Jump to content

Featured Replies

He's been playing at Doncaster in EFNL with Jamar so should have some football conditioning as it's a tough league. Will no doubt assist Casey but will he play enough games to qualify for finals?

 
On 8/9/2022 at 7:58 PM, COOLX said:

How tall and heavy is  Josh Smith

 

On 8/10/2022 at 12:40 AM, WERRIDEE said:

I think he's 196 cms and 95-100 kgs

 

On 8/10/2022 at 2:49 AM, FireInTheBennelly said:

I think he's exactly what we need at the moment, but he breaks way too often 

Fire.  Not sure we are talking about Josh.   Joel certainly is injured more often than not and we’re he not wouldn’t doubt have found a spot up forward by now. 

 
5 minutes ago, monoccular said:

 

 

Fire.  Not sure we are talking about Josh.   Joel certainly is injured more often than not and we’re he not wouldn’t doubt have found a spot up forward by now. 

Apologies. Yes I must've skimmed straight over Josh and assumed it was Joel.

AMW, Bedford & Chandler are all being “managed”.  Especially given they also had a bye last week. That’s no footy considering Chandler should be on the fringe of senior selection.
 

With a full list aside from Tmcd, Dees have 19 listed players to play in VFL. I think we have played max.16 AFL listed and kept 7 spots for the VFL listed guys. (not sure if there is a max rule for AFL aligned clubs). 
 


9 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

AMW, Bedford & Chandler are all being “managed”.  Especially given they also had a bye last week. That’s no footy considering Chandler should be on the fringe of senior selection.
 

strange.. perhaps they are unloading

I have been looking for some time for the rules that determine finals eligibility for VFL...can't find it on AFL website. Any ideas  where the rules can be found?

 
1 hour ago, spirit of norm smith said:

AMW, Bedford & Chandler are all being “managed”.  Especially given they also had a bye last week. That’s no footy considering Chandler should be on the fringe of senior selection.
 

With a full list aside from Tmcd, Dees have 19 listed players to play in VFL. I think we have played max.16 AFL listed and kept 7 spots for the VFL listed guys. (not sure if there is a max rule for AFL aligned clubs). 
 

 

1 hour ago, Diamond_Jim said:

strange.. perhaps they are unloading

Covid the most likely answer.

7 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

AMW, Bedford & Chandler are all being “managed”.  Especially given they also had a bye last week. That’s no footy considering Chandler should be on the fringe of senior selection.
 

With a full list aside from Tmcd, Dees have 19 listed players to play in VFL. I think we have played max.16 AFL listed and kept 7 spots for the VFL listed guys. (not sure if there is a max rule for AFL aligned clubs). 
 

Wildly incorrect.   Bedford and Chandler missing due to Covid.  Moniz-Wakefield out with a groin injury.


Hadn’t heard anything about Bedford and Chandler having covid and being in isolation.  Has that been written or confirmed? It does appear the most likely reason given they’ve been key players at Casey this year, and not listed in the weekly injury discussion.  Any reference or source? 

Joel Smith starting well, one run down tackle and one lead up mark which he unfortunately missed. Looks threatening so far.

Anyone else having issues with the streaming? I can get the other 2 live games to load but not the Casey game.


Just now, Gaaawn said:

Anyone else having issues with the streaming? I can get the other 2 live games to load but not the Casey game.

On channel 7 if you're in vic

Too unselfish weid. Would've liked him to just back himself with a kick for goal.

Edited by Nascent


Few senior players braving the conditions in the stands including Dogga. For a guy seemingly on the way out he does still seem very invested. 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 42 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 286 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies