Jump to content

Featured Replies

Why are we so bad at recruiting.

Maybe we should be targeting recruiters. Eg Geelong or Richmond. It appears they can identify football talent. Unlike Melbourne.

 

INDICATIVE DRAFT ORDER (before the start of the 2020 Trade Period)

ROUND ONE

1. Adelaide 
2. North Melbourne 
3. Sydney
4. Hawthorn 
5. Gold Coast 
6. Essendon
7. Essendon
8. Carlton 
9. Adelaide 
10. Greater Western Sydney 
11. North Melbourne 
12. Fremantle 
13. Geelong
14. Western Bulldogs 
15. Geelong 
16. Collingwood 
17. St Kilda
18. Brisbane 
19. Brisbane
20. Geelong
21. Richmond 

ROUND TWO

22. Adelaide 
23. Hawthorn 
24. Sydney
25. Melbourne 
26. Gold Coast 
27. North Melbourne 
28. Port Adelaide
29. Carlton 
30. Greater Western Sydney 
31. Fremantle  
32. Adelaide 
33. West Coast
34. Port Adelaide 
35. Richmond 
36. Gold Coast
37. Geelong
38. Collingwood
39. Adelaide 

ROUND THREE

40. Western Bulldogs
41. Collingwood
42.  Brisbane
43. Port Adelaide 
44. Greater Western Sydney 
45. Hawthorn
46. Hawthorn 
47. Essendon
48. Hawthorn
49. Adelaide
50. Carlton 
51. Greater Western Sydney 
52. Melbourne 
53. Western Bulldogs 
54. West Coast 
55. Adelaide 
56. Port Adelaide
57. Sydney  
58. Port Adelaide
59. West Coast
60. Richmond 

ROUND FOUR

61. Sydney
62. North Melbourne 
63. St Kilda
64. Hawthorn
65. Adelaide
66. Essendon
67. Melbourne
68. Melbourne
69. Brisbane
70. North Melbourne 
71. Hawthorn 
72. Essendon 
73. Greater Western Sydney 
74. Collingwood
75. Gold Coast
76. St Kilda 
77. Essendon
78. Richmond

ROUND FIVE

79. Adelaide 
80. North Melbourne
81. Sydney 
82. Hawthorn 
83. Gold Coast
84. Essendon
85. Brisbane 
86. Carlton 
87. Greater Western Sydney
88. Melbourne 
89. Western Bulldogs 
90. West Coast 
91. Collingwood 
92. St Kilda
93. Brisbane
94. Port Adelaide
95. Geelong
96. Richmond

* Fremantle have a third selection in Round Six
 

On 10/27/2020 at 6:09 PM, Toorak said:

Why are we so bad at recruiting.

Maybe we should be targeting recruiters. Eg Geelong or Richmond. It appears they can identify football talent. Unlike Melbourne.

We are decent at drafting quality talent. Last years draft looks a ripper for us. We got Rivers late. He would be a top 10 pick if that draft was done again. Jackson also looks every bit a quality top pick. Looks like we got it right. We needed to after list management overpaid previous years and left us bereft of quality young kids coming through. Thankfully Mahoney and Taylor look to have got last year right. 

Edited by KingDingAling

 

With 2 days to go in the trade period Melbourne has picks 26, 31, 33, 43, 50, 68 and 69 to play around with.

Edited by Pinball Wizard

The next move must surely be to parlay them up to a first round pick. There are plenty of clubs that have father/son or nga selections and would trade to split picks and points


The provisional draft order with 2 days to go in the trade period —

Adelaide 1 9 22 23 40 56 66 80
Brisbane Lions 18 19 53 63 86 94
Carlton 8 30 51 87
Collingwood 16 39 42 75 92
Essendon 6 7 48 67 73 78 85
Fremantle 12 32 55
Geelong 13 15 20 38 96
Gold Coast Suns 5 27 37 76 84
GWS Giants 10 44 52 74 88
Hawthorn 4 24 45 46 49 65 72 83
Melbourne 26 31 33 43 50 68 69 89
North Melbourne 2 11 28 70 71 81
Port Adelaide 29 35 47 57 59 95
Richmond 21 36 61 79 97
St Kilda 17 64 77 93
Sydney 3 25 58 62 82
West Coast Eagles 34 60 91
Western Bulldogs 14 41 54 90

9 hours ago, FlashInThePan said:

The next move must surely be to parlay them up to a first round pick. There are plenty of clubs that have father/son or nga selections and would trade to split picks and points

You would think so, we have only removed 3 players from our senior list and maybe KK as well.  With list sizes likely to reduce by 2 and us adding Brown will are looking at really only using 3 maybe 4 picks tops, can't see us using any of the picks beyond our current 50 unless for a rookie upgrade.  Would say one of 26/31/33 will be needed for Brown, leaving the other 2 for pick upgrade, hoping for Fremantle's 12, they have 2 players in NGA that will be mid first round pick, if they use 12 in the draft the bids won't be to far after this pick they will be facing a point deficit in 2021.  Also no guarantee a club prior to pick 12 won't bid for one of their NGA players.

The other option is going after Collingwoods future first round pick

 

INDICATIVE DRAFT ORDER (after the 2020 Trade Period)

ROUND ONE

1. Adelaide
2. North Melbourne
3. Sydney
4. Hawthorn
5. Gold Coast 
6.Essendon
7. Essendon
8. Essendon
9. Adelaide
10. Greater Western Sydney 
11. North Melbourne 
12. Fremantle 
13. Greater Western Sydney 
14. Collingwood
15. Greater Western Sydney
16. Collingwood 
17. Richmond 

18. Melbourne 
19. Melbourne 
20. Greater Western Sydney 
21. St. Kilda

ROUND TWO

22. Adelaide
23. Adelaide
24. Hawthorn 
25. Brisbane 
26. Western Bulldogs 
27. Gold Coast Suns
28. Melbourne 
29. Greater Western Sydney
30. North Melbourne 
31. Sydney 
32. Fremantle 
33. Western Bulldogs
34. Sydney
35. Port Adelaide 
36. Richmond 
37. Gold Coast Suns
38. Carlton 
39. North Melbourne
40. Adelaide

ROUND THREE 

41. Western Bulldogs
42. Western Bulldogs
43. Sydney
44. Essendon  
45. Hawthorn 
46. Hawthorn 
47. Port Adelaide 
48. Carlton 
49. Hawthorn 
50. Melbourne 
51. Geelong 
52. Greater Western Sydney 
53. Brisbane 
54. Western Bulldogs 
55. Fremantle 
56. Adelaide 
57. Port Adelaide 
58. Brisbane 
59. Port Adelaide 
60. Sydney 
61. Richmond

ROUND FOUR 

62. West Coast 
63. Brisbane 
64. St Kilda 
65. Collingwood 
66. Adelaide 
67. St Kilda 
68. Brisbane 
69. Brisbane  
70. Collingwood 
71. Collingwood 
72. Hawthorn 
73. Port Adelaide 
74. St Kilda 
75. Collingwood
76. Gold Coast Suns 
77. Essendon 
78. Carlton 
79. Richmond

ROUND FIVE

80. Adelaide 
81. North Melbourne 
82. Sydney 
83. Hawthorn 
84. Gold Coast
85. Essendon
86. West Coast
87. Essendon 
88. Greater Western Sydney 
89. Melbourne 
90. Western Bulldogs 
91. West Coast  
92. Collingwood 
93. St Kilda 
94. Brisbane 
95. Port Adelaide 
96. Geelong 
97. Richmond


Has anyone else seen the superfooty twitter with our very own Benny Brown walking on google maps from Arden street to the M.C.G?

I'm sorry i don't know how to post it here, but it's funny.

21 hours ago, Whispering_Jack said:

INDICATIVE DRAFT ORDER (after the 2020 Trade Period)

ROUND ONE

1. Adelaide
2. North Melbourne
3. Sydney
4. Hawthorn
5. Gold Coast 
6.Essendon
7. Essendon
8. Essendon
9. Adelaide
10. Greater Western Sydney 
11. North Melbourne 
12. Fremantle 
13. Greater Western Sydney 
14. Collingwood
15. Greater Western Sydney
16. Collingwood 
17. Richmond 

18. Melbourne 
19. Melbourne 
20. Greater Western Sydney 
21. St. Kilda

ROUND TWO

22. Adelaide
23. Adelaide
24. Hawthorn 
25. Brisbane 
26. Western Bulldogs 
27. Gold Coast Suns
28. Melbourne 
29. Greater Western Sydney
30. North Melbourne 
31. Sydney 
32. Fremantle 
33. Western Bulldogs
34. Sydney
35. Port Adelaide 
36. Richmond 
37. Gold Coast Suns
38. Carlton 
39. North Melbourne
40. Adelaide

ROUND THREE 

41. Western Bulldogs
42. Western Bulldogs
43. Sydney
44. Essendon  
45. Hawthorn 
46. Hawthorn 
47. Port Adelaide 
48. Carlton 
49. Hawthorn 
50. Melbourne 
51. Geelong 
52. Greater Western Sydney 
53. Brisbane 
54. Western Bulldogs 
55. Fremantle 
56. Adelaide 
57. Port Adelaide 
58. Brisbane 
59. Port Adelaide 
60. Sydney 
61. Richmond

ROUND FOUR 

62. West Coast 
63. Brisbane 
64. St Kilda 
65. Collingwood 
66. Adelaide 
67. St Kilda 
68. Brisbane 
69. Brisbane  
70. Collingwood 
71. Collingwood 
72. Hawthorn 
73. Port Adelaide 
74. St Kilda 
75. Collingwood
76. Gold Coast Suns 
77. Essendon 
78. Carlton 
79. Richmond

ROUND FIVE

80. Adelaide 
81. North Melbourne 
82. Sydney 
83. Hawthorn 
84. Gold Coast
85. Essendon
86. West Coast
87. Essendon 
88. Greater Western Sydney 
89. Melbourne 
90. Western Bulldogs 
91. West Coast  
92. Collingwood 
93. St Kilda 
94. Brisbane 
95. Port Adelaide 
96. Geelong 
97. Richmond

Anyone think we could package 18 and 19 up for one of Essendon's top 10 picks? Could we get a walk in winger for one of the picks? Cheers.

12 minutes ago, Boots and all said:

Anyone think we could package 18 and 19 up for one of Essendon's top 10 picks? Could we get a walk in winger for one of the picks? Cheers.

Reckon 19 & 28 for a pick around the 10 mark perhaps?

  • 3 weeks later...

INDICATIVE DRAFT ORDER (After second list lodgement)

ROUND ONE

1. Adelaide
2. North Melbourne
3. Sydney
4. Hawthorn
5. Gold Coast 
6.Essendon
7. Essendon
8. Essendon
9. Adelaide
10. Greater Western Sydney 
11. North Melbourne 
12. Fremantle 
13. Greater Western Sydney 
14. Collingwood
15. Greater Western Sydney
16. Collingwood 
17. Richmond 
18. Melbourne 
19. Melbourne 
20. Greater Western Sydney 
21. St. Kilda

ROUND TWO

22. Adelaide
23. Adelaide
24. Hawthorn 
25. Brisbane 
26. Western Bulldogs 
27. Gold Coast Suns
28. Melbourne 
29. Greater Western Sydney
30. North Melbourne 
31. Carlton 
32. Fremantle 
33. Western Bulldogs
34. Sydney
35. Port Adelaide 
36. Richmond 
37. Sydney 
38. Carlton 
39. North Melbourne
40. Adelaide

ROUND THREE 

41. Western Bulldogs
42. Western Bulldogs
43. Sydney
44. Essendon  
45. Hawthorn 
46. Hawthorn 
47. Port Adelaide 
48. Sydney 
49. Hawthorn 
50. Melbourne 
51. Geelong 
52. Greater Western Sydney 
53. Brisbane 
54. Western Bulldogs 
55. Fremantle 
56. Fremantle 
57. Port Adelaide 
58. Brisbane 
59. Port Adelaide 
60. Sydney 
61. Richmond

