9 hours ago, whatwhat say what said:

i might have heard it wrong, but mitch cleary was sayng we might accept a pick in the 70s for clayton

that's insane, particularly if we are paying any of his salary for the next half decade

Getting rid of a bad influence on the kids coming through is a great way to get the club back on track, the pick we get back and how much we pay is irrelevant.

2 hours ago, The Jackson FIX said:

Maybe he thinks Sydney is in America. Academia not his strength.

Sydney is more expensive than America and that’s after the currency conversion.

Edited 6 hours ago6 hr by Bombay Airconditioning

1 hour ago, Lucifers Hero said:

We didn't push him out. The meeting was arranged the day before to be in his manager's office. Clarry's role was the agenda. The Manger would have given Clarry a heads up on what could happen with a new coach/CEO etc.

He was happy to stay on his terms, in his chosen role because he wasn't held accountable at mfc and most of those that had protected him (Green, Gawn, Richardson) are still at the club to somewhat cushion the impact of a new coach.

He has had 2 years to repay the faith,

His off field behaviour was well know to the club when he signed his mega contract in mid 2022.

Sadly, 'leopards don't change their spots' applies.

"His off field behaviour" - put yourself in Oliver's shoes: when is he EVER going to be allowed to get past that? Listen to anyone who actually knows Oliver and they'll say he turned a huge corner in 2025 with his training, he was highly motivated, and he was absolutely committed to the club. He gets the redundancy chat now and told that he's no longer really valued, that the club is far less committed to him than he is to them, and told he's free to explore his options. So he is. Yet EVERYTHING in the media (and this board, it seems) is focused on his "off field behaviour" from years ago. It's not hard to see why he'd feel that no matter what he does, he'll be punished for it. It's absolutely fine if you hold all players to the same exacting, unforgiving standards, but it's pretty clear most people don't.

9 hours ago, whatwhat say what said:

i might have heard it wrong, but mitch cleary was sayng we might accept a pick in the 70s for clayton

that's insane, particularly if we are paying any of his salary for the next half decade

Incredible. In how many industries could whomever tabled Clarrie's last contract keep their job. We might as well have taken $3.5-mil in cash and burned it in the centre square of Casey at the last family day.

Geez I can't believe he has seven years left on his contract.

He was a fantastic player but you don't give anyone that sort of time.

4 minutes ago, Adina88 said:

"His off field behaviour" - put yourself in Oliver's shoes: when is he EVER going to be allowed to get past that? Listen to anyone who actually knows Oliver and they'll say he turned a huge corner in 2025 with his training, he was highly motivated, and he was absolutely committed to the club. He gets the redundancy chat now and told that he's no longer really valued, that the club is far less committed to him than he is to them, and told he's free to explore his options. So he is. Yet EVERYTHING in the media (and this board, it seems) is focused on his "off field behaviour" from years ago. It's not hard to see why he'd feel that no matter what he does, he'll be punished for it. It's absolutely fine if you hold all players to the same exacting, unforgiving standards, but it's pretty clear most people don't.

The media talks about non bullying but love to put the boot into anyone.

It's certainly Oliver's fault. His behaviour was tolerated when he was in the top 5 players in the game. Now, not so much.

But how can anyone come to the conclusion that the club isn't pushing him out ? It's patently obvious that that's exactly what is happening.

Edited 6 hours ago6 hr by Gator

The club owes him no favours.

They have been very patient with him.

I don't like the criticism of him though.

The media is full of nuffies.

Let's just hope the club stands firm and does the best for itself and Clayton moves on and is happy elsewhere.

And the moron who was handing out contracts like life sentences is kicked up the ......

Oliver - Aleer - Steele is an easy trade scenario if we want Steele.

14 minutes ago, Adina88 said:

"His off field behaviour" - put yourself in Oliver's shoes: when is he EVER going to be allowed to get past that? Listen to anyone who actually knows Oliver and they'll say he turned a huge corner in 2025 with his training, he was highly motivated, and he was absolutely committed to the club. He gets the redundancy chat now and told that he's no longer really valued, that the club is far less committed to him than he is to them, and told he's free to explore his options. So he is. Yet EVERYTHING in the media (and this board, it seems) is focused on his "off field behaviour" from years ago. It's not hard to see why he'd feel that no matter what he does, he'll be punished for it. It's absolutely fine if you hold all players to the same exacting, unforgiving standards, but it's pretty clear most people don't.

What if he hasn’t changed his behaviour? That’s not a rhetorical question

10 minutes ago, Previously known as LITD. said:

Geez I can't believe he has seven years left on his contract.

He was a fantastic player but you don't give anyone that sort of time.

5 years left

1 minute ago, old55 said:

Oliver - Aleer - Steele is an easy trade scenario if we want Steele.

Perfect. all for this.

We get an experienced mid with high character to replace an experienced mid with personal challenges.

28 minutes ago, old55 said:

Oliver - Aleer - Steele is an easy trade scenario if we want Steele.

Interestingly saw Steele compared to Dunkley stats.

Very similar across the board. Reckon he will have a real fire lit under him.

Annoyed St Kilda captain, good reputation, team player.

He would be a good culture replacement guy for Clarrie.

We need leaders.

Have we shown interest in Steele?

44 minutes ago, old55 said:

Oliver - Aleer - Steele is an easy trade scenario if we want Steele.

Might be a best outcome from a bad bets bazaar.

37 minutes ago, old55 said:

Oliver - Aleer - Steele is an easy trade scenario if we want Steele.

It would be with Heath thrown in and us walking away from most of the contract.

Pies now chasing Clarry which helps us deal with Giants. I would give a bit more and try for Gruzewski, who is not getting a regular game with Hogan, Cadman, Riccardi and Brown, keeping him out and he is a Victorian.

Giants bringing in a few players and Max might be trade able.

9 minutes ago, Fat Tony said:

Have we shown interest in Steele?

I will ring Tom Morris and find out.

42 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Andy... is the inference that the Giant's needs just went up ?? Might heat up things between them and Pies ??

1 hour ago, BDA said:

no he didn't.

he's been nothing but a big headache for the club for the last 2 and half year's. Why do you think we want to move on from him.

we should have included behavioural clauses in his contract. big learning there for the club.

Behavioral clauses, being subjective in nature, would not only be very hard to quantify in the agreement but even harder to legally test should it come to that

It would be an overstep on behalf of the club IMO

Sandra Sully with the late news.

21 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

Andy... is the inference that the Giant's needs just went up ?? Might heat up things between them and Pies ??

Yes. I forgot to put a comment with the post.

33 minutes ago, Fat Tony said:

Have we shown interest in Steele?

I have thoroughly searched social media and have not seen our name linked with Steele at all.

16 hours ago, Demongirl35 said:

Instagram update.

Clarry has unfollowed Melbourne.

Will provide insta updates when I see them.

ahead of Tom Morris

Just now, Demonland said:

I have thoroughly searched social media and have not seen our name linked with Steele at all.

I think this is one i posted about and i would love to see happen, i think it makes a lot of sense, we're losing Trac and Clarry from the midfield, and if the Saints are pushing him out and might even contribute financially it feels like a really good fit.