17 hours ago, Robot Devil said:

I’ll be interested to see what this incident warrants. 

http://www.afl.com.au/video/2018-04-01/is-cripps-in-trouble-for-this-low-blow

The same as Oliver according to Mr MRO. Also, Lewis received a $1500 fine for misconduct.

Edit: $1500 for Lewis with an early plea.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2018-04-02/match-review-full-statement-round-two-weekend-games

Edited April 2, 20187 yr by Demon77

20 minutes ago, Demon77 said:

The same as Oliver according to Mr MRO. Also, Lewis received a $1500 fine for misconduct.

they don't explain the 3 misconducts. anyone see what they were?

• Melbourne's Jordan Lewis $1500 for misconduct;
• Lions Nick Robertson and Dayne Zorko $1500 each for misconduct;

2 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

they don't explain the 3 misconducts. anyone see what they were?

• Melbourne's Jordan Lewis $1500 for misconduct;
• Lions Nick Robertson and Dayne Zorko $1500 each for misconduct;

I edited the previous post to add the link DC. It goes into more detail. 

Edited April 2, 20187 yr by Demon77

3 minutes ago, Demon77 said:

I edited the previous post to add the link DC. It goes into more detail. 

it just says "misconduct", same with the video

3 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

it just says "misconduct", same with the video

You’re right, there’s no detail of the actual incidents, it only states Lewis’ misconduct was against Mathieson in the second quarter.

4 minutes ago, Demon77 said:

You’re right, there’s no detail of the actual incidents, it only states Lewis’ misconduct was against Mathieson in the second quarter.

Well it was Mathieson so he should be forgiven.

25 minutes ago, america de cali said:

Well it was Mathieson so he should be forgiven.

You mean he should receive $1500

On 26/02/2018 at 3:56 PM, Jaded said:

I love that he's an angry kid, but he needs to really learn to control how he reacts to taggers, because the least helpful thing he can do for the team is get suspended. 

We need him in the side, and he should take tagging as flattery and another challenge he needs to overcome, not as an excuses to release his frustrations.

He is treading a fine line, and until he gains Hodge like status, the MRP and umpires will continue to punish him for every little indiscretion. 

 

I get your post but its the nature of the beast so to speak.

Think john mcenroe.

Tacked onto the original Oliver fine this is a bit misleading, I went looking to see what he'd been fined for, but only Lewis has been fined.  It should have it's own thread.  

In the report it said the Brisbane doctor was consulted. Probably lucky we weren't playing Carlton or Lewis would probably be out for 3 weeks for whatever he did.

30 minutes ago, Nasher said:

In the report it said the Brisbane doctor was consulted. Probably lucky we weren't playing Carlton or Lewis would probably be out for 3 weeks for whatever he did.

They initially thought Lewis had taken Mathieson's head clean off during an attempted tackle. Luckily their doctor found it hidden inside his jumper.

4 minutes ago, Skuit said:

They initially thought Lewis had taken Mathieson's head clean off during an attempted tackle. Luckily their doctor found it hidden inside his jumper.

...so not the back part of his shorts where it should be put.

 

15 minutes ago, david_neitz_is_my_dad said:

 

Remember Norf are protected under the Boomer Harvey Snipe Agreement. 

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2018-05-07/match-review-full-statement-round-seven

Nathan Jones, Melbourne, has been charged with misconduct against Jack Newnes, St Kilda, during the third quarter of the Round Seven match between Melbourne and St Kilda, played at Etihad Stadium on Sunday May 6, 2018.

In summary, he can accept a $1500 sanction with an early plea.

Misconduct is fixed financial sanction of $2500. The player can accept a $1500 sanction with an early plea. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Contact between St Kilda’s Jake Carlisle and Melbourne’s Jesse Hogan from the third quarter of Sunday’s match was assessed. The ball was kicked through for a point with Carlisle and Hogan coming towards the goal square, after the ball has passed the line and registered a score. On the behind-goal vision, Carlisle turns toward Hogan and makes contact with an open hand to the throat area of the Melbourne player. The umpire in control of the play is within five metres and pays a free kick to Hogan for high contact. It was the view of the Match Review Officer that there was high contact made to the Melbourne player and the contact was not excessively exaggerated by Hogan. It was also the view of the match review officer that the force used in the contact was below that required for a charge to be laid, and no further action was required after the free kick was paid.

And it appears the punch to the stomach is now only a fine, after Steele dropped Max in the last quarter.  Initially I thought he had gone down with an injury it was that forceful. 

Max was furious and at the next ruck contest invited him to stand a little closer....which Steele refused to do. 

4 hours ago, Demonland said:

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2018-05-07/match-review-full-statement-round-seven

Nathan Jones, Melbourne, has been charged with misconduct against Jack Newnes, St Kilda, during the third quarter of the Round Seven match between Melbourne and St Kilda, played at Etihad Stadium on Sunday May 6, 2018.

In summary, he can accept a $1500 sanction with an early plea.

Misconduct is fixed financial sanction of $2500. The player can accept a $1500 sanction with an early plea. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Contact between St Kilda’s Jake Carlisle and Melbourne’s Jesse Hogan from the third quarter of Sunday’s match was assessed. The ball was kicked through for a point with Carlisle and Hogan coming towards the goal square, after the ball has passed the line and registered a score. On the behind-goal vision, Carlisle turns toward Hogan and makes contact with an open hand to the throat area of the Melbourne player. The umpire in control of the play is within five metres and pays a free kick to Hogan for high contact. It was the view of the Match Review Officer that there was high contact made to the Melbourne player and the contact was not excessively exaggerated by Hogan. It was also the view of the match review officer that the force used in the contact was below that required for a charge to be laid, and no further action was required after the free kick was paid.

Good to hear that the match review officer is an expert on "perforated wind pipe" matters. 

On 5/7/2018 at 4:50 PM, Demonland said:

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2018-05-07/match-review-full-statement-round-seven

Nathan Jones, Melbourne, has been charged with misconduct against Jack Newnes, St Kilda, during the third quarter of the Round Seven match between Melbourne and St Kilda, played at Etihad Stadium on Sunday May 6, 2018.

In summary, he can accept a $1500 sanction with an early plea.

Misconduct is fixed financial sanction of $2500. The player can accept a $1500 sanction with an early plea. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Contact between St Kilda’s Jake Carlisle and Melbourne’s Jesse Hogan from the third quarter of Sunday’s match was assessed. The ball was kicked through for a point with Carlisle and Hogan coming towards the goal square, after the ball has passed the line and registered a score. On the behind-goal vision, Carlisle turns toward Hogan and makes contact with an open hand to the throat area of the Melbourne player. The umpire in control of the play is within five metres and pays a free kick to Hogan for high contact. It was the view of the Match Review Officer that there was high contact made to the Melbourne player and the contact was not excessively exaggerated by Hogan. It was also the view of the match review officer that the force used in the contact was below that required for a charge to be laid, and no further action was required after the free kick was paid.

Just picked up on this.

Does anyone have any idea of the nature of our captain’s misconduct.

Doesn't Christian have to specify anything more than “misconduct”?

And doesn’t  a chop to the throat qualify as misconduct.

Fair dinkum, this Guy is far worse than the old MRP ever was.  A law unto himself. 

 

Does that tossed Christian just have to say “misconduct” to fill Gill’s coffers?

What is the allegation?