ROUND FOUR 

62. West Coast 
63. Fremantle 
64. St Kilda 
65. Collingwood 
66. Brisbane 
67. St Kilda 
68. Brisbane 
69. Brisbane  
70. Collingwood 
71. North Melbourne 
72. Hawthorn 
73. Port Adelaide 
74. St Kilda 
75. Collingwood
76. Gold Coast Suns 
77. Essendon 
78. Carlton 
79. Richmond

ROUND FIVE

80. Adelaide 
81. North Melbourne 
82. Sydney 
83. Hawthorn 
84. Gold Coast
85. Essendon
86. West Coast
87. Essendon 
88. Greater Western Sydney 
89. Melbourne 
90. Western Bulldogs 
91. West Coast  
92. Collingwood 
93. St Kilda 
94. Brisbane 
95. Port Adelaide 
96. Geelong 
97. Richmond

2020 AFL NATIONAL DRAFT ORDER

ROUND ONE

1. Adelaide

2. North Melbourne

3. Sydney

4. Hawthorn

5. Gold Coast 

6.Essendon

7. Essendon

8. Essendon

9. Adelaide

10. Greater Western Sydney 

11. North Melbourne 

12. Fremantle 

13. Greater Western Sydney 

14. Collingwood

15. Greater Western Sydney

16. Collingwood 

17. Richmond

18. Melbourne 

19. Melbourne 

20. Greater Western Sydney 

21. St. Kilda

ROUND TWO

22. Adelaide

23. Adelaide

24. Hawthorn 

25. Brisbane 

26. Greater Western Sydney

27. Geelong

28. Melbourne 

29. Western Bulldogs

30. North Melbourne 

31. Carlton

32. Fremantle 

33. Western Bulldogs

34. Sydney

35. Port Adelaide 

36. Richmond 

37. Sydney

38. Carlton 

39. North Melbourne

40. Adelaide

ROUND THREE 

41. Western Bulldogs

42. Western Bulldogs

43. Sydney

44. Essendon  

45. Hawthorn 

46. Hawthorn 

47. Port Adelaide 

48. Sydney

49. Hawthorn 

50. Melbourne 

51. Geelong 

52. Western Bulldogs

53. Brisbane 

54. Western Bulldogs 

55. Fremantle 

56. Fremantle

57. Port Adelaide 

58. Brisbane 

59. Port Adelaide 

60. Sydney 

61. Richmond

ROUND FOUR 

62. West Coast 

63. Fremantle

64. St Kilda 

65. Collingwood 

66. Collingwood

67. St Kilda 

68. Collingwood

69. Brisbane  

70. Brisbane

71. North Melbourne

72. Hawthorn 

73. Port Adelaide 

74. St Kilda 

75. Collingwood

76. Gold Coast Suns 

77. Essendon 

78. Carlton 

79. Richmond

ROUND FIVE

80. Adelaide 

81. North Melbourne 

82. Sydney 

83. Hawthorn 

84. Gold Coast

85. Essendon

86. West Coast

87. Essendon 

88. Greater Western Sydney 

89. Melbourne 

90. West Coast  

91. Collingwood 

92. St Kilda 

93. Brisbane 

94. Port Adelaide 

95. Geelong 

96. Richmond

ROUND SIX

97. Adelaide

98. North Melbourne

99. Essendon

100. Fremantle

101. Carlton

102. Greater Western Sydney

103. Melbourne

104. West Coast

105. Collingwood

106. St Kilda

107. Geelong

108. Richmond

ROUND SEVEN

109. Adelaide

110. North Melbourne

111. Fremantle

112. Carlton

113. Greater Western Sydney

114. Melbourne

115. West Coast

116. Collingwood

117. Geelong

ROUND EIGHT

118. North Melbourne

119. Fremantle

120. Carlton

121. Greater Western Sydney

122. Collingwood

On 10/27/2020 at 6:09 PM, Toorak said:

Why are we so bad at recruiting.

Maybe we should be targeting recruiters. Eg Geelong or Richmond. It appears they can identify football talent. Unlike Melbourne.

What are you talking about? 

Maybe a decade or so ago but 2016 onwards has been sensational you plum haha

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 134 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 416 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies