Jump to content

Featured Replies

6 minutes ago, Drunkn167 said:

$4 million over 4 years seems way too high for him. Didn't Lewis give a speech earlier in the year that the players should be willing to play for less money to get more, best 22 players in, in order to win a flag?

If the MFC have offered Lever that much, doesn't that pretty much throw all of that out the window? Thats gonna p*** off a lot of the playing group 

Generally agree, but $1M per season isn't what it use to be and won't be in 3 seasons time at the end of his contract.  Lever waited until the new EBA was out for a good reason.

 

MFC could have bot Stringer and Watts for the price of Lever

Just now, Dee Dee Ramone said:

MFC could have bot Stringer and Watts for the price of Lever

And not improved at all

 
8 minutes ago, Drunkn167 said:

$4 million over 4 years seems way too high for him. Didn't Lewis give a speech earlier in the year that the players should be willing to play for less money to get more, best 22 players in, in order to win a flag?

If the MFC have offered Lever that much, doesn't that pretty much throw all of that out the window? Thats gonna p*** off a lot of the playing group 

It will be much more than that if he is forces to go into the draft.

He'll put a massive price on his head for years 1 and 2 and then get paid under's for years 3 and 4 when he reaches the MFC

11 minutes ago, Drunkn167 said:

$4 million over 4 years seems way too high for him. Didn't Lewis give a speech earlier in the year that the players should be willing to play for less money to get more, best 22 players in, in order to win a flag?

If the MFC have offered Lever that much, doesn't that pretty much throw all of that out the window? Thats gonna p*** off a lot of the playing group 

Woo ahh big fella... we don't want to hear that especially with your bro at the club.. are they shitty?! Lever will be immense for us, worth it.


13 minutes ago, Drunkn167 said:

$4 million over 4 years seems way too high for him.

Wouldnt be on that, or even close.

Dont believe the media lies.

16 minutes ago, Drunkn167 said:

$4 million over 4 years seems way too high for him. Didn't Lewis give a speech earlier in the year that the players should be willing to play for less money to get more, best 22 players in, in order to win a flag?

If the MFC have offered Lever that much, doesn't that pretty much throw all of that out the window? Thats gonna p*** off a lot of the playing group 

you contradict your own post D167

 

Lewis gives a speech saying existing players should accept less, in order to attract more "best 22" players from other clubs, then you wonder if the existing players will be p****ed off, because of the arrival of a new "best 22" player from another club, on good coin?

 

Rethink, and re-post

 
7 minutes ago, faultydet said:

you contradict your own post D167

 

Lewis gives a speech saying existing players should accept less, in order to attract more "best 22" players from other clubs, then you wonder if the existing players will be p****ed off, because of the arrival of a new "best 22" player from another club, on good coin?

 

Rethink, and re-post

You're missing the point dude.

There are a number of players currently on the list who are better then Lever on a helluva of a lot of less money, that's what would create animosity within the group.

Don't get me wrong all, Lever would be a great catch for Melbourne no doubt, and it'd be awesome to see him dominate in our backline.

Edited by Drunkn167

11 minutes ago, Petraccattack said:

Wouldnt be on that, or even close.

Dont believe the media lies.

Agreed.  Hadn't heard $mill mentioned.  Wouldn't be surprised if Adelaide would throw that around though.  Hell hath no fury as a Crow scorned.


Just now, Drunkn167 said:

You're missing the point dude.

There are a number of players currently on the list who are better then Lever on a helluva of a lot of less money, that's what would create animosity within the group.

Thats not the point at all.

Lewis tells players to accept LESS, in order to attract outside players who will be best 22

Then you suggest players will be ANGRY, if said new best 22 player takes the money Lewis has been telling them to sacrifice.

 

makes Zero sense at all.

 

We have no defender who is better than Lever at what he does. None. So why the concern?

1 hour ago, kurtneverdied said:

2/2 Told you guys. Stuff you doubters. Listen next time.

What was the first one Kurt?

Just now, faultydet said:

Thats not the point at all.

Lewis tells players to accept LESS, in order to attract outside players who will be best 22

Then you suggest players will be ANGRY, if said new best 22 player takes the money Lewis has been telling them to sacrifice.

 

makes Zero sense at all.

 

We have no defender who is better than Lever at what he does. None. So why the concern?

Coz I can tell you for a fact that the players would definitely be pretty angry about.

I heard from the 7 news piece it was 750k a year for 4 years. In 4 years time i bet you another increase in the cap will happen. Also considering some clubs have multiple players on close to 1mil a year, where is all our money?

Just now, Drunkn167 said:

Coz I can tell you for a fact that the players would definitely be pretty angry about.

And I have no doubt at all that is the case. It's always a huge concern about out of joint noses when attracting new talent.

But it flies in the face of what Lewis was saying, and that's my point.


Too many seduced by Lever.

He is good....but no so good that you risk animosity

Just now, Drunkn167 said:

Coz I can tell you for a fact that the players would definitely be pretty angry about.

Players have to earn the coin, also remember Nathan Jones, Bernie Vince and Lewis are all close to the end, huge cap room available if guys like Oliver and Petracca earn it. It's also one of those things in which you hope they buy in to the product, not the coin. I could see guys like Petracca and Oliver wanting big bucks and being tempted by different clubs. I don't see guys like Hunt or Gawn demanding big money, because i think they're really invested in the club. 

2 minutes ago, MurDoc516 said:

I heard from the 7 news piece it was 750k a year for 4 years. In 4 years time i bet you another increase in the cap will happen. Also considering some clubs have multiple players on close to 1mil a year, where is all our money?

That's what i heard also, and that sounds reasonable to me.

Adelaide are obviously training to paint it as a financial move to save their own skin, so don't be surprised if they throw some numbers out there.

23 minutes ago, Petraccattack said:

Wouldnt be on that, or even close.

Dont believe the media lies.

I'd hope so

Has everybody seen the interview Kane Cornes did? Shows you how out of touch the crows are.
 

 


4 minutes ago, Drunkn167 said:

Coz I can tell you for a fact that the players would definitely be pretty angry about.

Who's on heaps less D that thinks they have more value?

Lever is being paid on form and potential to drive us to the next step, hopefully the playing group can give it time to see how it works out and not get their noses out of joint. 

4 minutes ago, Drunkn167 said:

Coz I can tell you for a fact that the players would definitely be pretty angry about.

Yeah, lets stick with our plan of the past 53 years.  That will work!

People are speculating the amount anyway.  The bigger the amount, the bigger the reaction. Don't get sucked in.

All Melbourne media and 7 news reporting 4x 750k But Adelaide 7 news say 4x 1mil I would say Adelaide media pumping it up to get a better deal or to tell the Adelaide members why they wouldn’t match it

 
1 minute ago, Cards13 said:

Who's on heaps less D that thinks they have more value?

Lever is being paid on form and potential to drive us to the next step, hopefully the playing group can give it time to see how it works out and not get their noses out of joint. 

I'd be angry if the club was incompetent and not thinking about the future of the playing group with this deal. However, since Jackson has been incharge i think the club has become rather stable.

3 minutes ago, MurDoc516 said:

Has everybody seen the interview Kane Cornes did? Shows you how out of touch the crows are.
 

 

Thats so unprofessional, wow.

Hope we get him for nothing in the draft.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Gold Coast

    From the start, Melbourne’s performance against the Gold Coast Suns at Peoples First Stadium was nothing short of a massive botch up and it came down in the first instance to poor preparation. Rather than adequately preparing the team for battle against an opponent potentially on the skids after suffering three consecutive losses, the Demons looking anything but sharp and ready to play in the opening minutes of the game. By way of contrast, the Suns demonstrated a clear sense of purpose and will to win. From the very first bounce of the ball they were back to where they left off earlier in the season in Round Three when the teams met at the MCG. They ran rings around the Demons and finished the game off with a dominant six goal final term. This time, they produced another dominant quarter to start the game, restricting Melbourne to a solitary point to lead by six goals at the first break, by which time, the game was all but over.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • CASEY: Gold Coast

    Coming off four consecutive victories and with a team filled with 17 AFL listed players, the Casey Demons took to their early morning encounter with the lowly Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium with the swagger of a team that thought a win was inevitable. They were smashing it for the first twenty minutes of the game after Tom Fullarton booted the first two goals but they then descended into an abyss of frustrating poor form and lackadaisical effort that saw the swagger and the early arrogance disappear by quarter time when their lead was overtaken by a more intense and committed opponent. The Suns continued to apply the pressure in the second quarter and got out to a three goal lead in mid term before the Demons fought back. A late goal to the home side before the half time bell saw them ten points up at the break and another surge in the third quarter saw them comfortably up with a 23 point lead at the final break.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    With their season all over bar the shouting the Demons head back on the road for the third week in a row as they return to Adelaide to take on the Crows. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 59 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    The Demons did not come to play from the opening bounce and let the Gold Coast kick the first 5 goals of the match. They then outscored the Suns for the next 3 quarters but it was too little too late and their season is now effectively over.

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 231 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kysaiah Pickett. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 41 replies
  • GAMEDAY: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    It's Game Day and the Demons are back on the road again and this may be the last roll of the dice to get their 2025 season back on track as they take on the Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 546 replies