Jump to content

Featured Replies

6 hours ago, Redleg said:

Very annoying.

I would have him in ahead of Spargo. He is far more versatile.

But you are probably correct.

If we keep dropping him, he will leave and I believe we will regret it.

I would too based on form. I like have the extra midfielder rolling in there instead of having 4 small forwards.

Unfortunately this comes with territory when you are constantly challenging for a flag. You'll always get those borderline best 22 that'll eventually get squeezed out.

Edited by dazzledavey36

 

Spargo is critical to our ability to move the ball inside 50. I know people don’t rate him that highly. He’s in the low possession high impact category, but he isn’t a spectacular player like Kosi so people aren’t enamored with him.  But he is one of the best players at two way running and delivering the ball inside 50 that we have. He also allows Kosi to spend more time in the middle which I love. 

I think we all feel JJ is hard down by. I am too. But then I think who goes if he stays, and I can’t come up with an obvious answer. Sparrow is a more dynamic player and he is a battering ram which allows Viney to have a rest. I also thought he was better against GC than JJ. 

JJ does everything well but nothing spectacular and maybe that’s the problem. In a top team with a midfield full of spectacular footballers, you’ll always have players hard done by. Where else would Dunstan get 40+ touches a week at Casey and then not get a game? It’s frankly ludicrous. I feel for him too as his career doesn’t have the prospects that JJ’s career does. I know JJ will go elsewhere and play 200 games. It’s almost a no brainer.
 

On a side note, I hope we sign Chandler up soon. The last of my must signs for this year. 

46 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

Spargo is critical to our ability to move the ball inside 50. I know people don’t rate him that highly. He’s in the low possession high impact category, but he isn’t a spectacular player like Kosi so people aren’t enamored with him.  But he is one of the best players at two way running and delivering the ball inside 50 that we have. He also allows Kosi to spend more time in the middle which I love. 

I think we all feel JJ is hard down by. I am too. But then I think who goes if he stays, and I can’t come up with an obvious answer. Sparrow is a more dynamic player and he is a battering ram which allows Viney to have a rest. I also thought he was better against GC than JJ. 

JJ does everything well but nothing spectacular and maybe that’s the problem. In a top team with a midfield full of spectacular footballers, you’ll always have players hard done by. Where else would Dunstan get 40+ touches a week at Casey and then not get a game? It’s frankly ludicrous. I feel for him too as his career doesn’t have the prospects that JJ’s career does. I know JJ will go elsewhere and play 200 games. It’s almost a no brainer.
 

On a side note, I hope we sign Chandler up soon. The last of my must signs for this year. 

For me JJ's best chance is to somehow push Hunter out and play wing - I'm not being critical of Hunter but if I'm JJ that's the spot I'd be looking to take 

 

 

Always thought JJ would make a fine tagger especially on a half forward/midfield where he is able to shut down the games best quarter back. I think of Nick Daicos for this instance.

He's incredibly disciplined and ultimate professional when it comes to doing the team things.

5 minutes ago, Sydee said:

For me JJ's best chance is to somehow push Hunter out and play wing - I'm not being critical of Hunter but if I'm JJ that's the spot I'd be looking to take 

 

JJ already played that role for the majority of last season. And then we went and got Hunter. So that’s a slap in the face to him. 
I think Hunter is very underrated around here. Not only is he a very experienced player who is very smart, his ball use is generally really good. He also has a massive tank and has given Langdon the opportunity to take much needed breaks during games. That will pay off heavily come finals. 
I think long term JJ could take that role, but at 23 he wants to play now and he deserves to. Hunter has 4+ seasons left in him. JJ isn’t waiting around for that. 
The other problem of course is that I think JJ could make a fine half back flanker, but that position is so heavily filled already and that’s without Salem even playing yet. 
 

JJ is the perfect 23rd  player to have because he is actually a really good footballer who can play a number roles and execute them well. But he has every right to want to be a best 22 player and there are about 10 sides I reckon he would walk into and never miss a game. 


1 minute ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Always thought JJ would make a fine tagger especially on a half forward/midfield where he is able to shut down the games best quarter back. I think of Nick Daicos for this instance.

He's incredibly disciplined and ultimate professional when it comes to doing the team things.

I agree. But then who does he replace in the lineup?

And don’t say Sparrow because we both know that won’t happen. 

1 minute ago, Jaded No More said:

JJ already played that role for the majority of last season. And then we went and got Hunter. So that’s a slap in the face to him. 
I think Hunter is very underrated around here. Not only is he a very experienced player who is very smart, his ball use is generally really good. He also has a massive tank and has given Langdon the opportunity to take much needed breaks during games. That will pay off heavily come finals. 
I think long term JJ could take that role, but at 23 he wants to play now and he deserves to. Hunter has 4+ seasons left in him. JJ isn’t waiting around for that. 
The other problem of course is that I think JJ could make a fine half back flanker, but that position is so heavily filled already and that’s without Salem even playing yet. 
 

JJ is the perfect 23rd  player to have because he is actually a really good footballer who can play a number roles and execute them well. But he has every right to want to be a best 22 player and there are about 10 sides I reckon he would walk into and never miss a game. 

When I see Hunter at the games the territory he covers is really something to behold. I'm never fussed about him getting mountains of possessions, his movements off the ball and ability to fold back has been a major asset. 

Jvr will come out and play a ripper.

It's great that the club stood by him. I also wonder with seemingly small acts like this, if players take note and are more likely to stay at the club( Chandler).

Perhaps Kozzie was pleased with the way the club supported him after his incident.  Yea they didn't appeal but Goodwin was most gracious in what he said about it all.

And speaking of Kozzie, I think we all feel hes due to kick a big bag of goals soon. This is probably the game for it.

And maybe Petty will show some great forward talent.

Feel so much more confident after the appeal.

 

It is the kind of game I would have liked to see JJ in. On one hand Spargo's ability to deliver into the 50 is a huge benefit but I wouldn't mind that extra mid rotation. 

Now that we've freed JVR, my attention it solely on how I want us to absolutely poluvarise the Hawks.  Let's face it, we owe these [censored] (insert adjective of choice) more than any other team in the AFL. 

I'd love to see us totally click in a way we didn't quite against North and smash them by 150+ points.

That's not too much to ask is it?


All the talk is about JJ missing, but I think Haremsy is easily to the same or higher standard and he's another that's missing.

Assuming we don't get more injuries and he's able to find form, there could be another selection squeeze with Salem getting close to playing again for Casey.  This depth of tallent is generally a good problem to have.

48 minutes ago, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

Now that we've freed JVR, my attention it solely on how I want us to absolutely poluvarise the Hawks.  Let's face it, we owe these [censored] (insert adjective of choice) more than any other team in the AFL. 

I'd love to see us totally click in a way we didn't quite against North and smash them by 150+ points.

That's not too much to ask is it?

I think after Jvrgate and with May playing his 200th there will be a strong esprit de corps . As such I too am expecting a big win and statement from the team. 

1 hour ago, Jaded No More said:

JJ already played that role for the majority of last season. And then we went and got Hunter. So that’s a slap in the face to him. 
I think Hunter is very underrated around here. Not only is he a very experienced player who is very smart, his ball use is generally really good. He also has a massive tank and has given Langdon the opportunity to take much needed breaks during games. That will pay off heavily come finals. 
I think long term JJ could take that role, but at 23 he wants to play now and he deserves to. Hunter has 4+ seasons left in him. JJ isn’t waiting around for that. 
The other problem of course is that I think JJ could make a fine half back flanker, but that position is so heavily filled already and that’s without Salem even playing yet. 
 

JJ is the perfect 23rd  player to have because he is actually a really good footballer who can play a number roles and execute them well. But he has every right to want to be a best 22 player and there are about 10 sides I reckon he would walk into and never miss a game. 

Fair enough - I was not criticising Hunter simply saying which position I would target if I was JJ - which I'm not

As you correctly highlight other positions on the field are a low probability for him to get a regular spot in the absence of injuries

12 hours ago, Left Foot Snap said:

With the Rooey verdict, I can see an AFL backlash against us and expect a horrid run from the umpires this week as reprisal. If it was anyone but Hawthorn (or WCE) this week, I would be backing against us. Also expect some piddling negative stories in the media coming up. 

Yes, I don't trust the AFL HQ.

"Viva la Roo!!"

If anyone out there is looking for a topic for their PhD in Psychology, I can recommend "AFL supporter paranoia". Plenty of material to work with.

What are we watching for this weekend.

For me it's the interaction between the forward talls and the smalls plus May's mobility.

I'm not despairing of our forward line as yet. Fritsch should have had 3 goals last week which would have made it a comfortable win but there's definitely room for improvement as a unit


6 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

What are we watching for this weekend.

For me it's the interaction between the forward talls and the smalls plus May's mobility.

I'm not despairing of our forward line as yet. Fritsch should have had 3 goals last week which would have made it a comfortable win but there's definitely room for improvement as a unit

I'm watching to see if there is a kick out from a point that goes to the right, or to a free Demon not in the back pocket.

2 minutes ago, Redleg said:

I'm watching to see if there is a kick out from a point that goes to the right, or to a free Demon not in the back pocket.

you're dreaming ........... miracles never happen

We suffer from CAS (Corridor Aversion Syndrome)

3 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

Spargo is critical to our ability to move the ball inside 50. I know people don’t rate him that highly. He’s in the low possession high impact category, but he isn’t a spectacular player like Kosi so people aren’t enamored with him.  But he is one of the best players at two way running and delivering the ball inside 50 that we have. He also allows Kosi to spend more time in the middle which I love. 

I think we all feel JJ is hard down by. I am too. But then I think who goes if he stays, and I can’t come up with an obvious answer. Sparrow is a more dynamic player and he is a battering ram which allows Viney to have a rest. I also thought he was better against GC than JJ. 

JJ does everything well but nothing spectacular and maybe that’s the problem. In a top team with a midfield full of spectacular footballers, you’ll always have players hard done by. Where else would Dunstan get 40+ touches a week at Casey and then not get a game? It’s frankly ludicrous. I feel for him too as his career doesn’t have the prospects that JJ’s career does. I know JJ will go elsewhere and play 200 games. It’s almost a no brainer.
 

On a side note, I hope we sign Chandler up soon. The last of my must signs for this year. 

Excellent analysis Jaded. I totally agree with you re Spargo, and I was surprised he didn't play for Melbourne last week (but he will be better given the Casey game). I think he's crucial to our structure and his skills are elite. The issue seems to be with ground ball gets with Melbourne currently and given the positive Inside 50s against GC it would have been great to have him up forward improving delivery and conversion.

JJ parked discussions regarding a new contract til later in the year which I can totally understand given his fringe ststus in the team. It will be interesting to see whether it's JJ or Harmes playing as sub in on Saturday. Harmes was good last week I thought when he came on but I actually would have liked him to play the whole game locking down Noah Anderson. That mid lockdown role is someting he excels at although I know Melbourne generally doesn't like going down that path because it affects structure/rotations. Having said that, I think we should be prioritising JJ ahead of Harmes. Harmes is a UFA in 2024 and turns 28 in October. IMO we should be trying to trade him this year as  another club would probably be prepared to offer him 3 years and a guaranteed spot in their best 22.

I also agree we need to sign Chandler, also Woewodin who is definitely much-improved.

14 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

you're dreaming ........... miracles never happen

We suffer from CAS (Corridor Aversion Syndrome)

Why aren’t the good doctors at the club medicating this??? 😜

23 minutes ago, Sydney_Demon said:

Excellent analysis Jaded. I totally agree with you re Spargo, and I was surprised he didn't play for Melbourne last week (but he will be better given the Casey game). I think he's crucial to our structure and his skills are elite. The issue seems to be with ground ball gets with Melbourne currently and given the positive Inside 50s against GC it would have been great to have him up forward improving delivery and conversion.

JJ parked discussions regarding a new contract til later in the year which I can totally understand given his fringe ststus in the team. It will be interesting to see whether it's JJ or Harmes playing as sub in on Saturday. Harmes was good last week I thought when he came on but I actually would have liked him to play the whole game locking down Noah Anderson. That mid lockdown role is someting he excels at although I know Melbourne generally doesn't like going down that path because it affects structure/rotations. Having said that, I think we should be prioritising JJ ahead of Harmes. Harmes is a UFA in 2024 and turns 28 in October. IMO we should be trying to trade him this year as  another club would probably be prepared to offer him 3 years and a guaranteed spot in their best 22.

I also agree we need to sign Chandler, also Woewodin who is definitely much-improved.

I thought Woey was a lock but now I'm thinking didn't his dad play for cwood as well?

Chandler for sure. He has been a really good surprise for us. His goal sense in the praccy games was terrible but now I don't think he can miss them.

As for Spargo, if you were a real stats person you could argue he's not best 22. But if you watch him closely you notice how much running he does and its very rare his disposals are turned over. Also seems to pop up so many times and kick a much needed goal.


4 hours ago, Sydee said:

For me JJ's best chance is to somehow push Hunter out and play wing - I'm not being critical of Hunter but if I'm JJ that's the spot I'd be looking to take 

The Club brought in Hunter to play wing so I think JJ would have got the message at that stage fairly loud & clear. Why would JJ be targetting a position he already had but lost to a specialist who has been a great success?

4 hours ago, leave it to deever said:

Jvr will come out and play a ripper.

It's great that the club stood by him. I also wonder with seemingly small acts like this, if players take note and are more likely to stay at the club( Chandler).

Perhaps Kozzie was pleased with the way the club supported him after his incident.  Yea they didn't appeal but Goodwin was most gracious in what he said about it all.

And speaking of Kozzie, I think we all feel hes due to kick a big bag of goals soon. This is probably the game for it.

And maybe Petty will show some great forward talent.

Feel so much more confident after the appeal.

It's interesting how this has played out. I reckon there was a chance JVR would have been rested this week but because of the suspension/appeals Goody has actually talked him and his position in the side up. Obviously you can't appeal successfully and then rest him from the team. If JVR doesn't have a great game then I don't think it matters ahainst Hawthorn but a different story in a week's time against Port. Re Chandler, clearly being picked and perservered with has worked. If he gets offered a decent contract extension and continues to get picked he has every incentive to stay. The same applies for JJ. I also agree with you about Kozzie. He was lucky to only get 2 weeks and the Club's messaging including not appealing was appropriate and again has worked given he's signed on til the end of 2027. There's been a huge number of naysayers about Petty's move forwards. Goody has been a bit non-committal about this to date but, now that he's actually talking up Petty's performances, hopefully it will lead to positive outcomes. If it doesn't then we still have time to change the mix!

1 hour ago, leave it to deever said:

I thought Woey was a lock but now I'm thinking didn't his dad play for cwood as well?

It was disgusting the way that Melbourne behaved towards Shane Woewodin.

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2021/08/08/how-brownlow-medallists-shock-trade-to-collingwood-unfolded/

It's to Woewodin's credit that he's remained loyal to the Club, raised his son as a Melbourne supporter, and I'm optimistic that Taj will get a contract extension and be an important contributor to the Club over many years.

Just flown down from NSW for the game, sure to be better than my other one so far against Brisbane 

6 minutes ago, Sydney_Demon said:

The Club brought in Hunter to play wing so I think JJ would have got the message at that stage fairly loud & clear. Why would JJ be targetting a position he already had but lost to a specialist who has been a great success?

It's interesting how this has played out. I reckon there was a chance JVR would have been rested this week but because of the suspension/appeals Goody has actually talked him and his position in the side up. Obviously you can't appeal successfully and then rest him from the team. If JVR doesn't have a great game then I don't think it matters ahainst Hawthorn but a different story in a week's time against Port. Re Chandler, clearly being picked and perservered with has worked. If he gets offered a decent contract extension and continues to get picked he has every incentive to stay. The same applies for JJ. I also agree with you about Kozzie. He was lucky to only get 2 weeks and the Club's messaging including not appealing was appropriate and again has worked given he's signed on til the end of 2027. There's been a huge number of naysayers about Petty's move forwards. Goody has been a bit non-committal about this to date but, now that he's actually talking up Petty's performances, hopefully it will lead to positive outcomes. If it doesn't then we still have time to change the mix!

It was disgusting the way that Melbourne behaved towards Shane Woewodin.

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2021/08/08/how-brownlow-medallists-shock-trade-to-collingwood-unfolded/

It's to Woewodin's credit that he's remained loyal to the Club, raised his son as a Melbourne supporter, and I'm optimistic that Taj will get a contract extension and be an important contributor to the Club over many years.

Thanks for that article.  It was pretty shocking especially after he took a pay cut. Pretty two faced effort. 

 
2 hours ago, Redleg said:

I'm watching to see if there is a kick out from a point that goes to the right, or to a free Demon not in the back pocket.

I cant for the life of me understand why we don't emulate what we did at times in the preseason.. 

I.e had option both sides that worried opposition enough to leave glaring holes in the corridor.   

Noooooooo.... lets go back to kicking it out left..   every single fn time. Insanity.

I haven't bought a ticket for public reserve for ages.. fell off my chair when i saw the prices! $80 for Level 2. $55 for nosebleed.

Out-of-control.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 199 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

    • 330 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

    • 31 replies