Jump to content

Featured Replies

What exactly is a stuttering dick? Doubt it is happy, dancing or hopping...

it was probably a grammar mistake (spl) or toned down a tad :o

 

it was probably a grammar mistake (spl) or toned down a tad :o

Shouldn't it be spelt d-d-d-d-dick? :blink::)

Can someone explain the article in today's Age that rated the liveability of all Melbourne's suburbs? If you can please explain to me how Borewood comes in at 80 out of 321 and ahead of Fitzroy at 82? Good heavens I mean the two suburbs are like chalk and cheese. And then the suburb of my birth Box Hill South comes in at 83! So with all I have achieved in my life I have moved one rung up the liveability scale or 0.003% improvement in 30 years! Don't say a word of this to DC.

 

Can someone explain the article in today's Age that rated the liveability of all Melbourne's suburbs? If you can please explain to me how Borewood comes in at 80 out of 321 and ahead of Fitzroy at 82? Good heavens I mean the two suburbs are like chalk and cheese. And then the suburb of my birth Box Hill South comes in at 83! So with all I have achieved in my life I have moved one rung up the liveability scale or 0.003% improvement in 30 years! Don't say a word of this to DC.

it's your punishment for reading the rage, earl

p.s. quite a lot of very desirable suburbs ranked poorly. must be a socialist plot

it's your punishment for reading the rage, earl

p.s. quite a lot of very desirable suburbs ranked poorly. must be a socialist plot

Yes, clearly the first thing up against the wall when the revolution comes is a few uppity suburbs whose reputation has long exceeded their true worth. Throw in a few footy clubs in some of those suburbs (Collingwood, Carlton, Essendon) and now you are talking ... :):lol:


Borewood cannot be ranked above Old Fitzroy unless there are bonus points for sterility and lifelessness.

I wonder how Tittybong ranks with Stuttering Dicks Creek

Or if Shiitterton in the UK is Better then the town of Hole?

Can someone explain the article in today's Age that rated the liveability of all Melbourne's suburbs? If you can please explain to me how Borewood comes in at 80 out of 321 and ahead of Fitzroy at 82? Good heavens I mean the two suburbs are like chalk and cheese. And then the suburb of my birth Box Hill South comes in at 83! So with all I have achieved in my life I have moved one rung up the liveability scale or 0.003% improvement in 30 years! Don't say a word of this to DC.

A ridiculous article that lacks any credibility whatsoever. I glanced at it expecting to see Romsey firmly entrenched at number1 but to my and the lads chagrin, Romsey was not mentioned. The lads were so outraged they damaged their computer and have cancelled their subscription to that vile newspaper.

 

i drove through fitzroy yesterday on the way to north carlton

i wish i hadn't

You should have continued dc, and meandered in a roughly NW direction, until you reached sunny shores of Romsey. The inadequacies of Borewood would have been immediately apparent.


i drove through fitzroy yesterday on the way to north carlton

i wish i hadn't

Straying from bohemian pretension into Academic authoritarianism.

You must be preparing to vote Green.

or visiting an old tennis partner perhaps.

Straying from bohemian pretension into Academic authoritarianism.

You must be preparing to vote Green.

or visiting an old tennis partner perhaps.

i was visiting a friend who is pulling up stumps and going to live in a farmhouse in sw frogland

he offered me carte blanche on his extensive library

i was visiting a friend who is pulling up stumps and going to live in a farmhouse in sw frogland

he offered me carte blanche on his extensive library

The South of France was not rated anywhere near North Carlton but I imagine it has some other benefits.

I trust his pension will be spent on wine,great food and immoral women.

and the rest squandered.


Straying from bohemian pretension into Academic authoritarianism.

You must be preparing to vote Green.

or visiting an old tennis partner perhaps.

Dc votes grey or mauve biff. You know that.

Dc votes grey or mauve biff. You know that.

actually, old chap, shades of grey (with a little bit of beige)

Can someone explain the article in today's Age that rated the liveability of all Melbourne's suburbs? If you can please explain to me how Borewood comes in at 80 out of 321 and ahead of Fitzroy at 82? Good heavens I mean the two suburbs are like chalk and cheese. And then the suburb of my birth Box Hill South comes in at 83! So with all I have achieved in my life I have moved one rung up the liveability scale or 0.003% improvement in 30 years! Don't say a word of this to DC.

actually earl, more like spray-paint and cheese

Aren't we straying somewhat away from topic?

WJ, this is about the only thread on Demonland that can't be derailed ...


actually, old chap, shades of grey (with a little bit of beige)

50 presumably ...

WJ, this is about the only thread on Demonland that can't be derailed ...

That is such a sensible comment it doesn't even need to be accompanied by a phalanx of emojis.

 

That is such a sensible comment it doesn't even need to be accompanied by a phalanx of emojis.

That can fixed (and DC did it for me!)


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Adelaide

    The atmosphere at the Melbourne Football Club at the beginning of the season was aspirational following an injury-plagued year in 2024. Coach Simon Goodwin had lofty expectations with the return of key players, the anticipated improvement from a maturing group with a few years of experience under their belts, and some exceptional young talent also joining the ranks. All of that went by the wayside as the team failed to click into action early on. It rallied briefly with a new strategy but has fallen again with five more  consecutive defeats. 

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
  • CASEY: Coburg

    The Casey Demons returned to their home ground which was once a graveyard for opposing teams but they managed to gift the four points on offer to Coburg with yet another of their trademark displays of inaccuracy in front of goals and some undisciplined football that earned the displeasure of the umpires late in the game. The home team was welcomed by a small crowd at Casey Fields and looked right at home as it dominated the first three quarters and led for all bar the last five minutes of the game. In the end, they came away with nothing, despite winning everywhere but on the scoreboard and the free kick count.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 18 vs North Melbourne

    After four weeks on the road the Demons make their long awaited return to the MCG next Sunday to play in a classic late season dead rubber against the North Melbourne Kangaroos. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Thanks
    • 95 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    The Demons were wasteful early before putting the foot down early in the 2nd quarter but they chased tail for the remainder of the match. They could not get their first use of the footy after half time and when they did poor skills, execution and decision making let them down.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 241 replies
  • PODCAST: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 7th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Crows.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 23 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Kysaiah Pickett and Clayton Oliver. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 27 replies