Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Firstly we shouldn't be ageist against Vince and we should give him a 1 year contract.

Due to giving away our first rnd pick I think we can only have 3 picks in the draft 31, 49, 51 ATM.

McKenna and Bull to swap around lists.

Hold on to Vandenberg to see if his luck can finally change.

Obviously the big fish we are going to get is Gaff due to FA.

Delist Pedersen, Bugg, Kennedy Harris, Johnstone, Keilty (rookie)

SENIOR

B: J.LEWIS, O.MCDONALD, JETTA

HB: HIBBERD, LEVER, SALEM

C : GAFF (FA), OLIVER, JONES

HF: PETRACCA, HOGAN, FRITSCH

F: MELKSHAM, T,MCDONALD, WEIDEMAN

FOLL: GAWN, BRAYSHAW, VINEY

IC: VINCE, HARMES, NEAL-BULLEN, SPARGO

VFL

B: J.SMITH, FROST, J.WAGNER

HB: HUNT, PETTY, PICK 49 (ATLEY\BENDIGO)

C : STRETCH, TYSON, BAKER

HF: BALIC, T.SMITH, HANNAN

F: GARLETT, PICK 51 (MUNN\STURT), KENT

FOLL: KING, MAYNARD (ROOKIE), PICK 31 (O'HALLORAN\JETS)

IC: FILIPOVIC (ROOKIE), VANDENBERG, MCKENNA (ROOKIE SECOND RND PICK), C.WAGNER (ROOKIE CASEY\FIRST RND PICK)

 

 
  • Author
5 minutes ago, SFebey said:

You’ve turned into a spam bot!

That's a bit harsh you hurt my feelings☹️

 

Watch Pies make a big play for Sam Weideman. Pies will offer 1st round pick. Pick 8-9 (pies 1st round) for Weid and our pick 26-27 (2nd round). 

F-orf is my reply.  We have invested and he is ready to rock in 2019. Could be our Hogan-Weideman-Tommymcd forward era. 

3 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Watch Pies make a big play for Sam Weideman. Pies will offer 1st round pick. Pick 8-9 (pies 1st round) for Weid and our pick 26-27 (2nd round). 

F-orf is my reply.  We have invested and he is ready to rock in 2019. Could be our Hogan-Weideman-Tommymcd forward era. 

purely hypothetically.. if trading weideman meant we could get gaff, would you do it? with gaff i reckon we'd be top four and really pushing for a flag. i think weideman is too important personally. he'll come good. could be on the cards though if the club gets aggressive and looks for a flag ASAP instead of in 3-4 years time..

would never trade a KPF (a young one at that) in the hope of bringing in a mid.

Better to go like for like. Out - Tyson, In - Gaff.

List is a lot more balanced doing this.

PS. All recent trades we have done with the filth has resulted in us getting the raw end of the stick. They can GAGF AFAIC.

 

Oh a WERRIDEE team line up thread...

unnamed.gif

Edited by dazzledavey36


4 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Watch Pies make a big play for Sam Weideman. Pies will offer 1st round pick. Pick 8-9 (pies 1st round) for Weid and our pick 26-27 (2nd round). 

F-orf is my reply.  We have invested and he is ready to rock in 2019. Could be our Hogan-Weideman-Tommymcd forward era. 

Why would we trade him for pick 8 or 9 when we drafted him at 9 and have put a few years of development in to him? 

1 minute ago, Mickey said:

Why would we trade him for pick 8 or 9 when we drafted him at 9 and have put a few years of development in to him? 

Don't listen to him.  He's the king of the 'hypothetical trade' that's based on absolutely nothing.

52 minutes ago, Rocky said:

purely hypothetically.. if trading weideman meant we could get gaff, would you do it? with gaff i reckon we'd be top four and really pushing for a flag. i think weideman is too important personally. he'll come good. could be on the cards though if the club gets aggressive and looks for a flag ASAP instead of in 3-4 years time..

Nope; no way would I.

I prefer the Weide.

19 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Watch Pies make a big play for Sam Weideman. Pies will offer 1st round pick. Pick 8-9 (pies 1st round) for Weid and our pick 26-27 (2nd round). 

F-orf is my reply.  We have invested and he is ready to rock in 2019. Could be our Hogan-Weideman-Tommymcd forward era. 

Can those making comment please read the second paragraph. The Weid is a keeper

Interesting the overwhelming Weid love here. I was expecting much more anti-weed sentiment.


We have some very good players of our own that are without a contract next season. How about we worry about signing them before raping and pillaging the rest of the league.

Lot's of mail on Weeds to Collingwood given they might be losing Moore.

2 hours ago, Dappa Dan said:

Interesting the overwhelming Weid love here. I was expecting much more anti-weed sentiment.

He's given everyone a hint of his wares

Now people have something witnessed to believe in.

My Christmas stocking is very satisfied, from a couple of years back.

 

But this years 2018 Xmas stocking is still empty so far.  It wants a running mid signed sealed & delivered.

I'd prefer one of Tex's !

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2F4K7nbcgs

Edited by DV8

2 hours ago, Dappa Dan said:

Interesting the overwhelming Weid love here. I was expecting much more anti-weed sentiment.

I feel like we would be a predominantly pro-weed club.

 

images.jpg

Edited by mongrel

4 hours ago, Adzman said:

We have some very good players of our own that are without a contract next season. How about we worry about signing them before raping and pillaging the rest of the league.

Lot's of mail on Weeds to Collingwood given they might be losing Moore.

oh yeah? and what's that?..

6 hours ago, mongrel said:

I feel like we would be a predominantly pro-weed club.

 

images.jpg

NOTHING WRONG... with a bit of Weid.


3 hours ago, Rocky said:

oh yeah? and what's that?..

People will laugh at me for this... but...

I'd give up a third round pick for Darcy. An early one, too. He's not Tom Boyd.

i wouldn't laugh dan, but he seems surplus to our requirements.. i reckon we have other priorities anyway. but if he's going cheap, why not?

19 hours ago, Rocky said:

oh yeah? and what's that?..

That Collingwood would look to replace a young tall with a young tall. Plenty of chatter from Collingwood fans about it. Not sure you will get anything concrete at this stage of the year.

 
20 hours ago, Dappa Dan said:

People will laugh at me for this... but...

I'd give up a third round pick for Darcy. An early one, too. He's not Tom Boyd.

I would too.

The young fella might turn, into a Follower.

worth the risk.

he's not what we need 

 

and you don't deal with the filth

Edited by daisycutter


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 95 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 366 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies