21 minutes ago, monoccular said:

Nothing mystifying about Magpies Gleeson and Christian screwing us.

Agree. Gleeson is a biased 35 year Magpies member.

54 minutes ago, jaydenh10 said:

not one agrees with this but this isn’t a good look….

it isnt but its good to get some bloody honesty from our players.

1 hour ago, Jaded No More said:

At least Adrian Anderson’s record remains intact

I had given up when I saw he was doing the defense. I follow quite closely his musings and just don’t think he has the skill set for these tribunals.

50 minutes ago, jaydenh10 said:

not one agrees with this but this isn’t a good look….

Absolutely

Go Riv

It’s madness

He was going for the ball

His eyes are on the ball

He has 0.0005 second reaction time when the ball pops up

Edited 14 hours ago14 hr by GS_1905

For health and legal reasons the AFL may now have no option but to introduce a no defence rule.

Start off with 3 weeks and work up from there.

Unfair, now yes but after a while risky bumps will become less common.

An accident is three weeks

but

Moore deliberately dropping your knees into someone is not even reviewed???

And

Knocking out a player with a swinging arm is also just 3 weeks

Madness

Explain that to me

@AFL is losing the fans

1 hour ago, Lord Travis said:

I feel sorry for May. He could've actually tried to clean Evans up and it's wouldn't be far far worse. Instead he did the right thing and elected not to bump at all and still copped a three week suspension.

Poor bastard.

Hopefully he snaps Moores spine with a rogue knee at some point.

Whatever ever the outcome none of us are happy but that’s actually a really disgraceful comment in the last sentence.

Wishing injury on a player is bad enough but any adult knows the implications of a snapped spine.

FFS, we’re better than that.

Appeal and if that fails just play him anyway if we lose the 4 points for an unregistered player or don't think would give a flying [censored]

"we find that he had sufficient time to position his body so that he was no longer attempting to gather the ball."

This is what these idi-ts said.

Edited 14 hours ago14 hr by Redleg

1 hour ago, jaydenh10 said:

not one agrees with this but this isn’t a good look….

Onya Riv 👏

5 minutes ago, Pennant St Dee said:

Whatever ever the outcome none of us are happy but that’s actually a really disgraceful comment in the last sentence.

Wishing injury on a player is bad enough but any adult knows the implications of a snapped spine.

FFS, we’re better than that.

Folks need to vent, PSDee.

And then take it to the court system for restraint of trade. Unlawfully preventing our player from his rightful position at work due to corporate bullying.

6 minutes ago, Ghostwriter said:

Folks need to vent, PSDee.

We can vent without stooping that low.

There’s no excuse for that

1 hour ago, jaydenh10 said:

not one agrees with this but this isn’t a good look….

I personally love the message from Rivers. What I dislike is Channel 7 labelling it a ‘hit’. The AFL went as far as to say it wasn’t a hit or bump.

1 hour ago, JTR said:

Saw this question in Zitas twitter thread, which I found interesting.

How can the charge be "upheld" when the case was sent directly to the Tribunal and not graded by the MRO?

If this was in the ruling then I think it's the grounds for appeal...

Edited 14 hours ago14 hr by rjay

I want a few players to pull up and not go for the ball in coming matches.

Then I would love to see the reaction of the footy world.

Justin McInerny is sanctioned for nudging an opponent into the fence.

Brayden Maynard forcefully shoves an opponent into the dugout - not mentioned.

"Knees" Moore slides, knees out, into an opponent on the ground - not mentioned.

Even if there is no conflict of interest, there needs to be seen to be no conflict of interest.

This decision just adds to my disillusion with the AFL. I'll never stop loving The Dees and I'll still go to our games but I'm pretty much done with the AFL as a whole.

Local footy is so much better on so many levels.

15 minutes ago, Ghostwriter said:

Onya Riv 👏

Not sure about that. Riv will probably now get a "please explain" or worse......commenting on a Tribunal decision.

Just now, Harvey Wallbanger said:

Not sure about that. Riv will probably now get a "please explain" or worse......commenting on a Tribunal decision.

And the fact that Riv probably knows the consequences makes me admire his public support for his teammate even more.

This decision just adds to my disillusion with the AFL. I'll never stop loving The Dees and I'll still go to our games but I'm pretty much done with the AFL as a whole.

Local footy is so much better on so many levels

Players these days don't have the same sense of self protection as10,20 30+years ago. The rules have taken out the bump which often was about protecting yourself as much hurting your opponent. This collision 10 years ago doesn't happen - both players most likely turn a little sideways to brace for contact instead of May running straight on and Evans leading with his face. Neither player gets hurt.

I have taught my 12 year old son to protect himself in the contest. Its really the only way to stop yourself from being injured like Evans was.

AFL rules, MRO, the tribunal system are to blame for his injuries and head office needs to be held accountable. Being officiating in the manner they have for the past 5-10 years they have completely changed the way it gets played so people lead with their head into contests. I can't stand seeing this. Players need to be able to protect themselves first and foremost

Edited 14 hours ago14 hr by Sideshow Bob
.

1 minute ago, Ghostwriter said:

And the fact that Riv probably knows the consequences makes me admire his public support for his teammate even more.

I want our players to be smarter than that. Anyway, let's hope nothing comes of it.....

Edited 14 hours ago14 hr by Harvey Wallbanger
typo