Jump to content

And another one bites the dust - Cook

Featured Replies

Both Cook and Gys had one common trait. They don't have the bodies to play AFL. Neeld signalled early with Magner that he wanted players who had a body to play AFL.

Watch out beanpoles.....

 

Jaded this is not a go at you but I am really tired of the "did not develop" argument.

It is trotted out for every draft failure.

The New FD has had 12 months with Cook.

They have made their decision based on the facts they see close up.

It confirms my opinion and numerous others.

The kid is struggling to be Casey standard.

There are plenty of failures in high draft picks.

EG Thorpe at Hawthorn, high draft pick. The hawks could not "develop" him and were is he now?

It is not always " failure to develop a player"

Some do not make it from Juniors to AFL level.

Poor Choice lets get on with it.

If other clubs are interested in Cook, they obviously see something in him and back themselves to develop him.

I'm not saying he'll end up a great player, but Neeld came in last year and insisted on keeping Bate, obviously backing himself to develop him into something worthwhile.

Neeld was wrong, but kudos to him for at least trying. I worry that he sees no redeeming feature in a pick 12 who has been in the system for just 2 years. We've given bigger duds more of a go.

Oh and Mitch Thorp didn't fail to develop, he was a [censored] with massive off field issues.

Cook is a footballer but needs to work hard to get fitter, stronger etc.

Have seen him play for Casey. He can take a mark, good decision maker and good kick.

All of that counts for little if he does not have the work ethic needed to turn himself into a senior AFL footballer.

Neeld has my full support if he is getting rid of players who don't want to work hard to improve.

 

I am a bit surprised by Cook's delisting because his work rate and gut running during Casey Games were of a high standard and Neel likes effort. But on Sunday at Casey Fields I was lining up to get a coffee, and in front of me were Brian Royal and Aaron Greaves - the two midfield coaches. They were talking about Lucas Cook and how he continually ran himself into the right position, but didn't have the nouse to use his height or position to take the mark, and it was frustrating the coaching staff.

I will be super mad if we get rid of Gysberts. We lack class in close and he has bags of it.

Think Gysberts will go if we get the right price.


I dont want to lose Gysberts!!!! Has a lot of potential and has had a bad yr with injury. Surely he warrants at least 1 more yr Neeldy......

If other clubs are interested in Cook, they obviously see something in him and back themselves to develop him.

I'm not saying he'll end up a great player, but Neeld came in last year and insisted on keeping Bate, obviously backing himself to develop him into something worthwhile.

Neeld was wrong, but kudos to him for at least trying. I worry that he sees no redeeming feature in a pick 12 who has been in the system for just 2 years. We've given bigger duds more of a go.

Oh and Mitch Thorp didn't fail to develop, he was a [censored] with massive off field issues.

Thorpe might not be a good example, the point I was trying to make is quite often players do not develop beyond their junior days no matter how much effort is put into them.

Jaded I am not sure that the article in today's Hun says there are a number of clubs interested now.

It may mean at the time of his drafting.

Just a though as it does not read correctly in my opinion.

I am a bit surprised by Cook's delisting because his work rate and gut running during Casey Games were of a high standard and Neel likes effort. But on Sunday at Casey Fields I was lining up to get a coffee, and in front of me were Brian Royal and Aaron Greaves - the two midfield coaches. They were talking about Lucas Cook and how he continually ran himself into the right position, but didn't have the nouse to use his height or position to take the mark, and it was frustrating the coaching staff.

I will be super mad if we get rid of Gysberts. We lack class in close and he has bags of it.

The down side is he is just as skinny as the day he was drafted

 

I dont want to lose Gysberts!!!! Has a lot of potential and has had a bad yr with injury. Surely he warrants at least 1 more yr Neeldy......

By the right price, i mean a early to mid 2nd rounder.

I highly doubt we would offload him for anything less

The other aspect is that Neeld knows he can really put the broom through right now. He doesnt strike me as a hoarder. If the FD cant see much of a future in someone , nows as good a time as ever, especially whilst some club(s) might think theres still something in a player to look at. Better to put him up now than when clubs KNOW theres nothing.

You can tell theres a lot of players at the club who simply wouldnt have been drafted had mark had any input. He has input now...theyre going !!


The other aspect is that Neeld knows he can really put the broom through right now. He doesnt strike me as a hoarder. If the FD cant see much of a future in someone , nows as good a time as ever, especially whilst some club(s) might think theres still something in a player to look at. Better to put him up now than when clubs KNOW theres nothing.

You can tell theres a lot of players at the club who simply wouldnt have been drafted had mark had any input. He has input now...theyre going !!

As well BB Neeld's future depends on it.

If there is little improvement by the end of 2013 the knives will be out fairly or not.

He has another 1.5 seasons to show some improvement at the MFC or his senior coaching days are over.

Action now is the only choice.

God I hoep the FD knows what they are doing.

Not that we have much choice but to support them

As well BB Neeld's future depends on it.

If there is little improvement by the end of 2013 the knives will be out fairly or not.

He has another 1.5 seasons to show some improvement at the MFC or his senior coaching days are over.

Action now is the only choice.

God I hoep the FD knows what they are doing.

Not that we have much choice but to support them

Yep and holding onto players like Cook does not = action.

Well we won't die wondering like with Bate, Dunn, Miller etc on the list until they have no value. Cook and Gysberts shave trade value now and if we don't value them then we should access it.

As well BB Neeld's future depends on it.

If there is little improvement by the end of 2013 the knives will be out fairly or not.

He has another 1.5 seasons to show some improvement at the MFC or his senior coaching days are over.

Action now is the only choice.

God I hoep the FD knows what they are doing.

Not that we have much choice but to support them

I think you may be over stating the circumstance old timer.

If Neeld for example loses the first 8 games, and there is every indication of that, considering the experienced departures, he will be done, no way will the club stick fat for another two years of losing.

I can understand Cook's delisting, hasn't shown any promise since he was drafted, if it's true about Gysberts then I'd be a bit surprised, given his injuries he's had this year.

Another pre-season under Neeld/Misson and he might start showing some of that form from when he was first drafted.


The down side is he is just as skinny as the day he was drafted

Who Cook? He's put on 10kg since arriving at the club. Dont beleive what you read on the clubs website. Anyone hes gone, I know you hate him old dee but the kid has potential, will be a player elsewhere.

I think you may be over stating the circumstance old timer.

If Neeld for example loses the first 8 games, and there is every indication of that, considering the experienced departures, he will be done, no way will the club stick fat for another two years of losing.

god you talk sh!t

Neeld has had a year to work out the lie of the land.

We've already seen in the last draft what Neeld value highly when he drafted Taggert, Tynan and Sellar - hardness and athleticism. In other words, the ability to compete.

Cook is a wonderfully skilled player who makes great decisions when you deliver him the ball. The problem is that he's slow and not a physically dominant player. Not a good combo because it means that you have a lot of trouble competing. Gysberts has some of the best inside hands I've seen at Melbourne for a while, but is not athletic at all. It just means that he struggles to spread and struggles to get to contests and compete - which is important for Neeld.

Compare that with him wanting to keep Bate - strong and a really good runner. Neeld just found out, after coaching him, that he wasn't good enough. But there was a definite reason why he kept him.

I think you may be over stating the circumstance old timer.

If Neeld for example loses the first 8 games, and there is every indication of that, considering the experienced departures, he will be done, no way will the club stick fat for another two years of losing.

I think bluey that the club will give him his full 3 years and then make a decision.

I expect next year to be bleak with so many new faces and at the beginning of a rebuild. I don't expect we'll pick up much experienced talent this draft

To axe him next year would just be too much turmoil and given that the board has given him the ok to wield the axe not enough time to measure progress

I expect many will be calling for blood next year but he will see out at least his contracted 3 years

End of 2014 will be a MFC watershed and not just for the coach

I'm no fan of Lucas Cook, but all this means is that we are going to get lumped with a bunch of confirmed duds for another 1 - 2 years (Bennell, Jetta, Strauss, etc), instead of backing ourselves in to develop Lucas into a decent player.

So far we have ditched / lost our 2011 B&F, 2011 leading goalkicker, 2010 B&F, and 2010 No.1 draft pick. When do we start tackling those who have no ability whatsoever?

As for Gysberts, it would be an absolute disgrace if we let him go for anything less than a first round pick.


137

the answer when you add 68 and 69 together

This is a classic example of a 'reach' at the drafting table. He was never up to first round quality but there was pressure to get a big forward for the team rather than draft the best available player, which was one of Jacobs, Atley or Smedts. If only Gold Coast could have let Tom Lynch fall one place later we would have got an absolute beauty.

Andrew Gaff,

Koby Stevens,

Ben Jacobs,

Aaron Cornelius,

Jarred Moore,

Jack Viney,

Paul Marschall,

Jake Neade,

Khan Haretuku

That's who I'm hoping our replacements will be.

Gaff re-signed with WCE months ago TD.

Would be great to have a player like him at the club though.

 

The problem with much of our drafting over the years is we sometimes tried to get cute, or creative all at the expense of sufficient meat and potato players.

They stuffed up with Cook

Who Cook? He's put on 10kg since arriving at the club. Dont beleive what you read on the clubs website. Anyone hes gone, I know you hate him old dee but the kid has potential, will be a player elsewhere.

I don't hate him at all. I don't know the kid and all i hear is he is a nice guy.

I am just staing the obvious HG.

In his second year at the club he cannot get a regular game in Casey Firsts, not one vote in either the VFL seniors or Reserves.

The MFC FD has spoken if they don't know who does.

The club has put their faith in this group so by proxy we have to support them until proven otherwise wrong.

Why do you think I hate him?

I get no joy from the fact another high draft pick has gone down the Loo


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Carlton

    Good evening, Demon fans and welcome back to the Demonland Podcast ... it’s time to discuss this week’s game against the Blues. Will the Demons celebrate Clayton Oliver’s 200th game with a victory? We have a number of callers waiting on line … Leopold Bloom: Carlton and Melbourne are both out of finals contention with six wins and eleven losses, and are undoubtedly the two most underwhelming and disappointing teams of 2025. Both had high expectations at the start of participating and advancing deep into the finals, but instead, they have consistently underperformed and disappointed themselves and their supporters throughout the year. However, I am inclined to give the Demons the benefit of the doubt, as they have made some progress in addressing their issues after a disastrous start. In contrast, the Blues are struggling across the board and do not appear to be making any notable improvements. They are regressing, and a significant loss is looming on Saturday night. Max Gawn in the ruck will be huge and the Demon midfield have a point to prove after lowering their colours in so many close calls.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 0 replies
  • REPORT: North Melbourne

    I suppose that I should apologise for the title of this piece, but the temptation to go with it was far too great. The memory of how North Melbourne tore Melbourne apart at the seams earlier in the season and the way in which it set the scene for the club’s demise so early in the piece has been weighing heavily upon all of us. This game was a must-win from the club’s perspective, and the team’s response was overwhelming. The 36 point win over Alastair Clarkson’s Kangaroos at the MCG on Sunday was indeed — roovenge of the highest order!

      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • CASEY: Werribee

    The Casey Demons remain in contention for a VFL finals berth following a comprehensive 76-point victory over the Werribee Tigers at Whitten Oval last night. The caveat to the performance is that the once mighty Tigers have been raided of many key players and are now a shadow of the premiership-winning team from last season. The team suffered a blow before the game when veteran Tom McDonald was withdrawn for senior duty to cover for Steven May who is ill.  However, after conceding the first goal of the game, Casey was dominant from ten minutes in until the very end and despite some early errors and inaccuracy, they managed to warm to the task of dismantling the Tigers with precision, particularly after half time when the nominally home side provided them with minimal resistance.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Carlton

    The Demons return to the MCG as the the visiting team on Saturday night to take on the Blues who are under siege after 4 straight losses. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 220 replies
  • PODCAST: North Melbourne

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees glorious win over the Kangaroos at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 29 replies
  • POSTGAME: North Melbourne

    The Demons are finally back at the MCG and finally back on the winners list as they continually chipped away at a spirited Kangaroos side eventually breaking their backs and opening the floodgates to run out winners by 6 goals.

      • Haha
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 253 replies