Jump to content


Recommended Posts

Posted
48 minutes ago, Dr.D said:

doesn't mean we ignored it. We aren't going to get leg speed over night. 

Tactics must be changed to suit what we have available 

hone in on ball skills, don’t just play last years model. It never works...

  • Like 2

Posted
6 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Tactics must be changed to suit what we have available 

hone in on ball skills, don’t just play last years model. It never works...

That would require a different coaching approach SWYL so good luck.

Posted

If so many of you are so sure the FD reviewed that game heavily despite the message over the offseason from the club that it wasn't (see post #4 which mentioned some of the times), please explain why that message came out?  What did they hope to achieve by publicly downplaying how much that loss to WCE was analysed? I don't get it.

Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, S_T said:

If so many of you are so sure the FD reviewed that game heavily despite the message over the offseason from the club that it wasn't (see post #4 which mentioned some of the times), please explain why that message came out?  What did they hope to achieve by publicly downplaying how much that loss to WCE was analysed? I don't get it.

Goodwin backed in his Gameplan, calling it a bad day. 

I always have thought it was far worse, along with others on here. 

The Coach now, either still backs in his plan or he has hit the wall. 

I think Simon is a good bloke, but i have always been worried that a rookie coach would not be able to sort this club out, our issues are too deep. 

He still has the chance to prove me wrong, and i hope he does, but a huge loss tonight will be a serious punch on and off the field. 

Our list is not balanced, regardless of injury. The 2019 rules have completely sideswiped the MFC Football Dept. 

how this happened has me very concerned. 

Edited by Sir Why You Little
Posted
1 hour ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Goodwin backed in his Gameplan, calling it a bad day. 

I always have thought it was far worse, along with others on here. 

The Coach now, either still backs in his plan or he has hit the wall. 

I think Simon is a good bloke, but i have always been worried that a rookie coach would not be able to sort this club out, our issues are too deep. 

He still has the chance to prove me wrong, and i hope he does, but a huge loss tonight will be a serious punch on and off the field. 

Our list is not balanced, regardless of injury. The 2019 rules have completely sideswiped the MFC Football Dept. 

how this happened has me very concerned. 

I'm not sure Goodwin still qualifies as a "rookie coach". Not only is he onto his third season as senior coach, but he's also had many years as an assistant including a couple at Melbourne as part of a proper succession plan.

Posted
12 hours ago, Dr.D said:

doesn't mean we ignored it. We aren't going to get leg speed over night. 

But we should have got it over the off season. Thats the point.

Posted
20 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

I'm not sure Goodwin still qualifies as a "rookie coach". Not only is he onto his third season as senior coach, but he's also had many years as an assistant including a couple at Melbourne as part of a proper succession plan.

His first Senior Coaching job was with us, We have a bad history with Rookies...


Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

His first Senior Coaching job was with us, We have a bad history with Rookies...

How many years do you think a coach has to serve before he's no longer a "rookie"? It can't just be that a coach is a "rookie coach" when he's at his first senior job. By that definition Alistair Clarkson and John Longmire would still be "rookies". 

I can accept Goodwin was a "rookie coach" in his first year as our Senior Coach and maybe even his second. But not now that he's into his third.

Edited by La Dee-vina Comedia
typo
Posted
33 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

Where from?  

Reckon the draft and trade period would have been a good place to start..

Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

How many years do you think a coach has to serve before he's no longer a "rookie"? It can't just be that a coach is a "rookie coach" when he's at his first senior job. By that definition Alistair Clarkson and John Longmire would still be "rookies". 

I can accept Goodwin was a "rookie coach" in his first year as our Senior Coach and maybe even his second. But not now that he's into his third.

I used 'rookie' yesterday referring to Goodwin and Mahoney not yet having the experience to steer us thru difficult times such as now, without Roos (for Goodwin) and PJ (for Mahoney) to guide or cover them.

I was making a case for a Neil Balme type to steady the ship and support them thru challenging times thereby reducing the risk of 'rookie' errors.   'So 'rookie' was intended as breadth of experience not time.   

Maybe that is where SWYL picked up the 'rookie' reference.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero
Posted
7 minutes ago, Demon3 said:

Reckon the draft and trade period would have been a good place to start..

And which players?  

Just saying 'trade and draft period' is an easy out for you.  Who are these quick and skillful players we missed out on?

Posted
28 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

How many years do you think a coach has to serve before he's no longer a "rookie"? It can't just be that a coach is a "rookie coach" when he's at his first senior job. By that definition Alistair Clarkson and John Longmire would still be "rookies". 

I can accept Goodwin was a "rookie coach" in his first year as our Senior Coach and maybe even his second. But not now that he's into his third.

Well then we think differently 

Clarkson and Longmire climbed the mountain ⛰ 

Goodwin thus far has come crashing down to the ground, with no plan B

Posted
13 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

I used 'rookie' yesterday referring to Goodwin and Mahoney not yet having the experience to steer us thru difficult times such as now, without Roos (for Goodwin) and PJ (for Mahoney) to guide or cover them.

I was making a case for a Neil Balme type to steady the ship and support them thru challenging times thereby reducing the risk of 'rookie' errors.   'So 'rookie' was intended as breadth of experience not time.   

Maybe that is where SWYL picked up the 'rookie' reference.

No I spoke for myself

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

And which players?  

Just saying 'trade and draft period' is an easy out for you.  Who are these quick and skillful players we missed out on?

Its not an easy out  because Ill tell you exactley ..  and it goes back to the original post, if a proper review was done of the West Coast prelim loss then they would have identified they need to get some serious leg speed into the team.. rather than be seduced by what they think they need.. another big defender.. ridiculous. Take pick 6 and get Zac Buttress , dont use pick 27 on another inside mid like Tom Sparrow, go for Ian hill, quick outside player with great skills, Nick Hind was the quickest player in the VFL.. but we take a bloke called Aaron NIetshcke no one has ever heard of.. i could go on..  Matthew Parker is electric.. the Saints nabbed him at 47.

 

SO there are heaps of examples.. but im a bit over the to and fro Wiseblood, i respect your decision to disagree. Hope the Dees can turn it around.

  • Like 2

Posted
11 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Well then we think differently 

Clarkson and Longmire climbed the mountain ⛰ 

Goodwin thus far has come crashing down to the ground, with no plan B

It took Clarkson 5 years to as you say " climb the mountain" as senior coach and Longmire inherited a very professional and experienced side to win a flag in his 2nd year.

Posted
4 minutes ago, drysdale demon said:

It took Clarkson 5 years to as you say " climb the mountain" as senior coach and Longmire inherited a very professional and experienced side to win a flag in his 2nd year.

Thanks for passing on information that we all know

Goodwin is a Rookie Coach at a Club that doesn’t know how to win (still)

Clarkson and Longmire weren’t put in that situation 

Posted
3 hours ago, S_T said:

If so many of you are so sure the FD reviewed that game heavily despite the message over the offseason from the club that it wasn't (see post #4 which mentioned some of the times), please explain why that message came out?  What did they hope to achieve by publicly downplaying how much that loss to WCE was analysed? I don't get it.

I'll tell you why. 

As i have said on any number of occasions across multiple threads - and at the real risk of repeating myself and boring posters to death - our communication at the club is appalling. There are any number of examples from big to small. 

PJ made it clear that our focus in terms of our resourcing had to be the football department as you are going nowhere if not winning. And hard to argue against that. Implicit though in that focus was that once winning began other aspects of the club would get attention.

I can only assume that has not occurred because our communication and membership engagement is not up to scratch and is a black eye on the club. And on Gary Pert i reckon. Maybe the last point is bit tough on Pert, but he has had enough time at the club to sort things and communication and membership engagement must be among his KPIs.

Our messaging (or more accurately mixed messaging), our website, our social media, how we respond to membership queries (not blaming the staff by the way on this - it is clearly a system issue and reflects a lack of investment) and our members engagement strategies are all poor.

 

 

  • Like 1

Posted
33 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Thanks for passing on information that we all know

Goodwin is a Rookie Coach at a Club that doesn’t know how to win (still)

Clarkson and Longmire weren’t put in that situation 

Why don't you go into hibernation for the next 5 years or more until Goodwin is no longer coaching the Demons following a successful career.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Demon3 said:

Reckon the draft and trade period would have been a good place to start..

I reckon we were D3... Gaff.  But IMO during the 2nd Half of the season changed our views on the priority of Gaff,  and at the End, showed we needed much more than foot speed/running power ...

Maybe our tall defenders hadn't come on as wanted or expected during 2019, and with Levers 2nd knee injury... the footy dept May have decided to get the best Tall back we could find. 

.... And then we went to the draft, selecting quick running players.   But they are still 1st Yr players.

...................................................................

 

I reckon Our 2019 gloss made us look far more  'complete',  than we really were/are. We Are still building, still developing...  maybe more like  75%  finished ???

.

Edited by DV8
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, DV8 said:

I reckon we were D3... Gaff.  But IMO during the 2nd Half of the season changed our views on the priority of Gaff,  and at the End, showed we needed much more than foot speed/running power ...

Maybe our tall defenders hadn't come on as wanted or expected during 2019, and with Levers 2nd knee injury... the footy dept May have decided to get the best Tall back we could find. 

.... And then we went to the draft, selecting quick running players.   But they are still 1st Yr players.

All fair points DV8. As i said, its an oponion game, i respect those who disagree, iI' in the camp that we ignored our most pressing needs and didn't react to a major loss. I hope the  players we drafted really do make it, time will tell.

 

Go Dees.

Posted
13 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Tactics must be changed to suit what we have available 

hone in on ball skills, don’t just play last years model. It never works...

Hawthorn's foot skills, for example

Geelong with their ball movement from the back half (hand and foot skills)

Both those teams "tweaked" their style over the years.

Not sure our game plan is amenable to tweaking; as we've seen over the last few weeks, it's all or nothing. When we lose, we lose really badly - we have no "give" in our structures - they are brittle.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, drysdale demon said:

Why don't you go into hibernation for the next 5 years or more until Goodwin is no longer coaching the Demons following a successful career.

Leave the humour out of this. You are not a funny man

you and Satyr have the same Blind Faith

So what is your margin for tonight?

Posted
22 minutes ago, frankie_d said:

Hawthorn's foot skills, for example

Geelong with their ball movement from the back half (hand and foot skills)

Both those teams "tweaked" their style over the years.

Not sure our game plan is amenable to tweaking; as we've seen over the last few weeks, it's all or nothing. When we lose, we lose really badly - we have no "give" in our structures - they are brittle.

Great isn’t it....

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    2024 Player Reviews: #36 Kysaiah Pickett

    The Demons’ aggressive small forward who kicks goals and defends the Demons’ ball in the forward arc. When he’s on song, he’s unstoppable but he did blot his copybook with a three week suspension in the final round. Date of Birth: 2 June 2001 Height: 171cm Games MFC 2024: 21 Career Total: 106 Goals MFC 2024: 36 Career Total: 161 Brownlow Medal Votes: 3 Melbourne Football Club: 4th Best & Fairest: 369 votes

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 5

    TRAINING: Friday 15th November 2024

    Demonland Trackwatchers took advantage of the beautiful sunshine to head down to Gosch's Paddock and witness the return of Clayton Oliver to club for his first session in the lead up to the 2025 season. DEMONLAND'S PRESEASON TRAINING OBSERVATIONS Clarry in the house!! Training: JVR, McVee, Windsor, Tholstrup, Woey, Brown, Petty, Adams, Chandler, Turner, Bowey, Seston, Kentfield, Laurie, Sparrow, Viney, Rivers, Jefferson, Hore, Howes, Verrall, AMW, Clarry Tom Campbell is here

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Training Reports

    2024 Player Reviews: #7 Jack Viney

    The tough on baller won his second Keith 'Bluey' Truscott Trophy in a narrow battle with skipper Max Gawn and Alex Neal-Bullen and battled on manfully in the face of a number of injury niggles. Date of Birth: 13 April 1994 Height: 178cm Games MFC 2024: 23 Career Total: 219 Goals MFC 2024: 10 Career Total: 66 Brownlow Medal Votes: 8

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 3

    TRAINING: Wednesday 13th November 2024

    A couple of Demonland Trackwatchers braved the rain and headed down to Gosch's paddock to bring you their observations from the second day of Preseason training for the 1st to 4th Year players. DITCHA'S PRESEASON TRAINING OBSERVATIONS I attended some of the training today. Richo spoke to me and said not to believe what is in the media, as we will good this year. Jefferson and Kentfield looked big and strong.  Petty was doing all the training. Adams looked like he was in rehab.  KE

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Training Reports

    2024 Player Reviews: #15 Ed Langdon

    The Demon running machine came back with a vengeance after a leaner than usual year in 2023.  Date of Birth: 1 February 1996 Height: 182cm Games MFC 2024: 22 Career Total: 179 Goals MFC 2024: 9 Career Total: 76 Brownlow Medal Votes: 5 Melbourne Football Club: 5th Best & Fairest: 352 votes

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 8

    2024 Player Reviews: #24 Trent Rivers

    The premiership defender had his best year yet as he was given the opportunity to move into the midfield and made a good fist of it. Date of Birth: 30 July 2001 Games MFC 2024: 23 Career Total: 100 Goals MFC 2024: 2 Career Total:  9 Brownlow Medal Votes: 7 Melbourne Football Club: 6th Best & Fairest: 350 votes

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 2

    TRAINING: Monday 11th November 2024

    Veteran Demonland Trackwatchers Kev Martin, Slartibartfast & Demon Wheels were on hand at Gosch's Paddock to kick off the official first training session for the 1st to 4th year players with a few elder statesmen in attendance as well. KEV MARTIN'S PRESEASON TRAINING OBSERVATIONS Beautiful morning. Joy all round, they look like they want to be there.  21 in the squad. Looks like the leadership group is TMac, Viney Chandler and Petty. They look like they have sli

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Training Reports 2

    2024 Player Reviews: #1 Steven May

    The years are rolling by but May continued to be rock solid in a key defensive position despite some injury concerns. He showed great resilience in coming back from a nasty rib injury and is expected to continue in that role for another couple of seasons. Date of Birth: 10 January 1992 Height: 193cm Games MFC 2024: 19 Career Total: 235 Goals MFC 2024: 1 Career Total: 24 Melbourne Football Club: 9th Best & Fairest: 316 votes

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 3

    2024 Player Reviews: #4 Judd McVee

    It was another strong season from McVee who spent most of his time mainly at half back but he also looked at home on a few occasions when he was moved into the midfield. There could be more of that in 2025. Date of Birth: 7 August 2003 Height: 185cm Games MFC 2024: 23 Career Total: 48 Goals MFC 2024: 1 Career Total: 1 Brownlow Medal Votes: 1 Melbourne Football Club: 7th Best & Fairest: 347 votes

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 5
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...