1

Edited July 8, 20186 yr by Redleg

2 hours ago, KingDingAling said:

If Murphy seriously wants to come to MFC he would be very high on my list. The only concern would be injuries, but if I could name a couple of players that would improve our side significantly it would be Josh Kelly or Marc Murphy. We are embarrassingly bad by foot. It is the type of embarrassingly bad by foot that I saw when I used to play under 11's football.

didn't Murphy commit to the blues?

1 hour ago, WERRIDEE said:

Let's hope we have Gaff in the bag and not Hannebery  He's the type of player that will ruin the club.

ooh, disagree Werri.

Why do you say that?   I'd prefer Hannebury,,, unless you know something I don't?

1 hour ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Hannebery has been below average this season. 

so lets get him.

gaff will cost a pretty penny - either to extract him or for meth coke to keep him

5 minutes ago, DV8 said:

didn't Murphy commit to the blues?

ooh, disagree Werri.

Why do you say that?   I'd prefer Hannebury,,, unless you know something I don't?

Inside, slow and injury prone. Hannebery is someone we don't need we need outside run and carry like Gaff not Hannebery he is cooked.

Murphy did commit 2 years to Carlton wouldn't want him anyway another player that is cooked.

Edited July 8, 20186 yr by WERRIDEE

10 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

Inside, slow and injury prone. Hannebery is someone we don't need we need outside run and carry like Gaff not Hannebery he is cooked.

Murphy did commit 2 years to Carlton wouldn't want him anyway another player that is cooked.

We cannot afford every uncooked star. We need some maturity that is cooked, that's still resting. prior to dinner. 

This sort of mature talent helps guide us and maintains some cap space for the the near future for those who become available.

We DO NOT want to lockup all our finances on one or two players,,, who may, or may-not be worthy.

16 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

Inside, slow and injury prone. Hannebery is someone we don't need we need outside run and carry like Gaff not Hannebery he is cooked.

Murphy did commit 2 years to Carlton wouldn't want him anyway another player that is cooked.

Would you think Hannebury better than Tyson?

We need to accumulate players of Gaff's quality

Surprised we haven't had a "Hunting for Hanneberries" thread created yet

I don't want to be the one to start it though as it's not my rumour...

Edited July 8, 20186 yr by John Demonic

2 hours ago, Redleg said:

1

My precise thoughts exactly Redleg. 

2 hours ago, John Demonic said:

Surprised we haven't had a "Hunting for Hanneberries" thread created yet

I don't want to be the one to start it though as it's not my rumour...

It’s a terrible rumour, Hannebery is cooked. 

6 hours ago, FireInTheBelly said:

We need to accumulate players of Gaff's quality

I think the accumulated consensus of DL is that the MfC needs to accumulate accumulators of Gaffs caliber

Geez I hate the expression ‘cooked’ when it’s applied to footballers.

There’s something not quite right about it.

Whilst I’d like to see Gaff in the red and the blue, I don’t see why doesn’t Goodwin throw Jayden Hunt on a wing if he’s not liking him in defence. He definitely has outside run. In spades.

 

2 minutes ago, Ron Burgundy said:

Geez I hate the expression ‘cooked’ when it’s applied to footballers.

There’s something not quite right about it.

Whilst I’d like to see Gaff in the red and the blue, I don’t see why doesn’t Goodwin throw Jayden Hunt on a wing if he’s not liking him in defence. He definitely has outside run. In spades.

 

Hunt’s disposal and Kicking can be average as we have all seen

12 minutes ago, Ron Burgundy said:

Geez I hate the expression ‘cooked’ when it’s applied to footballers.

It describes his situation perfectly. No need to fluff it. 

Edited July 8, 20186 yr by Ethan Tremblay

33 minutes ago, deefella said:

Hunt’s disposal and Kicking can be average as we have all seen

Yes

let me know when hunt is even close to giving a master class in accumulation 

10 hours ago, FireInTheBelly said:

We need to accumulate players of Gaff's quality

We also need to accumulate reasons for him to come, accumulated enough salary cap, and accumulate our support.

13 hours ago, DV8 said:

Would you think Hannebury better than Tyson?

Trade Tyson stay away from Hannebery.

Not a bad game from Gaff yesterday, 41 + 2goals, against a good side. 

15 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

The same as Lever 800k

Where do you get your information that Lever is on that?  

3 minutes ago, It's Time said:

Where do you get your information that Lever is on that?  

Asked to borrow a fiver off Lever last week and when he opened his wallet took a peek. 

5 hours ago, Ron Burgundy said:

Geez I hate the expression ‘cooked’ when it’s applied to footballers.

I watch most Swans games up here. Hannebury is a shadow of his former self. I can only hope he's injured if he isn't then IMO the best way to describe him is "cooked". For some reason his running ability which was never fast but was elite endurance has vanished. He can't impact contests anymore. He's not playing in the guts and playing on the wing he's become non competitive. It is very sad to see. 

In any event his best position is as an in and under extractor exactly what we don't need. Don't understand why his name is even being raised.

Gaff, on the other hand is exactly what we need.  

7 minutes ago, Robot Devil said:

Asked to borrow a fiver off Lever last week and when he opened his wallet took a peek. 

Was this what it looked like inside?

Edited July 9, 20186 yr by It's Time

14 minutes ago, It's Time said:

Where do you get your information that Lever is on that?  

I have it from a very reliable source it’s $750k

19 minutes ago, SFebey said:

I have it from a very reliable source it’s $750k

I have it from a very reliable source is $650k. 

 

Well ok. Its a friend of a friend of a friend reliable source. But the source that gave it to me has been very reliable in the past. 

Edited July 9, 20186 yr by It's Time