8 minutes ago, Richard Tionary said:

Yeah true I didn't really think about that, just put 2 and 2 together. Thought Smith had an impact against Port without the disposals though. 6 tackles and is a real physical presence. 

Love the handle BTW.  Took a few minutes but I got it in the end.

 

Clever!

39 minutes ago, DubDee said:

IN - Weeds

OUT - T Mac (injured)

I wouldn't make any other changes. I know they are saying T Mac should be right and he is tough but you don't mess around with internal bleeding and bruising to the lung.  Another hit in the same place on sunday and it would not be pretty (although I aint a doctor and will back the clubs medicos).

We don't need Frost at the back as we have O Mac, Smith and Hibbo.  Membrey only 188 and Bruce not playing

Didn’t a similar thing happen to Riewoldt against Adelaide this year ? Big hit ...coughing up blood ...concerns against flying home ...played the following week & was probably the reason they won 

1 hour ago, Wiseblood said:

Geary will be a handy in, but Webster is a huge out for them.  His run and carry off the flanks has been terrific this season.  It's actually a bigger out than I think most people would give credit for (not saying you think that way LH, just in general).

I do think Webster is a big out...that is why I suggested we rest Tom Mc...

46 minutes ago, DemonLad5 said:

My guess would be that he'll come in for Tim Smith even if Tmac plays. 7 snags in the 2s including 19 touches and 12 marks will get you a recall

The Coburg factor worries me though

Not much opposition

22 minutes ago, jumbo returns said:

The Coburg factor worries me though

Not much opposition

yes JR, but I think thats balanced out by the fact he did in wet conditions. Not easy for a tall forward when its wet and slippery.  Was an impressive game. 

1 hour ago, Richard Tionary said:

Apolgies Bin, still finding my feet!

Not a problem Dick. Welcome btw.

As you are new you get a pass on the posting statements that sound like fact with no source.

The posters with more that 200 posts who do so regularly do not.

If however you start posting stuff like 'this is the worst loss in the history of the club', 'hogan has played two bad games in a ow and should be dropped', etc etc i reserve the right to call you Reac

Edited June 28, 20187 yr by binman

Petty to debut this week, mark my words. Has been playing well and been an emergency so he has gotta come in.

Edited June 28, 20187 yr by Drunkn167

1 minute ago, Drunkn167 said:

Petty to debut this week, mark my words.

Yeh boi! 

1 minute ago, Drunkn167 said:

Petty to debut this week, mark my words.

Ahead of Smith?

1 minute ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Yeh boi! 

Just a hunch.

Just now, Drunkn167 said:

Just a hunch.

Of course.. 

5 minutes ago, Drunkn167 said:

Petty to debut this week, mark my words.

Could be correct. At the end of training the group gathered and when they split I could see a few players supporting Petty (perhaps as congratulations for selection). Still only a guess though.

1 minute ago, kevin martin said:

Could be correct. At the end of training the group gathered and when they split I could see a few players supporting Petty (perhaps as congratulations for selection). Still only a guess though.

Drunkn brohym is on the list. All over it. 

Ideal week to debut Petty, would much rather him than Frost

1 hour ago, Petraccattack said:

yes JR, but I think thats balanced out by the fact he did in wet conditions. Not easy for a tall forward when its wet and slippery.  Was an impressive game. 

True that.....

Petty confirmed to debut

http://m.melbournefc.com.au/news/2018-06-28/petty-pleased-with-debut-news

Edited June 28, 20187 yr by Mickey

1 hour ago, Drunkn167 said:

Petty to debut this week, mark my words. Has been playing well and been an emergency so he has gotta come in.

From what I've read Drunkn he's been really consistent in the 2s