Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
6 minutes ago, deanox said:

We might have booked Scully but the rest of the comp didn't. It's bloody stupid unless you're north supporters.

 

Just now, layzie said:

North weren't even playing tonight!

Every club participates in the draft, and every club's supporters have the right to expect their #1 pick to at least see out the first contract.

1 minute ago, Nascent said:

Why every other teams fans has joined the booing bandwagon is somewhat perplexing but probably relates to group think

Group sheep think more like it.

Absolute star tonight!

 

i’m going to enjoy the Saints slide down the ladder and out of finals. 

they had 28-14 free kicks and still bottled it. their lack of midfield talent will tell. 

1 minute ago, Chook said:

 

Every club participates in the draft, and every club's supporters have the right to expect their #1 pick to at least see out the first contract.

What about every club not involved and their spectators?


1 minute ago, Chook said:

 

Every club participates in the draft, and every club's supporters have the right to expect their #1 pick to at least see out the first contract.

Once again excuse my ignorance but how did he avoid seeing out that contract?

Just now, layzie said:

What about every club not involved and their spectators?

Every club is involved in the draft. That's the point.

20 minutes ago, Earl Hood said:

I think you are right. I can’t work out what rule a number of these so called frees are awarded for. 

28 frees to  St K, 14 to Port. 
Absolutely every 50:50 decision went to the Saints. The Marvel crowd( all Saints) definitely influenced the Umpires by screaming for frees the whole match.

We Demon supporters have got to try to influence the imps like that, but it’s harder at the bigger MCG, and we rarely have a crowd  that all goes for us .

Edited by Jumping Jack Clennett
Typo

 
1 minute ago, layzie said:

Group sheep think more like it.

Absolute star tonight!

He's a gun and was always going to be. Like the way he goes about his footy when he's switched on.


4 minutes ago, Chook said:

Every club is involved in the draft. That's the point.

I've never booed a player because they stiffed a club other than mine. 

11 minutes ago, sue said:

Once again excuse my ignorance but how did he avoid seeing out that contract?

He had his foot out the door half way before his first season was over and requested a trade to Port.

North could have held him to his contract but seemed both parties thought a split was better.

North have done well out of the deal regardless with Sheezel and Wardlaw, who hasn't played yet. Wardlaw is an explosive mid who will be a gun, assuming he gets on the park (injury prone with hammy issues last year).

Edited by Nascent

4 minutes ago, layzie said:

I've never booed a player because they stiffed a club other than mine. 

Me neither, but I get it.


3 minutes ago, Chook said:

Me neither, but I get it.

Fair enough, seems like a waste of energy though.

23 minutes ago, layzie said:

I've never booed a player because they stiffed a club other than mine. 

Been going to the football for over 50 years. I have never booed any player or umpire. I'd feel a fool doing it and I'd be right. It's simply moronic.

2 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Feel free to 🤮 on this post. 

 

Carn crows!

Funnily enough, if Crows get up and and both Bombers and Lions win, there will be 7 teams at the top of the ladder separated only by percentage.


57 minutes ago, layzie said:

I've never booed a player because they stiffed a club other than mine. 

Only one, and I will not mention his name.  Hint- went to GW$ then Hawks

5 minutes ago, monoccular said:

Only one, and I will not mention his name.  Hint- went to GW$ then Hawks

Voldemort?🙃

 

Imagine changing your employer and then turning up to site with all the proper accreditation, head out and get booed by 'stakeholders', whilst you go about your paid job for 3 hours to provide entertainment for 'stakeholders' on a weekly basis...

Imagine doing so when you are 19.

Imagine thinking, "He's an AFL footballer, it's fair game, it comes with the territory..."

It's an absolute [censored] disgrace by those that do it, and by those that condone it and the apologists.

I am so surprised that where we are culturally in 2023, and how the AFL positions itself around mental health that it has not been addressed by the AFL publicly. The AFL need to disentangle the right to boo about incidents in a match, vs systemic individually directed bullying...

Yes, it's a mental health issue.

10 hours ago, Jibroni said:

The 50m penalty needs to go

I say keep it but I think they could have a 25 m penalty used in conjunction. Not all infractions deserve the same penalty. Just saying.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Gold Coast

    The Gold Coast Suns find themselves outside of the top eight for the first time since Round 1 with pressure is mounting on the entire organisation. Their coach Damien Hardwick expressed his frustration at his team’s condition last week by making a middle-finger gesture on television that earned him a fine for his troubles. He showed his desperation by claiming that Fox should pick up the tab.  There’s little doubt the Suns have shown improvement in 2025, and their position on the ladder is influenced to some extent by having played fewer games than their rivals for a playoff role at the end of the season, courtesy of the disruption caused by Cyclone Alfred in March.  However, they are following the same trajectory that hindered the club in past years whenever they appeared to be nearing their potential. As a consequence, that Hardwick gesture should be considered as more than a mere behavioral lapse. It’s a distress signal that does not bode well for the Queenslanders. While the Suns are eager to remain in contention with the top eight, Melbourne faces its own crisis, which is similarly deep-seated but in a much different way. After recovering from a disappointing start to the season and nearing a return to respectability among its peer clubs, the Demons have experienced a decline in status, driven by the fact that while their form has been reasonable (see their performance against the ladder leader in the Kings Birthday match), their conversion in front of goal is poor enough to rank last in the competition. Furthermore, their opponents find them exceptionally easy to score against. As a result, they have effectively eliminated themselves from the finals race and are again positioned to finish in the bottom half of the ladder.

    • 3 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Haha
    • 276 replies
  • REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Essendon

    Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Gold Coast

    The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Thumb Down
      • Clap
      • Haha
    • 155 replies
  • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 33 replies