Jump to content

Angus Brayshaw Concussion Issues

Featured Replies

 

I crashed my motorbike on the weekend, I hit ice. I dislocated my finger, tore my pants and cracked my helmet, I remember a bang but that is all. No headaches no issues, will need a new helmet.

Now I have heard and read many reports about helmets not minimizing concussion but I would never ride a motorbike or a push bike without one. Does it give me confidence? Yes. If you can slow down the deceleration of the brain then you may reduce concussion. I understand the increased risk of neck & back injuries. A risk I accept.

We have had this discussion many times and it would appear that the two sides simply disagree.

11 minutes ago, ManDee said:

I crashed my motorbike on the weekend, I hit ice. I dislocated my finger, tore my pants and cracked my helmet, I remember a bang but that is all. No headaches no issues, will need a new helmet.

Now I have heard and read many reports about helmets not minimizing concussion but I would never ride a motorbike or a push bike without one. Does it give me confidence? Yes. If you can slow down the deceleration of the brain then you may reduce concussion. I understand the increased risk of neck & back injuries. A risk I accept.

We have had this discussion many times and it would appear that the two sides simply disagree.

The helmet stopped you from splitting your head open, it does nothing for concussion.

 
31 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

Good to see him in a helmet and back training. Hope the club tries everything they can to get him back and playing whilst looking after his safety. He's a talented and driven kid who we invested a pick 3 in so obviously we'd love him to have a long healthy career in the red and blue!

I'd love Brayshaw in for Bugg right now... getting this kid fit and healthy is super important to our future success.

9 minutes ago, Clint Bizkit said:

The helmet stopped you from splitting your head open, it does nothing for concussion.

Thanks Doc.

 


25 minutes ago, Clint Bizkit said:

The helmet stopped you from splitting your head open, it does nothing for concussion.

that is true, but i wouldn't say it does nothing for concussion. a properly fitted helmet with appropriate cushioning material should help a little.

Just now, daisycutter said:

that is true, but i wouldn't say it does nothing for concussion. a properly fitted helmet with appropriate cushioning material should help a little.

It's not actually stopping the inertia of the brain moving within the skull which is what causes concussion.

Helmets are great for protecting your skull and for protection from scratches and cuts, but nothing for concussion. 

Look at the helmets NFL players wear and all the concussion issues they have.

 
27 minutes ago, ManDee said:

I crashed my motorbike on the weekend, I hit ice. I dislocated my finger, tore my pants and cracked my helmet, I remember a bang but that is all. No headaches no issues, will need a new helmet.

Now I have heard and read many reports about helmets not minimizing concussion but I would never ride a motorbike or a push bike without one. Does it give me confidence? Yes. If you can slow down the deceleration of the brain then you may reduce concussion. I understand the increased risk of neck & back injuries. A risk I accept.

We have had this discussion many times and it would appear that the two sides simply disagree.

Motorbike helmet is not the same as sports helmet. The analogy isn't apples with apples. A number of years ago I came off my pushbike, cracked my head on a signpost splitting the helmet open and received concussion. Sure, I may have died without the helmet, but it didn't stop the concussion. It's just anecdotal evidence.

My understanding is that brain specialists all tend to agree about sports helmets preventing cuts, bruises and possible fractures but doing SFA to prevent concussion, apart from wearer confidence (which as others have pointed out can also work in reverse).

Why can no one read "MAY REDUCE CONCUSSION"

Most experts say helmets cannot prevent concussion, which I accept. I am not talking about prevention but reduction. Can anyone categorically prove that some helmets may NOT reduce concussion? I have not read that yet.

 

Edit - I left a word out - BOLD


39 minutes ago, Clint Bizkit said:

It's not actually stopping the inertia of the brain moving within the skull which is what causes concussion.

Helmets are great for protecting your skull and for protection from scratches and cuts, but nothing for concussion. 

Look at the helmets NFL players wear and all the concussion issues they have.

you didn't read what i said

i've said all you've said many times before, but it's not accurate to say they can give zero help to concussion. appropriate padding material can reduce some of the initial deceleration forces.  by saying it can have a small effect is not claiming it can stop concussion, but it might make a small reduction in the severity of the concussion, or even avoid it in a minor head clash.

i'd certainly be looking at the new one that was referenced here previously (can't remember the name)

5 minutes ago, ManDee said:

Why can no one read "MAY REDUCE CONCUSSION"

Most experts say helmets cannot prevent concussion, which I accept. I am not talking about prevention but reduction. Can anyone categorically prove that some helmets may reduce concussion? I have not read that yet.

I would have thought that the best plan would be to change a player's approach to the game to remove the chances of being concussed at all.  Most other players don't suffer repeated concussions, so what are they doing differently?  Even wearing a helmet that "may reduce" concussion, is not going to lessen the long term affects... I don't know for sure, but isn't there a chance that all it is doing is prolonging the players footballing career while possibly masking the longer term affects due to more lesser concussions occurring over a longer period of time; this could be just as bad as a career shortened by severe concussions .

Just now, Clint Bizkit said:

It doesn't decelerate the brain inside the skull.

huh? of course it does

that's not what the research claims on the new anti-concussion head band we discussed a lot a few weeks ago

39 minutes ago, ManDee said:

Why can no one read "MAY REDUCE CONCUSSION"

Most experts say helmets cannot prevent concussion, which I accept. I am not talking about prevention but reduction. Can anyone categorically prove that some helmets may reduce concussion? I have not read that yet.

Excuse being facetious, but it's also true that if Gus grew his hair long and then got a permed afro it may also reduce just a tiny bit of concussion.

Anything may. 

If the advice was that helmets have been proven to reduce concussion, the afl would make them compulsory for all.


I feel I'm banging my head against a wall just reading this.

3 minutes ago, Biffen said:

I feel I'm banging my head against a wall just reading this.

I reckon a helmet would probably help there. Maybe?

I wouldn't have thought a helmet would make any difference to the deceleration on the brain inside the skull.

In much the same way as someone driving a car headon into a brick wall at 60km/h, the whiplash effect of going from 60km/h to 0km/h is not going to be any different no matter how many extra layers of protection the car has externally.

On 24/05/2017 at 5:36 PM, Roger Mellie said:

Agreed, the only thing this club is owed for is Lumumba

Maybe, but we were silly enough to take eon someone who was very obviously for all to see a complete narcissist

1 hour ago, Clint Bizkit said:

The helmet stopped you from splitting your head open, it does nothing for concussion.

 

1 hour ago, Clint Bizkit said:

I know a lot about this.

Clint - are you. a neurosurgeon in disguise?

8 minutes ago, Biffen said:

I feel I'm banging my head against a wall just reading this.

Post of the year, Biff.

1 hour ago, Clint Bizkit said:

It's not actually stopping the inertia of the brain moving within the skull which is what causes concussion.

Helmets are great for protecting your skull and for protection from scratches and cuts, but nothing for concussion. 

Look at the helmets NFL players wear and all the concussion issues they have.

Correct. 


1 minute ago, JTR said:

I wouldn't have thought a helmet would make any difference to the deceleration on the brain inside the skull.

In much the same way as someone driving a car headon into a brick wall at 60km/h, the whiplash effect of going from 60km/h to 0km/h is not going to be any different no matter how many extra layers of protection the car has externally.

Not quite so.

A modern car well designed with a crumple zone will decelerate just that little more slowly than a rigid shelled older type "solid" car from the 1960s so concussions and whiplashes though not prevented may be reduced.

Both side are correct in theory. But in practice, current technology helmets can only be of minor effect in the most marginal case.

It is just basic physics.  Concussion occurs because the momentum of the skull and contents is reduced to zero (or even reversed) in too short a time - a large decelleration which leads to the brain sloshing around and concussion.  Padding will indeed help spread the change in momentum over a longer time.  If the time to come to a stop is larger, the decelleration is smaller and there will be less sloshing around of the brain. 

However in practice, the problem is that existing padding materials would have to be ridiculously thick to bring the decelleration down into the 'no concussion' zone.      Imagine a player with a 3 foot surround of polystyrene beads in a bag around his head - he has all of that 3 feet and time for his head to come to a stop before it reaches the immovable object. 

But there are occasional reports of new high-tech materials which may make the padding small enough to be wearable.  No idea if the reports are reliable.  

7 minutes ago, JTR said:

I wouldn't have thought a helmet would make any difference to the deceleration on the brain inside the skull.

In much the same way as someone driving a car headon into a brick wall at 60km/h, the whiplash effect of going from 60km/h to 0km/h is not going to be any different no matter how many extra layers of protection the car has externally.

check out Unequal Halo head bands

Quote

Consumers should take comfort in knowing there are several governmental agencies that regularly review and monitor product claims made by companies, such as Unequal. These type of products are highly-scrutinized because of the millions of concussions and head injuries that devastate our youth each year. In the last five years, several companies marketing unsubstantiated claims were forced to remove those claims, stop selling the product, and even to cease operations. Our claim, Reducing Concussion Risk, is validated by science, doctors, and testing by accredited independent labs approved by leading organizations (NOCSAE, FIFA, ASTM, etc.) that show Unequal significantly reduces concussion risk, compared to no head protection.

Quote

UNEQUAL REDUCES CONCUSSION RISK.

UNEQUAL HALO TESTS SHOW A GENERAL REDUCTION IN ACCELERATION,
A KEY COMPONENT IN THE REDUCTION OF CONCUSSION RISK.

  • University research papers, published reports, medical studies and lab tests on sports head protection conclude acceleration is a key element in determining a protective product’s potential to reduce concussion risk among athletes.
  • VA Tech’s landmark, peer-reviewed study helped established their STARS rating system for football helmets. STARS has become a de facto standard to which all professional and collegiate equipment managers respect and monitor. The authors of this study and others emphasize that peak acceleration is a main driver in determining concussion risk; that lower peak acceleration predicts a lower incidence of concussion.
  • ASTM’s soccer headgear standard measures acceleration reduction in lab tests, comparing a “head form” with and without headgear.
  • NOCSAE, the National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment, developed the Severity Index (SI) formula, which is a measurement of the protective qualities of helmets for several sports. Football helmets, for instance, must fall below a 1200 SI to be certified for use by NOCSAE. Acceleration is a main component of the SI formula. Lower acceleration = Lower SI = lower concussion risk.

unequal-technologies-halo-10mm-concussion-prevention

 
4 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

Yes he was wearing a helmet thing morning. And was kept out of any competitive drills.

He doesn't really need confidence. He needs technique training, awareness, strength and a bit of good luck. 

Really ?

I'd say he needs a lot of confidence.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 11

    Round 11, the second week of The Sir Doug Nicholls Round, kicks off on Thursday night with the Cats hosting the Bulldogs at Kardinia Park. Geelong will be looking to to continue their decade long dominance over the Bulldogs, while the Dogs aim to take another big scalp as they surge up the ladder. On Friday night it's he Dreamtime at the 'G clash between Essendon and Richmond. The Bombers will want to avoid another embarrassing performance against a lowly side whilst the Tigers will be keen to avenge a disappointing loss to the Kangaroos. Saturday footy kicks off as the Blues face the Giants in a pivotal clash for both clubs. Carlton need to turn around their up and down season while GWS will be eager to bounce back and reassert themselves as a September threat. At twilight sees the Hawks taking on the Lions at the G. Hawthorn need to cement themselves in the Top 4 but they’ll need to be at their best to challenge a Brisbane side eager to respond after last week’s crushing loss to the Dees on their home turf. The first of the Saturday night double headers opens with North Melbourne up against the high-flying Magpies. The Roos will need a near-perfect performance to trouble a Collingwood side sitting atop the ladder.

      • Like
    • 318 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Sydney

    The two teams competing at the MCG on Sunday afternoon have each traversed a long and arduous path since their previous encounter on a sweltering March evening in Sydney a season and a half ago. Both experienced periods of success at various times last year. The Demons ran out of steam in midseason while the Swans went on to narrowly miss the ultimate prize in the sport. Now, they find themselves outside of finals contention as the season approaches the halfway mark. The winner this week will remain in contact with the leading pack, while the loser may well find itself on a precipice, staring into the abyss. The current season has presented numerous challenges for most clubs, particularly those positioned in the middle tier. The Essendon experience in suffering a significant 91-point loss to the Bulldogs, just one week after defeating the Swans, may not be typical, but it illustrates the unpredictability of outcomes under the league’s present set up. 

      • Thanks
    • 16 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Brisbane

    “Max Gawn has been the heart and soul of the Dees for years now, but this recent recovery from a terrible start has been driven by him. He was everywhere again, and with the game in the balance, he took several key marks to keep the ball in the Dees forward half.” - The Monday Knee Jerk Reaction: Round Ten Of course, it wasn’t the efforts of one man that caused this monumental upset, but rather the work of the coach and his assistants and the other 22 players who took the ground, notably the likes of Jake Melksham, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kozzie Pickett but Max has been magnificent in taking ownership of his team and its welfare under the fire of a calamitous 0-5 start to the season. On Sunday, he provided the leadership that was needed to face up to the reigning premier and top of the ladder Brisbane Lions on their home turf and to prevail after a slow start, during which the hosts led by as much as 24 points in the second quarter. Titus O’Reily is normally comedic in his descriptions of the football but this time, he was being deadly serious. The Demons have come from a long way back and, although they still sit in the bottom third of the AFL pack, there’s a light at the end of the tunnel as they look to drive home the momentum inspired in the past four or five weeks by Max the Magnificent who was under such great pressure in those dark, early days of the season.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Southport

    The Southport Sharks came to Casey. They saw and they conquered a team with 16 AFL-listed players who, for the most part, wasted their time on the ground and failed to earn their keep. For the first half, the Sharks were kept in the game by the Demons’ poor use of the football, it’s disposal getting worse the closer the team got to its own goal and moreover, it got worse as the game progressed. Make no mistake, Casey was far and away the better team in the first half, it was winning the ruck duels through Tom Campbell’s solid performance but it was the scoreboard that told the story.

    • 3 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Sydney

    Just a game and percentage outside the Top 8, the Demons return to Melbourne to face the Sydney Swans at the MCG, with a golden opportunity to build on the momentum from toppling the reigning premiers on their own turf. Who comes in, and who makes way?

    • 505 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Brisbane

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse a famous victory by the Demons over the Lions at the Gabba.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 35 replies
    Demonland