Jump to content

Ben Newton Viv Michie

Featured Replies

Posted

With the news that Vince will be out for another month i think its the perfect opportunity for these two to step up and fill in that role that Bernie Plays. Both players that can play inside and out and have good all round skill set. Both have showed glimpses that they could become very good AFL players.

I was also going to put Angus Brayshaw in there aswell but probably a bit too early for him.

Who would be your choice?

Edited by dazzledavey36

 

I reckon the toump

 
  • Author

Vandenberg seems to have a bit of pace about him so might fill the void.

Completely forgot about him.

With Vince out, I don't think the options above are mutually exclusive. I hope that all will get a run, depending on who we play.


Just saw it on the club website. Bloody hell!

Petracca and Vince - not at all happy about this.

Last year it was Hogan and Clark. We are better placed to cover injuries this year. Don't despair, we will enter the competition competive in all areas of the ground, even the midfield.
 

Newton's spot in the team was all but certain anyway, in my opinion.

Newton's spot in the team was all but certain anyway, in my opinion.

Agree with this.


Just looking at a pic of Stretch on the MFC website and he has more muscle on him than I ever remember his old man having and from all reports he has done everything right in his first pre-season. There has been a bit of an emphasis on no saviours since Roos has taken over and I'm looking forward to seeing who can cement a spot in the team based on form because we finally have depth.

Just looking at a pic of Stretch on the MFC website and he has more muscle on him than I ever remember his old man having and from all reports he has done everything right in his first pre-season. There has been a bit of an emphasis on no saviours since Roos has taken over and I'm looking forward to seeing who can cement a spot in the team based on form because we finally have depth.

I reckon this concept of "depth" is very overstated here. We've got depth in developing talent and footballers with potential but we don't have 30 players who have proven they can play consistent AFL footy.

When I try and put my best 22 together there are 10 or so vying for the last 5 spots but none of them would get much of a look in at the top clubs. I'm not saying we aren't on the improve, just that we have potential that people are interpreting as depth. It's the same "depth" that Blease, Strauss, Tappy and a host of others have provided in previous years.

I reckon this concept of "depth" is very overstated here. We've got depth in developing talent and footballers with potential but we don't have 30 players who have proven they can play consistent AFL footy.

When I try and put my best 22 together there are 10 or so vying for the last 5 spots but none of them would get much of a look in at the top clubs. I'm not saying we aren't on the improve, just that we have potential that people are interpreting as depth. It's the same "depth" that Blease, Strauss, Tappy and a host of others have provided in previous years.

I take your point but if you look at the thread where posters choose their best 22 plenty have Grimes missing a spot. He was captain last year. That's no Blease, Straus or Tappy.

I take your point but if you look at the thread where posters choose their best 22 plenty have Grimes missing a spot. He was captain last year. That's no Blease, Straus or Tappy.

And I reckon they are quite wrong. We'll see. I hope you're right Wrecker!


I reckon this concept of "depth" is very overstated here. We've got depth in developing talent and footballers with potential but we don't have 30 players who have proven they can play consistent AFL footy.

When I try and put my best 22 together there are 10 or so vying for the last 5 spots but none of them would get much of a look in at the top clubs. I'm not saying we aren't on the improve, just that we have potential that people are interpreting as depth. It's the same "depth" that Blease, Strauss, Tappy and a host of others have provided in previous years.

There's a lot of hope that this depth is a bit better but unfortunately that's not yet proven.

...and I agree with you on Grimes.

Vandenberg fits the role if he shows a bit in the NAB cup.. Tall athletic mid, much like bernie

Grimes plays.

I reckon his "disposal issues" have been, largely, a result of having no first options upfield combined with the weight of captaincy.

I'm happy to have him controlling our rebound 50's this year if everyone else does their job.

I reckon this concept of "depth" is very overstated here. We've got depth in developing talent and footballers with potential but we don't have 30 players who have proven they can play consistent AFL footy.

When I try and put my best 22 together there are 10 or so vying for the last 5 spots but none of them would get much of a look in at the top clubs. I'm not saying we aren't on the improve, just that we have potential that people are interpreting as depth. It's the same "depth" that Blease, Strauss, Tappy and a host of others have provided in previous years.

Our list is looking healthier this year than last, we have greater depth and competition for positions, our new draftees over the last couple of years like Salem, Kent, JKH all deserve game time. If we keep turning over 14 or so players each year and drafting well to replace them with we will have much better depth.

As someone else mentioned here, the thing that concerns me about Newton is Kane Mitchell who is one of the worst players I've ever seen was getting a game ahead of him late in the year.


As someone else mentioned here, the thing that concerns me about Newton is Kane Mitchell who is one of the worst players I've ever seen was getting a game ahead of him late in the year.

He wasn't competing with him for a spot, he was competing with Wines and Cornes.

not expecting to much on either but having said that id love to see both have a run and see you never know

Our list is looking healthier this year than last, we have greater depth and competition for positions, our new draftees over the last couple of years like Salem, Kent, JKH all deserve game time. If we keep turning over 14 or so players each year and drafting well to replace them with we will have much better depth.

I doubt we'll turn over more than eight this year, possibly fewer. We needed a big cleanout, but it's done and further changes on that scale will just cause instability. No risk of MFC doing that under its present leadership.

 

Turning over 14 players a year is turning over the list every 3 years, for obvious reasons, that won't happen. Interestingly though we have turned over 20 odd players over the previous 2 seasons (half the list), so we are still actively re-building, although we are doing it without any fanfare

I doubt we'll turn over more than eight this year, possibly fewer. We needed a big cleanout, but it's done and further changes on that scale will just cause instability. No risk of MFC doing that under its present leadership.

Take Georgiou and Clisby for example only 1 & 2 years on the list, under the previous leadership i suspect these two would still be on the list but under the current leadership these two are done.

We still have many players who were drafted from 2007-2011 who could be turned over Spencer, Mckenzie, Fitzpatrick these guys haven't had much success in their careers and wouldn't get games with other clubs.

If Max King, James Harmes, Jayden Hunt don't show that they are going to make it this year I wouldn't be suprised to see them gone also.

The current leadership is making harsh but better decisions than previous leadership which is causing stability not instability.

At the end of the year turned over players might be

Cross retired

Spencer

Fitzpatrick

Mckenzie

Terlich

Harmes

Hunt

King

I don't think any of these guys are really going to be good AFL players and the current leadership is making the right decisions.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Carlton

    Good evening, Demon fans and welcome back to the Demonland Podcast ... it’s time to discuss this week’s game against the Blues. Will the Demons celebrate Clayton Oliver’s 200th game with a victory? We have a number of callers waiting on line … Leopold Bloom: Carlton and Melbourne are both out of finals contention with six wins and eleven losses, and are undoubtedly the two most underwhelming and disappointing teams of 2025. Both had high expectations at the start of participating and advancing deep into the finals, but instead, they have consistently underperformed and disappointed themselves and their supporters throughout the year. However, I am inclined to give the Demons the benefit of the doubt, as they have made some progress in addressing their issues after a disastrous start. In contrast, the Blues are struggling across the board and do not appear to be making any notable improvements. They are regressing, and a significant loss is looming on Saturday night. Max Gawn in the ruck will be huge and the Demon midfield have a point to prove after lowering their colours in so many close calls.

    • 0 replies
  • REPORT: North Melbourne

    I suppose that I should apologise for the title of this piece, but the temptation to go with it was far too great. The memory of how North Melbourne tore Melbourne apart at the seams earlier in the season and the way in which it set the scene for the club’s demise so early in the piece has been weighing heavily upon all of us. This game was a must-win from the club’s perspective, and the team’s response was overwhelming. The 36 point win over Alastair Clarkson’s Kangaroos at the MCG on Sunday was indeed — roovenge of the highest order!

    • 4 replies
  • CASEY: Werribee

    The Casey Demons remain in contention for a VFL finals berth following a comprehensive 76-point victory over the Werribee Tigers at Whitten Oval last night. The caveat to the performance is that the once mighty Tigers have been raided of many key players and are now a shadow of the premiership-winning team from last season. The team suffered a blow before the game when veteran Tom McDonald was withdrawn for senior duty to cover for Steven May who is ill.  However, after conceding the first goal of the game, Casey was dominant from ten minutes in until the very end and despite some early errors and inaccuracy, they managed to warm to the task of dismantling the Tigers with precision, particularly after half time when the nominally home side provided them with minimal resistance.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Carlton

    The Demons return to the MCG as the the visiting team on Saturday night to take on the Blues who are under siege after 4 straight losses. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 213 replies
  • PODCAST: North Melbourne

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees glorious win over the Kangaroos at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 29 replies
  • POSTGAME: North Melbourne

    The Demons are finally back at the MCG and finally back on the winners list as they continually chipped away at a spirited Kangaroos side eventually breaking their backs and opening the floodgates to run out winners by 6 goals.

      • Vomit
      • Clap
      • Haha
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 253 replies