish 17th this year. 18th next year.

I'm not trying to be Nostradamus. Just trying to discuss football. Dawes and Clarke both came to us over the last two years. So I say you are wrong there. None will come to us this year.

You are short of the facts.

We may finish last next year because GWS may have got better. We couldn't possibly be worse.

Dawes came to us as discard from Collingwood who was hardly a name player even though we have paid overs for him has not justified any such tag this year.

Clark came to us in unusual situation where he had planned to return West for family reasons. It was planned that he would play with Freo. It would appear that when he did go home the family situation had become more difficult and he chose to opt out of the West. We were lucky that the family situation provided a bounty for us. MFC was hardly employer of choice for players. Pity Clark has been injured.

And you are certainly not being Nostradamus about next year.


Martin or Conca would hardly be great acquisitions to our team. We need good mids with experience and on field leadership to change our fortunes around.

Pass on Conca ... just an average onballer. Not worth throwing the kitchen sink at.

Incorrect.

The best pressure act player at the tigers, and no slouch when the ball gets into his hands.

Will be more important to them than Martin in the future, in my opinion.

28 disposals and 3 goals today from Conca. Pretty low pressure game, but he is doing all the right things and goes a bit under the radar at the Tiges due to the big names like Cotchin, Martin, Deledio.
If we can get Conca across, then we'd be fools to try. He can play as an inside mid, or an outside running mid who kicks goals. He is well rounded. If we get him across, I'd draft a bigger bodied inside midfielder like Nathan Freeman come draft time.

Incorrect.

The best pressure act player at the tigers, and no slouch when the ball gets into his hands.

Will be more important to them than Martin in the future, in my opinion.

He would be worth what we pay him and we would hardly be paying overs. The Tigers, I believe, can't pay him what he is worth, we can offer him a bit more than he is worth. Not exactly throwing the kitchen sink at him.

Is this the thread where we say we should pay a ridiculous amount for a player and when he invariably re-signs with his current club we say we didn't actually want him anyway??


I'm much happier with Dustin Martin at Richmond.

He doesn't make the tigers side, and would be a liability in more ways than one, in our club environment.

What the hell does this even mean?

People saying a player shouldn't be drafted because they wouldn't fit into the "culture" have either been living under a rock, or grossly misinterpret the club's culture as it is.

I love how people think that guys like Conca would even hint at the idea of ever coming to melbourne. Is in a team thats bound for sucess for the next ten years and destined to become one of the biggest clubs in the AFL. Conca would absolutely laugh in our face. Not many players are not wanna come to melbourne and this is thanks to Cam Schwab and Chris Connelly and the culture they set up. Its going to take a while to get rid of this Cancer Culture but we will get there.

I love how people think that guys like Conca would even hint at the idea of ever coming to melbourne. Is in a team thats bound for sucess for the next ten years and destined to become one of the biggest clubs in the AFL. Conca would absolutely laugh in our face. Not many players are not wanna come to melbourne and this is thanks to Cam Schwab and Chris Connelly and the culture they set up. Its going to take a while to get rid of this Cancer Culture but we will get there.

i tend to agree, would have to double his paycheck to even get a second look, having said that it would be stupid not to put in a call and just ask him, they should be asking anyone with even a 1% chance of moving.

 

I love how people think that guys like Conca would even hint at the idea of ever coming to melbourne. Is in a team thats bound for sucess for the next ten years and destined to become one of the biggest clubs in the AFL. Conca would absolutely laugh in our face. Not many players are not wanna come to melbourne and this is thanks to Cam Schwab and Chris Connelly and the culture they set up. Its going to take a while to get rid of this Cancer Culture but we will get there.

Yeah, good point.

Might as well not even ask the question.

Might as well not try.

Might as well give up.

Martin still hasn't signed and Conca has a big money offer from the Eagles.

Neck Tatts wants to go to the Swans but they don't want him for cultural rather than monetary reasons.

I imagine both will stick with the Tigers.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 91 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 330 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies