32 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

Who needs oppo fan site quotes when we’ve got you, huh. 

You mean all my work is for nought😢😉

Edited April 20, 20232 yr by Lucifers Hero

32 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

Nana-Shaz? She’s the head of the Doggies cheer squad. Quite the character, too.

lol

i was actually referring to a well known satirical piece (bigfooty iirc) about a day with the grog squad where shazza (iirc) was the fearsome head honcho. very politically incorrect

some other poster might remember a link?

3 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

lol

i was actually referring to a well known satirical piece (bigfooty iirc) about a day with the grog squad where shazza (iirc) was the fearsome head honcho. very politically incorrect

some other poster might remember a link?

You're not talking about Sharon Cutajar? Aka nanna Shaz as she's referred to by doggies supporters..

4 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

lol

i was actually referring to a well known satirical piece (bigfooty iirc) about a day with the grog squad where shazza (iirc) was the fearsome head honcho. very politically incorrect

some other poster might remember a link?

Someone did post that here last year or the year before. Very funny piece. 

24 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Right....

Do you even know what I was referring too? Or have you gone way too early on this again.

Read some of their comments again. Example A:

• Just what we need, an angry, fired up Melbourne on the rebound..

We usually rebound well after a bad loss. Are they wrong here?

• See which side Max is going and tell Miller to b-line it to the other side, no way Max keeps up with Miller.  Can't let him sit behind play, have to play him smart or physical.

Again, they're not wrong once again.. their ruckman will need all the luck they get trying to combat Max and Brodie.

• Our backline is miles away from our best lineup but realistically their fwd's are pus. Young/ Van Rooyen is a good matchup. Grimes/ Fritch should work.

Yep, pretty much agree with them once again. Their backline is a shambles.

I'm happy to keep pointing them out for you?

Well I'm not entirely sure about our forwards being "pus".

I mean, we are the highest scoring side in the league...

9 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

You're not talking about Sharon Cutajar? Aka nanna Shaz as she's referred to by doggies supporters..

no

12 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

You're not talking about Sharon Cutajar? Aka nanna Shaz as she's referred to by doggies supporters..

The one and only. Very flamboyant in her GameDay attire, outrageously so. OTT Doggies devotee. Pregame Round One, waiting in the race for banner raising and SHE tells ME she loves MY red and blue garb. And she’s the one wearing red, blue and white glitter platform boots! 😂

Edit: so jealous of those boots. 

Edited April 20, 20232 yr by WalkingCivilWar

Just now, daisycutter said:

no

That’s to whom I thought you were referring. But I realise now it’s Shaz from the Richmond CS many years ago. Seems Shaz is a common CS name. 😁

2 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

That’s to whom I thought you were referring. But I realise now it’s Shaz from the Richmond CS many years ago. Seems Shaz is a common CS name. 😁

Who woulda thunk it??

23 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

You mean all my work is for nought😢😉

Noooooo!!!!! Your work is arguably the most important content on DL! Soz Andy/David/chopped liver

13 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

Well I'm not entirely sure about our forwards being "pus".

I mean, we are the highest scoring side in the league...

Definitely not the forward part, but their backs are very vulnerable and we definitely need to take advantage of it.

3 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

The targeting of Max Gawn's back/head is never going to stop until the club goes to the AFL with video evidence and demands a response from the league and the umpires.

When Gawn starts getting soft frees every time someone touches him, then clubs will stop targeting him illegally. But while they can get away with it, they'll keep doing it because he is such a brilliant and important player.

Oliver gets a few whacks too.

3 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

I know, Luci. I was just making a point.

Once again, thanks for trawling through the muck to bring us this. 💕

I’ll be fraternising with about 20 Toiges tonight. Because it’s a shared banner, they’re coming to ours to join in the making of it. I’m wondering if any of them made any of the comments you’ve listed. Maybe I’ll climb to the top of the giant ladder and yell out, “I sure hope FISTS OF FURY LEVER is playing this Monday!” Then I’ll look for someone flinching. 😄

Just remember to disinfect afterwards. 

Just now, leave it to deever said:

Just remember to disinfect afterwards. 

No need for that. Picked up my hazmat suit from the cleaners this morning. 

1 minute ago, leave it to deever said:

Just remember to disinfect afterwards. 

tiger balm?

I think the fists of fury title should probably remain at Richmond aka a certain player we all know. ( first name ryhmes with Brent).

4 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

I mean.. they're not wrong with majority of this lol.

 

1 hour ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Right....

Do you even know what I was referring too? Or have you gone way too early on this again.

Read some of their comments again. Example A:

• Just what we need, an angry, fired up Melbourne on the rebound..

We usually rebound well after a bad loss. Are they wrong here?

• See which side Max is going and tell Miller to b-line it to the other side, no way Max keeps up with Miller.  Can't let him sit behind play, have to play him smart or physical.

Again, they're not wrong once again.. their ruckman will need all the luck they get trying to combat Max and Brodie.

• Our backline is miles away from our best lineup but realistically their fwd's are pus. Young/ Van Rooyen is a good matchup. Grimes/ Fritch should work.

Yep, pretty much agree with them once again. Their backline is a shambles.

I'm happy to keep pointing them out for you?

The word “lol” says it all.

 

4 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

 

The word “lol” says it all.

 

How so? 

4 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

I’ve stopped laughing… now I’m angry. 

Re number of supporters : Remember, quality over quantity

8 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

How so? 

Why “lol” if what you’re saying was complimentary from the outset? You didn’t like having the real meaning of your comment being acknowledged so you were quick to try to appear to be praising our team by plucking out the positive things in the OP. All good, though. You have your opinions, etc., etc., etc. I just wanted you to know I see what you’ve done, ‘s all. 

I missed the good old Tigers supporters. You know, the ones who use to drag themselves out of the gutter on Swan st, brushing the needles out of their arms and shuffling off to the G on a Saturday arvo.

54 minutes ago, Gorgoroth said:

I missed the good old Tigers supporters. You know, the ones who use to drag themselves out of the gutter on Swan st, brushing the needles out of their arms and shuffling off to the G on a Saturday arvo.

They are a little more sophisticated these days Gorg.

Instead of "brushing the needles out of their arms" they just pick up their little pipes and shuffle off.

Surprised to see Cotchin is still playing this year. I assumed he retired already… his numbers and impact back this up! 

• Our biggest issue is if Fists of Fury Lever plays. With no Lynch and our bombs inside 50, Lever will think he is at a Las Vegas buffet racking up intercept marks.

Just brilliant. Hope it goes to plan.

3 hours ago, daisycutter said:

tiger balm?