Jump to content

Front and Back

Featured Replies

Whilst there are still 2 coaching positions left to fill, Neeld has indicated that he is after well-experienced people to be on his coaching panel. Given that we are quite inexperienced, even if Craig accepts another job elsewhere, i feel that a senior assistant will be brought in to help in these matters.

 

What about Bradshaw from Sydney/Brisbane? I know he is a good footy player and has had a lot of success...doe he want to coach? I could see him being a forwards coach...

 

What about Bradshaw from Sydney/Brisbane? I know he is a good footy player and has had a lot of success...doe he want to coach? I could see him being a forwards coach...

doesn't want to live in Melbourne still I believe

My 2c worth, Id have Dermot, I know everyone hates him but he has mentioned on radio he would like to help the demon forwards.

Would he have the time or would he be a part time assistant.


Tom Harley is GM of AFL NSW/ACT - as if he's going to take an Asst Coach job! Same with Dermott - he's off around the world with Getaway half the time.

I like the Leigh Brown suggestion, Neeld wouldn't have to explain what he's talking about.

In an ideal world I would be over the moon if our coaching setup looked like...

Forwards: I think we should go hard after Sumich. Well regarded, would help him by getting involved at another club, rather than living in the West Coast bubble. Would love him as the forward line coach.

Defenders: David King. Highly impressive on Fox Sports, perfect man to coach the backline, wouldn't be hard to get and would be cheap too.

I'd also go for Dean Laidley as Director of Coaching/Opposition Analysis. Achieved a lot with little resources at North, and is known for his strength tactically.

In an ideal world I would be over the moon if our coaching setup looked like...

Forwards: I think we should go hard after Sumich. Well regarded, would help him by getting involved at another club, rather than living in the West Coast bubble. Would love him as the forward line coach.

Defenders: David King. Highly impressive on Fox Sports, perfect man to coach the backline, wouldn't be hard to get and would be cheap too.

I'd also go for Dean Laidley as Director of Coaching/Opposition Analysis. Achieved a lot with little resources at North, and is known for his strength tactically.

Not overly keen on the idea of King. Was part of Wallet's reign of terror at TigerLand.

 

Might be just me but there seems to be a change in the air as to how anyone ( within the footy world) regards us now. Suddenly the MFC isnt that supposed lepper colony. People WANT to be at Melbourne.

Good !!

The "leper colony" look & feel was a mirage created by the many nervous nellies and chicken littles on internet forums.

  • Author

The "leper colony" look & feel was a mirage created by the many nervous nellies and chicken littles on internet forums.

Im not so sure that it wasso imaginary Ted. . We struggled for years to get anyone to look at us long enough let alone bang our door down wanting to be part of us.

It wasnt that long ago we almsot didnt have a sponsor.!! Ah yes.. all a '"creation" :unsure:


My suggestions:

Forwards coach - Leigh Brown

Backline coach - Max Hudghton

Of the coaches we could go after it will also be about what we can afford, along with if we go for a senior assistant for Neeld.

B/L - Hudghton or Harley

F/L - Sumich

S/A - Craig or Laidley

Of that lot, i'd go hell for leather at trying to bring in Harley and Sumich. The latter would cost a few bob, so go after Laidley over Craig (less $)

Harley would be an incredible get imo,....great football brain, but if hes GM of Afl. Nsw, Act then wouldn't like our chances unless hes got strong coaching ambitions.

It wasnt that long ago we almsot didnt have a sponsor.!!

That's what I mean. "Almost"? Yet we did have a sponsor.

We're an AFL club that many people around Oz would saw off an arm to be part of. Granted we're not up there in prestige with the Pies, the Eagles, Crows, etc. But we're not that far off them either.

Not overly keen on the idea of King. Was part of Wallet's reign of terror at TigerLand.

True, doesn't mean the guy can't coach... With leatherface bringing in the likes of Kent Kingsley, and Greg Miller picking the likes of Tambling over Buddy, what hope did he have? I don't think even Norm Smith as an assistant at that club would've been able to do much.

His insights in the media this year have been fantastic, head and shoulders above anyone else I've heard exit coaching and enter the media... He's tasted success from his playing days at North, If he's in a coaching department that's well run and heading in the right direction, I think he'd be a fantastic asset to the club.


The idea of Brereton or Carey being on our coaching panel are outrageous. These guys have been out of the game forever and to date have shown zero inclination to coach, so why would either of them suddenly decide they want to turn their careers and their lives on their head to be an assistant coach? Come on, let's try and be at least a little bit reasonable.

  • Author

I couldnt see the Kid coming in any full time capacity but as a specialist forward consultant , I dont see why not. I wouldnt be so quick to suggest he knows nothing relevant about the game of today.

Prowling the forward line and being effective really hasnt changed much in recent decades. A lot of the rest of the game might have . Goals are Goals :huh:

  • Author

The idea of Brereton or Carey being on our coaching panel are outrageous. These guys have been out of the game forever ...................

Sorry Nasher ...must have misread that bit ...thgen again.. I dont think so

Sorry Nasher ...must have misread that bit ...thgen again.. I dont think so

There's your problem, you only read half the sentence. This is proven by the fact that you've "dot-dot-dotted" the bit that changes the context of the sentence completely. Forgiveable initially given that I worded it poorly, but then a bit silly when I reworded it to make it obvious and you still didn't get it. See above post, in which I've said the same point I was trying to make in the first place, with the words placed in a different order.


Mark Williams has also departed his role as 'Ball Movement Coach' (whatever that means). I suppose the title describes the role in broad terms, but I was never sure how the interaction worked in practice with the three line coaches. Does anyone have a clearer picture of this? Do other clubs have assistants dedicated to these responsibilities? Is it a role we should look to retain in the Neeld regime?

Obviously our new coach will make a call on this, but I'd be interested in the views of fellow Demonlanders.

Sumich is another Damien Drum under no circumstances should we let him anywhere near our club

Forwards- John Barker or Leigh Brown

Defenders - Max Hudgton, Adam Simpson or Brady Rawlings

  • Author

Heres the thing Nasher.. just for the record here as youre attempting a backout.. You used a cojunction..the word AND that means you were using two points.. both of which canbe read in isolation.

Youre right you possibly phrased your original point poorly.

 
Heres the thing Nasher.. just for the record here as youre attempting a backout.. You used a cojunction..the word AND that means you were using two points.. both of which canbe read in isolation. Youre right you possibly phrased your original point poorly.

You are one very frustrating individual to communicate with.

Nasher attempts to make a point.

Belzebub misinterprets.

Nasher reads own point again - sees how the words he wrote don't actually say what he meant, follows up with a reword so point is written as intended. Mea culpa.

Belzebub replies, pointing out the first mistake for a second time.

Nasher frustratingly acknowledges mistake for a second time

Belzebub replies, pointing out the first mistake for a third time, accuses Nasher of backpedaling.

Nasher bashes head against the desk, very hard.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 41 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 283 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 47 replies