DistrACTION Jackson 10,768 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 What about 3 for 6 and a player... with some change back Quote
Demonland 74,545 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 St Kilda need it for all the trading they'll be doing. 2 Quote
whatwhat say what 23,892 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 freo have said they want two first rounders for brad hill - well there ya go, there's two first rounders! 1 Quote
AaronDaveyChipsAndGravey 390 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 On 10/10/2019 at 03:05, Collar-Jazz-Knee said: What about 3 for 6 and a player... with some change back Expand I like this. Pick 3 for 6 and someone like Zac-Langdon I wouldnt mind at all. Really just hinges on how the Giants view their chances of getting Tom Green with just pick 6 now Quote
Redleg 42,195 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 On 10/10/2019 at 03:09, whatwhatsaywhat said: freo have said they want two first rounders for brad hill - well there ya go, there's two first rounders! Expand I don't understand this, Freo could have taken 6 and done the same deal with GWS, unless they are trying to showoff to their fans. Quote
Redleg 42,195 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 On 10/10/2019 at 03:05, Demonland said: Expand Is that the end of us splitting now? Quote
Ted Lasso 19,586 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 Could we split with the Cats? 3 for 14, 17 and 24 so we'd go to the draft with 14, 17, 21, 24 and 30 potentially for Frost 1 Quote
whatwhat say what 23,892 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 On 10/10/2019 at 03:22, Patches O’houlihan said: Could we split with the Cats? 3 for 14, 17 and 24 so we'd go to the draft with 14, 17, 21, 24 and 30 potentially for Frost Expand i would be pretty unimpressed if we did that 2 Quote
Clintosaurus 7,955 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 Reckon Adelaide will bid for Green with Carlton's pick. I would do 3 for 6 and a player - Caldwell would be first choice. Kemp with 6 = HAPPY DAYS!!!! Quote
TRIGON 4,821 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 FWIW the AFL Draft Pick Value Calculator has Trading out pick 3 as the equivalent value of GWS pick 6 and then pick 37. Of course what the calculator can't take into account is the impact of us potentially bidding on Green. 1 Quote
Redleg 42,195 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 On 10/10/2019 at 03:05, Collar-Jazz-Knee said: What about 3 for 6 and a player... with some change back Expand That guarantees GWS the 2 players they want after GC obvious 2. Quote
Clintosaurus 7,955 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 On 10/10/2019 at 03:37, Redleg said: That guarantees GWS the 2 players they want after GC obvious 2. Expand They will get them anyway. Might as well get something from it happening. Quote
Demonland 74,545 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 On 10/10/2019 at 03:09, whatwhatsaywhat said: freo have said they want two first rounders for brad hill - well there ya go, there's two first rounders! Expand They were asking for 2 first rounders. One this year and one next year. However that was the old negotiation trick of asking for the moon before dialing it back. Quote
Ted Lasso 19,586 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 On 10/10/2019 at 03:24, Clintosaurus said: Reckon Adelaide will bid for Green with Carlton's pick. I would do 3 for 6 and a player - Caldwell would be first choice. Kemp with 6 = HAPPY DAYS!!!! Expand I wonder if we could convince them to give us pick 6 and Jeremy Finlayson for pick 3 1 Quote
Redleg 42,195 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 On 10/10/2019 at 03:42, Patches O’houlihan said: I wonder if we could convince them to give us pick 6 and Jeremy Finlayson for pick 3 Expand Could have got him last year for about 40. Quote
Ted Lasso 19,586 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 On 10/10/2019 at 03:43, Redleg said: Could have got him last year for about 40. Expand Yeah, every year there seems to be a player we don't go for and i can't work out why. this year it's Dougal Howard. Quote
whatwhat say what 23,892 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 On 10/10/2019 at 03:44, Patches O’houlihan said: Yeah, every year there seems to be a player we don't go for and i can't work out why. this year it's Dougal Howard. Expand we really don't need any more key defenders Quote
Wiseblood 24,637 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 On 10/10/2019 at 03:22, Patches O’houlihan said: Could we split with the Cats? 3 for 14, 17 and 24 so we'd go to the draft with 14, 17, 21, 24 and 30 potentially for Frost Expand One of those picks would head west for Langdon you would say. I'm not sure the above does it for me though. I think, at this stage, I'd rather take three to the draft. The picks that the Cats have are a little low and, now that GWS have made that trade, there isn't anyone we can do a decent swap with from what I can see. 2 Quote
Ted Lasso 19,586 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 On 10/10/2019 at 03:46, whatwhatsaywhat said: we really don't need any more key defenders Expand Dougal Howard is a clear upgrade on Oscar McDonald though. Quote
whatwhat say what 23,892 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 On 10/10/2019 at 03:50, Patches O’houlihan said: Dougal Howard is a clear upgrade on Oscar McDonald though. Expand nah Quote
Demon3 2,541 Posted October 10, 2019 Author Posted October 10, 2019 On 10/10/2019 at 03:46, Wiseblood said: One of those picks would head west for Langdon you would say. I'm not sure the above does it for me though. I think, at this stage, I'd rather take three to the draft. The picks that the Cats have are a little low and, now that GWS have made that trade, there isn't anyone we can do a decent swap with from what I can see. Expand Use pick 3 - get the third best player in the pool (Young for me). Add Langdon and AT, possibly a Jenkins / Butler type and other picks for the draft to go for pace. Its a good refresh, add them to fit players, second year draftees and get on with business. 1 Quote
AshleyH30 566 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 (edited) Interestingly, with Sydney holding Pick 5, they will almost certainly bid for Green. GWS now hold Pick 6 and will need to jump ahead of Sydney if they want a top 10 pick and Green. The problem for GWS is that if the rumours are true that Sydney have approached us about Pick 3, they will have to outbid Sydney for our pick to prevent Sydney bidding on Green and making Pick 6 Null and Void. Edited October 10, 2019 by AshleyH30 1 Quote
drdrake 3,203 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 GWS would want to try and get our pick 3 to ensure no one bids for Green. How about Pick 3 for Bonar and pick 6, we might need to throw in a late pick for points but I reckon GWS would want to remove any club from bidding for Green, means they basically get the 2 players that would be top 10 picks for 12 and 18, massive win for them We walk away from Trade week with Langdon, Bonar, Tomlinson pick 6 and what ever we get for Frost. 1 Quote
Colm 2,204 Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 On 10/10/2019 at 03:22, Patches O’houlihan said: Could we split with the Cats? 3 for 14, 17 and 24 so we'd go to the draft with 14, 17, 21, 24 and 30 potentially for Frost Expand Cats could be an option I guess. Really want to get a top 10 pick though. If they could swap 17&24 into a good pick in the top ten then it would be more appealing Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.