Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Gawn - busted his guts

Viney - had no impact

Rivers - played with heart

Sparrow - tagging failed miserably 

Bowey - has lost momentum 

Langdon - gave limited drive

Fritsch - some impressive moments 

Van Rooyen - was rarely involved

Neal Bullen - season worst game

Tholstrup - out of depth

Chandler - small man syndrome 

McDonald- frustrated and frustrating 

Pickett - has tuned out

Oliver - was embarrassingly incompetent 

Lever - showed no leadership 

Howes - not a backman 

Woewodin - little to commend

Turner- little to admire

Melksham - age has wearied

McVee - rarely found space

Petty - was uninvolved again

May - hopefully back soon

Moniz - Wakefield - regularly amateurish disposal 

 

Edited by joeboy

 

Do you actually think the umpires made an iota difference to the result? 

12 minutes ago, Oxdee said:

Do you actually think the umpires made an iota difference to the result? 

Yep.

I appreciate and look forward to Joeboy’s analysis each week but the “woe against me” towards the umpiring that has permeated Demonland this year has been unbearable to be honest.

 

May – under constant pressure

Lever – all at sea

Bowey – struggled all night

McVee – composed but besieged

McDonald – still worth spot

Howes – not AFL standard

Woewodin – not AFL standard

Viney – years taking toll

Langdon – tried heart out

Moniz-Wakefield – not AFL standard

Rivers – showed fighting spirit

Neale-Bullen – energetic but limited

Sparrow – solid but slow

Kolstrup – judge next season

Chandler – better option needed

Pickett – too little effort

Van Rooyen – had few opportunities

Petty – wasted in forwards

Fritsch – accurate but lazy

Melksham – last hurrah time

Gawn – couldn’t stem tide

Oliver – off the boil

Turner (sub) – couldn’t help much

T Mac

Crucified by umps.

Busted a gut.

Showed great restraint. 
 

Deserves another year.

 


joeboy - lost his tether

Bowey    - improved second half 

Trent Rivers  - beacon in the gloom

Tom Sparrow - 

Max Gawn    - captain’s knock (again)

Ed Langdon-  season standard game

Fritsch  - some spirited cameos 

AFL/media      - poisoned golden chalice

Umpires.   - can’t do Jack

Bevo -  australian rules throwball

The rest - prayer helps apparently 

 

 

 

Edited by Tarax Club

1 hour ago, joeboy said:

Gawn - busted his guts

Viney - had no impact

Rivers - played with heart

Sparrow - tagging failed miserably 

Bowey - has lost momentum 

Langdon - gave limited drive

Fritsch - some impressive moments 

Van Rooyen - was rarely involved

Neal Bullen - season worst game

Tholstrup - out of depth

Chandler - small man syndrome 

McDonald- frustrated and frustrating 

Pickett - has tuned out

Oliver - was embarrassingly incompetent 

Lever - showed no leadership 

Howes - not a backman 

Woewodin - little to commend

Turner- little to admire

Melksham - age has wearied

McVee - rarely found space

Petty - was uninvolved again

May - hopefully back soon

Moniz - Wakefield - regularly amateurish disposal 

 

Knee jerk reactionJoe, seems to lose the plot when we lose badly.Just 3 players passed his high standards.

 

 
17 minutes ago, Bobby McKenzie said:

Knee jerk reactionJoe, seems to lose the plot when we lose badly.Just 3 players passed his high standards.

 

His high standards. A poor team performance, started and finished at the contest again.

59 minutes ago, Satyriconhome said:

His high standards. A poor team performance, started and finished at the contest again.

Fair enough but I will stick to my opinion. That's what it's all about isn't i? I fully respect yours. Cheers.

 


  • Author
7 hours ago, Bobby McKenzie said:

Knee jerk reactionJoe, seems to lose the plot when we lose badly.Just 3 players passed his high standards.

 

Ok so you’re at it again taking pot shots at me.

Let’s see your 3 word responses and show how many positives YOU can come up with.

On reflection, and upon watching a replay the only ‘knee jerk reaction’ ( your words ) I regret were for Langdon who was ‘actually steady throughout’

10 hours ago, joeboy said:

Gawn - busted his guts

Viney - had no impact

Rivers - played with heart

Sparrow - tagging failed miserably 

Bowey - has lost momentum 

Langdon - gave limited drive

Fritsch - some impressive moments 

Van Rooyen - was rarely involved

Neal Bullen - season worst game

Tholstrup - out of depth

Chandler - small man syndrome 

McDonald- frustrated and frustrating 

Pickett - has tuned out

Oliver - was embarrassingly incompetent 

Lever - showed no leadership 

Howes - not a backman 

Woewodin - little to commend

Turner- little to admire

Melksham - age has wearied

McVee - rarely found space

Petty - was uninvolved again

May - hopefully back soon

Moniz - Wakefield - regularly amateurish disposal 

 

Fairly accurate assessment.

I would say that Bowey played one of his better games for the year.

Langdon was a bright light as well.

Viney didn't look very enthusiastic and your right Kozzie look like he had checked out just like his two games prior. Not good at all.

Anb struggled as did a few others.

Chandler is way overated.

Petty as a fwd averages one goal in just over three games.

In what other team would he stay in that role week after week with that low scoring?

 

 

 

 

Dogs are flying

Many playing injured 

Viney, Oliver slow

Torched in clearance 

Several not ready 

Sparrow not humbled 

TMac rightfully furious 

Didn't stop trying

Prepare for 25

5 hours ago, joeboy said:

Ok so you’re at it again taking pot shots at me.

Let’s see your 3 word responses and show how many positives YOU can come up with.

On reflection, and upon watching a replay the only ‘knee jerk reaction’ ( your words ) I regret were for Langdon who was ‘actually steady throughout’

Maybe you should watch the replay before your comments then.Often presents quite a different picture from the actual game live. Things the camera don't  miss. QED


7 minutes ago, Bobby McKenzie said:

Maybe you should watch the replay before your comments then.Often presents quite a different picture from the actual game live. Things the camera don't  miss. QED

Um his 3 word comments are visceral and instinctive.

Watching the replay may sometimes give a more accurate response but as most of accept this is not the point of the thread.

In any event Joeboy does quite a good job.

It's not an easy thread to complete.

edited with scores 

Gawn - busted his guts 9/10 

Viney - had no impact 4/10

Rivers - played with heart 8/10

Sparrow - was trying alot 4/10 

Bowey - has lost momentum 2/10

Langdon - tried all night  8/10

Fritsch - some limited moments 4/10 

Van Rooyen - was rarely involved 2/10

Neal Bullen - season worst game 3/10

Tholstrup - out of depth 4/10

Chandler - small man syndrome 2/10

McDonald- frustrated and frustrating 3/10

Pickett - has tuned out 3/10

Oliver - was embarrassingly incompetent 4/10

Lever - showed no leadership 2/10

Howes - not a backman 3/10

Woewodin - little to commend 2/10

Turner- little to admire 3/5

Melksham - age has wearied 2/10

McVee - rarely found space 6/10

Petty - was uninvolved again 3/10

May - hopefully back soon 4/5

Moniz - Wakefield - regularly amateurish disposal 3/10

  • Author
28 minutes ago, Bobby McKenzie said:

Maybe you should watch the replay before your comments then.Often presents quite a different picture from the actual game live. Things the camera don't  miss. QED

You still haven’t bothered responding to my request 

2 hours ago, leave it to deever said:

Um his 3 word comments are visceral and instinctive.

Watching the replay may sometimes give a more accurate response but as most of accept this is not the point of the thread.

In any event Joeboy does quite a good job.

It's not an easy thread to complete.

What is the point of this thread so @joeboy can vent his spleen (topical) after a loss. The number of replies to this thread now, ever diminishing know what they are going to read so don't even look at it.

Three words - Poor Team Performance.


1 hour ago, joeboy said:

You still haven’t bothered responding to my request 

Joe, I wouldn't try to upstage the oracle. QED to me is not the Latin  "Quod erat Demonstrated"  but, QUITE ENOUGH DONE. Enjoy the rest of the week end.

 

,

This is the first thread that i read after a game.Often brutal but generally both fair and accurate .Remarkable effort to post    a 3 word summary on every player so soon after games  final whistle .

31 minutes ago, Satyriconhome said:

What is the point of this thread so @joeboy can vent his spleen (topical) after a loss. The number of replies to this thread now, ever diminishing know what they are going to read so don't even look at it.

Three words - Poor Team Performance.

Um ...here we are.

 
  • Author
16 hours ago, Satyriconhome said:

What is the point of this thread so @joeboy can vent his spleen (topical) after a loss. The number of replies to this thread now, ever diminishing know what they are going to read so don't even look at it.

Three words - Poor Team Performance.

It has spoken🙄

2 hours ago, joeboy said:

It has spoken🙄

Funny thing Joeboy this is also the first thread that I go to after a game win lose or draw, so keep it coming mate.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 568 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and 
 it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies