Jump to content

Featured Replies

Firstly, I just want to clarify that my question to George last week regarding Melksham was intended to come across as tongue in cheek! Secondly, love the pod, keep up the great work gents. Thirdly, in the post match presser Goody described BBB's game as a little quiet. However, the commentators on channel 7 mentioned how effective he was despite the stats sheet not showing this. In my opinion, he regularly provided a target and brought the ball to ground, at one point in a 4 against 1 situation. I thought he was a critical tall target and provided plenty of ariel contest work. What do you guys think?

 

More a question about the remainder of our home and away season. We are 2 games and a good percentage clear from 5th spot with games against North and Hawks in our last 5 games. 
Do we start to manage a few players in order to have them cherry ripe for finals. 
Chandler looks like he has benefitted from a stint in the twos. 
Jack Viney, Max, Judd, maybe even Trac are all players that could probably do with a rest before finals both to avoid injury and have them cherry ripe come September. Thoughts?!

 

players from both sides were absolutely exhausted at the conclusion of the game - for melbourne, how much did our lack of run in the last have to do with an extended 10-day break and the conditioning that comes with consistent week-on-week football?

it would seem to me that whenever a team has an 'extended' break they tend to look like they're running in treacle during the subsequent game

Re May. Im wondering if age and dodgy hamstrings are catching up with him...or it was purely an off day.  He was sublime a couple of weeks ago but even then  his kicking, while it's  always had its occasional flaws,  is beginning to feel like a genuine  liability. Everytime he goes to kick it I realise I have no trust it's going to a melb player!  We obviously need him, he's still a star,  but my question is do we need to take the kick ins off him entirely and / or do we need to try to get him to handball now rather than kick as we might do with someone like Max? 


  • Author
12 hours ago, BigMacjnr said:

Anyone else get shades of 2021 round 19 vs the Bulldogs with this game? Feels like Goody wanted to create a shootout to kick the offence into gear pre-finals. When it happened last week you take that as possibly a once off, when it happens again and happened in 2021 you take it as something planned, at least that is how I saw it. 

Can you talk a bit about Kozy's performance. Nice to hear Goody mention his forward half pressure hasn't wavered one bit but my goodness that was a special performance today!

Do you mean 2022? We played them in Rd 19 in both 2021 and 2022. 2022 was a shootout. 2021 was not.

Excellent Podcasts the past few weeks guys. Top Stuff as always.

I thought our pressure was well down this week. Would be interested to hear what the pressure guage was for this match as Binman will no doubt speak to in his Stats File segment.

We had 1 measly tackle Inside 50 to 13 for the Crows. We average 12 a game usually so we were well down on that stat. Adelaide average 10 so they were well up with their 13.

The Crows had 69 tackles for the match up on their average 66 a game whilst we only managed 47 tackles well down on our average of 60 a game.

52 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Do you mean 2022? We played them in Rd 19 in both 2021 and 2022. 2022 was a shootout. 2021 was not.

Yep got my years wrong. Good call. So correction on initial post:

Taking learnings from 2022, Goody is looking to kickstart the offence like we did same time last year. Have to hope we put it all together and don't fall off a cliff like we did last year. Maybe they are thinking the formula worked last year they just didn't have a fit list?

I need to look at avoiding certain media pendants after the weekend. Pies were outplayed for a vast majority of the match but someone else should get Cox's premiership medal this year...meanwhile the Dees didn't win, the Crows lost... 

 

Do we prefer to finish 2nd, 3rd or 4th?

Finish 4th and it's MCG against the Pies.

Finish 3rd and play Port or Brisbane at their home ground.

2nd looks unlikely but there is still a chance, which would be a home final against an interstate team.

I believe we are travelling better this year at the G, so my guess is that we prefer 2nd or 4th. We don't want to finish in 3rd.


  • Author
1 hour ago, ElDiablo14 said:

Do we prefer to finish 2nd, 3rd or 4th?

Finish 4th and it's MCG against the Pies.

Finish 3rd and play Port or Brisbane at their home ground.

2nd looks unlikely but there is still a chance, which would be a home final against an interstate team.

I believe we are travelling better this year at the G, so my guess is that we prefer 2nd or 4th. We don't want to finish in 3rd.

We might also leave this one for a couple of weeks time.

If we can finish 2nd then that is my preference. Still torn on 3rd or 4th. I don't like having to win in Port (or Brisbane) in the first week of finals and initially 4th place against the Pies to snag a home prelim seems the preference but if we lose that game we will be faced with a Prelim in Port or Brisbane.

Really wished we had that extra win in the bank that we coughed up in the Alice.

Watching yesterday it once again became apparent we are susceptible when we can’t force teams down the line for May and Lever to intercept.

Crows did it via short kicks and marks and finding a target till they were in range.

Last week it was the lions moving the ball through the corridor which they inexplicably abandoned in the last qtr once they felt the game was safe.

Essendon from memory also refused to go down the line earlier in the season when we played.

It also explains why we struggle in wet conditions where intercept marking is more difficult.

How can this be mitigated or is this a potential fatal weakness and just the reality of how we choose to play and we knowingly accept this trade off.

Also what are your feelings on smith, he was the spark we needed in the final term, do you think he should be in the starting 22 over Brown.

The Tigers worry me a little bit. Early in the year I was hoping that this return game against them would be a cakewalk as their season would be in tatters by now. Now for the second week in a row we're playing against a team with their season on the line and a sniff of finals. Whilst I would love to end their season I don't think we will have an easy task of it.

What do we need to do to put them out of their misery.

Love the Podcast and I'll take my answer off the air.

12 minutes ago, Demonland said:

We might also leave this one for a couple of weeks time.

If we can finish 2nd then that is my preference. Still torn on 3rd or 4th. I don't like having to win in Port (or Brisbane) in the first week of finals and initially 4th place against the Pies to snag a home prelim seems the preference but if we lose that game we will be faced with a Prelim in Port or Brisbane.

Really wished we had that extra win in the bank that we coughed up in the Alice.

Should do this tonight…..


31 minutes ago, george_on_the_outer said:

Should do this tonight…..

This may very well define our strategy moving forward in terms of resting players and managing the effort for each round.

We need to make sure all our superstars are in prime physical condition for finals.

9 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Agreed but we also don't want to slip out of 4th.

I reckon we are almost a lock in the top 4. Win against North and Hawthorn means Dogs,GWS and Geelong would need to win all 5, at the very least 4, of the remaining 5 games.

Hard to see us losing the 4th spot if we win those two games that should be a given.

1 hour ago, Demonland said:

We might also leave this one for a couple of weeks time.

If we can finish 2nd then that is my preference. Still torn on 3rd or 4th. I don't like having to win in Port (or Brisbane) in the first week of finals and initially 4th place against the Pies to snag a home prelim seems the preference but if we lose that game we will be faced with a Prelim in Port or Brisbane.

Really wished we had that extra win in the bank that we coughed up in the Alice.

Just win each week as it comes up and let September take care of its self. 


G’day all, love the podcast, first time poster here. Question, even if you weren’t a fan of Brown’s game/numbers on the weekend, it is so clear that we need an experienced tall forward to take a key defender, lead away from others, run the patterns, etc. I thought Brown was vital to our other forwards having the game they did on the weekend, but probably was a bit slow with pressure and seemed like he couldn’t keep up with the game. Smith made an immediate impact, but don’t see him as the answer for a whole game. What do you think the solution is? Persist with Brown; Try Grundy/Gawn; wait for TMac to be back; keep Tommo back and swing Petty forward; Keen to hear your ideas. 
Shorty. 

If it’s not too late, my question is:

Is Schache near the cusp of selection? I’m just not sure we can carry someone like Brown for much longer if he’s not hitting the scoreboard. I also think Schache could play the second ruck which would leave JvR as a stay at home forward. 

  • Author
26 minutes ago, At the break of Gawn said:

If it’s not too late, my question is:

Is Schache near the cusp of selection? I’m just not sure we can carry someone like Brown for much longer if he’s not hitting the scoreboard. I also think Schache could play the second ruck which would leave JvR as a stay at home forward. 

@george_on_the_outer will no doubt talk about that when talking about Casey. @binman was at the game too so he can give his opinion. 

 
54 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Tonight is our 200th Podcast

Huge congrats and enormous thanks!  The work you obviously put into every episode is hugely appreciated by this Demonlander, and I’m sure, many others!  I don’t think I’ve missed one.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 0 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 230 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies