Jump to content

Featured Replies

4 hours ago, DemonAndrew said:

I just don't rate Brayshaw.

He can't get the ball and when he does get it he turns it over.

Either he improves massively in 2017 or he's trade bait for mine.

Were you one of those that wanted Hunt delisted?

Demonland Podcast LIVE @ 8:00PM with Jeff White
 

No offence to @stevethemanjordan who I rate on this forum but why, oh why, are we discussing potential trades after only 2 rounds of footy have been played? One could be forgiven if it was looking Like 2013 all over again but it ain't.

And those who are suggesting trading Brayshaw need to take a good hard look at themselves in the mirror and then head butt it.

55 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Were you one of those that wanted Hunt delisted?

no, i don't "want" anyone delisted - i want them all to succeed.

but i'm cognizant of the fact that, at the moment, brayshaw is tracking no better than toumpas as a player.

i would love it if he could become a valuable contributor to the side, but at the moment is averaging less than 15 disposals a game at 68% efficiency across 33 games. it's not good enough, just as toumpas' average of less than 15 disposals a game at 74% efficiency across 35 games is similarly not good enough for a modern footballer be they a midfielder or a push-up half forward.

if brayshaw was what we had to give up to get a lever in, i'd do the deal in a heartbeat.

Edited by DemonAndrew

 
4 minutes ago, DemonAndrew said:

no, i don't "want" anyone delisted - i want them all to succeed.

but i'm cognizant of the fact that, at the moment, brayshaw is tracking no better than toumpas as a player.

i would love it if he could become a valuable contributor to the side, but at the moment is averaging less than 15 disposals a game at 68% efficiency across 33 games. it's not good enough, just as toumpas' average of less than 15 disposals a game at 74% efficiency across 35 games is similarly not good enough for a modern football be they a midfielder or a push-up half forward.

if brayshaw was what we had to give up to get a lever in, i'd do the deal in a heartbeat.

Dig up, not down!  ;-)

c'mon man youre losing all credibility now. Brayshaw was third in the rising start in 2015 from memory, had a cracking year.  he'll be back


2 minutes ago, McQueen said:

No offence to @stevethemanjordan who I rate on this forum but why, oh why, are we discussing potential trades after only 2 rounds of footy have been played? One could be forgiven if it was looking Like 2013 all over again but it ain't.

And those who are suggesting trading Brayshaw need to take a good hard look at themselves in the mirror and then head butt it.

Steve, It's fair to say that clubs have started sowing the seeds for potential trade acquisitions. Lever does address a need, regardless of how the season pans out, and now is time to get into his ear. Convincing the player is 99% of the battle,  because history will tell you that 99% of of uncontracted players will end up at their preferred destination. 

Suggesting trade scenarios is a pointless excercise at this time because we don't know what currency either party will have by the end of the season. Having said that, I'd trade like for like:

Lever => Lumumba and Garland 

8 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Crows wanted Gibbs, still might want him. Could do a three way deal with Carlton and Adelaide.

Crows get Gibbs

Dees get Lever

Blues get our pick 15

 

Perfect!!!

So we all agree Lever is a gun but then we don't want to give up a good player for him in return?

Brayshaw for Lever is a fair trade until sentiments get involved 

Edited by Jaded

 

I don't see the glaring need - TMac, Omac, Frost, Hibberd - we could groom Keilty back there too but we're choosing to groom him fwd-ruck - there's a message there.

  • Author

@McQueen - Because I saw the article floating around and thought I'd share it as a point of discussion. 

 

I too think offering up Brayshaw is going a bit far.

There's a whole lot of untapped potential there, although I do think many demonanders believe him to be something that he's not; that being a classy and skilled user of the footy. Gussy will be part of a top five most important players in a couple of years, I'm sure of it. His attack on the ball, man and ability to mark above his head are his strengths. He is dual sided, but definitely not in the Mitchell league. It's an area he needs to clean up though, for sure.

I'm sure most are aware of the fact that we'll need to keep as much of our core together as possible to have a shot at the flag. Our core being Hogan, Weeds, Viney, Salem, Petracca, Oliver, Brayshaw, Hunt, Stretch etc. So if we were going to go after Lever, we'd be offering a fringe player and some future picks including a first rounder.

Anyway, too early to speculate but he's definitely a player I'd love at the club. I heard Mahoney saying not long ago that we have saved coin to lure someone at the right time and when I look at our list, I believe we're another quality tall defender short and perhaps a classy and skilled power running mid short.

Edited by stevethemanjordan


4 minutes ago, DemonAndrew said:

i really hope so.

he's stopped developing at this stage imo.

Averaged 12.7 disposals first year and that rose to 17.6 in a year with concussion issues last year and then 21 in round 1. 

Bit rough to compare him to Toumpas and to state he has stopped developing.

7 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Crows get Gibbs

Dees get Lever

Blues get our pick 15

 

Perfect!!!

Especially since Blues knocked  back Crows  first and second round picks last year .

Dreaming!

1 hour ago, Redleg said:

Were you one of those that wanted Hunt delisted?

He didn't answer the question, Your Honour.

31 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Crows get Gibbs

Dees get Lever

Blues get our pick 15

 

Perfect!!!

I think if this was suggested, they'd just cut us out of the deal.

Lever for Gibbs.

Brayshaw has the potential to be an A grade mid - they don't grow on trees.

i hate it when people say - 'we can find a mid anywhere'...

You won't stumble across a rolls Royce often and mids win flags.


20 minutes ago, ProDee said:

He didn't answer the question, Your Honour.

Duly noted.

17 minutes ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

I think if this was suggested, they'd just cut us out of the deal.

Lever for Gibbs.

That's only if Lever nominates Carlton as his preferred destination. Plus the Blues seem to be well stocked with young key backs, such as Marchbank and Plowman. They need quality mids more than anything.

If this is correct we don't need to get too excited.

" Early in 2017, the out-of-contract Lever indicated he planned on signing another contract with the Crows, remaining in Adelaide despite his Victorian roots."

52 minutes ago, mo64 said:

That's only if Lever nominates Carlton as his preferred destination. Plus the Blues seem to be well stocked with young key backs, such as Marchbank and Plowman. They need quality mids more than anything.

You're being very generous to Plowman, but I take your meaning.


1 hour ago, DemonAndrew said:

actually, i did.

Did you "call" for Hunt's delisting ?

11 hours ago, Salems Lot said:

To get something you have to give something

This is not the forum to talk about your sexual history SL. Stay on topic. Moderators?

Edited by Return to Glory

Demonland Podcast LIVE @ 8:00PM with Jeff White
 
2 hours ago, Fifty-5 said:

I don't see the glaring need - TMac, Omac, Frost, Hibberd - we could groom Keilty back there too but we're choosing to groom him fwd-ruck - there's a message there.

The first 3 are hardly composed or reliable with ball in hand. Keilty is an unknown quantity at AFL level. 

Lever would be a great acquisition if he were open to a move to the Dees and the deal could be done. Asking price would be steep no doubt.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Haha
    • 122 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Haha
    • 35 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 302 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Like
    • 31 replies
  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    It's Game Day and the Demons have traveled to Alice Springs to take on the Saints and they have a massive opportunity to build on the momentum of two big wins in a row and keep their finals hopes well and truly alive.

      • Like
    • 907 replies