Charlie Gardiner.. any interest?

[Eastie Boyz 0]

tbh I don't get the point you're trying to make either

[mo64 5,881]

tbh I don't get the point you're trying to make either

I agree, I can't see Rhino's point, plus it's factually incorrect. Davey and Martin nominated for the national draft but were overlooked. And I would have thought that Davey has cemented an AFL career.

[Rhino Richards 1,467]

I agree, I can't see Rhino's point, plus it's factually incorrect. Davey and Martin nominated for the national draft but were overlooked. And I would have thought that Davey has cemented an AFL career.

Missed the point and nitpick. Par for the course isnt Mo?

[pantaloons 2,019]

This is pure gold. I can't believe I'm contributing post #54 on Charlie freakin' Gardiner.

I haven't read them all, but I will suggest that whether Gardiner is better than 3 or 4 or 8 current Melbourne players is not of concern to me. What is of concern is making sure Melbourne either used the first pick in the preseason draft on a player who may legitimately aid us in our premiership quest, or pass and have filled our list via the national draft. Using the pick on a guy who has been rejected by 2 clubs, is clearly not up to it and wouldn't be part of our best 22 is a complete waste of everybody's time and would be another list management calamity. Gardiner being better than players like Bartram isn't a reason put them both on the list, it's a blatant hint that neither of them should be on there.

[Freak 100]

looks like no-one knows what you're on about rhino

[QueenC 74]

This is pure gold. I can't believe I'm contributing post #54 on Charlie freakin' Gardiner.

It stopped being about Gardiner awhile ago and has been turned into another excuse for Freak and co. to malign one of our own.

I'm still asuming that it is a "no" on Gardiner though?

[H_T 3,049]

This is pure gold. I can't believe I'm contributing post #54 on Charlie freakin' Gardiner.

That in itself is pure gold pantaloons. Who would of thought?

I haven't read them all, but I will suggest that whether Gardiner is better than 3 or 4 or 8 current Melbourne players is not of concern to me. What is of concern is making sure Melbourne either used the first pick in the preseason draft on a player who may legitimately aid us in our premiership quest, or pass and have filled our list via the national draft. Using the pick on a guy who has been rejected by 2 clubs, is clearly not up to it and wouldn't be part of our best 22 is a complete waste of everybody's time and would be another list management calamity.

Gardiner being better than players like Bartram isn't a reason put them both on the list, it's a blatant hint that neither of them should be on there.

Quite right Pantaloons, and as you say Gardiner would clearly not legitimately aid us in our premiership quest after being rejected by not 1 club, but two clubs.

Why some 'people' are even contemplating Gardiner is bizarre, given their thoughts prior to trade week, demanding more picks and upgrading of picks. I would've thought they would rather fill our list via the national draft than have Charlie "freakin" Gardiner!

Are you in cheer squad HT??

What the Charlie Gardiner cheer squad?...No Goose. You should know that because it seems there is only two members...and you're one of them.

the freak is all over you and you can just tell by your tone HT that your only a little boy!!

........

I hope for your sake, you can interpret this quote of yours....because I can't decipher this for the life of me!