Jump to content

2016 Contracts

Featured Replies

What is interesting is that we have the 2 McDonalds and Frost with contracts expiring the end of this year (3 key backs on the weekend) and the rumour mill into 3rd or 4th gear on Hurley.

 
38 minutes ago, H_T said:

What is interesting is that we have the 2 McDonalds and Frost with contracts expiring the end of this year (3 key backs on the weekend) and the rumour mill into 3rd or 4th gear on Hurley.

Frost isn't out of contract, signed for 3 when we got him

5 minutes ago, DavidNeitz9 said:

Frost isn't out of contract, signed for 3 when we got him

Well the OP needs editing then, if that is the case.

 
  • Author
2 hours ago, DavidNeitz9 said:

Frost isn't out of contract, signed for 3 when we got him

Source? If it is decent second hand source, I will take it.

Terlich, grimes; cant see them playing next year

Lumumba can't seem to get on the track but might see the writing on the wall and fall on his sword.  Especially if we get hibberd

Matt jones is an interesting one though, seemed to be best 22 at the start of the year and has played consistantly since we picked him up

 


18 hours ago, rpfc said:

Source? If it is decent second hand source, I will take it.

A friend who works at the MFC RPFC, i was also told Bugg signed for 3

22 hours ago, H_T said:

Well the OP needs editing then, if that is the case.

 

On 15 June 2016 at 2:27 PM, billy2803 said:

Didn't Jeffy re-sign for another 3 years only a couple of weeks ago?

HT - I'm pretty sure I'm on RPFC's Ignore List, so can you please request that he updates his post with regards to Jeffy's contract status please.

Cheers.

  • Author
7 hours ago, DavidNeitz9 said:

A friend who works at the MFC RPFC, i was also told Bugg signed for 3

Ok, changes made.

 
3 hours ago, rpfc said:

Ok, changes made.

Also, Dunn & Spencer are UFA's next season. Garlett signed untill 2019

  • 1 month later...

So I was thinking about all of this talk about list management with Melbourne and Hurley/Hibbard/Prestia and thought what do we actually need. So I did a mini-depth chart with the help from the AFL player rankings of what we have and italics are out of contract: 

Key Forward

Small/Med Forward

Inside Mid

Outside Mid

Ruck

Small/ Med Defender

Key Defender

Hogan

Garlett

N. Jones

Vince

Gawn

Jetta

T. Mac

Watts

Petracca

Viney

Salem

Spencer

Bugg

Frost

Weiderman

Kent

Tyson

Stretch

King

Wagner

O. Mac

Dawes

Vanders

Brayshaw

Hunt

King

Lumumba

Dunn

Pedersen

Harmes

Oliver

Kennedy

 

Melksham

Garland

Hulett

JKH

Trengove

Grimes

 

White

 

 

 

ANB

M Jones

 

Terlich

 

 

 

Michie

Smith

 

 

 

 

 

 

Newton

 

 

 

 

Key Forwards: I believe that we have the quality here and the development of Hulett in the 2's plus King is enough for me to say that we can afford to not bring on another key forward at the moment. I'd be looking for the ruck/forward though for our depth. I would be giving Dawes (28) and Pedersen (29) another contract unless we get an offer from another club that we win from (e.g. Vickery, Nankervas, late 2nd round). I would not be moving on them for nothing or next to nothing. 

Small/Medium Forwards: Love them, they are all signed on, there is enough development here and they are all young. I'd say that I'd be drafting a small forward in the rookie draft and see how they develop - no need to go out and find one or draft one as there are plenty of mids I'd like to see as resting small/medium forwards. 

Inside Mids: I thought we had enough but I really feel we are 2 short. I'd be looking to get in a class inside mid and draft in another. I'd be saying goodbye to Michie and re-signing Trenners. 

Outside Mids: I have Hunt and Salem in here because I feel they will move up to a wing next year. Vince maybe off a half back so that reduces it. Our runners are not good enough and we need to bolster this area. I think that we need an experienced outside runner here (GWS?) and again need to draft in this area. Newton is gone at the end of the year, Grimes again is great depth and I'd want to be given something good in return for him because he has a future in the AFL. As much as Matt Jones has shown development, I think that we might be able to draft someone in the 3rd round that might offer more than another year of Jones. 

Rucks: Simple, we need another. This has to come either in the draft or through trade. I'd prefer a ruck/forward but happy to see what we get. I think that we also need to do the right thing by Spencer next year and trade him to a club where he can be playing regular AFL games. He is a good ruckman, too good for VFL. 

Small/Med Defenders: Oh we need Hibbard. I can see why we got Melksham and bringing Vince off a half back is needed. I think we do need H to get back playing next year because he gives us the depth of half back. We need to re-sign White and bring in another half back in Hibbard. Sorry Terlich, thanks for the service. I believe there is a good list and depth here, but to my mind another 2 are needed. 

Key Defenders: I like the future here with the Macs and Frost. Again I'd dangle Dunn and Garland because they should be playing AFL somewhere and we'd want something equal back in return. Clearly Hurley helps in here, if not, an experienced backman such as a Brown will help with the depth and keep the pressure on. 

So what that leaves me with as some key needs: 
1. Inside mid - good 
2. Inside mid - developing 
3. Outside mind - good 
4. Outside mid - developing 
5. Ruck - developing (King?)
6. Ruck/forward - developing (King?) 
7. Small/Med defender - experienced (Hibbard?)
8. Small/Med defender - developing 
9. Key defender - experienced (Brown?)
10. Small/Med forward - rookie 

So how do we target this considering that we dont have 10 new spots on the list? Good question. I assume that Newton, Michie, Jones are off the list. Everyone else is up in the air based on need. 

I believe that in trade terms that we need to find and experienced inside and experienced outside mid first and foremost. Is this De Bour and Peerce from Freo (I hope not) as they are the only on the free agency market. I'd be looking at GWS and seeing what we can acquire there with our future first rounder. Obviously Crouch and Prestia should be at the top of our list and really this is where we need to add someone. We need an outside runner and I don't have a solution but that Josh Kelly would be nice. We cannot expect to draft a round 1 starter this year so I’d be handing over my first rounder next year for an outside mid and handing over a player (Dawes, Dunn?) for an inside mid.

From a defender standpoint, this comes down to Hurley or not. If we don't get Hurley we shouldn't trade for a key defender (hear me out). The Browns (Collingwood and WCE) are free agents and are worth the depth. If we don't get Hurley, there is not a better option that our developing key backs because we are not going to get the GC boys, Marchbank is a nice idea but he is undersized, Weitering/Lever aren’t leaving and Rance is locked away.

The ruck idea is one that I’d be interested on hearing what the Football Department think of the Kings. Essentially they are what we need, a ruck and a ruck/forward, but are they the answer. I don't know and I wouldn't mind getting Nankervas from Sydney as he is now excess for them. Max needs to have a good next three weeks, I’m assuming we can re-rookie if no one else wants him, but I cant see him moving to the senior list.

Small medium players – I think Hibbard is the answer in here and I hope so is Melksham. I feel that the others need to be more development players, but Hibbard (or player like) is a must.

1. Outside midfielder - experienced
2. Inside midfielder – experienced
3. Small/Med Defender - Hibbard
4. Outside midfielder - draft
5. Inside midfielder – draft
6. Get an experienced Brown in FA
7. Ruck – Nankervas (Sydney)
8. Small forward/defender – rookie draft

So how does bringing in 8 work, well it doenst because for a beginning, we don't have the list space:

Out Senior – Jones, Terlich, Newton
Out Rookie – King, Michie, White, Wagner

In Senior – White, Wagner,
In Rookie – 2 KPP, 1 Ruck, 1 small def/fwd

I believe that we need to say goodbye to 1 of Dunn/Garland and Dawes/Pedersen as much as I’d like to keep all 4. I think that Ahern from GWS might suit our outside needs as I’ve looked at the list of out of contract players, and there aren’t that many that scream we need you. I have also suggested Barlow as he does offer experience, hardness and seriously needs a new start. Maybe a Jack Steele (GWS), Conca (Rich), Cavka (WC), and Hvroat (WB) are options again a trade for a future pick, this years pick, or one of our KPP.

Out Senior – Jones, Terlich, Newton, Dawes, Dunn
Out Rookie – King, Michie, White, Wagner

In Senior – White, Wagner, Hibbard (2nd rd), Ahern (GWS future 1st? something in return), Barlow (Dawes?),
In Rookie – 2 KPP, 1 Ruck, 1 small def/fwd

 

The last idea I am going to put out there is trading something we have for something better. His name is Liam Hulett and he has shown he should have been drafted a long way ahead of his number. I’d love to keep him but I wonder if he might be of interest to Freo/Ess/WB and we could get something they have excess of. If we ended up with a Hvroat for Hulett its not a bad result for us going forward.

 

Hope this is food for thought and my questions for you are:

  1. 1.    Who is the outside mid we are missing?

  2. 2.     Do we need another ruckman next year?

  3. 3.     Are you willing to give up our first rounder next year?

  4. 4.     Is someone like Hulett (ANB, Vanders, Harmes) to get someone else who is developing.


As rfpc hasn't logged on for a while, thought I might update the contract status

8birV4Yq+VfAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==

If anyone can see errors please let me know. (not sure about Garlett and Kent in particular)

Wouldn't mind if we saw some 2017 OOC players wrapped up this year eg Tyson, Stretch, Salem and of course Jesse!

The likely basis for contracts:

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/afl/aflpa-not-happy-with-1011-per-cent-offer-to-players/news-story/f29e3bbff423f052356dbf05e939c6ae

"Total player payments per club this year are $10.37 million, not including additional services per club of $1.022m. The average AFL player wage last year was about $300,000".  That means the salary cap incl (ASA's) will be in the around $12.5m per club (which the AFL will fund) Clubs were informed this in the last few weeks.  The new average appears to be around $330k-$350k.  .

Sounds like the AFL is playing hard ball with AFLPA demands: "The union still haven’t got to first base on their initial three phases of the pay talks. The league have not agreed to the principle of paying players a percentage share, nor has the AFL identified what revenues might be excluded such as government grants. And it certainly has not entertained an exact percentage number, which has yet to be provided by the AFLPA".  Marsh put back in his place by the look of it!  After all, the AFLPA is owned by the AFL!

  • 3 weeks later...

In 'rfpc's' absence, this is a list of players who are still out of contract:

B6k9P6LqaETnAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC

Who gets a contract depends on the number spots on the seniors list after trade week ends @ Oct 20. 

  • Given the frequency of selection for the seniors this year the front runners are M. Jones and Wagner. 
  • Would be very surprised to see Dawes, Terlich and Grimes re-contracted.  Also doubt Newton's chances.  
  • That means 4-6 spots available with 1 used for Hibberd and at least 3 for new draftees. 

Extra spots could be created from 2017 OOC players being traded.  Not at all surprised to see this happen.  Who is traded out depends on how good a pick/player we want in. 

NB:  Maynard is an additional 'B' rookie for 2017.  Trengove recontracted for 2017.  I have assumed that as Pedersen has been sent for surgery its a sign he will be offered a contract of some sort.    All other contract status is as per post #36 above.

The club has done really well to sign up the players it wants to keep while minimising the players whose careers it will terminate which tbh I always find sad to lose an mfc player especially one who has played his whole career with us and given us his all. 

  • 2 weeks later...
12 hours ago, deanox said:

LH has Pedersen signed on?

Not yet.  He had surgery last week which suggests he will get a contract so I removed him from the 2016 OOC players in post #38.


Does anyone know for certain that Newton is out of contract. A couple of articles that listed our out of contract players mentioned all players above except Newton. I wander if he got a 3 year contract, Port did say when he left that our contract offer was much better than their offer in both dollars and years.

  • 3 weeks later...

After today's news I thought I would update rfpc's table so people can keep track of the overall list:

IYXOgLZxAYD1AVJ1AYOsDOWwOtIUTCKwHiKoTCGx

The announcements today were:  Jack Grimes, Matt Jones, Dean Terlich would not be offered a contract.

I guess it was predictable but still sad to see loyal Demons go. 

Any idea on how long someone can stay as a B rookie. Assuming Smith gets at least a 2nd year as a B rookie before having to go to either the normal rookie list or main list. Then someone like Maynard who signed on and trained just before the end of the year, does he have 2 more years? It may not matter but just interested given clubs can now sign Indigenous and multicultural players as B rookies.


3 hours ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

After today's delistings I thought I would update rfpc's table so people can keep track of the overall list:

IYXOgLZxAYD1AVJ1AYOsDOWwOtIUTCKwHiKoTCGx

The delistings today were:  Jack Grimes, Matt Jones, Dean Terlich

I guess it was predictable but still sad to see loyal Demons go. 

nice informative post, luci. hope you can keep it up to date

9 hours ago, daisycutter said:

nice informative post, luci. hope you can keep it up to date

Thanks dc, glad it is useful.  Will keep it updated as events unfold.

10 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

Any idea on how long someone can stay as a B rookie. Assuming Smith gets at least a 2nd year as a B rookie before having to go to either the normal rookie list or main list. Then someone like Maynard who signed on and trained just before the end of the year, does he have 2 more years? It may not matter but just interested given clubs can now sign Indigenous and multicultural players as B rookies.

Did some googling DeeSpencer and it seems the the same retention rules apply to all classes of Rookies.  Rookies can remain on a list for up to 3 years.

A 'B' Rookie cannot go onto another Rookie list after that 2 or 3 years.  It is either the main list or off the list altogether. 

Having said that there seems to be a push to eliminate the Rookie category altogether next year and put those players on the main list.  But not sure if that will apply to 'B' rookie or if that category remains as is.

If they don't get an AFL chance elsewhere, it would be nice if the MFC could facilitate Grimes, M. Jones and Terlich staying on Casey's list (where they have all given good service this year)!

 

It is simply astonishing that this club keeps handing out long term deals for guys ranked 15 - 35 on the list. 4 years for Melksham, 3 for Bugg, 3 for Garland, 4 for Lumumba, 3 for Michie.

We should rank everybody on the list for their long term strategic importance and hand out contracts in bands. If you are top 15 you can have 3+ years (rising to 5 for the top handful), 15-30 get two years and everybody else gets one year at a time.

 

 

 

10 minutes ago, poita said:

It is simply astonishing that this club keeps handing out long term deals for guys ranked 15 - 35 on the list. 4 years for Melksham, 3 for Bugg, 3 for Garland, 4 for Lumumba, 3 for Michie.

We should rank everybody on the list for their long term strategic importance and hand out contracts in bands. If you are top 15 you can have 3+ years (rising to 5 for the top handful), 15-30 get two years and everybody else gets one year at a time.

 

 

 

A very good idea in theory but I suppose you have to match the market place and as MFC you may be required to better it. In principle however I very much support your idea. Moreover in that 15-35 group the contracts should be highly incentivised with a reasonable base (say $150k) and then the rest based on senior selection.

It won't happen however while teams are desperate to attract  mid level talent from any source.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 34 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 242 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies