Jump to content

How the midfield looks as we enter Trade Week(s)

Featured Replies

Posted

Jones

Tyson

Viney

Vince

Prestia

Melksham

Brayshaw

VandenBerg

Petracca

HB -> Salem

HB -> Stretch

HF-> Harmes

HF -> Neal-Bullen

Plus Depth + Newton, Trengove, Michi, M Jones, Hunt

 

Wasn't aware that we had Prestia and Melksham 'entering' trade week..

  • Author

'How it looks' is not the same as 'How it is'!

This is my reading of all that I have read and heard... including my contacts on the GC

 

Sorry the point of this thread is....?

'How it looks' is not the same as 'How it is'!

This is my reading of all that I have read and heard... including my contacts on the GC

What have you heard WW?


Prestia is contracted.

We arent giving up top pick.

Until either Dion or either club says otherwise its all a dream (next year is a different story).

HB: Salem ####### ????

C: Stretch Jones ??????

HF: Brayshaw ###### Vanders

Foll: Gawn Vince Viney

Int: Tyson

Possibles: Petracca, ANB, Harmes, Newton, Trengove, Michie

How the 2nd year kids will go will be interesting. I think Brayshaw will have no troubles backing up. Petracca should find a spot as well but it's early days for him. I really like what Stretch brings as an outside runner and with a preseason in the gym I think he'll be every chance to lock down a wing spot. ANB and Harmes might have to take a step back but I'm sure both will be working hard for a spot.

As for trade ins:

Melksham: I heard his manager talking about having a spot for him at half back/wing and I'd imagine he'd get a good run there if that's the plan.

Bugg: He could take a spot in the back 6 or could take the tagging role. I think he'd be good at half back when a team has a dangerous high half forward/midfield type player like a Boomer Harvey. I'm not sure he's automatic best 22 but he wouldn't be far off as Grimes or Mitch White would be his main competition for a half back spot and he's a chance as a tagger.

Ben Kennedy: He'll be competing for spots in the half forward mix if we get him and likely rotating up to a wing.

There's definitely a big gap for another star midfielder as well but there's not much point entertaining that right now.

 

HB: Salem ####### ????

C: Stretch Jones ??????

HF: Brayshaw ###### Vanders

Foll: Gawn Vince Viney

Int: Tyson

Possibles: Petracca, ANB, Harmes, Newton, Trengove, Michie

How the 2nd year kids will go will be interesting. I think Brayshaw will have no troubles backing up. Petracca should find a spot as well but it's early days for him. I really like what Stretch brings as an outside runner and with a preseason in the gym I think he'll be every chance to lock down a wing spot. ANB and Harmes might have to take a step back but I'm sure both will be working hard for a spot.

As for trade ins:

Melksham: I heard his manager talking about having a spot for him at half back/wing and I'd imagine he'd get a good run there if that's the plan.

Bugg: He could take a spot in the back 6 or could take the tagging role. I think he'd be good at half back when a team has a dangerous high half forward/midfield type player like a Boomer Harvey. I'm not sure he's automatic best 22 but he wouldn't be far off as Grimes or Mitch White would be his main competition for a half back spot and he's a chance as a tagger.

Ben Kennedy: He'll be competing for spots in the half forward mix if we get him and likely rotating up to a wing.

There's definitely a big gap for another star midfielder as well but there's not much point entertaining that right now.

Trengove maybe?

"Go Home" syndrome from the Assumption College boy

So you are saying hes a possibility but put him in your starting midfield like hes signed, sealed and delivered to us.

I want to strangle you.


He may not get along that well with the new coach either.......... Rocket's not the most likeable of characters....

Why isn't Pendlebury in there? I heard he was a Melbourne supporter growing up, and Pies will want to trade him before his contract expi...
Never mind.

Why isn't Cyril Rioli in there? He's a really great player who would go really well in our midfield, so would surely jump at the opportunity to really stand out...

Never mind.

Why isn't...

Anyway, is my point made? Who the hell stars a 'status as we enter trade week' thread by including players who are at best unlikely?

Wacky. Can we have a rule about closing new threads that instantly contradict their own stated reason for existing?

Wasn't aware that we had Prestia and Melksham 'entering' trade week..

Good position to be in though. :P Dion at least.

So you are saying hes a possibility but put him in your starting midfield like hes signed, sealed and delivered to us.

I want to strangle you.

Calm down.


HB: Salem ####### ????

C: Stretch Jones ??????

HF: Brayshaw ###### Vanders

Foll: Gawn Vince Viney

Int: Tyson

Possibles: Petracca, ANB, Harmes, Newton, Trengove, Michie

At the risk of this thread devolving into more of a farce than it already is.......surely Jack Watts gets a look-in for the wing? (His best position, IMO. Would love to see him delivering the footy I50.)

He may not get along that well with the new coach either.......... Rocket's not the most likeable of characters....

thats true, imo.

I believe Salem will be a mid in 2016 and will in the not to distant future be our best mid, he's got some serious attributes to be both good on the inside but genuinely dangerous in space as well, reminds me a lot of Luke Hodge


I believe Salem will be a mid in 2016 and will in the not to distant future be our best mid, he's got some serious attributes to be both good on the inside but genuinely dangerous in space as well, reminds me a lot of Luke Hodge

Salem could be the biggest midfield story of next year if he makes the transition there. He is a gun.

Interesting if the rumoured trades for us eventuate.

Roos has declared he likes the big bodied mid like Vandenberg, yet we could be adding Prestia and Kennedy to Viney and Jones, who are all small and Melksham and Bugg who are not tall either. Salem is also being spoken about as a mid and when you throw in Kent, ANB and Stretch, we would have the smallest midfield in the AFL.

Have we changed direction or is it just a big coincidence?

Interesting if the rumoured trades for us eventuate.

Roos has declared he likes the big bodied mid like Vandenberg, yet we could be adding Prestia and Kennedy to Viney and Jones, who are all small and Melksham and Bugg who are not tall either. Salem is also being spoken about as a mid and when you throw in Kent, ANB and Stretch, we would have the smallest midfield in the AFL.

Have we changed direction or is it just a big coincidence?

Tyson 187cm

Brayshaw 187cm

Salem 185cm

Trengove 185cm

Vandenberg 188cm

Petracca 186cm

Vince 187cm

Michie 185cm

Melksham 185cm

Harmes 185cm

Nothing wrong with our midfield height at all. Infact i would say these guys are all solid mature bodies that Roos particular likes.

Go look at Hawthorn and they aren't a big midfield either.

 

Interesting if the rumoured trades for us eventuate.

Roos has declared he likes the big bodied mid like Vandenberg, yet we could be adding Prestia and Kennedy to Viney and Jones, who are all small and Melksham and Bugg who are not tall either. Salem is also being spoken about as a mid and when you throw in Kent, ANB and Stretch, we would have the smallest midfield in the AFL.

Have we changed direction or is it just a big coincidence?

Aside from Josh Kennedy, the Swans didn't have a tall midfield. Jack, Hannebery, McVeigh, McGlynn are all of similar height to our mids. Some people are overreacting to Freo's tall midfield. But even they went shorter this year by adding Neale to the starting onballers, and relegating Barlow up forward.

Salem could be the biggest midfield story of next year if he makes the transition there. He is a gun.

He has Hawthorn skills- would not look out of place in that line up


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 0 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 231 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies