Jump to content

The House That Jimmy Built

Featured Replies

Posted

What I like about the events post-season so far is the rebuild of the football department has proceeded without fanfare.

Piece by piece we have put together a new coach, fitness coach, coaching director comprising highly regarded individuals who have seen success at their former clubs.

There's been no big statements from Schwab, Connolly or Lyon. They've just put the pieces in place.

Considering Bails was inherited from the Harris-Gardner regime, and that what has been done over the past month could not have been achieved without Jimmy's debt reduction and club stabilization program, what we are getting to now is Jimmy's real legacy.

More than compensatory draft picks or short term fixes to the game plans, the football department reform we are now seeing is what will shape the medium term future of this club.

I for one am getting seriously upbeat about the future. This could be one wild ride.

 

Great post, Pitmaster. You have concisely and accurately summed up the broad perspective view of the Dees.

Ever since Joe Gutnik (as annoying as he was, we would have died without him and his $) the MFC have been scrambling to build a business model, club structure, and supporter base. Much of this time and effort has had neither of the two vital ingredients: an over-arching vision that draws people into it, and the right people to achieve it.

Enter one J. Stynes. Vision and leadership at an exceptional level

Enter two. G Lyon. Short term mission with no b/s requiring yes or no answers to join Jimmy's vision.

For the first time since the mid 1990's I am genuinely excited about the life of the whole club.

Great leadership

Expert management

Correct personnel

Marketing/promotional emphasis (ourr players in the TV footy shows, on ads on TV, artivcles in newspapers, our colours and history etc...)

An exciting, if incomplete, player list

A planned coaching panel mixing potential, innovation and experience.

This is Jimmy's legacy to date. Doff your caps, boys, to the lanky Irishman. Charge your glasses ans jump on board. Also, don't be suprised if the best clubman award gets renamed in the near future and it becomes as sought after as the Bluey.

.

  On 29/09/2011 at 21:43, pitmaster said:

What I like about the events post-season so far is the rebuild of the football department has proceeded without fanfare.

Piece by piece we have put together a new coach, fitness coach, coaching director comprising highly regarded individuals who have seen success at their former clubs.

There's been no big statements from Schwab, Connolly or Lyon. They've just put the pieces in place.

Considering Bails was inherited from the Harris-Gardner regime, and that what has been done over the past month could not have been achieved without Jimmy's debt reduction and club stabilization program, what we are getting to now is Jimmy's real legacy.

More than compensatory draft picks or short term fixes to the game plans, the football department reform we are now seeing is what will shape the medium term future of this club.

I for one am getting seriously upbeat about the future. This could be one wild ride.

Absolutely. Jimma.

Jimmy's been a great one thru his life in helping people Unite.

He has been the catalyst for us to push through together whilst treading thru this Mire.

A bit of a hicup this year offield with some maybe panicking around the club. Created some public fuss.

But it's Jimma that bonded us together & got some to pull their ego's into line.

 

I haven't been this excited about a season since the start of this season!

Talk is cheap, it's time to actually deliver now.

The OP is a tad harsh on Bailey? IMO he preached the united message of rebuilding and development as well as anyone and was a key member of the MFC team.

I think preople are to quick to kick bailey to the kerb? Yes we didnt probably deliver during his time at the club, but i doubt anyone would have?


  • Author

Not intending to have a dig at Bails DWA just pointing out the fact he predated the current regime.

  On 30/09/2011 at 00:17, Maldonboy38 said:
Ever since Joe Gutnik (as annoying as he was, we would have died without him and his $)

At the risk of opening old wounds, that's just quite simply not true.

When Gutnick became president Melbourne did not have any debt. After Gutnick, and those he brought into the club, left the board we were over $5m in debt.

Many things occurred during his time with us, but saving the club wasn't one of them.

What is exciting me is that people are "Choosing" Melbourne over other clubs - Mark Neeld, Neil Craig - rather than the other way around as in the past - Chris Judd etc.

Things are looking up. Thanks Jim & Garry.

 
  On 30/09/2011 at 09:40, Jarka said:

At the risk of opening old wounds, that's just quite simply not true.

When Gutnick became president Melbourne did not have any debt. After Gutnick, and those he brought into the club, left the board we were over $5m in debt.

Many things occurred during his time with us, but saving the club wasn't one of them.

Not helpful in rewriting history. He gave $2.7m because we were in debt and needed it. Have a look at the Annual Reports and see what our position was.

  On 30/09/2011 at 09:40, Jarka said:

At the risk of opening old wounds, that's just quite simply not true.

When Gutnick became president Melbourne did not have any debt. After Gutnick, and those he brought into the club, left the board we were over $5m in debt.

Many things occurred during his time with us, but saving the club wasn't one of them.

Absolutely spot on. There have been so many inaccuracies written and spoken about happenings around the Club during Gutnick's tenure.

  • 4 weeks later...

Similar stuff was written this time last year, since then the on field performance has gone backwards, the senior players preformed badly, there were off field behaviour problems, our number one draft pick left the club, the coach was sacked, the players turned on the management, the club was divided, Lyon started sniping from the sidelines, and Jimmy has had to step away from having an active role.

Hopefully we are in for a good season, but get realistic, nothing has changed yet.

  On 27/10/2011 at 23:18, Thomo said:

Similar stuff was written this time last year, since then the on field performance has gone backwards, the senior players preformed badly, there were off field behaviour problems, our number one draft pick left the club, the coach was sacked, the players turned on the management, the club was divided, Lyon started sniping from the sidelines, and Jimmy has had to step away from having an active role.

Hopefully we are in for a good season, but get realistic, nothing has changed yet.

Well said Thomo. Love Jimmy to death, but we are a long way from being a top team. Just watch any of the finals matches from this year - the gap between the top 5 and the next 3 is massive, then the next 3 after that is a little bit behind them, and then we're in the next bit (if that makes sense??!!).

Bailey did the rotten dirty work to get picks. Prendergast seems to have done a good job with the bounty he was given. Jimma has done a great job getting rid of debt.

And now to the "new" FD. They've done nothing yet and to say they have had little fanfare is a strange interpretation of events. They have an exceptional opportunity and have inherited fertile ground.

If this footy department succeed it will be built on the work of Bailey who probably sacrificed (in part) his senior coaching dreams for our club and some good work and good fortune off field.

Thanks Bails.


  On 30/09/2011 at 00:17, Maldonboy38 said:

Great leadership

Debatable. Leadership and MFC aren't a good marriage in 2011. On or off the field.

A year to forget IMO. But one to learn from...

  On 27/10/2011 at 23:38, Fan said:

Bailey did the rotten dirty work to get picks. Prendergast seems to have done a good job with the bounty he was given. Jimma has done a great job getting rid of debt.

And now to the "new" FD. They've done nothing yet and to say they have had little fanfare is a strange interpretation of events. They have an exceptional opportunity and have inherited fertile ground.

If this footy department succeed it will be built on the work of Bailey who probably sacrificed (in part) his senior coaching dreams for our club and some good work and good fortune off field.

Thanks Bails.

Thanks Bails????????????

Losing surely is the easiest thing to do in football. He received in excess of one million dollars to run the club into the ground. He did not pick the team, or the draft picks, he simply turned up and did a poor job, and you believe he deserves thanks??. Is there anyone who could not do that?

Bailey did not sacrifice his coaching dream, he could not coach and was found out when it was time to start winning.

Bailey was sacked because he could not get the players playing for him, he had no idea tactically, was a poor teacher and developer of players, and was a bad communicator. The only thing that tanking did was disguise his incompetence for a couple for years, and get him a contract extension. Bailey should be thanking the club for tanking, as it allowed him to get a second contract worth hundreds of thousands before he was exposed.

Having such a poor coach has damaged the club, not helped it. Players are underdeveloped, the game plan is years behind the rest of the competition, and with a better on field performance this year revenue would have been up. All this with GWS and GC coming in with better draft picks.

But you thank Bailey. One of the strangest opinions here.

  On 28/10/2011 at 00:04, Thomo said:

Thanks Bails????????????

Losing surely is the easiest thing to do in football. He received in excess of one million dollars to run the club into the ground. He did not pick the team, or the draft picks, he simply turned up and did a poor job, and you believe he deserves thanks??. Is there anyone who could not do that?

Bailey did not sacrifice his coaching dream, he could not coach and was found out when it was time to start winning.

Bailey was sacked because he could not get the players playing for him, he had no idea tactically, was a poor teacher and developer of players, and was a bad communicator. The only thing that tanking did was disguise his incompetence for a couple for years, and get him a contract extension. Bailey should be thanking the club for tanking, as it allowed him to get a second contract worth hundreds of thousands before he was exposed.

Having such a poor coach has damaged the club, not helped it. Players are underdeveloped, the game plan is years behind the rest of the competition, and with a better on field performance this year revenue would have been up. All this with GWS and GC coming in with better draft picks.

But you thank Bailey. One of the strangest opinions here.

This is a classless opinion.

Bailey left the club in a better position than he found it, and he served the club well at a very difficult time.

RPFC, calling it classless is weak. say it for how it is.

Thomo, that post is...no, I won't say it....Losing is easy - done it much? Done it deliberately, earning the scorn of thousands, media attention and done so against your own grain (which is to win if you had forgotten)? Losing is easy if you don't care at all.

Bailey deliberately lost games to get picks, the result of which was fielding under-strength, poorly experienced teams week after week. Then he'd be front a media pack interogating his adequacy, week after week. That you describe this as 'easy' is the strangest opinions I've read. Perhaps you've just not had the time to think it through. After all, it only went on for 3.5 years.

  On 28/10/2011 at 00:04, Thomo said:

Thanks Bails????????????

Losing surely is the easiest thing to do in football. He received in excess of one million dollars to run the club into the ground. He did not pick the team, or the draft picks, he simply turned up and did a poor job, and you believe he deserves thanks??. Is there anyone who could not do that?

Bailey did not sacrifice his coaching dream, he could not coach and was found out when it was time to start winning.

Bailey was sacked because he could not get the players playing for him, he had no idea tactically, was a poor teacher and developer of players, and was a bad communicator. The only thing that tanking did was disguise his incompetence for a couple for years, and get him a contract extension. Bailey should be thanking the club for tanking, as it allowed him to get a second contract worth hundreds of thousands before he was exposed.

Having such a poor coach has damaged the club, not helped it. Players are underdeveloped, the game plan is years behind the rest of the competition, and with a better on field performance this year revenue would have been up. All this with GWS and GC coming in with better draft picks.

But you thank Bailey. One of the strangest opinions here.

This is outrageously far off the mark.

To anyone who follows the Demons it was very obvious that Bailey was instructed to ensure that we finished several seasons with a certain number of wins, to ensure we could take full advantage of the draft system. This was done as part of a long term plan for the club, which ultimately targets a Demon premiership.

2011 was a horror season, but it is behind us now, and we are in a strong position from this point forward. Excellent trade week, and excellent recruiting in the coaching department. No debt and a playing list full of talent and potential.


  On 27/10/2011 at 23:38, Fan said:

Bailey did the rotten dirty work to get picks. Prendergast seems to have done a good job with the bounty he was given. Jimma has done a great job getting rid of debt.

And now to the "new" FD. They've done nothing yet and to say they have had little fanfare is a strange interpretation of events. They have an exceptional opportunity and have inherited fertile ground.

If this footy department succeed it will be built on the work of Bailey who probably sacrificed (in part) his senior coaching dreams for our club and some good work and good fortune off field.

Thanks Bails.

Unfortunately Fan I can see no evidence that Bails achieved anything as a legacy that any average afl coach could not have also

In fact I believe he achieved less than expected

I have never understood the arguments of those who were Bailey admirersj

Sorry, just the way I see it

  On 28/10/2011 at 00:04, Thomo said:

Thanks Bails????????????

Losing surely is the easiest thing to do in football. He received in excess of one million dollars to run the club into the ground. He did not pick the team, or the draft picks, he simply turned up and did a poor job, and you believe he deserves thanks??. Is there anyone who could not do that?

Bailey did not sacrifice his coaching dream, he could not coach and was found out when it was time to start winning.

Bailey was sacked because he could not get the players playing for him, he had no idea tactically, was a poor teacher and developer of players, and was a bad communicator. The only thing that tanking did was disguise his incompetence for a couple for years, and get him a contract extension. Bailey should be thanking the club for tanking, as it allowed him to get a second contract worth hundreds of thousands before he was exposed.

Having such a poor coach has damaged the club, not helped it. Players are underdeveloped, the game plan is years behind the rest of the competition, and with a better on field performance this year revenue would have been up. All this with GWS and GC coming in with better draft picks.

But you thank Bailey. One of the strangest opinions here.

Yea i do thank Dean Bailey for putting the club before his own career for at least 08 & 09. We are now in a better place both on & off the field.
  On 28/10/2011 at 00:22, rpfc said:

This is a classless opinion.

Bailey left the club in a better position than he found it, and he served the club well at a very difficult time.

  On 28/10/2011 at 01:21, why you little said:

Yea i do thank Dean Bailey for putting the club before his own career for at least 08 & 09. We are now in a better place both on & off the field.

I know some are glass half full people, but the praise that some are giving Bailey is bizarre. The rewriting of history on here is ridiculous.

The facts are Bailey was sacked because he was a terrible coach. The player skill level, fitness and commitment were not up to AFL standard. He was trying to implement a game plan that was years behind every other club, and was either not smart enough, or too arrogant to realise this when everyone else could plainly see it.

If Bailey had set up the club for success, he would still be the coach. He was sacked because he was doing a very poor job.

 
  On 28/10/2011 at 02:57, Thomo said:

I know some are glass half full people, but the praise that some are giving Bailey is bizarre. The rewriting of history on here is ridiculous.

The facts are Bailey was sacked because he was a terrible coach. The player skill level, fitness and commitment were not up to AFL standard. He was trying to implement a game plan that was years behind every other club, and was either not smart enough, or too arrogant to realise this when everyone else could plainly see it.

If Bailey had set up the club for success, he would still be the coach. He was sacked because he was doing a very poor job.

I have no idea why you have changed the font but if it is to give your opinion a gravitas that it lacks it won't work - you have lumped all that happened to our club on Bailey and it is unfair, unreasonable, and not the truth.

He is gone, and the past cannot be changed. It can be re-written and that is what you are doing.

I have argued this for long enough during the time it was relevant, I don't feel the need to get into it while it is no longer relevant.

Move on.

The season just gone was the only season where we were considered to have underperformed. As others have said, he did everything expected of him throughout 08 and 09, and I believe we met expectations in 2010 as well.

This year Dean wasn't up to the task, but I think he gave it his all and unfortunately he's not the man for the job next year.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: West Coast

    Saturday’s election night game in Perth between the West Coast Eagles and Melbourne represents 18th vs 15th which makes it a tough decision as to which party to favour. The Eagles have yet to break the ice under their new coach in Andrew McQualter who is the second understudy in a row to confront Demon Coach Simon Goodwin who was also winless until a fortnight ago. On that basis, many punters might be considering to go with the donkey vote but I’ve been assigned with the task of helping readers to come to a considered opinion on this matter of vital importance across the nation. It was almost a year ago that I wrote a preview here of the Demons’ away game against the Eagles (under the name William from Waalitj because it was Indigenous Round).  I issued a warning that it was a danger game, based on my local knowledge that the home team were no longer easybeats and that they possessed a wunderkind generational player in Harley Reid who was capable of producing stellar performances playing among men a decade and more older than he.  At the time, the Eagles already had two wins off the back of a couple of the young man’s masterclasses and they had recently given the Bombers a scare straight after their Anzac Day blockbuster draw against the then reigning premiers.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 08

    Round 08 of the 2025 AFL Season kicks off on Thursday with a must-win game for the Bombers to stay in touch with the top eight, while the struggling Roos seek a morale-boosting upset. Friday sees the Saints desperate for a win as well if they are to stay in finals contention and their opponents the Dockers will be eager to crack in to the Top 8 with a win on the road. Saturday kicks off with a pivotal clash for both sides asthe Bulldogs look to solidify their top-eight spot, while Port seeks to shake their pretender tag. Then the Crows will be looking to steady their topsy turvy season against a resurgent Blues looking to make it 4 wins on the trot. On Election Night a Blockbuster will see the ladder-leading Pies take on the Cats, who are keen to bounce back after a narrow loss. On Sunday the Sydney Derby promises fireworks as the Giants aim to cement their top-eight status, while the Swans fight to keep their season alive. The Hawks, celebrating their centenary, will be looking to easily account for the Tigers who are desperate to halt their slide. The Round concludes on Sunday Night with a top end of the table QClash with significant ladder implications; both Queensland teams are in scintillating form. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons?

    • 2 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: West Coast

    The Demons hit the road in Round 8, heading to Perth to face the West Coast Eagles at Optus Stadium. With momentum building, the Dees will be aiming for a third straight victory to keep their season revival on course. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 300 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Richmond

    The fans who turned up to the MCG for Melbourne’s Anzac Day Eve clash against Richmond would have been disappointed if they turned up to see a great spectacle. As much as this was a night for the 71,635 in attendance to commemorate heroes of the nation’s past wars, it was also a time for the Melbourne Football Club to consolidate upon its first win after a horrific start to the 2025 season. On this basis, despite the fact that it was an uninspiring and dour struggle for most of its 100 minutes, the night will be one for the fans to remember. They certainly got value out of the pre match activity honouring those who fought for their country. The MCG and the lights of the city as backdrop was made for nights such as these and, in my view, we received a more inspirational ceremony of Anzac culture than others both here and elsewhere around the country. 

      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Richmond

    The match up of teams competing in our great Aussie game at its second highest level is a rarity for a work day Thursday morning but the blustery conditions that met the players at a windswept Casey Fields was something far more commonplace.They turned the opening stanza between the Casey Demons and a somewhat depleted Richmond VFL into a mess of fumbling unforced errors, spilt marks and wasted opportunities for both sides but they did set up a significant win for the home team which is exactly what transpired on this Anzac Day round opener. Casey opened up strong against the breeze with the first goal to Aidan Johnson, the Tigers quickly responded and the game degenerated into a defensive slog and the teams were level when the first siren sounded.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Richmond

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 28th April @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse the Demons 2nd win for the year against the Tigers.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/
    Call: 03 9016 3666
    Skype: Demonland31

      • Thanks
    • 29 replies
    Demonland