Jump to content

Featured Replies

9 minutes ago, kev martin said:

Used the trigger word, sorry for the confusion. I wouldn't know if they are in a 'loading' program.

The trainers worked them hard, sprints after the sim. 

How’s Petty looking?

 
  • Author
Just now, Roost it far said:

How’s Petty looking?

Great, moving well, I think still underdone fitness wise. Completed the training with extra runs and sprints.

Must be a temptation to bring Petty in and lock him around the forward goal square.

Appeared happy.

4 minutes ago, kev martin said:

Great, moving well, I think still underdone fitness wise. Completed the training with extra runs and sprints.

Must be a temptation to bring Petty in and lock him around the forward goal square.

Appeared happy.

Well that’s good news

 

Thanks KM.   Must be hot but demonland must be informed.    Thanks

4 minutes ago, kev martin said:

Must be a temptation to bring Petty in and lock him around the forward goal square.

A half fit Petty is probably better than the next choice

I think they'll use BBB as the sacrifice forward if he's half fit


  • Author
Just now, 640MD said:

Thanks KM.   Must be hot but demonland must be informed.    Thanks

Your welcome, the heat wasn't too bad (heating up a bit later), it was the dryness that is draining.

  • Author
1 minute ago, Diamond_Jim said:

I think they'll use BBB as the sacrifice forward if he's half fit

BBB in rehab, no running, mainly stretching and simple ball handling.

The Colt is certainly made of the right stuff, wrestling JV after a heavy training session, love it.!!

 

Colt sounds very interesting...when do we think he might be ready for a run?  Pretty keen to see him out there I reckon he'd add something by the sound of it.

Really just want McAdam available, he was meant to help fix all this nonsense in the forward line and where is he?  Anyone know anything about his current situation and when he might be back?

6 minutes ago, kev martin said:

BBB in rehab, no running, mainly stretching and simple ball handling.

Thanks Kev

Perhaps they are trying light training mixed with match days (one can only hope)

IIRC Buddy didn't attend match training for his last few years


3 minutes ago, Young Angus said:

Colt sounds very interesting...when do we think he might be ready for a run?  Pretty keen to see him out there I reckon he'd add something by the sound of it.

Really just want McAdam available, he was meant to help fix all this nonsense in the forward line and where is he?  Anyone know anything about his current situation and when he might be back?

Goody mentioned 3-4 weeks in his presser last week.

8 minutes ago, Young Angus said:

Really just want McAdam available, he was meant to help fix all this nonsense in the forward line and where is he?  Anyone know anything about his current situation and when he might be back?

I think Petty, Koz and McAdam all make us better, and i hope we can get them all fit and firing.

But let's be patient, it's a long season

1 hour ago, kev martin said:

They are loading.

 

1 hour ago, Roost it far said:

What do you mean by saying they’re loading?

 

1 hour ago, kev martin said:

Hard running after the session, a few on their haunches, and some underdone are given extra repeats.

 

1 hour ago, kev martin said:

General fitness, push them after the 4 day break.

I assume the trainers know how to get the best out of them.

 

46 minutes ago, kev martin said:

Used the trigger word, sorry for the confusion. I wouldn't know if they are in a 'loading' program.

The trainers worked them hard, sprints after the sim. 

I had a good chat with Melk late last season at a Casey match (he was an observer).  While we chatted about many things, i did manage to sneak in a question specifically about "loading".

His response...

"What's loading?" lol

So i tried to explain the theory as exposed on here re ramping up training eg; through extra track work / sprints / gym work outside of the usual training program.

His response....

"We just train and hit the gym.  Yes there are weeks where we do some extra work ie; on a long break between matches, but it's not something i notice or am aware of.

You may be referring to training 'loads' which is just another term for the amount of training we are asked to complete on the track each week. 

Aside from that there's specific programmes for individuals coming back from injury etc but that's about it"

Edited by Demon Dynasty

  • Author
6 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Thanks Kev

Perhaps they are trying light training mixed with match days (one can only hope)

IIRC Buddy didn't attend match training for his last few years

Could be right, he has had his own program at other times. Earlier on he was training with the group.

Did he play in the Casey Praccy? 

If not I would be worried about his capacity to have an AFL ready body.

  • Author
18 minutes ago, Young Angus said:

Really just want McAdam available, he was meant to help fix all this nonsense in the forward line and where is he? 

Whelan, the indigenous support worker, was also absent from training. First time I hadn’t seen him. Don't won't to speculate but I will, with McAdam and Whelan missing perhaps it is something personal.

Edited by kev martin


8 minutes ago, Demon Dynasty said:

 

 

 

 

I had a good chat with Melk late last season at a Casey match (he was an observer).  While we chatted about many things, i did manage to sneak in a question specifically about "loading".

His response...

"What is loading?" lol

So i tried to explain the theory as exposed on here re ramping up ttraining eg; through extra track work / sprints / gym work outside of the usual training program.

His response....

"We just train and hit the gym.  Yes there are weeks where we do some extra work but it's not something i notice or am aware of.

You may be referring to training 'loads' which is just another term for the amount of training we are asked to complete on the track each week. 

Aside from that there's specific programmes for individuals coming back from injury etc but that's about it"

Has the loading myth been busted or as a club do we keep it on the downlow?

19 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

Has the loading myth been busted or as a club do we keep it on the downlow?

Jake Melksham might not necessarily understand loading, so don’t dismiss the theory just yet.

Majority of AFL players are not sports scientists, in fact most are far from it.

27 minutes ago, kev martin said:

Could be right, he has had his own program at other times. Earlier on he was training with the group.

Did he play in the Casey Praccy? 

If not I would be worried about his capacity to have an AFL ready body.

Yes he played .

Got 2 goals but I didn't see any comments on his "movement"

  • Author
6 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Yes he played .

Got 2 goals but I didn't see any comments on his "movement"

That's good, probably means BBB has his own program and will be available down the track.

McAdam is now the odds on favourite for the Brownlow.


2 hours ago, Demon Dynasty said:

 

Gadzooks!  Will we ever fix this!??

Simon should allocate at least one entire training session every week to ensure we are NOT doing this.

Even if it means moving Stafford aside and taking over the whole session.

It’s not really up to us. Are we not training for the way teams will inevitably play us? 

1 hour ago, kev martin said:

Great, moving well, I think still underdone fitness wise. Completed the training with extra runs and sprints.

Must be a temptation to bring Petty in and lock him around the forward goal square.

Appeared happy.

DONT DO IT!

PLAY BBB, FULLARTON, BILLINGS gets a full game and Salem l plays back

Out Bowey, Spargo, Laurie,

In BBB, Fullarton, Kozzy, Chandler sub

32 minutes ago, von said:

It’s not really up to us. Are we not training for the way teams will inevitably play us? 

To some degree yes Von.

There's no doubt we put time into the oppo.  Including strategy, possibly targeted training and of course at the selection table.

But the bulk of what we do, according to the Coach anyway, is targeted at playing the way we want to play and to our strengths. 

That's my understanding anyway.

 
1 hour ago, Young Angus said:

Really just want McAdam available, he was meant to help fix all this nonsense in the forward line and where is he?  Anyone know anything about his current situation and when he might be back?

McAdam hammy.  Not expected to return before R5. (Source: J. Gabelich, AFL site)

1 hour ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Thanks Kev

Perhaps they are trying light training mixed with match days (one can only hope)

I would back that in as being quite close to how his recovery is being managed early post op DJ.

In theory, if he's pulling up ok post any matches, then we should start to see him spending increased time in the main group as each week passes.

The reverse if he isn't pulling up so good.

The next step down would obviously not be so positive.

Edited by Demon Dynasty


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 192 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 330 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies