Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

Wow. That’s sad. I can’t imagine what would cause a rift between a cheer squad and their own players. But then again, there are Dees ā€œfansā€ around who don’t hold back when it comes to their personal attacks on some of our players, so I guess anything is possible.Ā 

Port fans have plenty to beef about their club and a lot justified after their missteps in the past few seasons. I cant see much justification for some of the vituperative comments of our players here given our lofty position on the ladder and no different to where we were last season at same time. Some criticism is always fair but ā€œcancel cultureā€ logic is starting to appear demanding severe retribution to players for issues that are routine manageable in every club.Ā 

Edited by John Crow Batty

Ā 
26 minutes ago, John Crow Batty said:

I cant see much justification for some of the vituperative comments of our players here given our lofty position on the ladder and no different to where we were last season at same time. Some criticism is always fair but ā€œcancel cultureā€ logic is starting to appear demanding severe retribution to players for issues that are routine manageable in every club.Ā 

Oh, for sure some criticism is fair. It’s the senseless and purposeless personal insults that I resent. It’s the same core group of posters who indulge in this. And god forbid you should ask any of them.to knock it off. Ā You’d be told that…

46B1B4C3-5BA3-4255-9714-1E5BE9BF768E.thumb.jpeg.cdb14fd549550a02e6ecd1e48f72efec.jpeg

LOL if that was the case I’d spend an inordinate amount of time up on my high horse.Ā 

6 hours ago, Deesprate said:

Ha you need a new predictor mine says we win 5 in a row and finish on top!

His must be broken, mine says the same as yours...

 

I'm not a stats man at all but is anyone else concerned that in the key indicators for clubs winning the flag over the past several seasons, we have fallen well down on last year?

A thought I had on the Melksham chase down the wing early in the 4th qtr....

Why wasn't Tom Clurey pinged for insufficient attempt? He ran 40m, had ample opportunity to dispose of the ball and then ran out of bounds. Ball in.

Ā 


11 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

A thought I had on the Melksham chase down the wing early in the 4th qtr....

Why wasn't Tom Clurey pinged for insufficient attempt? He ran 40m, had ample opportunity to dispose of the ball and then ran out of bounds. Ball in.

Ā 

Clurey didn't run the ball out of bounds. He was in play but the ball was over the line when he kicked it.Ā 

35 minutes ago, loges said:

I'm not a stats man at all but is anyone else concerned that in the key indicators for clubs winning the flag over the past several seasons, we have fallen well down on last year?

Do you have reference to the indicators / current stats? There was an article about the key indicators back in April, they were looking pretty good back then despite us not really looking like we were playing that well and still wining games (IMO). I'd be interested to see where teams are ranked now vs then. Also the uneven fixture can skew the stats a bit so I'm not sure you can read too much into the stats as you mentioned. A good discussion point all the same to take a look at how things are tracking.

https://www.espn.com.au/afl/story/_/id/33768562/afl-2022-champion-data-deep-dive-stats-reveal-premiership-contenders-fremantle-dockers-melbourne-biggest-danger

Ā 

Ā 

20 minutes ago, Bonkers said:

Do you have reference to the indicators / current stats? There was an article about the key indicators back in April, they were looking pretty good back then despite us not really looking like we were playing that well and still wining games (IMO). I'd be interested to see where teams are ranked now vs then. Also the uneven fixture can skew the stats a bit so I'm not sure you can read too much into the stats as you mentioned. A good discussion point all the same to take a look at how things are tracking.

https://www.espn.com.au/afl/story/_/id/33768562/afl-2022-champion-data-deep-dive-stats-reveal-premiership-contenders-fremantle-dockers-melbourne-biggest-danger

Ā 

Ā 

Only what they've quoted on a couple of the footy shows.

Ā 
2 hours ago, mo64 said:

Clurey didn't run the ball out of bounds. He was in play but the ball was over the line when he kicked it.Ā 

You contradicted yourself.Ā 

If he was out of bounds when he kicked it he clearly ran the ball over the boundary line. Watch it again.

He had ample opportunity to dispose of the ball or keep the ball in play and didn't (because we had a spare man down the line). That is textbook insufficient attempt

Lever’s concerned the 6 day break won’t be enough time to get up next week.

In - Oliver, Petty

Out - Lever, Bedford (not Melksham)

Edited by Bring-Back-Powell


On 7/18/2022 at 5:36 PM, WalkingCivilWar said:

Two major errors in one sentence that went through through to the keeper. Ā The proofreader needs to be dropped!

Probably has a Phd from La Trobe.Ā 

Edited by Queanbeyan Demon

Just now, Queanbeyan Demon said:

Probably has a Phd from La Trobe.Ā 

ā€œLa Trobeā€ - Ā is that a new brand of cereal?

3 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

ā€œLa Trobeā€ - Ā is that a new brand of cereal?

Medieval rock opera WCW.Ā 

Just now, Queanbeyan Demon said:

Medieval rock opera WCW.Ā 

Aaaaand… none the wiser. šŸ™ƒ

6 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

Oh, for sure some criticism is fair. It’s the senseless and purposeless personal insults that I resent. It’s the same core group of posters who indulge in this. And god forbid you should ask any of them.to knock it off. Ā You’d be told that…

46B1B4C3-5BA3-4255-9714-1E5BE9BF768E.thumb.jpeg.cdb14fd549550a02e6ecd1e48f72efec.jpeg

LOL if that was the case I’d spend an inordinate amount of time up on my high horse.Ā 

Ignored Users works well!


1 minute ago, D4Life said:

Ignored Users works well!

This is true. Except that you can’t escape seeing their posts when someone else quotes them. One day the mods might see fit to include a ā€œyou’re dead to me ā€œ button. I’ll wait for that. 😁

I thought the following snippet from the Mongrel Punt was as gem, and well worth sharing with Demonland friends:Ā Ā 

"There were multiple ā€œlittle thingsā€ moments that seemed to fall the way of the Dees in this game. Make no mistake – this is not luck. It’s amazing how the harder you work, the luckier you get, huh?"

Edited by Deeoldfart
Typo

23 hours ago, loges said:

Only what they've quoted on a couple of the footy shows.

Yeah, David King and Leigh Montagna have their 4 key stats that they always carry on about. It is about how hard teams defend and attack with and without the ball. I forget the actual details, my eyes have started to glaze over when they roll them out to support any given argument they are currently running. Reality is a little mor nuanced than that but simplified stats make for great news ;)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds.Ā 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards?Ā Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre?Ā 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 172 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Like
    • 328 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 31 replies