Jump to content

Shaun McKernan anyone?


ManDee

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, stuie said:

No mention of the rookie list and was said to be a "better FWD -Ruck option than Spencer" (who is on the main list in case you didn't know).

No one suggested putting him on the rookie list...

 

No one needed to mention the rookie list. We only have rookie spots left. 

Why are you talking about delisting someone?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, billy2803 said:

That was in relation to what I said in my previous quote.

Again, please highlight where I had a crack regarding the primary/rookie list options for any potential DFA's, as per your previous quoting of my post.

That's not what I said you did. I just said you had a crack, you clearly did. Don't try and move the goal posts now.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Night Crawler said:

No one needed to mention the rookie list. We only have rookie spots left. 

Why are you talking about delisting someone?

FMD. Just read champ...

 

8 hours ago, ManDee said:

Just delisted by EFC, is he a better FWD -Ruck option than Spencer? 

196cm    99kg  Born  01/09/1990

Season 2016 Totals/Averages
 
  GM K HB D M G B T HO FF FA AF * SC *
 Total 6 44 21 65 20 4 1 8 41 4 7 315 306
 Average 6 7.3 3.5 10.8 3.3 0.7 0.2 1.3 6.8 0.7 1.2 52.5 51.0

Stats -Footywire

 

8 hours ago, stuie said:

We only have space for rookies now don't we? Can't see us taking a 26 year old in the draft.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, stuie said:

We only have space for rookies now don't we? Can't see us taking a 26 year old in the draft.

 

So you were uncertain if we had main list spots available? My god. I thought everyone on here would have a basic understanding of how many spots on the list we had left.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, stuie said:

That's not what I said you did. I just said you had a crack, you clearly did. Don't try and move the goal posts now.

 

You quoted my post about primary and rookie lists, then accused me of having a crack. There is absolutely nowhere in my post that you quoted that I was having a crack at you.

And you reckon I'm changing the goal posts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


10 hours ago, Night Crawler said:

So you were uncertain if we had main list spots available? My god. I thought everyone on here would have a basic understanding of how many spots on the list we had left.

 

 

Lol the misquoting is getting worse... You don't see how me asking that was leading the OP to understand the list situation?

Wow.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, stuie said:

Lol the misquoting is getting worse... You don't see how me asking that was leading the OP to understand the list situation?

Wow.

 

Stuart, the OP actually asked what peoples opinions of him were, specifically comparing him to Spencer.  ManDee was not saying that we should give him a place on the primary list.  Here is what ManDee asked;

"Just delisted by EFC, is he a better FWD -Ruck option than Spencer?"

Most people that have replied, yourself included, have indicated that if they would bring him in, that the rookie list would be the main and/or only way we would do this.  It's just that you took it that step/s further (shock horror) and implied that because Spencer was on our Primary List, that if we are looking at someone as an upgrade on him, that they would naturally have to go on the Primary List too (your post #22).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes from me as a rookie spot. Could be interesting to see how he goes as a FB and take on the the big guys like Hawkins, Walker and Tippet. Also gives us insurance if one of the McDonald's go down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, stuie said:

No mention of the rookie list and was said to be a "better FWD -Ruck option than Spencer" (who is on the main list in case you didn't know).

No one suggested putting him on the rookie list...

 

And Stuart, just to further confirm what a majority of posters think, you have stated the above in you post #22 that "no one suggested putting him on the rookie list".  You only had to scroll up to my post #19, which, for your benefit, I have quoted below...

12 hours ago, billy2803 said:

We have spots available on the rookie list if it were decided that we would look at any DFA, so no need to delist anyone, Stuart.

Personally, I think there is zero chance that they would be looking at any of the DFAs for any spot on our primary list (as I think we have made all the changes we want to make), or the rookie list (as I think they will try their luck with a couple of project players that aren't "proven" at AFL level.

And when you were scrolling up, you would've gone past CBDees post #20 (the very next one following my above one), where he/she stated;

"None if we rookie him. We only have two live picks (47&69) in the main draft after promoting Wagner but we have rookie pics."

You accuse others of misquoting.  You accuse others of changing the goal posts.  It is truly baffling.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he would be worth a rookie spot, mainly as insurance but he may have some upside. I think he could do the FWD/Ruck role better than Spencer and perhaps better then Pedo.

As a rookie who could we get to fill that FWD/Ruck role that is better than McKernan? So for me it is a yes. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, billy2803 said:

Stuart, the OP actually asked what peoples opinions of him were, specifically comparing him to Spencer.  ManDee was not saying that we should give him a place on the primary list.  Here is what ManDee asked;

"Just delisted by EFC, is he a better FWD -Ruck option than Spencer?"

Most people that have replied, yourself included, have indicated that if they would bring him in, that the rookie list would be the main and/or only way we would do this.  It's just that you took it that step/s further (shock horror) and implied that because Spencer was on our Primary List, that if we are looking at someone as an upgrade on him, that they would naturally have to go on the Primary List too (your post #22).

 

12 minutes ago, billy2803 said:

And Stuart, just to further confirm what a majority of posters think, you have stated the above in you post #22 that "no one suggested putting him on the rookie list".  You only had to scroll up to my post #19, which, for your benefit, I have quoted below...

And when you were scrolling up, you would've gone past CBDees post #20 (the very next one following my above one), where he/she stated;

"None if we rookie him. We only have two live picks (47&69) in the main draft after promoting Wagner but we have rookie pics."

You accuse others of misquoting.  You accuse others of changing the goal posts.  It is truly baffling.

 

19 hours ago, stuie said:

We only have space for rookies now don't we? Can't see us taking a 26 year old in the draft.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

But that's assuming we don't think some combination of Watts or Weideman can do that job for us in the short to medium term. And it doesn't help us find the long term solution either.

Don't forget Jordan Lewis bringing those 3rd man up skills over to us. Should add a new dimension to our midfield rucking stocks.

Edited by DominatrixTyson
Link to comment
Share on other sites


16 minutes ago, jeck wartz said:

Ha! Stu's recruiting team have suggested to the club that we should recruit Josh Green and Shaun Mckernan to the club to boost our "superstar factor."

why do we need threads about players we're never going to recruit in a million years?

Jeck, do we need a FWD/Ruck?

If yes, who is available? 

If no, you are at odds with the FD and most supporters.

Sorry to post a thread about a player that may fit a need at our club.  And to answer your question, we have threads because we love our club and we want it to improve, we like to talk to like minded supporters and to argue about what is best for our club. Also sorry to have an opinion. Please ignore threads that you don't like and don't impose your negativity.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ManDee said:

Jeck, do we need a FWD/Ruck?

If yes, who is available? 

If no, you are at odds with the FD and most supporters.

Sorry to post a thread about a player that may fit a need at our club.  And to answer your question, we have threads because we love our club and we want it to improve, we like to talk to like minded supporters and to argue about what is best for our club. Also sorry to have an opinion. Please ignore threads that you don't like and don't impose your negativity.

 

 

We need a player who plays that position, but an AFL standard one. 

surely there has to be some sort of filter though, we have no spots for a DFA so it's not going to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Jesus Hoganshaw said:

Unlike what stuie keeps suggesting, we're very unlikely to put any DFAs on the primary list.

I haven't suggested that once, in fact I've been the one pointing out the list spaces. But nice attempt at trolling champ.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, jeck wartz said:

Let me get this straight...

I have a different opinion so i am a troll now?

who were you planning on getting rid of to make room for these players Stu?

To be fair to Stuart, he did belt us with the "Green on the Rookie List" line ad nauseam in that other thread, so there wouldn't be a need to delist anyone.  Green would need to nominate for the Rookie Draft though for us to get him that way.

My concern about parking a DFA like Green (or McKernan, et al) on the rookie list is that we could be using that spot to develop an untried, speculative pick, similar to what we did with Wagner, AvB, etc (I could've gone back to the likes of Jurrah, Flash, etc, but wanted to keep it recent).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    BOILED LOLLIES by The Oracle

    In the space of a month Melbourne has gone from chocolates to boiled lollies in terms of its standing as a candidate for the AFL premiership.  The club faces its moment of truth against a badly bruised up Collingwood at the MCG. A win will give it some respite but even then, it won’t be regarded particularly well being against an opponent carrying the burden of an injured playing list. A loss would be a disaster. The Demons have gone from a six/two win/loss ratio and a strong percentag

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 2

    CLEAN HANDS by KC from Casey

    The Casey Demons headed into town and up Sydney Road to take on the lowly Coburg Lions who have been perennial VFL easy beats and sitting on one win for the season. Last year, Casey beat them in a practice match when resting their AFL listed players. That’s how bad they were. Nobody respected them on Saturday and clearly not the Demons who came to the game with 22 players (ten MFC), but whether they came out to play is another matter because for the most part, their intensity was lacking an

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles

    ALAS SPRINGS by Whispering Jack

    I got the word on Saturday from someone who knows someone inside the Fremantle camp that the Dockers were pumped and supremely confident about getting the W the next day against Melbourne at TIO Traeger Park in the red heart of the country. I was informed that the Dockers were extremely confident for a number of reasons. They had beaten the Demons on their home territory at the MCG at their last two meetings so they didn’t see beating them at Alice Springs as a problem. They belie

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    PREGAME: Rd 13 vs Collingwood

    The Demons head back to Melbourne after an embarrassing loss to the Dockers to take on the Magpies at the MCG on Kings Birthday. With a calf injury to Lachie Hunter and Jacob van Rooyen possibly returning from injury who comes in and who goes out?  

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 258

    PODCAST: Rd 12 vs Fremantle

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 3rd June @ 8:30pm. Join George, Binman & I as we dissect the Demons embarrasing loss to Fremantle in Alice Springs. You questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human. Listen & Chat LIVE: ht

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 58

    VOTES: Rd 12 vs Fremantle

    Captain Max Gawn has a considerable lead over reigning champion Christian Petracca in the Demonland Player of the Year Award. Steven May, Alex Neal-Bullen & Jack Viney make up the Top 5. Your votes for the embarrassing loss against the Dockers. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 33

    POSTGAME: Rd 12 vs Fremantle

    The Demons were blown out of the water and were absolutely embarrassing against the Fremantle Dockers in Alice Springs ultimately going down by 92 points and getting bundled out of the Top 8 for the first time since 2020.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 589

    GAMEDAY: Rd 12 vs Fremantle

    It's Game Day and the Demons and the Dockers meet on halfway on neutral territory in the heart of the country in Alice Springs and the Dees need to win to hold onto a place in the Top 4.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 772

    TROUBLE by The Oracle

    Situated roughly in Australia's geographic centre, Alice Springs has for many years been a troubled town suffering from intermittent crime waves, particularly among its younger residents. There was a time a little while ago when things were so bad that some even doubted the annual AFL game in the town would proceed.  Now, the hope is that this Sunday’s Melbourne vs Fremantle encounter will bring joy to the residents of the town and that through the sport and the example of the participants,

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...